I generally believe that Virtual Tours are a good thing. They are an especially good thing if the house is in great shape or has been staged to look great. In fact, I've heard from lots of buyer clients and people who never turned into buyer clients that if there aren't interior photos or a Virtual Tour they can look at, the house is crossed off the list.
This seems a bit extreme and it got me to wondering how widespread this type of mindset is. In fact, I have a listing that's been on the market awhile and I had a Virtual Tour done (after staging) and it looked great. Time went by and the tour "expired" even though the listing did not. I guess there was some mis-communication between me and the Virtual Tour company. Anyway, it went "off the air".
Coincidentally, showing activity seemed to slow down a bit as well. My clients sent me an e-mail asking about the Virtual Tour. Well, I was surprised it had been taken down but, more to the point, I started wondering if there is really any direct cause and effect between a house having a Virtual Tour and showing activity. After all, there are tons of foreclosures and short sales that would certainly not lend themselves to interior photos or Virtual Tours. People still look at those in real life.
Then, there are the Sellers in the world that don't want Virtual Tours. Maybe they have really nice stuff they don't want the world to see on the Internet or any number of reasons.
I don't have an answer for this. It just got me wondering.
Comments(9)