Ar_home_b_search
 

A couple of years ago I blogged about a book I'd read.  Over the past couple of weeks I've been reminded of that book several times.

People I've been talking with have expressed their interest in achieving, concern for achieving, and/or self-contempt for their failure to achieve excellence in all areas of their business and life.  So much so that I thought it would be worth repeating what I wrote before.  But before I do that, let me give you one example - from another industry, unrelated to Real Estate.

...

I found a new Optometrist a couple of weeks ago.  (I finally had the need since moving here about a year ago.) 

She was clearly lower-priced than other Optometrists in the area.  Her full price was below their discounted price.  Still, without even asking for it, she offered to discount her price for me by a percentage that just happened to match the percentage the other Optometrist I'd called had offered.

She expressed her desire to be THE Optometrist who is interested in providing the best service and education for the area.  She's genuinely concerned about children and learning, and wants everyone to know that correcting the focus of each eye individually is often NOT ENOUGH to help kids who are struggling with reading.  (Sometimes there are problems with the eyes working together, or with the interaction between the brain and the eyes.  That's why it's important to have your child see a Developmental Optometrist - not just a discount Optometrist, or (less specialized yet) just a Pediatrician.)

She mentioned that she's looking for a different location.  Presumably to improve her accessibility.  Or maybe she wants to also improve the "experience" of the office - making it less "office-like."

When another patient mentioned that they were going to shop around to see if there was another frame-design that they liked better, she quickly jumped in to say she could get pretty much ANY frame.

So, here's my new Optometrist trying to be the BEST in everything: BEST price, BEST service, BEST accessibility, BEST experience, and BEST product selection.

The result: I'm convinced she's leaving money on the table.  And I suspect she's struggling in business as a result.

She's not advertising as "The Low-Price Leader", yet her prices blow away the nearest competition.  She could raise her prices and STILL be lower than their discounted price.  She spends lots of time with each patient - and flexes her hours to accommodate virtually any need or desire - opening early and/or staying late, including weekends.  She'll apparently go to any length to get any product for any patient - regardless of cost to the business.  And she's (semi-)actively looking for a new office - despite having a VERY well-established clientele (many of whom have known her main assistant for more than 40 years!)

She lamented that while she knows she's very good as an Optometrist, she doesn't have any business background.  And fears that the lack of business training (that she and all her Dr. friends didn't get in school) is hampering her ability to build her practice.  Yet she has no time to get that training now.

OK, so what does that have to do with you?  You're either a Realtor, or a Lender, or someone who works with Realtors and/or Lenders.  You're most likely not a Doctor, and even less-likely a Developmental Optometrist.  (As important as they are, they're a fairly rare group!)  And you, in all likelihood, have some business background.  So, what's it got to do with you?

Here's what:

If you own a business or are working in a business, or volunteer with an organization (basically, if you are more than a couch potato or a perpetual web-surfer), and you're interested in helping your business or organization move in the direction of being the BEST, you may benefit from considering what it REALLY means to be, and what it REALLY takes to be the BEST.  It very well may not be what you expect.

Read on to see what I wrote two years ago:

**********************

Yesterday I wrote about Exceeding Expectations versus Meeting Needs.  I proposed that we should first and foremost focus on discovering and meeting the needs of our clients.

Today I want to talk a little bit more about exceeding expectations, but more from the perspective of trying to achieve excellence in every area of our businesses.  I should "warn" you - this will be more of a book review than my own independent thinking.

A while back I read the book, "The Myth of Excellence" by Crawford and Matthews.  The authors set out to research and write a book on excellence in business.  Their hypothesis was that the BEST businesses excelled in ALL 5 areas of business, including: access, experience, price, product, and service.  As they did their research they discovered that the thousands of people they were surveying seemed to be all giving the wrong answers.  Finally, they decided, those answering weren't wrong about the BEST businesses excelling in ALL 5 areas of business, on the contrary, the BEST companies DIDN'T dominate in all areas. 

The BEST weren't THE BEST in everything.  No, they were THE BEST in ONE thing.  Excellence in EVERYTHING is a myth.

What they discovered was the BEST companies tried to dominate the market in one area, and one area ONLY.  They tried to be better-than-average or "good" in a second area.  And they tried to make sure they weren't less than average in the other three areas - this they called "par."

The point is: we are foolish to try to be the best at everything.  We'll burn ourselves out, and in business end up leaving "money on the table" if we try to excel in everything.

And it will be most helpful if your entire organization is all "on the same page" as far as identifiying what you're going to try to dominate and be "good" in.  Again, if you're pulling in different directions you'll be weaker for it.

If you get the book (or find it in your local library to read), the first two chapters outline their research.  The rest of the book is spent going into detail on each of the 5 areas giving examples of how it all works out.

 

I JUST felt my first earthquake since getting back to the Bay Area.  This one felt pretty minor in comparison to the last one.  The last one was in '89... it was called the Loma Prieta quake. 

I remember that one QUITE well!

I as standing behind the main register at the retail store where I was a Manager.  The product on the shelves behind me started to fall all around me.  And LOTS of product came off the shelves.  It was a MESS!!

A couple of minutes after that one hit, and we'd confirmed everyone in the store was OK, we started to head for the door... only to watch the big plate glass window of the store across the walkway bow out about 6" before exploding in shards of glass.

Later, when we got back to our apartment, we found a bit of a mess, but the only things we couldn't find were a few of our marbles that were kept in glass boot-shaped mugs on a shelf.  So when we were able to call out to a family member outside the Bay Area we told them, "Aside from losing our marbles, we're fine!"

In comparison, though, this one seems to be minor.... just a second of shaking, with one reasonably noticable "bump".

UPDATED to add:

Here's a link to the current quake.

Compare that to the '89 quake.

 

With the Copenhagen meeting coming right up, and the "Climategate" incident still under investigation, I've continued to look into some of the questions that are being debated in regard to anthropogenic global warming (AGW) (that is, man-made global warming or man-made climate change - depending on the currently-popular phraseology.) 

Here's a short (29 min) Finnish documentary that fairly simply explains what's going on in the scientific community.  It's mostly in Finnish and English, but subtitles have been provided in a variety of languages.

The mainstream media is still parroting the line from the politicians that "the debate is over" - despite very significant doubts that have been raised not only by the "Climategate" revelations but also over the past 6 years or so by people with expertise in the pertinent fields of study.  (One of the most important disciplines in climate studies is statistics - since what is being discussed is "average temperatures" and "trends" etc.)

Will our politicians barge forward with their fear-based "solution" for catastrophe that's based on discredited data-massaging?

 

This just came in.  It was too good to keep to myself:

What I Do Today

What I do today is very important because I am trading a day of my life for it.

Tomorrow this day is gone forever, leaving behind what I traded for it.

Therefore I will do everything I can to assure that what remains will be:

productive, great, good and successful......

...in that way I need never regret the price I paid for today!

- Author Unknown

Only one thing to add that was implied but not explicitly said: To assure I have no regrets I want to also assure that first and foremost, what I do today is in alignment with my Purpose, Vision(s), Mission(s), and Values.

Enough said

 

A friend of my posted this story elsewhere, and I just had to share it here with you-all.

This fourth grade girl thinks she is about to give a school report on where her Dad is stationed in Iraq and is surprised when he shows up for her report.

Here's what that sentence looks like in real life. (WARNING: You may want to have some tissue handy before clicking on that link.)

 

 

Thanks to Lisa Spalding, I just saw this video.  I imagine you'll find it as funny and sad as me... unfortunately there seems to be at least a grain of truth to the impression.

 

OK, time to post another area where I think, despite screaming matches to the contrary, there really is widespread agreement.  This one is also about Health Care... specifically, whether or not the Government should be controlling our healthcare.  (I believe the real disagreement comes in when the discussion turns to whether any healthcare decisions should be controlled by our government, and how many of those decisions should be left entirely up to the individual and/or his/her Healthcare Provider.  But let's leave that discussion for another thread.  One where we're not as interested in finding points of agreement.  Feel free to start just such a thread if you feel you must comment about that and want to start that discussion.)

Do you agree with the following statement?

Our Government should not be controlling all healthcare decisions.

The options for responding:

I agree - Our Government should not be controlling all healthcare decisions.

I disagree - Our Government should be controlling all healthcare decisions.

 

It finally "happened"!  I finally got to 50,000 points!

It took a while, but I did it.  And no, it wasn't just "luck" nor was it through any special insider information or skill.  It was just a matter of sticking with this.  And DOING SOMETHING from time to time.  (I haven't even been all that regular at posting things... instead doing posts in bursts.)

I did learn along the way a few things that don't help in the points game:

1) There's a limit on how many original posts one can make and still get points.  (I believe you don't get any points if you post more than 10 original posts within a week.  So, you could make 10 posts on one day and then wait until the next week to post again.  Or you could post one a day continuosly forever and get points every day.  But if you're doubling or tripling up every day, your effort will stop getting rewarded with points after a few days, until the next week.) (NOTE: See this blog for clarity on "Points" and other Frequently Asked Questions.)

2) There's a limit on how many comments you can make and still get points.  (You'll stop making points after 10 comments in a single day.)

3) There's a limit on how short both posts and comments can be and still get points.

4) You'll get no points (but perhaps a sense of satisfaction) from posting non-original material.  (And please be careful to neither plagiarize (claim something as yours when it's not) nor violate copyright (use material outside of "fair use" without permission.))

But I've found ActiveRain is really more about community than the game of "winning" points.  So, if you have a lot to say, by all means: SAY IT!  And if you find something interesting from someone else to share, SHARE IT!

 

Can we all, or at least a vast majority of us, agree that our Health Care System is not perfect, that it has flaws, and could stand to be reformed in SOME manner?  That it could be improved?

This is not a place to determine exactly what manner it should be reformed, but just to see if we can agree that leaving things exactly as they are is not an ideal to be aiming for.

As a poll this question would have the options for answering:

A) Yes - I agree that the U.S. Health Care System could be improved.

B) No - I think the U.S. Health Care System has no room for improvement.

What do you think?

 

With all the heated discussions (or screaming sessions) that are going on, I think it would be helpful to take a step back and affirm those things that we can all agree on.  Or at least, affirm those things that most of us can mostly agree on.

Sure, there are issues where there will be staunchly held, diametrically opposed perspectives.  But even there, perhaps we can find one or to points of agreement.

What would you say to starting a series of posts to try to find those points of agreement?

 
 

David Holzmann

Mountain View, CA

More about me…

Holzmann & Associates

Address: CA

Email Me



Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog