Ar_home_b_search
 

I just wanted to share a couple of my last projects with you.  The project is the sandcastle, but the purpose of building the sandcastle is to photograph it after the sun goes down.  The first stands about three to three and a half feet at the tallest points.  It took about two hours to build and uses a 30 second exposure lit by a single flashlight as I walk around the castle (bridge).  The second stands about seven feet tall and took over seven hours to stack all that sand.  Man do my muscles ache!  I used bulb exposure so I'm not exactly sure on the time.  I would guess about 1.5 to 2 minutes of exposure.  Same single flashlight, but this time I had my son hold up a blue and then a red gel in front of the lens at the appropriate times.

 

pastedGraphic_1.pdf

pastedGraphic.pdfI recently evaluated a 21-foot Wonderpole from Polepixie that is particula

rly suited for Pole Aerial Photo

graphy (PAP).  The thing that makes it suited for PAP over other Wonderpoles is that it’s black.  Okay, that doesn’t mean you can’t do PAP with a Wonderpole of another color, but the black one just looks like a piece of cool photographic equipment.

 

 

It doesn’t happen often and I try to be mindful when photographing a home, but there are times when equipment is reflected in a window.  A black pole should need little to no cloning where a white pole would definitely need post processing before delivering the final product.  An efficient workflow is important.  Having a black pole potentially means less time spent in post processing in addition to just looking more professional.  And perception is reality to the client.

 

 

I’ve been developing PAP systems and techniques for many years, and have used a number of poles in varying heights, sizes and materials.  So I thought I would share my thoughts about the Wonderpole and its use for handheld PAP.

 

 

I got the Wonderpole from John Hokkanen at Polepixe.  Polepixe provides a number accessories for painter’s poles and more recently, the Wonderpole.  John has thought of just about everything one would need to conduct PAP efficiently and safely without having to deign and manufacture your own rig.  Before Polepixie, only geeks like John and I really did PAP.  Polepixie has opened PAP up to the “normal” population.

 

 

The Wonderpole is heavier, beefier and more rigid than a painter’s pole of comparable height.  I find it very controllable even with a 2 1/2 pound Nikon D5000 attached.  The 21 foot version is 5 feet when collapsed.  This makes it easy to transport and to extend either horizontally or vertically.  There are also 30 and 40 foot versions of the Wonderpole.

 

 

Polepixie supplies a weight boot with every Wonderpole.  The boot’s purpose is to hold an ankle weight at the bottom of the pole enhancing stability and safety of operation.  With 10lbs at the bottom of the pole, one can easily tip the pole from horizontal to vertical.  When you tip an extended pole from horizontal to vertical, control is assured throughout the entire range of motion.  Extending a pole vertically does not provide that assurance.

 

 

When conducting PAP with taller poles, you want to keep the base in firm contact with the ground to give you the longest moment arm possible.  If the base loses contact with the ground, that moment arm is suddenly shortened.  Having weight at the bottom of the pole gives you added control and time to get the base back on the ground.  Without the base weight things can get very scary in a hurry.

 

 

My only concern with the Wonderpole is that it comes sup

plied with a nylon cap over the bottom of the pole.  When I mentioned to John that I thought the nylon end cap at the bottom of the pole seemed as though it might wear quickly, he sent me a prototype replacement.  It’s a longer nylon cap with a spike bolted to it.  Over the spike fits a heavy duty rubber cap.  This is exactly what is needed.  Essentially the pole now has a heavy rubber foot which can quickly and easily be converted to a metal spike to be used on soft sloping ground.  John also supplied a high density foam disk which fits under the cap at the bottom of the pole.  Its purpose is to act as a shock absorber when  the upper sections are retracted vertically.  As I said, John has thought of everything.

 

 

Summary:  Short poles are easier and safer to control, but height is limited.  Poles above 30 feet become in

creasingly riskier and more difficult to control.  On top of that, cost goes up exponentially with height.  I have often said, most of my best PAP shots are taken between 15 and 20 feet.  This makes the 21 foot version of the Wonderpole one of the best choices for someone serious about getting elevated shots.  It gets you to the most optimum height safely.

 

 

There are always risks when conducting PAP, but the base weight coupled with a maximum height of 21 feet mitigates that risk.  The 21 foot Wonderpole with Polepixie accessories is the perfect combination of height, safety, controllability and price.  Before conducting any type of PAP, I highly encourage you to read the safety page on the Polepixie site.

 

Yesterday I was given a shoot deadline for three homes.  The photos had to be ready today.  The biggest problem is that two of the homes faced North so any shot during the day would have the face of the house in shade providing little detail.  So I ran and shot the West facing house and set up the first North facing house between showings.  Right after the last showing I rushed to the second house and got the dusk shot I needed.

Knowing that I had one day to get two twilight shots, I figured twilight happenes twice a day, so I set up with the home owner for me to be there at 6:30AM.  The photo below is what I got.  I needed something more.  So I broke out my one strobe and tried to get some extra light on the house...not working for me.  I then decided I liked what the flash was doing up close to the house, so I just took several shots moving the flash around in front of the house to get all the lighting I needed.  I figure it's digital, so layering was an option.  It took two separate attempts at layering the shot, but the second photo is what I ended up with.  I hope you like it.

before

after

 

When I was young, I saw the Alfred Hitchcock movie, "The Birds."  It was the scariest movie I had ever seen.  The fact that we live on the major bird migratory route didn't help any.  Several times a year one can see thousands upon thousands of birds roosting in trees, on power lines and on tops of signs.  It's enough to keep a kid inside all summer.  This evening I figured I'd capture a few photos of these birds so you can see what I mean.

1

2

3

4

5

6

I found this on YouTube for your amusement.

 

 

Gene Allen posted a photo for a guessing game today.  I have in mind one I've been wanting to do for several weeks now, but I haven't been able to get out to the next town to get the photo I want to use.  When I saw Gene's photo, it reminded me of a photo I have that would be great for this guessing game.  So what is this?

guess

 

I shot this house for another agent yesterday and later put it up on a professional real estate photographer group for evaluation.  I like the group because these guys are quite honest.  It can hurt at times, but I've never seen anyone be mean.  So one of the comments I got indicated that he thought the house needed to look a little cheerier.  I just want to get a few more opinions.  Be very honest.  Tell me what you really think.

The house faces North so a mid-day shot would not be advisable.  The clouds rolled in just at sunset.

1st editreworked

 

I know that most of you guys won't be all that impressed, but in extreme South Texas, the temperature rarely dips below 32 degrees.  So when it does and it's coupled with freezing drizzle, we get sights we aren't used to down here.

1

2

Okay, so I helped it a bit with the water hose and it was all melted away by 2PM.

 

I spent a good part of the day at he South Padre Island Kite Festival on SPI, Texas.  Lots of unique kites, flags and wind toys.  And the multi-line kite demonstrations were phenomenal!  I used to fly two line kites and make kites myself, but things I saw today were way beyond anything I could have even imagined in both design and performance.

01

02

03

5

I have lots more photos, but I didn't want to bore everyone.  Okay, for those who want to see more of these photos, follow this link.

 

Along the same lines as my other two blogs this morning, I encountered this article from Larry Lohrman at Photography for Real Estate about being a real estate agent AND a real estate photographer.  In my case with no real estate photographers in my area (at the time) I had no choice but to learn how to take great real estate photos.  Now I'm shooting listings for a number of other agents both in my office and for other offices.

What About Being A Real Estate Agent And A Real Estate Photographer

 

 

It looks like I'm full of it today.  This link is to a professional real estate photographer's website.  If course he wants all real estate agents to use professional photographers to shoot their listings, but I think he makes a few valid points.  I'd like to get your input on this subject.  Are professional photos all that important?  Why do you think so, or think not?  Link to the blog.

real estate photography

 
 
Print_7050 Rainmaker_large

Lee Jinks

McAllen, TX

More about me…

Greater McAllen Association of REALTORS®

Address: 509 Nolana, McAllen, TX, 78504

Office Phone: (956) 682-4119

Cell Phone: (956) 655-8634

Email Me



Listings

Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find TX real estate agents and McAllen real estate on ActiveRain.