Nationally respected mortgage and real estate expert Fred Glick will be appearing on CNBC's Closing Bell with Maria Bartiroma at 4:30PM ET today (Friday) to talk about his ideas on the Tax Credit and Extension just signed into law by President Obama.

Fred will be making a major announcement about how the future of the economy should be shaped.

If you miss the event live, you will be able to catch it on http://fredglick.com or on Fred's Facebook Fan Page at by clicking here.
 
Fred  L  Glick,  Principal Innovationist
Mortgage and Real Estate Brokerage 
Best Numbers   215.852.4469 East Coast  415-683-6950 West Coast 
fred@fredglick.com      fredglick.com

222 W Rittenhouse Square C2  Box 15888  Philadelphia PA  19103   215.829.8850 x201
20335 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 203  Woodland Hills, CA 91364   310-741-7178075 East Morgan Trail, Suite 1   Scottsdale, AZ  85258  877-282-5789 Licensed Real Estate Salesperson, PA- US SPACES, INC.RS285216Real Estate Broker, CA Dept of Real Estate USLM, Inc DRE01507615Licensed Real Estate Salesperson, State of NJ, LICHTMAN ASSOCIATES REAL ESTATE, LLC
U S Loans Mortgage LLC Licensed by the Commonwealths of PA & VA, States of MD, FL, CO, AZ, 
Licensed Originator in the State of NJ
National NMLS Originator License 133975
 

 

First, I am must state that I am in agreement that the Federal tax credit for purchasing a home should be continued.

But, I believe that the approached can be changed to benefit not only the buyers, but the government itself.

Currently as proposed, no one is required to pay the credit back.

Also, the credit comes back to people after they have bought and the problem most people have is to acquire the funds to buy.

My solution is that you give the people the funds directly for closing and that they pay the money back over a 10 year period, WITH interest so that the Treasury receives a "profit."

So, we don't have to raise taxes, people become more responsible more homes get sold, more jobs get created.

Anybody have a problem with that?

 

First, I am must state that I am in agreement that the Federal tax credit for purchasing a home should be continued.

But, I believe that the approached can be changed to benefit not only the buyers, but the government itself.

Currently as proposed, no one is required to pay the credit back.

Also, the credit comes back to people after they have bought and the problem most people have is to acquire the funds to buy.

My solution is that you give the people the funds directly for closing and that they pay the money back over a 10 year period, WITH interest so that the Treasury receives a "profit."

So, we don't have to raise taxes, people become more responsible more homes get sold, more jobs get created.

Anybody have a problem with that?

 

Brilliant! A 1-story home with two entrances. Great 3 bedroom home with two baths all on one level with a very modern kitchen, beautiful mature back, fenced yard adn 2 seperate forced air heating systems.

 

Other anemenities include: hardwood flooring, built in bookcases, pull down attic stairs, newer roof, Anderson double pane energy efficient windows, shed in back and washer dryer!

 

This home is ready for you (and the in-laws) to move right into! Call Fred Glick at 215-852-4469 or go to http://www.postlets.com/res/2932735 for more info and pictures.

 

Harry Reid's office just confirmed these details:

1) Sen Isakson, Dodd, Lieberman have agreed, and Senate Finance 
[Baucus and tax staff] have agreed to this credit extension and 
expansion:
2) For first time homebuyers, the income level to qualify is $ 
75,000/150,000
3) For step up buyers the income level to qualify is $ 125,000/250,000
4) For step up buyers, they must have been residing in their primary 
residence for 5 years
5) The credit is 10% of the sales price, with a maximum of $ 7290.
6) The credit runs from Dec. 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010.
7) For legitimate sales contracts as of April 30, 2010 you have 60 
days to close.
8) There is a waiver for military.
9) This will be added to the Unemployment Insurance bill. It will 
then go to the House.

 

By Alan J. Heavens
INQUIRER REAL ESTATE WRITER

Senate negotiators spent today trying to forge an agreement that would extend the $8,000 tax credit for qualified first-time home buyers past its Nov. 30 deadline.

A decision had been expected by tonight, but procedural issues caused a delay, housing-industry sources said.

The Senate compromise would cut the tax credit to 10 percent of the sale price, with a $7,290 cap, the sources said, and would make the credit available for houses under agreement of sale by April 30, with 60 more days to settle.

Once the Senate acts, the plan will go to the House and then to President Obama.

Supporters of the extension attribute 357,000 of the two million sales of previously owned homes that have been recorded this year through Sept. 15 to the credit, which is retroactive to Jan. 1 - purchases they say would not have been made otherwise.

The National Association of Realtors' chief economist, Lawrence Yun, expects the final credit tally to be 400,000 of the five million existing-home sales anticipated this year.

Sales of new homes, whose September numbers will be reported by the Commerce Department tomorrow, also are benefiting from the incentive, with a combination of the credit and interest rates at 5 percent "boosting lower-end sales," said Wayne Norris, sales director for Hanley Wood Market Intelligence, which tracks the market.

Without the credit, recent improvements in the housing market might not have materialized, some observers said.

For example, Standard & Poor's Case-Shiller Composite Index for August, released today, showed prices in 20 metropolitan areas rising for the third consecutive month, this time 1.25 percent.

According to the index, which excludes the Philadelphia region, the steep price declines of the last two years began slowing in February across the nation.

Philadelphia home prices continue to fare much better than those in the rest of the country, third-quarter data from Kevin Gillen of Econsult Corp. show.

Though Gillen did not yet have figures for the entire eight-county region, his city numbers show prices rising a scant 0.2 percent during the summer, compared with a 6.8 percent rise in the spring.

Case-Shiller says home prices in the 10 largest U.S. cities on its list have fallen 32 percent since the real estate bubble burst in 2006. In Philadelphia, the drop has been just 8 percent.

Joel L. Naroff of Naroff Economic Advisers in Holland, Bucks County, said the national market was healing enough that "it's worth seeing if it can make it on its own."

By contrast, Moody's Economy.com chief economist Mark Zandi said "the housing market [would be] better able to stand on its own two feet" if extending the tax credit coincided with job growth.

Patrick Newport of IHS Global Insight Inc. predicted that if the credit were not extended, prices would resume their decline an additional 5 percent after the first of the year.

Noelle Barbone, who heads Weichert Realtors' Media office, said the tax credit had raised awareness of homeownership and captured the interest "of people who never thought of buying a home."

Philadelphia Realtor and mortgage broker Fred Glick is not convinced, saying, "Most of the people who bought because of the credit actually would have bought anyway."

But ask Lisa Portadin, who is selling her Collingswood house to move to Boston, if she wants the tax credit extended, and her answer is pretty definitive: "Absolutely."

As originally proposed by Sens. Christopher J. Dodd (D., Conn.) and Johnny Isakson (R., Ga.), the Senate bill would extend the full tax credit to June and expand it to all buyers earning $300,000 or less, except for investors and vacation-home purchasers.

Amendments by Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.) and Sen. Max Baucus (D., Mont.) would end the full benefit April 1, reducing it by $2,000 each quarter until the end of the year.

Contact real estate writer Alan J. Heavens at 215-854-2472 or aheavens@phillynews.com.

 

If this is all true, it is very interesting!

 

Via Robert G Hertzog (Summit Home Consultants):

Is The FDIC Killing Short Sales?

As some of you already know, I blogged recently about being interviewed recently by our local NBC news affiliate.  To read the blog, click here.  Basically, IndyMac Bank (now OneWest Bank), is holding one of my clients hostage, demanding a $75k promissory note, or they will proceed to foreclosure.  For the life of me, I couldn't figure out why they were doing this.  The BPO came in at the contract price of $275k, with a net to IndyMac of $241k.  What advantage could there possibly be for them to proceed to foreclosure?

Yesterday, I figured it out.  You see, IndyMac was taken over by the FDIC and sold to OneWest Bank in March/2009.  Guess who the investors are behind OneWest?  George Soros, Michael Dell, Steve Mnuchin (former Goldman Sachs executive), and John Paulson (hedge-fund billionaire).  

Now, listen to the deal they got from the FDIC....

Basically, they purchased all current residential mortgages at 70% of par value (70% of the outstanding loan amounts).  They purchased all current HELOCS at 58% of Par Value!!!

Next, in order to "sweeten the pot", the FDIC stepped in and guaranteed the following:  For any residential mortgages where OneWest experiences a loss, the FDIC will step in and cover anywhere from 80%-95% of the loss.  The loss is calculated using the ORIGINAL LOAN BALANCE, not the amount that OneWest paid for the loan.  Let's use my clients situation as an example:

Loan Amount is $478,000, plus 6 months of missed payments, for a grand total of $485,200

OneWest pays $334,600 for the loan

We have an all cash offer of $241,000, net to OneWest.

So, let's do the math, shall we?  The net loss, according to the FDIC formula is the ORIGINAL LOAN AMOUNT minus the amount of the offer.  In this case, $485,200-$241,000, or $244,200.  Next, the FDIC, according to their Loss Share Agreement, writes a check to OneWest for 80% of the so-called "net loss".  So, in this case, OneWest gets a check from Uncle Sam for $195,360 (.80 X $244,200).

Add the $195,360 to the sales price of $241,000, and you get a grand total of $436,360.  Remember, OneWest paid $334,600 for the loan.  So, OneWest puts $101,760 in their pocket, thanks to the FDIC.  Folks, that is over $100k of our hard-earned tax dollars!

So, you ask...Why does this program hurt short sales?  Because, our brilliant government offers this SAME PROGRAM FOR FORECLOSURES!  The only difference is, the government picks up 80% of the tab on all of the extra costs associated with a foreclosure (BPO's, upkeep, utilities/maintenance, legal fees, etc.)

So, If I'm OneWest, why would I want to waste my time negotiating through a Short Sale, when I can make the same amount of money (if not more) by just letting it go to foreclosure?  And we wonder why nobody can get a Loan Modification?  Why would OneWest approve a loan modification for this guy, when they can foreclose and make over $100k?  And, to add injury to insult, they have held this loan for 6 months!  Not a bad ROI, huh?

What infuriates me the most is that in my particular case mentioned above, they have the guts to hold my client hostage for a $75k promissory note, after they are already making more than $100k on the sale!!! This is his primary residence, 1st Position loan, and OneWest has NO RECOURSE!  Imagine if they could make $100k, then get a deficiency judgement!  Talk about making some big bucks!

Can you say "GREED"?

The scary thing is that over 50 banks have Shared Loss Agreements in place with the FDIC.  Some of them include:  Bank of America (go figure), CitiMortgage, Wells Fargo, etc.  

This entire agreement between the FDIC and OneWest can be found here, on the FDIC website.  It's all there, for the world to see!  They have it all layed out.  All of the formulas, worksheets, etc.  

Now, it's up to us to bring it to the attention of our elected officials and the media.  Enough is Enough!

UPDATE 9/18/09:  I JUST READ AN AWESOME ARTICLE ON THIS, THAT GOES INTO WAY MORE DETAIL THAN MY BLOG ABOVE.  TAKE THE TIME TO READ IT WHEN YOU GET A CHANCE! CLICK HERE TO READ IT.

Wait, it gets better...The FDIC just announced that it needs to start borrowing money from the U.S. Treasure in order to replenish it's deposit insurance fund (the same fund being used to pay all of these banks in the Loss Share Agreements).  Go Figure!  Click Here to read it.

Robert G. Hertzog

Phoenix Real Estate Consultant

summit logo

 

 

 
 
Fredglickhighdef Rainmaker_large

Fred Glick

Philadelphia, PA

More about me…

U S Spaces, Inc & U S Loans Mortgage LLC

Address: 222 W Rittenhouse Square, Box 15888, Philadelphia, PA, 19103

Office Phone: (215) 829-8850

Cell Phone: (215) 852-4469

Email Me

Fred Glick's opinions, ideas and expressions on the state of real estate and mortgages.


Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find PA real estate agents and Philadelphia real estate on ActiveRain.