Over the  past five years I have worked with hundreds of REALTORS on their web site.  As we move from MLS to MLS, I've noticed a common theme, and I'm wondering if any of you have observed it as well... The more sophisticated / exclusive / expensive the homes are in a particular community, the less likely brokers are to share data thru IDX.

The patch work of MLSes and the rules that we need to follow as web developers are hugely inefficient.  Some MLSes, such as the Vermont Real Estate Information Network are fairly progressive about datasharing.  We can post VREIN members data to Google Base, for example, which we're not allowed to do with the data from the Northern New England Real Estate Network, despite an active lobbying campaign for a number of their members (who are instead now manually entering the data anyway...)  While VREIN covers western Vermont and most of the population centers, there is one area were there is very little data sharing: Ludlow, VT, home of Okemo Mountain (the place I learned to ski back when it was all pomas!)  There are dozens of multi-million dollar homes at Okemo, and yet a majority of them are not shared thru IDX

If you move to other parts of the country, the situation is even more profound.  The town of Greenwich, CT, a suburb of New York with a seven figure average home price, has its own MLS.  One broker there told me that the market there is "still very provincial".  There is little to no IDX sharing, individual agents are not allowed to show IDX data on their sites, and most of the web sites in that community pale in comparison to what I've seen in other markets.  By not sharing the data, brokers are forced to spend huge amounts of money on print advertising in the local paper, Greenwich Magazine, etc. and buyers have to go from site-to-site-to-site to find out exactly what is on the market.  How this is of benefit to the buyers, seller and REALTORS is beyond me as it certainly makes the purchase & sale of a home more inefficient.

If sellers were more educated about the inter workings of the MLS, I imagine that they would want as much exposure of their homes as possible... and yet, in some of the most exclusive communities with the most educated buyers & sellers, there is less datasharing then anywhere else.  Anyone have any ideas why?

Ted  

 


A friend of mine forwarded along this article this article on the Madison market:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/08/business/08home.html 

Here's why I don't think this is a model for the national market:

  •  Like politics, all real estate is local and Madison is a very unique community.  Here is the key line in the article: "FSBOMadison.com, the subject of a January 2006 article in The New York Times, charges $150 for an ad on the site and a yard sign. Taking advantage of antiestablishment sentiment in Madison, which has a highly educated and liberal population, it quickly grabbed a market share of roughly 20 percent."  Sounds a lot like the place I call home, Burlington VT, which I promise you is not like the rest of the country!

  • Selling your own home successfully requires two things: free time & financial sophistication.  Most people I've met who are financially sophisticated don't have a lot of free time, and vise versa.  Furthermore, many of those who are knowledgeable enough to successfully sell their own home can make more money in their day job then spending the time, effort and emotional energy selling their own home.

  • Real estate is all about information.  While I can certainly make the case that the national patch work of MLSes is far from perfect, FSBO information sharing is even worse.  It's all a numbers game: the more visibility a home receives the more likely it will find a buyer that will pay the asking price.  The MLS (in conjunction with IDX) provides a lot more exposure for a listing then a FSBO site can ever do.

Thoughts?  Comments?

Ted 

 

Hi

Hello ActiveRain!

I'm new to the community.  So far, I really like what I see... We're brewing up some really cool stuff on the web for REALTORs, from Google Map Integration to custom designed sites for those looking to target the 78% of home searches that begin online.

I'll post back new items additions as we bring them along, or I come across interesting real estate related web sites out there.

Thanks for checking out my blog! 

Ted

 

 
 
Rainmaker_large

Ted Adler

Burlington, VT

More about me…

Union Street Media

Address: 444 S. Union Street, Burlington, VT, 05401

Office Phone: (802) 865-3332 x 102

Email Me



Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find VT real estate agents and Burlington real estate on ActiveRain.