Ar_home_b_search
 

Late last year, my friend Chris called me to ask whether he should withdraw all of his deposits from his local bank. Chris was afraid that his bank might fail and he’d lose his savings.  “This isn’t 1929,” I said.  “Your deposits are insured and the government’s taking action to shore up our lending institutions to protect your deposits and to keep our banks solvent.”

While Chris’s deposits may be safe, the same can’t be said for the bank’s borrowers.  Last week I had dinner with a Kansas City based developer who was telling me about his stalled project because his lender has applied the new mark to market rules, which has resulted in a revaluation of his assets and is now requiring him to put more cash into his properties to recapitalize the assets.  This developer, who has financial partners, told me that his cash is getting tighter and his partners are growing wary of putting more money into the deals.

“It’s just like the early 90’s all over again–it’s a reverse run on the bank.  Instead of the depositors draining the bank, the bank’s draining its borrowers,” he complained.  “Last time, banks required more equity or called loans.  Investors gave up, let the properties go back to the lender, and took the loss and then started over. The funny thing that happened is the banks then sold those properties at a discount back to the very investors they took the properties from. The investors bought them back at a discount and then they were worth more 5 years later than when they originally owned them.”

Sounds like a short term lose-lose to me.  Are our banks just going to end up hurting themselves trying to recapitalize?  Is it inevitable and have our regulators gone too far?  Maybe it’s time to change the mark to market regulations so that investors can hold onto their properties and do what they do well–operate the assets.  Let the banks focus on lending and keep them out of the asset operating game. Doing so may be the best way to ride out this downturn and keep everyone in business.

About the Author:Jeremy Cyrier is a principal with MANSARD Commercial Properties and member of the CCIM Institute faculty.  He offers advisory services and brokerage expertise to commercial real estate owners and tenants.

Sign up for free CREFrontline updates, if you haven’t already. It’s free and has abolutely no obligations.

 


Boston Commercial Real Estate Gains from 2005-2007 Wiped Clear in 2009?
Jeremy Cyrier, CCIM (MANSARD Commercial Properties)
Portfolio Research has published some mean numbers that indicate that we’re going to be in for a wild ride over the next couple of years in the Boston area commercial real estate market. As much as what I hear around town is a false sense of…
A Free, Overlooked, and Proven Tip to Win Negotiations: Emotional Capital.
Jeremy Cyrier, CCIM (MANSARD Commercial Properties)
Thu, Jan 22, 2009 Selling You’re watching a football game on television. One team kicks off and a flurry of activity ensues. Guys are running everywhere and the ball’s on the move. They settle down. The two teams square…
How to Accumulate More Money in Commercial Real Estate Than Your Monopoly Banker
Jeremy Cyrier, CCIM (MANSARD Commercial Properties)
Sat, Jan 31, 2009 Investing We lost sight of the basics were were taught as kids. In fact, did you know that every day more money is printed for Monopoly than the U. S Treasury? It took an email chain with a list of factoids to get me…
 

Jeremy Cyrier, CCIM

Lexington, MA

More about me…

MANSARD Commercial Properties

Office Phone: (617) 674-2043 x 1

Cell Phone: (617) 304-2902

Email Me



Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog