Ar_home_b_search
 

Last year I blogged about the fate of the traditional Real Estate Brokerage Business Model and commented how I believed the large corporate owned offices would need to drastically change the way they did business. The ever increasing importance of the internet would result in 'Virtual Offices" which would facilitate the survival of Real Estate firms.

I've operated as a Realtor out of some of the biggest National Real Estate offices in Los Angeles. About 3 years ago, after carefully considering the benefits of remaining with a large corporate-branded brokerage, I concluded it would be in my best interests to obtain my Brokers License and operate independently. 

I fully appreciate that being an independent is not for everyone (we all have different needs and methodologies and I respect that), but I can't help questioning the real and practical benefits to the Realtor, and ultimately the clients, of working with a large brokerage.

While I totally agree that agents need to interact with each other in order to learn and grow, I believe that an office isn't essential for this to occur. There are many other forums where this can take place. (ActiveRain being a perfect example). It's interesting that office managers still don't have all their agents join and participate in ActiveRain.

I would far rather agents visit other Broker's Opens and interact that way, being able to discuss real situations and issues. 

Relatively few large offices have really dynamic Managers and Leaders who motivate, educate and inspire their team of agents. In my mind, ideally a large office should be a place where an agent goes to get recharged, encouraged, nurtured and energized. But in reality, most of the large offices are places filled with internal politics and corporate drudgery.

Floor time now yields extremely limited results (as clients can obtain the information they want online), corporate advertising is decreasing as the corporate offices are forced to reduce overheads, so the real benefit of an agent belonging to a large company has diminished.

When I moved to Los Angeles I joined a large "Big Name Company" a number of years ago - only to realize that I generated very little business that was directly attributable to the large corporate office.

Eventually I decided I was able to do less business,  make more money,  become more profitable and have more fun as an "Independent Brokerage" - And my clients seem to prefer the personal and preferential treatment I can offer them.

It's interesting to see how large Brokerages are now demanding an increased share of agent's commissions in order to cover their increased overheads and reduced income as market turnover has plummeted over the last 12 months. 

I keep asking exactly what agents are getting by paying their offices a bigger share of their commissions .... but no-one has been able to provide a rational and sensible explanation.

This should provide for an interesting debate!

Copyright © 2009 Penn Properties.  All Rights Reserved.

 
This post has been included in California Real Estate News Los Angeles County, CA Real Estate News West Hollywood, CA Real Estate News
Post is included in group: Condo Specialists
Post is included in group: LA Connection
Post is included in group: Realtors®
Post is included in group: Voice of Reason
Post is included in group: "Whacked"!!!

230 Comments on The Virtual Office Business Model Vs Traditional Corporate Real Estate Offices

APR
26
2009
773,640 Points 19 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp

I have had the same experience. I decided to open my own real estate business so that I have more control. I worked for a naitonal real estate firm. My broker asked why I am never in the office. I told them because I am selling real estate and networking with other people. I have no time to be in the office. Most agents think they are working when they come to the office. Those ones will not last long in the business. Great post!

8:23am • #1
1,545,555 Points 416 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Excellent.  I've worked from a home office since 1994.  Since 2006, I have shed my brokerage of licensees and operate a very nice broker-to-broker referral network.

It works.

It's lean and it's mean. 

 

8:26am • #2
861,446 Points 76 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Stewart--We think alike! I rent an office in a professional building, have 5 agents with me--and usually I'm the only one in the office. I don't WANT agents sitting at desks and waiting for the phone to ring. The goal is to get out there and GET business. Make business. Not wait for it to come to you.

 

8:35am • #3
975,463 Points 17 Featured Posts Hit Router Called Shot Master

Stewart, I agree and disagree.  I see quite a few agents and/or brokers going the independent route.  Many motivated strictly by the potential financial rewards.  I have dealt with some that are really in need of supervision and training.  But, then again, I've run into agents from big franchises that the same could be said of!

8:43am • #4
1,017,121 Points 25 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

 The future is here and franchise real estate offices are on it's way with the travel agencies of the 80's  . .the Internet is changing everything

9:01am • #5
672,070 Points 69 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp

Stewart: I also left a "big name brokerage" to start an independent brokerage. Although money always is a motivator, there were other factors involved as well. I hear what you are saying!

9:09am • #6
Outside Blog

I love the idea of having a virtual office.

 

I have had one for a long time, I now use topproducer which is an online contact managment system.

 

I recomend agents to try it.

 

Jorge

9:28am • #7

Stewart,

Let's not confuse bricks and mortar with support and partnership.  Are real estate companies having to rethink their bricks and mortar strategies? Absolutely.  But there is so much more to being part of a team that educates, motivates, trains, and leverages their brand on behalf of the agents than just the "office" itself.  We all agree that agents should be out in the field and not sitting in their office.  But whether they have a desk or not is a totally separate issue from being part of a larger company.  I am proud to be a broker with a company whose goal is to help our agents continue to succeed.  We aren't asking for more money from our agents; we are supporting them and showing them ways to succeed in an ever changing environment. And we have many very smart, passionate people to turn to every day for the answers.  I believe in having the power of people together.

 

9:43am • #8
691,670 Points 9 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp

Whiole I agree with you , the reality is here in the mountains a lot of agents want to see the bricks and mortar. We have a great plan and good compensation but lose agents to brick and mortor buildings. . So I would love to figure out a way to recruit . I am open to idead

9:53am • #9

Stewart: I am at Coldwell Banker and plan to remain. Coldwell Banker New England leads the market, not just in human talent but in technology. I have seen agents go work for start-ups and have seen their incomes plummet. Sure, they may be keeping more, but quite often, at least in my market, Coldwell Banker is the best brokerage overall. There was an agent in one of our sister offices who routinely sold tens of millions per year.  Since she left, she has not hit $10M in sales in the last 3 years. Her business, by and large, stayed with CB.  

Granted, every market is different and every agent is different. Maybe one day, I will go that route. Not now.

10:04am • #10
314,804 Points 2 Featured Posts Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Like Scott I am with Coldwell Banker and have been asked to join other offices. However in my local market IMHO support is integral for success. I go to my offices happy and refreshed. One's state of mind is an important factor in this business and with smaller agencies while the split may be better the split does not necessarily conflate to being successful in a brokerage with a better split.

 

Likewise the newer virtual offices may not necessarily mean they are better than the brick and mortar.

For example, the realtor that sold the home that I bought was with Remax for years and was the top agent in my area then jumped ship to be on his own. His agency is now defunct. I can't help wonder why he jumped ship when he was doing extremely well. Sometimes some people get greedy and their greed gets the best of them. Thus some smaller agencies becoming defunct over time.

Markets also differ so what may work in California may not necessarily conflate to what works in Florida etc. Instead it depends on many factors. For me the support and foundation are more important than being alone and/or how much money I can make compared to the brokerage because that is what often happens with smaller agencies. With that stated though for some people it works. For others... it is a personal preference and they make it work too but for some it's not always about the money. One can easily increase their sales with a smaller more independent brokerage but then how many actually do?

I prefer a hybrid model: A virtual office combined with a strong supportive brick and mortar brokerage that offers room for growth online and offline.

Aloha, Lana

10:17am • #11
384,516 Points 28 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

I agree with you for the most part.  I do think that many agents NEED the support of a company and the training it provides.  (If they choose wisely...we all know that many just don't have the support needed for new agents.)  I do think that once you have the knowledge and experience, you can make it virtually.  I think an agent needs to be seasoned and to have "been in the trenches" so they can handle all of the issues that do come our way. 

I am with a large brand myself but can honestly say that in the 18 months I've been with them, I have only acquired one lead, and that was thru floor time.  I may venture off eventually myself.  I believe my business would not suffer at all.

Active Rain is the perfect format for support and to generate new and exciting ideas.  Love it!!!!

 

10:23am • #12
186,688 Points 7 Featured Posts

Charlie--Sorry to but in, but as far as you recruiting I think prospective recruits just need to get to know you. ...Then of course how you compare with the competition regarding advertising, fees, splits

Stewart--I always feel more effective working from home. But, now that I have made the opposite leap, from Independent to Corporate I have found that nothing prevents me from starting from home as long as I make into the office on time. However, I have found that some people are not early risers--so I need to restrain myself and let customers and clients initiate calls before 10AM. (yes, there is a humorous story there:-)

Embracing the office/concept I had avoided is still taking some adjustment. But, its worth it--just having the opportunity to be exposed to more and to soak in other opinions.  Your subject was "working without an office", if I got it right. We all get out as soon as we have a reason to be out. Otherwise, I see nothing wrong with tending your database and answering calls in office. Just an opinion. Of course I have changed a bit since I started with Active Rain.

 

 

10:25am • #13
108,971 Points Outside Blog

Some very interesting points. I am fairly new to the business but i can already relate to some of the things you have brought up. I am actually in a office with a very good manager who motivates and solves problems for agents daily, but i agree that i am probably in the minority. Great Post

10:39am • #14
168,749 Points 15 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Relatively few large offices have really dynamic Managers and Leaders who motivate, educate and inspire their team of agents. In my mind, ideally a large office should be a place where an agent goes to get recharged, encouraged, nurtured and energized. But in reality, most of the large offices are places filled with internal politics and corporate drudgery.

I feel sorry for anyone working like that.  I work for the largest independent company in my area - 900 or so agents. I like the incredible infusion of technology, support, tips, education, uplifting speakers, and different ideas that I would never dream of or afford on my own.  I just want to sell homes, and they keep bringing me new tools and inspiration to do it with.  I can't imagine going out on my own... and I've been a broker for 30 years.

10:41am • #15
179,006 Points 13 Featured Posts

I think an office is a place that you can prospect and meet with clients, more and more this office is looking like it is online. 

10:56am • #16
584,579 Points 69 Featured Posts Called Shot Master

Stewart - Not being a Realtor I can't really comment on what is better, to be with a large corporate broker or a small independent.  However, I do have a few Realtor partners that I've been working with for years now and they all work for large brokerages and absolutely love it and don't want to change.

Three work for Coldwell Banker and three work for Rodeo Realty.  All six have worked at both small, independent brokers as well as the large, corp. brokerages and all say they make more money at the larger brokerages than they ever did at the smaller, independent brokers.  They all comment on the amount of services that they have available to them and they don't necessarily pay more for them.  With the exception of one, they all have higher splits than they did with the smaller brokers (the one has the same split).

On a more personal note, I just recently moved from a small, independent broker to a large, national brokerage and I couldn't be happier.  My only regret is that I didn't do it sooner.  As for the financial incentive, I have a higher split and more services for less fees.  However, having said that, I also believe that there is a big difference between the small, independent RE broker and the small independent mortgage broker as well as a difference between the large, national RE brokerage and the large, national mortgage brokerage. 

10:56am • #17

Very good post! Yes, make business - not wait for it to come to you.

10:57am • #18

I think the Virtual Business Model is better than the Traditional Corporate Real Estate Office Business. Because in Virtual Office Business Model, any customer from any country can get information for real estate.

denver real estate
10:59am • #19
801,306 Points 35 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

You are correct and there are some brokers out there that now are smart enough to offer a happy medium....and the best of both worlds. It would seem that the brick and mortar of old has an increasingly shorter lifespan.

11:22am • #20
390,859 Points 3 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Called Shot Master

I agree with everything you say and that's what I did Last June. Left RE/MAX, have my own office and do have a small office space and it costs me much less in expenses than at RE/MAX. ( I live on a PUD than prohibits home businesses). It has made no difference to how my clients view me, and we are hiring agents now looking for the 100% plan we offer at just $95.00 a month. They love it.

11:31am • #21
431,301 Points 26 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Thanks to everyone for the great input and good comments.

I agree that being independent is certainly not for everyone, but if one is disciplined and works to a set plan and schedule, running a home office and virtual office can be extremely efficient.

-- I've recently heard that ReMax is increasing the % of gross commission they take from their agents, yet I haven't heard what additional services or benefits their agents are gaining in return.

-- Coldwell Banker has an annoying $250 "fee" that their clients are charged in addition to the Real Estate Commission generated. I'm still trying to comprehend why any client would agree to pay this extra $250 (also, what is this fee really for?)

-- I was with Keller Williams for a while before I went independent and their fees kept on going up. What I didn't appreciate was having to pay a monthly "Advertising Fee" yet there was no guarentee my properties would be advertised in the Keller Williams ads for that week.

-- As for their Errors and Ommissions Insurance the large brokerages charge their agents, it appears that as an independent with a proven track record, the E&O paid could work out to be a lot less, reducing one's operating expenses.

 

11:40am • #22
314,804 Points 2 Featured Posts Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

"-- Coldwell Banker has an annoying $250 "fee" that their clients are charged in addition to the Real Estate Commission generated. I'm still trying to comprehend why any client would agree to pay this extra $250 (also, what is this fee really for?)"

At the Coldwell Banker corporate-owned brokerage where I work out of it is $295. Obviously all of my clients agree to pay for that knowing that it is a fee. It's a small price to pay for one of the biggest investments that some people will ever make but everyone is different. 

Some prefer to buy a home without extra fees. I can understand since I shop at thrift stores and am frugal with my money. However when I shop for clothes at Salvation Army I look for quality in the clothing. Similarly for this type of fee there are clients like me who will pay $5 for a Ralph Lauren skirt at Salvation Army instead of a generic skirt for $1.99. Everyone perceives value differently. Thus a reason why some opt to choose Coldwell Banker while some do not. It depends on the individual.

Every client and every company are different though and there is enough for all of us. I also would not want the same business models for all companies. I value diversity in business models partly because it is a catalyst for competition thus affecting prices. That is why I prefer a hybrid model where a client who does not have a computer (they are out there) can still opt to call or stop by as well as a virtual office for those who are Internet-centric. I would not go as far as to criticize the brick and mortar model though because it is a foundation of the industry and what it is today. The industry has evolved and nowadays we have choices both on the agent/broker side (i.e. which business model  they prefer and/or like) and the client/customer side (i.e. which business model, services, etc they prefer.)

Aloha, Lana

11:54am • #23
708,942 Points 63 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Hi Stewart... Very well presented post!  I think that this will be an ongoing debate for quite a while.  As has been discussed, different people have different needs, and while I belive that more seasoned agents may find some interesting benefits in "going solo", I also see a lot of benefit provided by the established brokerages to newbie agents.  Keller Williams Camp 4-4-3 program, for example, has been very successful for new agents in my office and I see so many people who get their real estate license but have no clue how to earn a living selling real estate, so I know there is a definite need (at that level) for the type of career development that those brokerages provide.  For a well experienced agent, though, the benefit line does begin to blur!

11:59am • #24
431,301 Points 26 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Lana - What actually justifies the $250 or $295 charged by Coldwell Banker?

Isn't that whay they receive a commission?

Effectively, they are charging a surcharge with no clear explanation why!

12:07pm • #25
431,301 Points 26 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Steve - Despite claims of ongoing training for "new agents", I've had first-hand experience with newer agents from "large brokerages (such as Keller Williams) where the new agent was not being properly mentored and was not correctly trained to operate in the field.

This must surely be a disservice to buyers, sellers, and other agents involved in the transaction.

12:11pm • #26
708,942 Points 63 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Hi Stewart... that is one of the "weaknesses" of the franchise system brokers... the whole "Each office is independently owned and operated" disclaimer sums up pretty well that not all KW, C21, CB, R/M, etc. offices are created equal... the owner/broker plays a HUGE role in the quality and caliber of service and qualification of the agents to deliver a consistent level of service.  And, the "independent contractor" status of agents also makes the consistency element more difficult than it would be if agents were employees.

12:16pm • #27

Coldwell Banker New England does not charge this fee. What is that for?

We are corporate owned, not a franchise or an affiliate.

12:52pm • #28
102,435 Points

Stewart,

You are so on point! I have said many of the things you mentioned with great negative response. I am so happy to see someone has clear vision and can see where things are going and why. No doubt, you really have you finger on the pulse of the real estate industry. The big names will have to make some drastic changes or they will become dinosaurs!

"Network Strong & Prosper!"(SM)

 

Coach K.C. (Real Estate Marketing Coach)

The Prosperitor!™

 

“Changing the Real Estate Marketing Paradigm, One Mind at a Time!”(SM)

12:56pm • #29
156,315 Points Localism Sponsor

I think the big stone and mortar to do will be a thing of the past in the next couple of years, we have to evolve with technology and changing business models.

12:57pm • #30
425,488 Points 2 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Hi Stewart~ The Bricks and Mortar buildings are not necessarily needed anymore. They will be the exception instead of the norm in the very near future.  I can't understand why most agents do not go ahead and get their Brokers license so that they are really free to decide if they really want to work for a firm or be their own firm.  I know it isn't for everyone, but at least have the freedom and flexibility and the education to decide if that is what they want or may want sometime in the future.  Most franchises provide little if anything to the agents.  If they are not helping you with leads and business, it is a waste of the agents and the firms money.  As far as the "extra fee" some firms think they should be charging, the savvy buyers or sellers tend to refuse to pay it. Relocation companies and Banks won't pay it either.  They feel like the commission is what the commission is, period.  Lots of mortgage companies and banks try to enforce junk fees, but it doesn't mean you have to pay them.  

12:58pm • #31
792,418 Points 32 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Real estate agents are an independent group of people with varying degrees of abilities and needs.  There is continued need for more than one business model for both agents and consumers to select as their business match.

1:00pm • #32
247,008 Points Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

I can remember when Brokers/Agents felt the Internet was a passing phase and would peter out.  Actually there's still some fighting reality!

Brick/Mortar, Franchise, Large Independent or one person office??  I would think so much depends on the individuals personality, mind set/self confidence, and how well prepared and organized they are among many other issues.  It probably also makes a difference depending on what part of the country you are working from.

It's a big major decision that only the individual can make.  Kinda like buying a house!

Sue

1:25pm • #33
247,697 Points 20 Featured Posts Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

I am independent and can't imagine working for a big firm. I like being nimble and can respond to the market quickly.

Some people really need the support of those larger firms to be successful because being on your own is a totally different mentality. As such, there will always be both.

One isn't better than another, just different.

 

1:32pm • #34
412,293 Points 1 Featured Post

1.I agree with you on all points strongly....except about starting my own independent brokerage company.I've been a Realtor for two decades and I've seen huge changes. Most of which I miss I might add. I don't at this time have any wish to start an office of my own.

2.I hate the "generic virtual office" (that's what I call it) the office needs energy and atmosphere to motivate agents.  There is NONE in the office I'm in . 

The next complaint is the huge commission the big company wants to cover their cost and doesn't benefit me at all. I have my own real estate sight  and have had for 7 years. All my business is generated from that. They (the company) should be paying me for the business I bring in from my sight! It's out of my pocket to keep this sight running!! Not there's  AND.....

You really hit the nail on the head about the managers that are "running the virtual offices" get real pleeze.... As you have said, to quote you Stewart...."relatively few large offices have really dynamic Managers and Leaders who motivate, educate and inspire their team of agents." It's a joke I think.

Great post, right on point Stewart ....I loved it!

I think I'll get a job as a waitress....I can take the money and run! LOL

Patricia Aulson/Portsmouth NH Real Estate     www.patricia4realestate.com

 

1:48pm • #35
865,493 Points 50 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router Attended Rain Camp

You could take three different agents with three different personalities and each of them would thrive in a different environment.  Personally, I was at a small office or a large national franchisor, and now I am at a small office with a local niche brokerage.  I like where I am more...  But, I still have thoughts of going on my own...

1:55pm • #36
1 Featured Post Hit Router

Good points Stewart, I do think that we are in the transition of moving away from companies that have way too many offices in a concentrated area. Guess what? The only way they can pay for them is to take money from their agents. The Internet is speeding that process, probably more than the traditional brokers would like.

I think offices are like agents, they are not all the same. I made a change in 2007 from one franchise to another. The difference in the office is night and day.  I went from feeling isolated and unsupported to having so many choices for training, support and guidance it feels like Christmas morning as a kid again.  With just under ten years in the business I still feel comfortable have the support system of the brokerage.

My one fear in the independent model are the agents that are simply not cut out to be operating unsupervised. I have seen some scary things this year already. It is a challenging market with the REO's and the Short Sales. 

Thanks for the great post.

1:59pm • #37
482,745 Points 1 Featured Post Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Hi Stewart,  Generally agree with your excellent analysis of our current business models.  I do think there are advantages to associating with a big box office although mostly for newer agents.  Well done !

2:00pm • #38
431,301 Points 26 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Michael - You said that your fear with independent agents is that they may operate unsupervized.

Based on my experience, Independent Brokers are often more professional and careful in their dealings - and the irony is I've witnessed a lack of supervision of some agents who belong to the so-called "Big Brokerages".

 

2:05pm • #39
314,804 Points 2 Featured Posts Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

"Lana - What actually justifies the $250 or $295 charged by Coldwell Banker?

Isn't that whay they receive a commission?

Effectively, they are charging a surcharge with no clear explanation why!"

At the Coldwell Banker where I work at we do explain what it is and what it's for. I explicitly fully disclose that it is a Coldwell Banker fee that I charge for transaction management and maintenance. I believe in full disclosure. It seems that you may disagree with a company charging an extra fee but that is a beauty of capitalism.

There are choices on both ends: A customer may opt to go to a company that does not charge extra fees or they can choose to work with one who does while an agent or broker can work at a brokerage that does not charge any extra fees. There are choices and both customers and agents/brokers decide for themselves.

Specifically with customers... they can choose not to sign. So far many choose in Florida to sign knowing about this fee and in Florida we are required to fully disclose. Thus an inherent problem. What happens in California may not necessarily conflate with what happens in Florida. Great post though.

2:19pm • #40

Hi Stewart, I do agree wwith you. As a part time agent I've worked with the big company and found it hard to get help with and training and mentorship. I'm now with a small company and find it a lot easier to get the info I need. True the big companys do have great training for there agent, but as a part time agent, you don't get any of that. I've also found no reason to pay a desk fee when I basiclly work from my virtual office.

3:12pm • #41
145,516 Points 21 Featured Posts Outside Blog

I've done it all, from owning my own company to working with a large franchise. I have finally found the perfect solution for me. I'm with a Regional Independent! We are the #1 company in our region, the Carolinas, and all the focus is on helping agents succeed. We do not pay fees and will not be asked to pay them in future. We do not get nickle and dimed, nor do our clients and no one is asking for more of our commissions. Rather, we get tons and tons of support, training opportunities, new information and innovative marketing opportunities, ALL tailored for our markets. We do not have corporate execs in California or Chicago trying to understand what we need in the Carolinas or trying to produce marketing that is generic enough for their franchises all over the country. We have the opportunity to interact with the CEO of our company quite frequently and have access to the experience of ALL of our company's leadership, marketing department staff and development team. I do not have to compete with my Broker In Charge for referrals as with many a small independent nor do I have to pay exorbitant referral fees as with a large franchise.

I have a fabulous home office and an office I can go to if I want to interact with colleagues. There is always someone whose work style and ethic I admire available to cover my business if I'm away or bounce an idea or problem off of. It is absolutely the BEST of both worlds for me!

Oh, and since sharing my experience with newer agent is rewarding and fun for me, I get to do that too!

3:27pm • #42

I could not agree more.  The allure of a large franchise brokerage firm may have had its benefits before the move towards technology-based advertising and property searches, but no longer.  When I was a salesperson just starting out, I was associated with two of the larger corporate franchise firms.  Their selling points were 1) Referrals; 2) Advertising; and 3) Brand Association. 

But in today's marketplace, people moving to Tallahassee from elsewhere get on the internet and do their own searches.  With many of larger search engines providing a portal into MLS, these potential buyers don't have to immediately rely on a local agent finding a property for them.  Moreover, I have yet to have a potential customer say to me "Gee, Scott, we'd love to have you help us find a home in Tallahassee.  But unfortunately you're not affiliated with (enter franchise name here)."

Study after study has shown the buyers could not care less about corporate branding, or how many initials an agent has after their name reflecting this or that type of certification.  Whether it is right or wrong our expertise is assumed.  What buyers want are attentive, professional agents who they feel comfortable working with.

Starting my own independent brokerage firm was the best move I have ever made in 14+ years of real estate practice.  The need for corporate/franchise affiliation is dead, and that will only become more clear as time goes by.

3:43pm • #43

Although I think independent seems like a reasonable way to go I have often questioned the ability of people to do so.  I have been with C21 quite a while now and simply question an independents ability to do one simple thing.   "BRANDING".  Why don't people believe that a group can generate more market awareness that one independent office?  I understand not wanting to pay the company money.  However, their is a certain trust and confidence that is instilled in the consumer when you walk in the door.  Although, I have often thought about going out on my own, I question whether my market presence will be as well percieved as an independent.  I am sure I can make it I just question whether I want the headache or if in my market a independent can compete with the big box companies.  I will continue to evaluate this situation and look forward to other peoples opinions.

3:45pm • #44
937,104 Points 361 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Stewart, I have been an indepedent home based broker for 15 years now, I can't even imagine doing it any other way. The money I save on office space goes towards marketing, education and technology. Of course it does take dicipline to work this way. IOt;s not for everyone. And that's quite all right with me.

3:59pm • #45
1,063,890 Points 156 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Hi Stewart, it does remain to be seen where the top six or seven large franchise names are in the near future. The Internet does seem to be having more and more of an effect on how people buy and sell houses. What an agent GETS is a key question for all the money they pay to a Broker.

4:19pm • #46

Hi Stewart...The virtual office is really nice and you are almost everywhere. It makes it easier for us realtors instead of dragging our client to and fro in our office we could be any place... with the technology we have right now in our fingertips makes our time more efficient

Ailynne PeBenito
4:28pm • #47
260,424 Points 10 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

I am very happy with my arrangement at RE/MAX. At my brokerage they do not charge an Administrative Fee, and we only contribute 1% to our brokerage. So we get the power of RE/MAX with a 99/1 split. We do pay every month into the advertising budget, but that is buying television and radio ads right here in my market - I think that's VERY beneficial.

5:09pm • #48
384,516 Points 28 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Wow, these comments are all over the board.  That's the great thing about Active Rain...so many opinions and ideas from everyone.  I was interested in the comments about the "Transaction Fees".  In my opinion, isn't that what we are paid for? 

I thought those that charged the fees may be interested in reading about a lawsuit here in Alabama due to Transaction fees.  http://www.al.com/business/birminghamnews/news.ssf?/base/business/124038826217990.xml&coll=2

5:24pm • #49
123,282 Points 1 Featured Post

Stewart, I was always in a brick and mortar brokerage until December 2007.  At that time, I came home to work for a new agency in town.  I did a great business until the brick and mortar office opened and I had an office there.  Then a lot of my time was devoted to answering questions and helping other agents and office staff get used to the new company.  I have returned home after having a baby and am once again enjoying my work more and having less interuptions, I am able to get more work done.  The other side is that the business I have is not from being in an office.  It is from marketing and keeping in contact with prior clients are simply answering my phone.  Floor time has lead to any business for me, I do it now to be in the office once a week or so.  The rest of the time I am meeting peopel face to face or working on marketing from home.

5:36pm • #50

I could not agree with you more. I had the same epiphany about a year ago. I went ahead and got my brokerage license here in California and in Oregon. I am so much happier!

I love knowing that I am responsible for all of my needs, my income, my marketing. I can also negotiate with clients in a much more free fashion.

In Oregon, offices are closing because of that tradtional model. They had a lot of agents on guaranteed office rent (they don't pay until they sell) and no one was selling anything last year, thus all these big offices were in the red.

I get together with agents during brokers and during the week I have lunch with other agents. I also have other brokerages in town trust me with their open houses so I can build a list of prospects for my new company.

Good luck to you! I am happy to hear that someone else has the same opinion about the business. I can't tell you how many phone calls I have received from other agents asking me how it is and how did I do it and that they are tired of putting money in their broker's pocket.

What' syour next step? Will you take on agents and grow or keep it just about you?


Thanks!

Brinette Holdren
5:51pm • #51
105,233 Points 12 Featured Posts

I've worked with big and small and I'm back with one of the biggest companies in Las Vegas... All of them have their pros and cons but at the end of the day.. it's really up to the agents.

Local franchises are just that... franchises and the owner/brokers pretty much have the final say on commission splits, tools/training offered. The more savvy ones are looking to keep their agents.. not fee them to death during a tough market. These are the same ones that will do extremely good when the market somewhat stabilizes.

5:51pm • #52
588,234 Points 80 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router Attended Rain Camp

Stewart - Interesting discussion.  I guess the good news is that Agents can choose where they want to work to find a fit that is best for them.  In many cases, that may be the virtual office.  In many other cases, that could be a large company.  I have been with RE/MAX since I started and love the fact that it is up to me to grow my business, working for myself but not by myself.  It is hard to argue that the sky is not the limit with a 95/5 split (or 100 percent for the Agents grandfathered in).  With this split, there still is the monthly bill but it is fixed.  Further there are opportunities for at-home agents to have lower fixed expenses who do not need floor time or space at the office.  I can see the benefits for an established Agent to be completely independent but it would also include greater responsibilities as well.  Like I said in the beginning, the good news is that there is something for everyone out there. 

 

6:10pm • #53
431,301 Points 26 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Again - a big thank you to everyone for their interesting input and varying points of view.

As Realtors it's totally up to us to make it happen .... we're our own "RainMakers".

I've found Buyers and Sellers prefer the fact that I'm operating an independent brokerage. They appreciate the personal, dedicated service I give them. They value the fact that I "need" them as clients, as opposed to the attitude often adopted by the big brokerages which dictate which escrow and title company a client should use.

I believe that within three years many of the "larger brands" will disappear from the industry.

6:38pm • #54

Stewart... You hit the nail on the head. I was with Remax for 20 yrs until 6 yrs ago when I opened up what was to be a small boutique agency swearing to God I wasn't going to hire any agents. As luck would have it, we're now at 138 agents making us the largest office in Ga south of downtown Atlanta. When I capitulated to take on agents it was a tsunami of sorts. What brought them to me was I was running the Montessori School of real estate (anything goes within the law). In other words, we don't bother the agents with rules and other assorted nonsense and we keep our hands out of their pockets. Our office is a small 1,800 sf space that is completely unneeded b/c if we see 5 agents a day blowing in and out (usually for 15 minutes or so) it's a big "agent" day. Just to do my duty as broker I sponsor all day and half day seminars every month that are quite a show with outside speakers, etc. If 40 of the 138 show up it's a big turnout. Agents don't want training as bad as some could use it. Far be it from me to force it on any of them. The cream always rises to the top anyway. Those that are passionate about the biz always figure it out just as I did. I got not one second of training in the 2 decades I was with Remax (8 different offices). In the end there's not that much to know anyway. You can either sell or you need to get back under the porch.

Virtually every franchise in the area has either closed or are losing so much money they don't know whether to shoot themselves or file bankruptcy. That includes all the majors including the Realogy group. There's no more commonality between one Coldwell agency and another than there is between a kumquat and an elephant. You can't franchise humans like you can hamburgers. Real estate franchising was a goofy idea from the very beginning and smart agents are finally figuring it out (me being one of them). People do business with people, not companies. For 20 years I could never connect the dots between ANY deal that I did and the name on the building. While they promote their uniqueness, let's face it, it's old wine in new bottles and nothing more than balderdash and poppycock. Nothing new but the color of the sign and some expensive PR (paid for by the franchisee agents).

Like all large independents, I'm low hanging fruit for the franchise salespeople and am bombarded with their visits almost weekly. I'm courteous to them and listen to their spiel. It's the same smoke and mirrors from each of them. When I quiz them about why their franchisees have closed or are hanging by a thread they quickly want to change the subject and talk more about the "nationally recognized name." Funny how that big name didn't help the 20 or so franchisees in my market in the past 2 years that shut their doors. Like the old Wendy's commercial... "Where's the beef."

Franchises remind me of the Wizard of Oz. When you pull the curtain back to see what the hell is really going on you discover some old man pulling strings trying to convince everyone that monkeys can fly. They can't. Me and Toto will stay where we are and ride the wave to the future of real estate as it goes through a much needed evolution. Virtual office is were we are all headed. Those that think otherwise simply have their collective heads buried in the sand.

Don Bush

 

6:40pm • #55

Entrepreneur vs employee is the comparison that's not being made.  You're really an employee, if you have the support/security of a national organization, or an independent broker.  You do not have to worry about actually running the business.  It doesn't matter if your company calls you an independent contractor.  Independent brokers are entrepreneur's, their success is totally up to them as is the responsiblility of running their own business.

One is not necessarily better than the other.  The world will always need employees, however without the entrepreneur's there's no employer for the employee's.

What is a Realtor?  A Realtor is a Sales Professional.  That is their core purpose, to sell real estate.  I am not a Realtor, but I am sales professional.  The art of selling is a craft.  It is something that is perfected over time.  It doesn't matter if your goal is to be a entrepreneur, or remain an employee.  Your success is dependent on how well you master your craft.  Education is key to your success as a sales professional.  You own your education, do not wait or make excuses why you're not continueing to progress.  If you're broker doesn't offer educational options, it's up to you to educate yourself.  

I see a huge void in the real estate industry with Realtors and the Internet.  How do you as a Sales Professional really use the Internet as a sales tool?  I'm offering a free webinar Wednesday night, "The Sales Starts With The Online Listing".  I'm going to educate you from a sales perspective of the system I used to list and sell millions worth of big ticket items online.  You will never look at your online listings the same!  To register click here.

6:49pm • #56
296,965 Points 3 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

I work from home and often times agree, however right now for me the benefit of having a broker to fall back on, the e&0 insurance and few other items are what stop me from going indepent items I jsut dont want to have to deal with.

7:07pm • #57
181,951 Points Attended Rain Camp

Stewart - In New England we are seeing younger, tech savy agents questioning the value of a split with a Broker that doesn't provide the services to warrant the company share. They are obtaining their Broker licenses and opening boutique shops.  I see this trend continuing as most companies have not invested in the appropriate technology, training and support.  Our business model, a virtual office (4 years) no desk fees, with substantial lead generation (no referral fees) attracts the new generation of agent.  We are expanding while everyone is contracting.  We recruit to the lead flow that agents cover from their home offices.  Each agent gets qualified leads through a live transfer (all leads are screened, qualified and then connected directly to the agent's cell phone). Through the Virtual Homes lead generation system, we can guarantee agents a lead a day with 4 qualified transfers a month.  We are looking for better ways to communicate our value proposition so that more agents will consider joining our company (licensed in MA, NH, Maine, CT and RI). This has been our greatest challenge for growth.

7:37pm • #58
278,556 Points 15 Featured Posts

There was a time when branding by the organization helped the individual agent. With the empowerment of the internet, individual agents are lending their branding equity to the organizations, without getting paid for it. Moving away from large organizations is not a fad, it is a trend.

8:05pm • #59
381,835 Points 19 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Stewart. I've worked at big local, small local, and now international and I prefer the latter.

Regarding you comment below:

-- I've recently heard that ReMax is increasing the % of gross commission they take from their agents, yet I haven't heard what additional services or benefits their agents are gaining in return.

To generalize ReMax this way is a bit unfair as each office is independently owned and operated. My commission has not gone down one penny due to my split with my owner as she has not changed is since Day 1. Contrary to popular belief there are many plans to choose from.  In addition, she has not raised desk fees and one year she even lowered them slightly when it got a little tough. (and that was for the entire office) but the desk fee has not risen above what it was when I started.

8:41pm • #60
615,384 Points Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

We work as independents -- and love it ---- have spent many years with "big boxes" and this is way better for us.

8:56pm • #61
1 Featured Post Attended Rain Camp

I was with RE/MAX for over 5 years and just loved the comraderie.  I received a wonderful education there but after my husband joined me we just couldn't see paying the high desk fees as well as all the added monthly fees.  We changed to a unique Prudential franchise which was actually a type of virtual office.  They have several small brick and mortar spots in the Denver and Colorado Springs area.  Just a couple of offices for agents to use for meeting clients or during floor time and a secretary.  You pay a flat $49.00 fee per month and then a percentage plus flat fee from commissions.  In March we dropped the Prudential franchise and the owner of the company is supplying us with WAY more advertising, tools, marketing, etc. than Prudential ever did.  We are up to more that 1,000 agents and growing every day.  In fact, we are in the process of expanding on our side of the state (my husband and I were the first agents on the Western Slope of Colorado).  Isn't it wonderful that we have difference choices!

9:01pm • #62
431,301 Points 26 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

"Franchises remind me of the Wizard of Oz. When you pull the curtain back to see what the hell is really going on you discover some old man pulling strings trying to convince everyone that monkeys can fly. They can't. Me and Toto will stay where we are and ride the wave to the future of real estate as it goes through a much needed evolution. Virtual office is were we are all headed. Those that think otherwise simply have their collective heads buried in the sand" - Don Bush

This truly summarises the situation so perfectly!

Don, thanks for your comments.

9:04pm • #63
128,015 Points 1 Featured Post Outside Blog

I've worked for a big name franchise and owned a big name franchise...it about killed me.  NEVER AGAIN!

I'm quite happy being independent and doing my own thing. I couldn't imagine life any other way.

9:15pm • #64
321,245 Points 8 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

There are choices and that makes this business great.  For me an independent option is still a possibility, however as a Keller Wiliams associate I love that I am encouraged to market myself.  Will this makes it easier for me to move to an independent model in the future if I decide - absolutely.

 

I also think brick and mortar vs virtual office are different.  For the first time in 5 years I'm in a brick and mortar office, and I love it.  I love meeting other minds there, and I am far more productive than when my 'office' was at home.

10:52pm • #65
546,315 Points 11 Featured Posts

Hi Stewart -- I started my own brokerage and left Re/Max and another huge regional brokerage that really does not provide an ROI, so I chucked it and keep 100% of my commission, no desk fees and I can pass savings along to consumers and make more money in the process.  It's a win-win and agents who give up a large part of their commission to their brokers when their brokers (for most agents) aren't bringing them business or even substantial business, well...the $$ speak for themselves if one were to really keep score!

11:38pm • #66
1,007,363 Points 36 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

I have my own independent brokerage and have been approached by a few larger companies.  I've asked what I would get for their share of my commission.  I was told training, a manager to oversee me, a big name to garner me more recognition, advertising and a nice office.

I'm still in my independent brokerage.

11:54pm • #67
APR
27
2009

I have been with a large brokerage as well as an independent so I have saw both sides and both have their advantages and disadvantages. Although lately I am leaning more towards agreeing completely with you. I joined a national franchise because honestly I thought the name recognition would be an advantage but I have found that consumers are becoming much more savvy and branding is not as effective as it has been in years past. Frankly comsumers know what they want whether from a large franchise or small brokerage...all that matters to them is the end product: to buy or sell a home. You make a lot of valid points in favor of an independent brokerage. Quality floor call leads are becoming scarce lately and managers who offer motivation and quality training are a rare commodity. I am approaching the timeframe that I will qualify in my state to take the brokers exam and I have been tossing the idea of opening my own firm around. Besides office space and paid advertising, I can't seem to think of a whole lot of benefits of being affiliated with a national company. And I work mostly from my home office now so I don't really use the office space provided(I'm much too busy to sit in the office all day anyways). And by the time one pays franchise fees and commission split, advertising could have paid for. Yes being independent is not for everyone but I have to agree with many of your points.

12:42am • #68
Localism Sponsor

My company is a group of young tech-savvy agents who blog, network, and our website is #1 ranked SEO in the entire state of HAwaii. Many of us came from Century 21 were we had desk fees and other charges. The paradigms of the real estate industry are evolving quickly especially in today's complex and changing market.  Most of our agents work at home, and use the kick-butt Ricoh color copier-fax-scanner for generating marketing materials and scanning documents and contracts.  The larger franchises, many of whom have high-rent facilities, may not be able to sustain their business model in this economic climate. Your post is compelling as reference the myriad of astute comments you've received in response to the post. Mahalo from Kauai...

1:54am • #69
121,998 Points 1 Featured Post Attended Rain Camp

What a fascinating discussion for me (not a realtor). It certainly supports the fact that I'm building my new company virtually with team members scattered around the country. How different it feels from the old corporate environment I lived in for too many years.

5:40am • #70
1,545,555 Points 416 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

You wrote: 

"I believe that within three years many of the "larger brands" will disappear from the industry."

I doubt it.  Real estate is a very complicated business and newly licensees need the structure of an office and access to a broker often. 

We might see some consolidation and some larger offices will merge locations, that's already happened in my area.  But, the brokers rely on the high broker split for new recruits and the recruits gravitate to office locations for comfort. 

I've employed many new agents who worked in my company which does not have offices.  They need a LOT of personal attention, access to the broker and training.  Not many brokers/managers will be willing to provide sufficient training without the structure of an office.

We'll see.  The key is business generation.  What the new recruits don't know is that their new beautiful office isn't going to hand them a lot of business.  On the contrary, the beautiful office depends on that new recruit selling their family and friends and splitting 50/50 with the broker.

Sure, it's broken.  However, I don't see it going away for some time.

 

6:33am • #71
106,017 Points

Hi Stewart - You have certainly generated a lot of discussion!  We, too, do NOT charge an administrative fee at Coldwell Banker Yorke Realty.  In our local market, I have seen a few small offices break up and join large offices.  I haven't seen the reverse.

7:01am • #72
4 Featured Posts

I've been on both sides of the fence and am still confused about the whole thing. I started out in a small independent office. Lucky for me, I began my career in real estate as an office coordinator. That gave me a great deal of training on the document side and I was able to see first hand the mistakes the agents were making when it came to the contracts and their interactions with clients. When I first became an agent, I was on a 50/50 split with the broker paying for company print ads and websites, business cards, and signs. Later I changed to an 85% plan and paid for all my own ads, cards, and website.

While at the independant office, I had a constant stream of potential buyers from floor time calls. Seller's, however were a different story. I was always hearing "sorry, it's RE/MAX" when they would list elsewhere. That prompted me to move to our local RE/MAX, where I was absolutely miserable. I wanted more training to help me obtain listings and got none. The broker was just plain ole horrible.

So, I moved to my current office, which is another franchise. I love my broker. And her husband who works right beside her. They want us to succeed. The downside is, I've never made such little money. 7% comes right off the top of everything that comes through the office for the franchise fee. Then the office takes their rather large percentage, leaving me with barely over 50%. And I pay for everything except my website and the use of the black & white copy machine, paper and toner. Essentially, I'm working for nothing by the time I advertise and pay for materials.

The franchise offers training, but at a heafty cost. A few times a year we may have someone come in and provide a class free of charge, but not as often as it should be. My broker is so busy selling that she doesn't have time to train the agent's coming in.

Floor time?? I hate it. I have had one sale due to floor time in the last 2 years. I could be out prospecting instead of playing secretary, which is exactly what I do while sitting at the office. I probably wouldn't mind working from the office more if I had 3 walls around my desk, but there's no privacy.

But, it's the best office in the area to work for. IMHO, it doesn't matter whether or not you are with a franchise. What matters is how the brokerage is ran and the attitude of the broker that's running it.

Lissa Uder, Your Lebanon MO Real Estate Agent

7:33am • #73
1,178,309 Points 133 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

I worked for a big brand in Nebraska and now in Nevada I have only worked with small independents.  I see no value in a big brand (although maybe many would disagree.)

Now when I worked at the last small independent, I had a little office space at my office.  It was loud and noisy and distracting with office politics.  I swore I would never do it again when I moved to my new brokerage and became so productive working from my home office and car office!  I did just get to the point where I was working 18 hour days and my husband pulled the plug on it so I am back at office space at my office.  I need the structure of hours to maximize my time:  "must finish it all by 6 PM"

It's only been a week but our productivity numbers for my team have increased greatly because I am even more focused now.

I love the small ind because I don't have to abide by corporate or franchise rules.  I am very free to do what is legal, ethical and moral.  I don't have to abide by antiquated systems and have the freedom to shift as a market shifts.

My brokerage is very elite and productive and small.  Non-producers are sent back to the division to go inactive.  We are one of the top producing brokerages with very little agents.  I am very proud to be a part of that!

7:43am • #74
431,301 Points 26 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Margaret - So it seems like the extra $250-$295 "Fee" that some Coldwell Banker offices charge is not a blanket policy across all offices.

That indicates to me that those offices charging the fee are simply squeezing their clients for this extra amount and their explanation for the fee is bogus.

Am I wrong?

7:51am • #75
202,016 Points 14 Featured Posts Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Stewart -

I'm going to focus on one statement that you made that you may want to do further research on:  "I can't help questioning the real and practical benefits to the Realtor, and ultimately the clients, of working with a large brokerage." 

Although the merits of a virtual office can be debated, one thing that a virtual office isn't is consumer-centric.  It is, however, agent-centricand according to Inman News, agent-centric models are becoming the way of the dinosaurs, which is probably why some of the national franchisees will be forced to change in order to stay alive.  I'm sorry that you had the experience of working with firms in the past that had a poor ratio of company-generated leads for their agents.  But this leads me to my second point...

Over 85% of today's buyers find their home on the internet.  You know that your own local paper, the LA Times, did away with the Sunday Real Estate Section.  So are newspapers across the country.  The internet is the only viable solution to get into more homes and reach more interested parties then any other form of media.  That's where the national firms have, and will always maintain a competitive edge.  Sure, MLS feeds go to syndicated sites, but I'm also talking about ways to drive traffic to a website and create "stickiness" and the ability to incubate leads.  I would be remiss not to mention the power of open houses done right, but a good broker and a great agent can make this work to the seller's advantage no matter the size of their office (but this attracts only the local buyers).

Why is all of this important to a seller?  I think the answer to this is fairly obvious.  The independent realtor simply doesn't have the tools, systems or training that ultimately benefit the consumer - whether they are buying or selling real estate.  I'm sure that many independents have great "referral networks" in place, but many don't.  Today's buyer in Seattle, may be from LA, and tomorrow's seller in Boston may find their buyer coming up for a medical residency from Chicago.  If your firm can find these buyers - great.  If not, please don't use this pitch to your prospective listing clients, because the facts will speak much more loudly than words!

 

8:34am • #76

We (my Husband and I) opened our own Brokerage in October 2008 in Barrie, Ontario (Canada). It is ELITE ACCESS REALTY INC.

We were afraid of being hurt by not using a big Brand(as our name is completely new) but we are doing great. We used technology to keep our business going (especially Internet) and our website is #1 in search engines. www.BarrieProperties.com

Some people that work in big Corporations are still resistant to admit that we are competing with the "big boys" but we are doing just fine.

The problem we are experiencing is getting other agents to work with us because they are afraid of not working with a big brokerage.

It's interesting how you mention that large Brokerages are now demanding huge splits an increased share of agent's commissions. I also keep asking why they are not mobile and work with a Brokerage like ours and I do have the explanation: FEAR! 

Here people are more traditional and conservative. I guess we are not like that because my husband and I come from bigger metropolitan cities but we are slowly changing their minds to a more modern concept of Real Estate.

We have so mane leads that we can't do it just the both of us. We need agents...open mind and effective agents that believe in change because this industry is changing!!

By the way, if you love the Internet, you will love www.HousingMarketMedia.com for your business. They are going to be launching a local real estate website for L.A. an other 50 cities so you can write articles for FREE but directed to prospective clients.

They just launched the one for my area this weekend so you can have an idea of how it works at www.BarrieHousingMarket.com

8:52am • #77
156,338 Points Outside Blog

I too have operated with REMAX and KW and am now at a small company with a virtual office and lots of technology.  I've been in business for 8 years and was a lender for 4 years before that, so I've been around.  My last stint was with KW and I was paying around 26k a year for a conference room, a fax and internet service essentially.  They do have some good free training at the offices and online, but most of it is geared towards newer agents.  I hired my own RE biz coach for 12k a year (3 years ago) and I get all the training and support I need.  I went to KW because all the older, producing agents were going there and I figured it would be a great synergistic environment and I could learn some helpful things from them.  Never panned out that way as they were never really "involved"...  Couldn't be happier now and never see myself going back to one of the big boys.

8:53am • #78
431,301 Points 26 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Weichert Realtors - I must disagree regarding your comment that a virtual office is not consumer-centric.

In the past, becoming consumer centric typically meant enhancing marketing practices to improve effectiveness in reaching consumers. However, a more practical definition could be making the entire buying & selling process more convenient for the client. A clear example, as a result of operating a virtual office the Realtor becomes more consumer-centric as meetings are more often carried out at a venue that's more convenient to the consumer. Clients don't need to be impressed by large corporate offices with rows and rows of unoccupied work cublicles.

Most corporate brokerages strongly encourage their agents to use in-house escrow, mortgage and title companies which are not independent parties to the transaction since the corporate office has a direct financial stake in those escrow, mortgage and title companies. This is certainly NOT consumer-centric, but more aligned to increasing the profits of the brokerage!

You stated: "The Internet is the only viable solution to get into more homes and reach more interested parties than any other form of media. That's where the national firms have, and always will maintain a competitive edge".

You comment is typical of the rhetoric that corporate national brokerages use to create the belief that independent brokerages cannot have the competitive edge in the market.

An efficient, techno-savvy independent brokerage can in fact, out compete on the very "competitive edge" you claim national brokerages have - so I don't buy into what you're saying!

It's a false claim to state that the independent Realtor doesn't have the tools, systems or training to benefit the consumer .... I have the same, if not superior tools & systems at my disposal to provide unparalleled levels of service to my clients. If fact, being independent means I can adapt and improve my systems far quicker than the management-heavy national brokerages which are burdened down with cumbersome protocols and internal politics.

As for "training" ... it's embarrassingly obvious that much of the training provided by national brokerages has little to do with the practicalities of selling Real Estate and is rather more focused on promoting the in-house vendors associated with that brokerage. The professionalism and lack of skills displayed by many new agents being trained by the national brokerages does nothing to benefit the public (clients).

Professional, disciplined and dedicated independents often take greater responsibility to remain better trained and informed than many agents operating at national brokerages.

Unfortunately, it appears that your argument is the rationale which large brokerages employ to scare agents into believing they cannot succeed on their own.

 

9:18am • #79
431,301 Points 26 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Peter and Particia -  You said it perfectly ... FEAR is the motivating factor that national brokerages use to stop agents from considering the merits of operating independently.

Your sound like you business is doing great - and that's so good to hear. Congratulations!!

Thanks for the referral to www.HousingMarketMedia.com - I will get onto it right away.

9:22am • #80

Martin, I just finished a 2 day trip to your franchisor in NJ and all they talk about is the shift back to broker-cetric business models, not consumer-centric. Personally, I'm me-centric but in order for that to materialize I have to give value for my fee, treat agents and clients alike with respect and deliver the goods. If I don't then no tickee, no laundry.  

While it was an interesting look-see at the Weichert campus and I was impressed with the vastness and sophistication of their operation it basically was the same old song; "Sign up with us, skim off 8% of your agents' commission and send to us and we'll make life better for everyone." Yeah, Yeah.... And Santa clause will be coming down my chimney come December.   

What is about to be dinosaurs is real estate franchises. However, my prediction may fly in the face of that quote attributed to that great American P.T. Barnum; "there's one born every minute and two to take them." While you are spot on about 85% of everyone shopping for homes on the Internet few Internet leads turn into sales. Just as darn near everyone that wants to buy a GM car will go to the GM web site to see the latest and greatest offering, at the end of the day they do what your daddy and granddaddy did... Drive down to the local GM dealer, get tackled by a salesperson, slammed into the finance office, and closed. Same goes for real estate. Everyone goes to the Internet to look-see but in the end they call one of their agent acquaintances and the process begins no different than how your parents bought a home. Call an agent, look at some homes, pick one. End of process.  

All the training you can eat is on the Internet and through other professional journals, local organizations or regional seminars. Franchisors have little more to offer than is available to anyone with an online connection. Most agents don't take advantage of training when you deliver it to them on a silver platter. If they did we wouldn't have 70% of all agents making less money than working at Home Depot. It all sounds nice and neat and believable just like multi level marketing which has reared its ugly head with yet 2 more real estate franchises but in reality when all the franchise BS gets to the front lines it doesn't convert into dead presidents on green paper. Nothing tells the truth like hard undeniable sales statistics. When you apply that litmus test, the franchise promises are exposed for what they are.. Empty shell games.  

Web traffic simply isn't all that and a bag of chips. Internet prospects are mostly trash and most every broker or agent that have monitored the stats discover that the ratio of closed sales to Internet prospects sifted through barely beat out direct mail. Now if your market or office goes cross grain to what is happening in most locations then good for you. However, you can't define a national market by analyzing one office or one agent anymore than a blind man can describe an elephant by holding onto his tail.

Don Bush

9:28am • #81
431,301 Points 26 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Justin - "Couldn't be happier now and never see myself going back to one of the big boys".

Yours is another of the many success stories about being independent and I share your sentiments exactly.

At KW in my area I would pay $30,000 - $40,000 a year for the priviledge of using their name & conference room. Anything over and above that would be an extra expense for my account (advertising, signage, phones, printing and copying, website maintenance and lead generation). It simply made no business sense to me!

9:34am • #82

One of the reasons I joined the company I did was because it was small (broker + 8-9 agents). I could have joined either of two other local companies, one of which has 100+ agents in one of their local offices. I just couldn't see what benefit there was to giving away 30-40% of my commission to be associated with their "brand". I also talked to my broker about expanding his office and opening a new location when I got my brokers license. Whether this will happen or not remains to be seen but he knows that that is direction I'm headed.

As the market shifts and as the demographics of the Realtor community changes I think that younger agents will be much more open to a virtual office as compared to a brick-and-mortar one. Getting our state real estate commission to embrace one is another matter entirely.

10:25am • #83

Great discussion from both sides of the table.  I think that many different business models are possible and are good for consumers.  What I don't understand is when people question why we don't all just go out and get our broker's license.  I think that many people don't want to have to spend additional time to running all aspects of a business versus focusing on selling homes, some don't want the additional pressures, some aren't good leaders, and some are very content with being a salesperson. 

With regards to large versus small & franchise versus independent brokerages, they both have their potential pros & cons.  I think that you need to be in a brokerage that fits your personality, can help you reach your personal & professional goals, has great support & training, and is always looking to the future.

10:27am • #84
814,368 Points 7 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Called Shot Master

I work for a small 100% firm that has recently started franchising nationally.  I pay a desk fee for (tech stuff) and a $500.00 transaction fee.  I find my business depends on me and no one else.  I am working on my Broker's License. 

10:46am • #85
228,471 Points 10 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor

Stewart, I am glad you brought up this HOT topic.  The trend is definitely moving TOWARDS home-based virtual offices; however, that arrangement is NOT right for everyone.  Some people need the encouragement of others and the discipline of going to an office.  Or they may have distractions at home.

But what's funny, is that I went to a LARGE real estate brokerage last week, probably 30-40 offices, and most were EMPTY.  Because agents don't work in their offices, they work out in the field.  So the office seemed very dead, not a lot of positive energy going on there.

10:49am • #86
431,301 Points 26 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Regina - That's one of the "Myths" about a large corporate office .... the offices are meant to be a place to interact and gain support .... yet most of these offices are empty and the brokerages are paying huge overheads for nothing. 

In my mind that's inefficiency and wastage of the highest order.

10:54am • #87
2 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Stewart, thank you for this one!  I interviewed at every franchise in town.  The gap between where I saw the market and our clients headed 2 years ago and where the large franchises were was so vast that I had to open my own Real Estate Company.  (Our motto is New Market, New Approach, New Team)  I feel that these large corporations are having the expected inability to steer their massive ships quickly and, to me, being nimble is critical.  Are there agents inside these marble offices diligently adjusting to their clients needs?  Absolutely.  I just didn't want to have to pay a franchise fee to be behind the curve.  In my market, the large franchises are beginning to charge desk fees.  It will be interested to see what happens to those massive offices.

I agree that there is a ton of work that can be done from home and that you are not going to list or buy homes from an office.  The challenge I would throw out to virtuals is that our client's still assume that you have an office.  How do you meet with Buyer clients the first time and gain their trust without an office? 

Rebecca

 

 

11:12am • #88

Stewart,

Different strokes for different folks., I feel some people need the motivation and especially the help of new technology. Like my minister stated Sunday. I need words not just visual instructions. I ordered a new bookcase for my office. It came in alot  of small pieces and the instructions were visual only.  They did not say use A1 to screw together C & D or what a fly bolt looks like. Myself and 2 others in the office put it together, finally! My point being I feel if we all went independent the business will lack alot of team work and sharing ideas. One  persons way is not always the right way! If you are talking to yourself you are talking to a fool. Can you imagine a Real Estate Board keeping up with x (900) individuals.

Scary

Diana L Brown

Home Realty/GMAC Real Estate

11:58am • #90
584,579 Points 69 Featured Posts Called Shot Master

Stewart - In regards to Rebecca's question about where to meet a client because when you go virtual, that can be a problem.  Having gone virtual some time ago, I have discovered that this is a challenge.  Meeting at the clients home is not always the best option.  I have found that meeting at the clients home can be a HUGE disadvantage and not the best use of my time and energy.  When meeting at the clients home they are distracted by EVERYTHING - the kids, the animals, the phone, visitors and anything and everything else going on.  Furthermore, in asking them to devote their time and attention to our conversation has backed fire on me when they respond "You're the one who wanted to meet us at home."

For me and my clients, meeting in a public place is not an option because the the nature of the discussion.  We are discussing a very personal and private transaction and sharing extremely sensitive information.  This is NOT the kind of environment that many of my clients feel comfortable handing out this kind of info.

The only answer is that I have had to rent a virtual office as needed.  When meeting with clients for the first time, I have a very professional virtual office that I can rent by the hour.  After the initial meeting, my clients are more likely to feel comfortable to dealing with me after that on the phone, fax and/or online.  But that initial meeting is absolutely key and I must be presenting myself as an extremely trusted professional.

Yes, this an additional cost that I must incur as a result of doing business, but I find that it's either comparable, or in some cases, less expensive than a monthly desk fee, which is what other brokers around here are charging for office space.

12:01pm • #91
431,301 Points 26 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Donne - I always ensure we sit at the dining room table which gives the meeting a sense of order

Fortunately I rarely have the clients being distracted by TV, kids, telephone calls, etc.

12:08pm • #92
Attended Rain Camp

Good post Stewart.  Definitely something I have tossed around.  Even though I'm with a larger brokerage I've always operated very independently...may be worth taking the next step!

12:46pm • #93
584,579 Points 69 Featured Posts Called Shot Master

Stewart - While I'm glad that working in a public place or your clients homes has worked out well for you, I have not had that same experience and/or success and I know without a doubt I am not alone.  You've been fortunate.  Because of the nature of my business and the info that is being exchanged, privacy is very important to both me and my clients.

That being the case, I must adjust my business practices to the way that I work and what is the most efficient way to use both mine and my clients time and energy.  Anyone else who requires this type of set-up may be surprised to learn that the virtual office it a very easy system to incorporate into your SOP.  For $150 a month, I get 16 hours of virtual office space.  If I need more, there is another package that offers a few more hours a month for another $50 a month.  I've only had to increase my basic package a few times since I've started using this service.  

1:31pm • #94
310,174 Points 10 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Stewart --- THANK YOU!!!! I love your post. 

  • My husband, Boyd, and I started an new concept for real estate companies in 1992 in Charleston, SC --- The AgentOwned Realty Co. --- it is jut what it says --- the Agent-Owners actually own 100% of the dividend stock in their companies. 
  • We have now grown to 14 offices spread out through lower SC.  The Agent-Owners have true Independence to do the real estate business they way they see fit. 
  • Really, they just outsource their management to a Service Company (which is Boyd & me) for a fee --- the rest is theirs. We have also set up "sister companies" from which the Agent-Owners profit. The "Sister Companies" are mortgage, title insurance, Allstate Insurance, Home Warranty and Business Brokerage.
  • If AgentOwned Realty had been in West Hollywood, you just may an Agent-Owner with us.  We have quite a few Agent-Owners who have owned their own small companies before.
  • I agree with Lynn --- the top 3 major brands will be gone in 3-4 years.

mama Liz Signature

1:48pm • #95
550,743 Points 22 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Nope, I ain't buying it.  I still believe that you need an 'umbrella' franchise name to work under.  Besides what do I care about ordering pencils, copiers, etc.  I want to sell real estate which means I go in (maybe) work, get out and sell. 

The number 1 question is:  How do you know you are loosing business? 

3:16pm • #96
431,301 Points 26 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Lyn - Since I became independent my Sales Turnover actually increased ... my expenses went down .... and I'm having more fun!

I find more and more clients want me to succeed as an independent Broker so they actively seek out referrals for me.

3:29pm • #97
254,781 Points 4 Featured Posts Outside Blog Hit Router

The way I see it is like this. Big corporate brokerages think the agents are succesful because of them, while the agent centric companies feel they are succesful because of the agents. I got into this business to work for myself not a corporation. Some people want & need the structure, I wan't and need 100% of the commission I earn.

4:25pm • #98

Stewart

Speaking of virtual offices, had a discussion w/ someone at real estate . com; long story made short, they provide leads, charge %35 of the top when the deal closes, agent then gets a 50/50 split, no desk fees,/franchise /transaction fees, only $400/yr for E/O which comes out of first 2 deals. Self generated leads get a 70/30 split or higher- this includes any referral business from a "company" lead. 

8:53pm • #99
APR
28
2009

I enjoyed your post and scrolling through the comments.  I love owning my own real estate office and working out of my home.  I am much more efficient, the office is quiet, and I have it set up so I can meet clients in my home if the situation arises.  I worked out of an office for 3 years before bringing it in to my home.  We found clients didn't come to the office anymore.  We met sellers in their home.  Most buyers we met online and spoke over the phone and then met at the properties they wanted to see.  I do enjoy doing everything including ordering office supplies, placing ads, doing mailings and working with my buyers and sellers.  What they like is they know I am the one responsible...I won't say 'my secretary forgot to change the picture'...it's all me.  I do have 2 agents with me and we stay in touch via email, phone and getting together frequently.  I stay in touch with other agents online, attending local, state and national tradeshows and conferences, taking educational classes frequently, networking events and more.  I was the number one agent in my town last year and in the top 100 realtors on Cape Cod - and that includes the 'teams' that put all transactions through one agent so my numbers are up against agents with 3 to 6 people working on sales.  It is hard work, but I absolutely love it!

6:58am • #100

This is the future my friends. I have been in the business for over 25 years. It took me a while to get use to virtual Stuff. I woke up one morning and realized that I had already been doing it for years, on the hood of a car, in a Star Bucks, at a fast food restaurant etc….Got rid of the dusty old office with all the awards. I built a new one at home. Then I was free. Sales increased, productivity increased, overhead went down. Life got better.

7:20am • #101
431,301 Points 26 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

"Then I was free. Sales increased, productivity increased, overhead went down. Life got better" - From the commentator above.

That's exactly what being an independent is all about ... it's absolutely liberating!

9:59am • #102
APR
29
2009
124,262 Points

I'm a very new Real Estate agent.  Just licensed in February of this year.  I work for a great company with inspired leadership, incredible technology, and a very great network of supportive agents.  I work out of my house.  Why would I need to drive someplace to sit at a desk?

Floor time? Bite me!  I try to make maximum use of my time ... Is floor time it?

2:32pm • #103
MAY
04
2009

I like the Virtual Broker Office concept so much that I researched what website products were available for an upcoming Independent Virtual Broker and really did not find anything. So, as a Internet Technology guru then Real Estate Broker, I spent the last 12 months developing a product for the industry. Check it out at VirtualBrokerOffice.com.

Comments and suggestions are what is most important to me.

9:01pm • #105
MAY
19
2009
227,064 Points 25 Featured Posts

We chose to be an independent brokerage.  We keep it small and focus on a niche.  I wouldn't change it because I love it.  We aren't a virual office.  However, we occupy an office / store front that is less than 900 sq. ft.  All of our agents operate from displays, home offices or in the field.  We do training both in-office and online and have nearly 100% attendance at those meetings.  The franchises haven't offered any compelling reason to change our business model so we have stayed independent..

12:50am • #107
608,296 Points 26 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

We work for a large brokerage. One thing that is really annoying to me is the huge amount of commmission that goes to relocation companies when their transferees work with me. It's up to 40% now. Soon it won't be worth it. Maybe that will be okay.

Sharon

1:53am • #108
429,369 Points 57 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Hi Stewart

In my area, two of the big box brands have closed up shop- the 2 remaining are not doing great, hoping that the number game eventually pays off the overhead.  Independents are doing slightly better, but lack "motivational meetings" -

I agree with you- save the overhead, and work from home!

4:17am • #109
429,369 Points 57 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Hi Stewart

In my area, two of the big box brands have closed up shop- the 2 remaining are not doing great, hoping that the number game eventually pays off the overhead.  Independents are doing slightly better, but lack "motivational meetings" -

I agree with you- save the overhead, and work from home!

4:17am • #110
197,544 Points 1 Featured Post Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Called Shot Master

To those charging the admin fee, it's been deemed illegal (per Inman) and has to be explained as "commission"- it's a bogus and unneccessary tack on for nothing in most cases. An administrative assistant is paid for administrative tasks- why the bonus on each transaction for standard fare? Ridiculous.

http://www.inman.com/buyers-sellers/columnists/teresa-boardman/calling-out-real-estate-junk-fees

 

The larger companies offer security for many- it seems to be a mindset for those that come from an "employee" status, and like the idea that they have a go-to in their broker for issues. Good large companies have accessible management; many do not.

We love having our own tiny operation, and I absolutely cannot imagine handing over $ to an entity that provides (for us) little in the way of recipricol benefit, but that decision isn't something that a more traditional mind set is comfortable with. With regard to ReMax, they generally have experienced agents that bolster the reputation, which is a great thing- can't argue with that!

6:24am • #111
192,951 Points 1 Featured Post Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router Called Shot Master

Some very good questions raised in this post. I work for one of the big National brands and they just added another yearly "fee". After a while you DO begin to wonder what you are paying for!?!

Thank you

6:27am • #112
145,354 Points 2 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor

Stewart, I recantly moved from a large locally owned company that prided itself in techno-savvy offerings geared to a one stop shop idea. It really limited us as to who we could do business with. I find my real estate life much more user friendly by being able to use my sphere of influence on the local social media scene.

My new company has a broker who wants us to do well and in turn he does well. So simple, but his mission statement is to help people! He is kind, considerate and really cares about his agents. When I go into the office I am surrounded by happy and satisfied agents who do well because they are professional and self-driven. This is a small but growing brokerage that does business from a golden rule perspective.

I also believe that the internet and technology will be the wave of the future and I am on board. One of the comments you made was that we all should be on AR....to that I applaud you!

7:15am • #113
197,862 Points 5 Featured Posts

I have been a manager/trainer for a large brand name office and I am now a broker/owner of a franchise...we are small but work a rural/resort market...I have always instructed my agents to market online, social network and have a website.  I am also an MCE instructor who specializes in marketing, so I do hands on workshops on setting up profiles for social networking and helping agents acquire and build an effective website.  I agree with the duty thing...I have never appreciated an agent who came to interview who wanted to know how much duty they would be getting and how I was going to get them leads.  The last time I looked...generating leads is the agents job!  Interesting post.  I own a franchise and I am happy so far with the support and training.

7:18am • #114
278,556 Points 15 Featured Posts

Whendollars. I went 1500 miles away to college back in the 60's I joined a fraternity to make a smaller group seem like a support system in the larger unfamiliar university. Franchises can perform the same function, and if that gives you the comfort to work that is great. What negates any franchise or large brokerage is the broker. is the broker good at reality testing and problem solving. I don't think I would ever do my own home office because I still want a thrid party to help me resolve conflicts that require more than my expertise. That doesn't mean you need a franchise. Now is the time to make sure that your expenses are truly business expenses, not comfort zone protection

8:11am • #115
451,025 Points 4 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp

Do we get equal value for the amount spent?  Probably not in most cases.  We left C21 after many years for that very reason.

Now, I question if we are getting value for all we pay to NAR, FAR, NEFAR, MLS, etc... 

  • Where is the support
  • Where is the oversight
  • Where is the enforcement of ethics

                                             In our area these seem to be AWOL.

Not too long ago it seemed that the majority of the less-than-ethical agents were all in the small independent offices.  Not so, today.  They are everywhere, it seems.   And nobody seems to care. 

We REALTORS® invest a lot of money in our 'organizations' and 'leadership'... it sure would be nice to see some kind of tangible ROI from it for a change.

8:55am • #117
762,522 Points 62 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Well I'm late to this party again! And it's not even 7:00 am! And I'm going to write a post about just that later

Stewart I too was with one of the big boys for years and jumped ship in 2006 and never looked back.  There was a lot of hype with them and the did promote all kinds of alliances with title companies etc soley to put more money in their pocket. That really bothered me.  I felt like my clients needed outside sources......and they got them.

I now have a small office with 5 agents working from an office.  We have fostered a team spirit and yet everyone does their own thing as well.  Some agents are really good at 'making' it on their own and othes need more support. I am happy that I am able to be there for our agents daily.

9:00am • #118
312,577 Points 11 Featured Posts Outside Blog

A few weeks ago I wrote a post based on the same thing : http://activerain.com/blogsview/1053397/the-extinct-real-estate-office

However, mine post was a little more tongue - n - check. I expected more of a debate but didn't get many comments. But all of your (my) arguments should make people stop and think. The world and our place in it is ever changing, just a little more rapidly at the moment. Maybe it's time we all reread the book "who moved my cheese."

9:53am • #119
412,293 Points 1 Featured Post

I think the virtual office stinks....handy but too generic, no atmosphere or energy.  The whole real estate thing has changed dramatically the last 20 years since I started in the business. I liked it the way it was, not the way it is. The only live pulse beat in the office is the receptionist and I'm not so sure about her!! Ha...

Patricia Aulson/Portsmouth NH Real Estate

9:56am • #120
482,745 Points 1 Featured Post Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Hi Stewart,  I see a much greater need for the traditional business model for less experienced agents or those who want to have a " turn key " job.

10:58am • #122

Hi Stewart, great post. I would emphasize that new agents should be building their "virtual office (meaning website, blog, etc)" from the moment they join any firm and begin to build their brand. From my experience which isn't much, you pay for 'technology' fees and other things that don't really build your brand. You get a website and contact management, but they don't belong to you.

That being said, there's a lot you can learn from an office that provides a learning and supportive environment for its agents. I've seen new agents come into my office and are taking off, gettting their first listings and sales.

 

11:55am • #124
2 Featured Posts

Internet based platforms, online transaction management systems, webinars, online meeting portals on and on...Better get used to it...

I remember back when I first started in real estate some old timers wouldn't use the fax machine and had to meet to deliver documents...

Gene

12:11pm • #125

Great post. Interesting post and some thought provoking ideas. The input and feedback and ideas that are found on active rain are or could be a great help to agents going it on their own.

2:45pm • #126
125,417 Points 1 Featured Post Hit Router Attended Rain Camp

It is definitely a decision that greatly depends on the individual situation.  Some people require more support than others, some real estate office offer more support than others.  It sounds like you've made the right decision for yourself.

3:24pm • #127
546,315 Points 11 Featured Posts

Hi Stewart -- We are 100% kindred spirits.  We have followed the same path, and I could not be happier.  Most agents are not really that business savvy I have found.  Even when I was with Re/Max and talked with agents who worked for a 50/50 commission split company, they said:  How can you pay that $900 per month desk fee, what a rip off.  I said: I pay Re/Max 12K per year and and my net income is double doing the same amount of business than what I made at your current company (my old company) and many truly don't get it.  And I left Re/Max because the expenses weren't there, but they didn't add any real value, so I started my own independent brokerage and can implement a more innovative, robust, and progressive service offering that creates a win-win for my clients and me.  As you say, to each their own and I'm not knocking other companies, but agents would do well to realize the massive changes underway and not be running to catch up, but to look ahead and catch the wave of change.

5:54pm • #128
727,987 Points 1 Featured Post Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

It has been very interesting reading comments from across North America.

5:54pm • #129
162,890 Points 2 Featured Posts Outside Blog

As I virtual marketer I am seeing more and more people contact me to assist them because they are moving to working 100% from home and needs their own support staff away from the office or they have joined a group that is more "virtual" than the big building firms. And the same, they are looking for virtual help for their virtual office. I think the percentage has picked up over the past year and the trend will continue with leaps and bounds.

9:26pm • #131

Interesting debate.

The answer to the initial question is "branding".

Like it or not, the lay person ( your client ) normally feels better with a known factor.  So, Coldwell Banker or Prudential are just that, branded entities.  Deny as you like, but facts are facts.  Also, unless a real estate agent is embedded in his/her market, branding is a tangible asset to building business.

Now, if you have been in the industry and are a noticeable entity or person in  your market, then you can certainly benefit financially and personally from branching out on your own.  A fact is, you started that way yourself!  So that speaks for itself.

Also, if your goal is really to help fewer people and work less, then hanging on your own may be the best way to go.  Motivated managers do not prefer to have that kind of individual on their team.

Creativity and ambition are key factors to success in this industry, who knows,  maybe someday you will get motivated to grow and become the next Century 21!

Best continued success.

 

Lou T.

Lou Tapia
9:34pm • #132

Stewart this was great!  I came from a big name shop..to "looking" at opening my own brokerage...to Connect Realty.  They offer all the tools, great splits and very, very low overhead. 

I took offense to Wiechert's comment about virtual offices not being consumer centric!  Our clients are met in an atmosphere where they are comfortable.  Their home, coffee shops...etc...they really like the new brave world of real estate.  They have access to all their documents on line, and weekly tracking of where and how often their listing has been seen on the Internet...our model is very much about the client...and still about the agent; our tools and our money.

We had T-Shirts made that say "Just say NO to Brick and Mortar!!!!"  LOL

9:38pm • #134
307,374 Points 32 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Great topic, thanks for posting. It's not so much what the agency does for you, or what you can do for yourself. Whether it's your own company, as small independent or a mega office conglomerate, you should give something to the entity you belong to. If it's your own company, surely you give a lot to be successful. But in any case, if you are only riding on someone's reputation, rather than your own, you'll soon become disgruntled and switch to something else, passing the blame for your own inadequacies.

The important thing is to be happy where you are and then go out an meet the people. People buy and sell homes. And to be successful, we have to talk to them.

9:39pm • #135

Okay,

I'll bite.  Nice post Stewart. Brick and mortar, big split, small splits independents; they all work for the needed. I so agree with building a lean and mean real estate machine.  I really can be done under any model, CB, Remax, C21, KW, EXIT, your name, my name etc.

If it involves generating productive agents to be among any of the above models, then it clearly comes down to the leader who may or may not help their agents develop their personal wealth enhancement strategies vial the companies mission vision model.

I've been with the biggest of brands (100 percent model minus desk rent), I've been with the profit sharing model, interdependent brand and I'm now an owner of a revenue sharing model that some folks interpret as a big up and coming brand.  Ironically, I'm modelling my mission vision plan for my company the way I want the team to look like.  Like attracts like.  Regardless of what people think of my brand, my brand is my brand for my little company.  My brand allows me the flexibility to grow the way I want it to grow, as well I'm back by quality support services, technology, training and the ability to earn much more than the conventional real estate models.

Could I do this under my name brokerage?  Yes.  Am I limited to my own abilities under my name brokerage?  Absoluetly. 

That's why I'm with EXIT.  EXIT has enhanced my ability to do what I do and what I plan to do.  I do not need to hire a recuriter, because I do not need licenses.  I'll attract good people, one associate at a time.  My colleagues will do the same and they reap the rewards.

Best of the year to you Stewart and thank you for the opportunity to comment on your great post.  Conventional real estate does need to re-think, re-tool and they all will in due time.  The fee thing you're referring to is likely a regional dilemma.  The cool thing is you're in charge now.

10:01pm • #136
173,819 Points

Okay, I forgot to log in... it's me again

I'll bite.  Nice post Stewart. Brick and mortar, big split, small splits independents; they all work for the needed. I so agree with building a lean and mean real estate machine.  I really can be done under any model, CB, Remax, C21, KW, EXIT, your name, my name etc.

If it involves generating productive agents to be among any of the above models, then it clearly comes down to the leader who may or may not help their agents develop their personal wealth enhancement strategies vial the companies mission vision model.

I've been with the biggest of brands (100 percent model minus desk rent), I've been with the profit sharing model, interdependent brand and I'm now an owner of a revenue sharing model that some folks interpret as a big up and coming brand.  Ironically, I'm modelling my mission vision plan for my company the way I want the team to look like.  Like attracts like.  Regardless of what people think of my brand, my brand is my brand for my little company.  My brand allows me the flexibility to grow the way I want it to grow, as well I'm back by quality support services, technology, training and the ability to earn much more than the conventional real estate models.

Could I do this under my name brokerage?  Yes.  Am I limited to my own abilities under my name brokerage?  Absoluetly. 

That's why I'm with EXIT.  EXIT has enhanced my ability to do what I do and what I plan to do.  I do not need to hire a recuriter, because I do not need licenses.  I'll attract good people, one associate at a time.  My colleagues will do the same and they reap the rewards.

Best of the year to you Stewart and thank you for the opportunity to comment on your great post.  Conventional real estate does need to re-think, re-tool and they all will in due time.  The fee thing you're referring to is likely a regional dilemma.  The cool thing is you're in charge now.

10:05pm • #137

I have always felt this way.  I have never worked for a national company only regional or independent.  I could never justify paying all of that money to a large firm.  I had friends who tried it and in the end they didn't end up any better, some worst.  I am now an independent broker with my own firm and three agents.  I think it has to do with your mindset as to whether you are an employee or an employer. 

Felicia C
10:07pm • #138

I have always felt this way.  I have never worked for a national company only regional or independent.  I could never justify paying all of that money to a large firm.  I had friends who tried it and in the end they didn't end up any better, some worst.  I am now an independent broker with my own firm and three agents.  I think it has to do with your mindset as to whether you are an employee or an employer. 

Felicia C
10:07pm • #139

New people need a brick and morter place and good training with mentors. Once they develope a clientle they can more on. I did, but I stuck with a major company, RE/MAX.

I work out of my home office, but still have a safe place to meet clients and have a support staff when I need them. We do not have lots of meetings, nor do we hang around the office. It is a get in, turn the paperwork in and get back to work type of place.

Many of my  clients like a name brand that they feel they can trust, especailly if they are new to the area. 

Susan Robertson, e-PRO, GRI
10:07pm • #140

Having worked for both large, national "brands" as well as smaller brokerages, I've ultimately started my own brokerage.  It really was not an easy decision because I did really love the people I worked for, however, there came a time when clients started asking me why I wasn't working for myself since I had a broker's license.   After listening to this for many months the market changed (dramatically) and I found it really no longer made economic sense to keep giving up a percentage of my money just to occasionally visit an office.

While it's true that in many cases the training new agents receive from working in a large brokerage is indispensable, it's also true that many independent brokers take it upon themselves to make sure new agents get off to a great start.  I've had the privilege of working for many great brokers and I hope to have the privilege of someday having one of my agents say the same about me.

10:11pm • #141

Great post.  Exactly what I've been thinking the past couple of years.  I finally took the plunge, got my broker's license, and as of a couple of weeks ago, started my own brokerage, Sidewalk Homes.  I like the fact that I can try things out without having to 'run it by the boss.' 

I spent 5+ years at traditional brokerages, mainly Century 21.  I learned a lot, which hopefully I will use to help Sidewalk Homes become successful.  Time will tell, but I know one thing, the game is changing, and you can either put your head in the sand like an ostrich or learn to change with it.

will bateson
10:18pm • #142

After being the Manager of a large franchise company with 275 agents in my charge for years, I quit and started my own brokerage with my husband a couple of partners.  The freedom is great.  We have an office, so it's not completely virtual, but it's basic.  In fact it's an executive suite where we have the ability to meet with our clients in a professional atmosphere and still have space for agents who need to get away from home to have a temporary workspace and all the equipment.  We have a paperless system where agents can turn in their files without ever leaving home. 

Training is essential, no matter how experienced the agent.  We hold weekly sessions for questions and issues that come up, or to go over the basics.  We learn from each other - especially about new marketing ideas or new technology that works.  We have "virtual" training for our agents, video, webinars, podcasts and written materials.  We offer web pages for each of our agents, and have a successful buyer lead program.  It works well.  As a franchise manager I sat at my desk and answered questions.  Honestly, if I was doing my job, I was recruiting volumes of agents instead of helping the ones we had.  Now I take inexperienced agents with me for open houses, showing properties, listing appointments, etc.  They learn much faster.

I think you really have the concept correctly.  In this market, and for the future of real estate, companies need to adapt.  Lean business models with technology as the focus.  Real estate companies have been doing business the same way for 50 years or more.  Isn't it time to change?

10:23pm • #143
230,656 Points 14 Featured Posts Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Stewart: I consider myself a healthy skeptic... Being a big fan of Henry Miller, I tend towards, "anytime a large group of people get together for anything, or on the surface agree with anything"... I raise questions. Many start out with high ideals, yet they always tend to gravitate towards serving themselves. I have several clients like yourself that have given up the office, the employees, the bigger box... and now make more money as independents simply serving their clients. They get more reward, work less hard, and enjoy the transaction. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this...

Rene' 

10:27pm • #144

Stewart - Excellent post about virtual offices, the power of the Internet, and the future of the real estate industry!

I've been with small boutiques and large franchises for over 30 years, and currently broker/owner of a KW franchise in Eastern NC.  Our fees have not increased since we opened our doors in 2005, and we provide exceptional training to our agents, compared to many other companies in our area.

While my personal team works from the KW office, I've been working comfortably from a fully-equipped home office for many years, and prefer the quiet concentration.  I've "branded" my business with an active website online for the past 12 years, and a follow-up system with past clients, so I haven't needed, (or expected) business from any company.  If you add true value to your services, the referrals will come naturally.

However, in as much as I like the independence, I feel that the weekly team meetings and training sessions add a major value proposition to everyone who attends, especially to the newer agents.

All the best to you with your new company!

 

 

 

 

Dianne Dunn, Keller Williams Realty, New Bern NC
10:30pm • #145

You sure did come up with this topic at the right time!  I'm with RE/MAX an had to think hard what I was recieving from the name.  Very little since 85% or more of my business comes from referrals and repeats.  Getting back to the post... virtural v/s brick and motor........ I was still with the same RE/MAX office and chosed to work out of my home to same money on desk fees.  I get more work done at home than at the office.  At the same time my pipe-line got smaller and smaller.  I know it's the market but some other agents that have not been in the business are very busy working on teams that are based out of large franchised companies.  Needless to say, I changed RE/MAX offices and join the largest team in my market area to get more leads.  Although I have made it though the a large part of the storm, just being with RE/MAX, my referral, repeats and my own leads just wasn.t getting me the volume I needed.

I just join this team last week and love the concept.  Morral of the story..... I was an experienced agent and chosed to cut my commision split in order to get more business without paying for my own advertising and large desk fees.

Doug Bryant
10:31pm • #146
1 Featured Post

I believe that it truly comes down to one's personality type, in terms of which business model a given agent gravitates to.  I have never believed that my success hinges on the name of the company I work for.  I have worked for a variety of companies over the course of my career, and my income never went up or down due to the name of the company on my paycheck.  I'll never quite understand why any real estate agent hangs around an office.  My experience tells me that while the synergy with other agents may provide some tips, an agent's time is MUCH better spent outside of the office, where the business is.  Never lose sight of the fact that the agents in your office are in direct competition with you.  I'm not suggesting that it has to be a contentious relationship, but I don't go out of my way to tell all my co-workers how I'm generating business.  It would simply give them an opportunity to implement my strategies and steal away some of my business :)

10:32pm • #147
1 Featured Post Attended Rain Camp

I see a trend in a lot of these responses- The pros of being independent vary by market and then are subject to the grit of the independent broker. I recommend that ANY agent that is eligible for a broker's license go ahead and get it because then you have the option to strike out on your own. I don't go to the office if I can help it.

10:33pm • #148

Amen!! The name of the game now in our business (and any business) is low overhead. Donny Deutche himself said that the fastest way to go out of business is by taking on more fixed monthly expenses i.e. renting more space. It is a business model that is antiquated and is on the way out with the advent of mass-accessable information. This internet revolution will continue to provide valuable information and limitless data about any property the buyer could desire but nothing will ever replace the knowledge of going to the place which means agents will always have a place. With the advent of the pdf attachment for ease of contract disbursement (and in some forward communities, legally permissable E-signatures) more buyers and agents are given the opportunites to get competitive on a more level playing field. No one needs to go into your office anymore to sign paperwork, and that is incredibly cool.  I for one can't wait until they make the Iphone app that has winforms so we could fill out and send offers when showing the property. These technological innovations level the playing field and place the advantage with those who can leverage themsleves into maximum productivity instead of the corporate titans who have the biggest proverbial sticks.

 

Bring it, KW, CB, Re-Max, C21, ETC.

10:34pm • #149

(I had posted this above, but for some reason it did not log me in. So here it is again. Thanks for caring).

 

Amen!! The name of the game now in our business (and any business) is low overhead. Donny Deutche himself said that the fastest way to go out of business is by taking on more fixed monthly expenses i.e. renting more space. It is a business model that is antiquated and is on the way out with the advent of mass-accessable information. This internet revolution will continue to provide valuable information and limitless data about any property the buyer could desire but nothing will ever replace the knowledge of going to the place which means agents will always have a place. With the advent of the pdf attachment for ease of contract disbursement (and in some forward communities, legally permissable E-signatures) more buyers and agents are given the opportunites to get competitive on a more level playing field. No one needs to go into your office anymore to sign paperwork, and that is incredibly cool.  I for one can't wait until they make the Iphone app that has winforms so we could fill out and send offers when showing the property. These technological innovations level the playing field and place the advantage with those who can leverage themsleves into maximum productivity instead of the corporate titans who have the biggest proverbial sticks.

 

Bring it, KW, CB, Re-Max, C21, ETC.

10:45pm • #150

I have been using a system called eBrokerHouse www.ebrokerhouse.com to manage my entire business for the past month and I love it. Its an online office solution for agents and brokers.

It's not a brokerage, but agents or brokerages can use this platform to manage every aspect of their business. I have used top producer in the past, but this is much more user friendly and much much cheaper. $29.99/month. Also, I have a team of 7 and I am able to add all of my team members with their own login info to my account for free.

Anyone else use this yet?

10:46pm • #154
7 Featured Posts

Sore point with me Stewart! Having worked quite happily from my virtual home office for 3 years I made the leap to a modest commercial office with high hopes of creating an inspiring place to invigorate my practice among colleagues. Just where are these colleagues? I have tried team relationships under my banner only to be disappointed in a lack of commitment and shared professional goals. As mortgage professionals, we must maintain approved commercial locations for such things as meeting clients, credit checks and file security so flying vitually is only possible during certain hours of the day, preferably outside rate-lock hours. However, once I get that chip inserted in my brain that lets me lock at will by blinking my right eye,  "to desk or not to desk" will become less and less an issues...as long as the coffee is great and the atmosphere stimulating! 

10:48pm • #155
1 Featured Post

Wow, I am shocked at all of the comments.  This really is a battle of the old vs new.  I am with Connect Realty and our entire organization is a virtual company.  Connect took it one step further instead of the bricks and mortar, they went with a 3 level management comp plan.  Our agents are paid a referral fee of 5% of the transaction for each person they refer to Connect.  I too was on my way to my own brokerage when I was introduced to Connect. 

It is so amazing, a great split 80% for the agents and amazing technology.  Our company offers virtual tours, realtor.com shocase listing and personal sites with IDX along with Transaction point as part of our technology for every agent.  The only fee charged to the agents is $299 for the year, or $29.95 month for the technology. 

I have over 30 people that I have refered to the company and I have no liability for any of them.  Yes they are my team and we all work together, but no liability is unbeatable.  I received over $3000 from the overrides of my agents from their transactions in April alone. 

Our founders understood that Real Estate as we knew it was going to change and they created a company that was pro agent and would survive the times.  They watched what happened to the Blockbusters when Netflix arrived.  I work out of my home as well, but some of the agents have pulled together to creat an office space in Sacramento for those that wanted the encouragement from one another.  The great thing is that it is so small scale, that if businees slowed down there is no major corporate expense to the company.  Take a look at Realogy who lost nearly a billion dollars last year.  It is just like the titanic, if the props are to small it cannot turn to avoid the iceberg.

11:13pm • #156

Is there anyone that has tried ZipRealty or a business model like it? 

A. Edwards
11:25pm • #157

Quick Question:  I've been a licensed broker in Alabama for over 17 years.  Have actively used the Internet since 1994 and have worked for RE/MAX and independent brokerage firms.  I am currently working from home, have a Virtual Office Website - needless to say, I completely embrace working from home.  I work for an independent company with the qualifying broker and myself as the only licensees.  My broker has a very small office space, decorated beautifully, with two conference rooms and one actual office.  The only time we are at the office is when we meet new clients, are writing up an offer with local clients, etc.

Do you ever see a time when a brokerage company will not have to have a separate address so those of us who work "virtually" can truly work from home?  I don't have a problem having a new company phone line installed, etc.  The majority of the time that I meet with my clients is at their home, office, or wherever it's most convenient for them - resulting in me almost never having to actually go to the "office."

Pat Whitman
11:51pm • #158
MAY
20
2009
Outside Blog

Stewart - Great Post - I agree with you alot of the larger brands will disappear.  I feel you need to brand yourself.  Your clients hire you not the company.

12:15am • #159

Bigger is not better.

Smaller is not better.

Independent is not better.

BETTER IS BETTER. 

There are some serious flaws in the tradional real estate model. Any business that relies on an overheated market to make money is not a good business model. The number one office for many years in the Coldwell Banker system has been the Beverly Hills North Office. This is an office in one of the best real estate markets in the country and deep in talent with a group of some of the most productive real estate agents nationwide. Yet this office is down 60% (based on sales reported through the local MLS) in closed sales volume YTD vs. the same time period 2 years ago. To make matters worse, one partnership (REO's) in the office has accounted for 31% of the office production YTD. Take away their production and the picture is much bleaker. There is no way this office can be operating at a profit with these numbers. And if the best office in one of the best real estate markets can't make money something is very wrong with the model.

The problem in the traditional real estate model is very simple - too many unproductive people taking up too many resources. If you take a close look at any sizeable traditional office you would see you could eliminate the bottom 50% of the office without having a big impact on company dollar.

Another sign that something is very wrong in the traditional model is found with the top producers in these companies. In most cases these agents are insulating themselves from their office as much as they can. They do their own marketing, branding, get their own coaching, hire assistants and all they want from their company is a bigger split, more space, good legal and too be left alone most of the time. I have been coaching these people for 15 years and I know what I am talking about. Also the team concept does not work in a traditional office model because the team agents are being paid on the split of the alpha agent and not on their own production. All of this has played right into the hands of Keller Williams which promotes agents doing their own thing and having their split to the company capped. The challenge KW faces is in body count. In West Los Angeles a KW office needs at least 100 - 200 bodies to be a profitable office. That number of productive agents does not exist in any one city. Therefore most KW offices are filled with lots of bodies that don't produce. And before any KW people jump up and down I suggest you look at the productivity numbers for large companies nationwide. KW has some of the best training and yet their productivity per agent does not reflect this resource.

I don't believe the issue is traditional or virtual or discount or Internet based. I think the issue is what model is going to provide the best service to the client and give agents a great way to make a living that can be sustained through any type of market. I believe one of the best things about the market right now is how tough it is. The ethical, skilled and productive with survive and hopefully the rest will go elsewhere. In my opinion this industry tolerates too much mediocrity. and needs a big cleansing of upprofitable companies and agents. The bar needs to be raised. Technology is changing the game and hopefully new models will emerge that will be more efficient and more effective for everyone involved in a real estate transaction. The idea that there is a standard commission for all agents (whether we call that 5 or 6% is immaterial) makes no sense at all. Why should a brand new agent on Day 1 be charging the same rate as a 20 year veteran who has sold 500+ homes. I know there will be exceptions to this however the commission strucure is all wrong to begin with.

I read most of the comments on this post, not all, and I feel it is one of the better discussions I have seen on ActiveRain. It is great to see the back and forth and different perspectives that people share. Different strokes for different folks!!

PS The $250 fee charged by many CB offices is purely a junk fee. It was started by the Jon Douglas Company in the 90's to save the company from going under when the market was so terrible. When CB eventually bought the Jon Douglas Company it kept the $250 fee even though the market had changed.

 

12:55am • #160

I will be provacative and state this conversation could be moot in a few years. I am not sure the big 3 or 4 names will survive the litigation heading their way.

 

 

 

 

 

 

John McConnin
1:11am • #161
121,998 Points 1 Featured Post Attended Rain Camp

Thanks everyone for helping someone on the periphery understand a little more about the industry.I too am building a new, virtual business and each time gain more insight for what I need to do.

1:57am • #162
1 Featured Post Localism Sponsor

I was with Prudential but found that the big box wasn't offering too much in the way of new tech. tools. Prudential wasn't changing but the world of real estate was. 

My new company, Herman Group Real Estate, which is a regional company, has really embraced tech. that allows me top notch training plus enhanced systems to assist my buyers and sellers. I'm still paying a franchise split but it is nominal in respect to the amount of opportunity that is being generated. I am actually an advocate of the independent. But, I like the comfort of a company that embraces the concepts of real estate in the 21st century.

New models will always emerge and the debate is yet to be settled, but I put my money on the virtual model.

3:04am • #163

Every time I go into a broker's office here, it's always empty. Most people seem to work from home or out of their cars.

3:20am • #164
250,733 Points 77 Featured Posts Outside Blog

I remember how surprised I was. I came from corporate america and had a job where several of us had virtual offices. I couldn't understand why the real estate compny I started with made such a big deal about going into the office. I have been "virtual"  for about 4 years. right now with a company of 3.

4:02am • #165
192,951 Points 1 Featured Post Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router Called Shot Master

The comments hav been as great as the post. Very insightful and for me, thought provoking. Wild how sometimes the most innocent blog can create such a stir.

6:47am • #166
1,017,121 Points 25 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

 

 

 

I can't understand the value of dropping thousands of dollars for an office that does nothing for your business. . unless they are giving you leads every single day. . at the end. .you have to KEEP YOUR MONEY ACCOUNTABLE !

When I was at Keller Williams, I paid nearly $32,000 a year for my cap, officie fees and they were even charging me for copies!!!. . $32,000 a year!!! the next year, I gave myself a $32,000 RAISE

Do I miss them?

Yes I miss my friends and colleagues. .

Do I miss paying $32,000 per year?

GUESS!

6:53am • #167

I appreciate and understand the views expressed here. In part, the comments are derived from the varied experiences and backgrounds of each of the participants. For the past ten years I have operated an Internet advertising agency specializing in Internet real estate marketing. I have worked with Realtors from all over the country and have had a number of brokerages as clients. My long term client relationships have been a tremendous source of information on the differences in brokerages as well as the differences between individual agents. For the sales associate just starting out the brokerage is an educational resource that one must experience. Once a Realtor has the knowledge and experience to be successful the value of the brokerage is diminished.

The real estate business is a sales business. In sales it all boils down to a numbers game. The more contacts, thye more leads one has, the greater the potential for success. In this new age of the Internet an indivudal Realtor can generate more leads than he can possibly handle. The Realtor or broker who understands the technology and the behavior of the Internet home buyer can achieve an incredible success. Market conditions almost don't matter. It's a question of market penetration and the people who know how to "work" the Internet will achieve a major success.

That said, I finally decided to join the ranks of Realtors and got my real estate license. In my first month as a Realtor I generated over 100 buyer leads and had my first sale within two weeks. I have eight active buyers including two cash buyers. I can generate more than 200 leads every month and will only be limited by my ability to handle the volume. I am now interviewing sales associates seeking a partner so that I can achieve a the full potetnial from the leads I am generating.

The bottom line is....if a broker has the capability to GENERATE BUSINESS form the Internet he/she can build a very successful business without the support of a major franchise or a corporate sponsor.

 

7:00am • #168
251,633 Points 2 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Isn't everything is a cycle, small was good then big became better, now virtual is the standout business model. I do think it is natural right now with the downturn in housing that many will go solo. If you are experience enough to preform all the functions of a brokerage it is more profitable.

7:08am • #169

Hello Stewart - WOW!  Great responses on your post - obviously a hot topic.  I've been a Real Estate Virtual Assistant for for 12 years, operating out of my home office.  I agree that working independently isn't for everyone but for those of us who are self-starters, dedicated to helping others achieve their goals and motivated by dedication and the satisfaction of knowing we're providing a great service, it's perfect!

Pamela Cendejas - Second Self Virtual Assistance
7:18am • #170
218,115 Points 4 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor

FACT-The birth of the Internet changed real estate industry (and many others) forever.  It has empowered the consumer like never before and gave them the ability to access resources to make decisions. 

Those who are hanging onto old school ways are most likely insecure and need the emotional support and/or training offered by the association with their peers.  (Not saying it's a negative, only a fact)

I don't believe the consumer really cares if your have a virtual or a brick and mortal company.  Customer service should be the number one goal and business model we adapt should be to supportive of that goal.

If the the customer needs are met first.  Why does it matter if it's a brick and morter or virtual office? 

Great post and many great comments.  Thank you.

7:23am • #171
550,743 Points 22 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Isn't this a repost of what you did a month or so ago?  I'd like to ask the readers how would you know you are loosing businessby breaking away from the big box brokers? Anyone that does floortime which is essentially acting as a free secretary answering phones for your broker is a stooge!

7:41am • #172

Q: I keep asking exactly what agents are getting by paying their offices a bigger share of their commissions ....

 

A: These large brokerages would need to bring value to the agents, just as much as agents need to bring value to their clients' real estate transactions.

8:04am • #173
6 Featured Posts

I completely agree with your point of view Stewart!  There are so many places to get information, and the office seemed like the least likely source (in my experience). 

I do however also agree w/ Melina.  A small independant office is not for everyone.  It takes a lot of motivation and focus that many don't possess. 

8:23am • #174
Attended Rain Camp

A brick and mortar is great to have.  Not  saying it's better than your virtual set-up, but there are some things of value you get by having a centralized place of business for it's employees.  Ideal set-up IMO is this physical office with the virtual capability you enjoy.
BJ Matson

8:27am • #175
106,017 Points

"Margaret - So it seems like the extra $250-$295 "Fee" that some Coldwell Banker offices charge is not a blanket policy across all offices.

That indicates to me that those offices charging the fee are simply squeezing their clients for this extra amount and their explanation for the fee is bogus.

Am I wrong?"

Stewart, there may be a difference btwn CB Residental Brokerage and the independent CB franchises.  Our CB franchise office is independently owned.  I can't comment on a fee that I know nothing about.  I would not join an office that charged such a fee because I would not be comfortable with this.  However, to say that "their explanation for the fee is bogus" is rude.  Debate and discussion is good.  Contempt is bad.

I'm a newer agent and I chose the agency because of the support and training that I would get.  It works for me. 

It also shocks and at times frustrates me but there are a lot of clients who do not use the internet much.  These are older clients and it is definitely the brick and mortar, and print advertising,  that attracted them.  Over time, there will be fewer of these but they still exist.  These are more time consuming clients and you get them, yep, from floor time.

8:32am • #176
110,439 Points 1 Featured Post Localism Sponsor

Whatever floats your boat, works for me.  Variety is the spice, and think all of the business models are necessary to fit the different personality types and levels of knowledge of agents throughout the world. I think Steve Shull sumarized the quandary as well as anyone.

For myself, I have worked for several companies of different sizes and am happy where I am for now.  Since I live in an area with a lot of relocation business, the CB brand is familiar and comforting to people making those long distance moves.  I get relocation leads by being on the various teams, but also receive leads generated through the company website which requires no referral fee.

Some of the comments about instructing agents to attend this and that, or requiring them to do certain things, flies in the face of "Independent Contractor".  Even though I am with a big brand, I work from home as a mobile agent and don't feel the pressure to do anything that I don't think is conducive to my personal business.  The training and support is always there, for new agents and more importantly to me, seasoned agents. 

I am fortunate to work for the #1 Coldwell Banker United office in the world for three years in a row.  Lot's of energy, great people and a great manager.  Pollyanna I am not, as I know there are always the politics or sour grape stories, but I stay away from that.  That's why I am loving my new source of information and encouragement, with a touch of lively, respectful debate...Active Rain!!

 

8:43am • #177

Great post, Stewart. Congratulations on having an AR featured post (although I see it is not your first). There is lots of food for thought here, and you have generated a good deal of interesting discussion. Keep up the good work, and keep us all thinking.

9:02am • #178
285,915 Points 20 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Called Shot Master

I spent the first 8 years of my career trying the alternatives--first, large indie (good training, bad splits and politics); then, corporate 'name' (desk and junk fees, extra paperwork, absentee broker); then my own storefront (little used, high utilities, time wasting solicitors and tire kickers) and have been all virtual for 18 months now which is just right. All my files are in one place and I am allowed to work undisturbed when in office.

I have not yet lost a listing or client that I know of because of not having bricks/mortar and we work with large developers and first time buyers alike. A cyberoffice may not be for everyone but it is for me!

Every time I see a white Corvette convertible I am reminded of what I could have had instead of supporting that storefront for 3 years . . . next year, next year . . . :)

9:30am • #180
Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Stewart,

Great Post - Great Responses. Isn't this a fascinating business. Virtual is here to stay,but like most you down play the role of a great broker. He wanted more and I needed more. Since then I have owned and managed Re/max, Realty Executives and an independent office. Each had its pluses and minuses.  Bottom line is that every agent is in business for themselves - regardless if one is working for a big house or out of their own house.

Just posted a blog on the Power Brokers, which points out how ineffective many "big Houses" actually are.  The biggest draw back for most "virtuals" is the biggest problem for most agents and that is self discipline. When you are home alone and working on building a business you better have more than normal share of self discipline.  I have a group of virtual agents with only one requirement, I expect rto see them once or twice a week. Most agents can benefit from the synergy of being around other producers even if it is just for an hour or two a week.

When I went through my independent years I did fine, frustrated when I wanted to take a week or two off and still handle my clients professionally - easier with technology today, but frustrating just the same.

For me the Move to Exit has provided the best of both worlds and I actually do make more than 100%. As it has been said - what ever floats your boat. 

Here is hoping you have a great year and keep up the stimulating blogs

Steve Cramer, CRB, CRS, ABR, GRI, yadda yadda

Broker Owner

Exit One Realty,  Denver

9:35am • #181

We have been debating the virtues of a virtual office vs. brick and mortor here in Northern Virginia all week. My team, Pitt Street Associates, works under an international real estate company called EXIT Realty. The technology and training at EXIT is the best I've seen.  This is what I think it boils down to: a realtor needs to choose their market niche and then educate themselves for that niche. If you are educated in your field, educated in technology, and have experience you will find clients, in fact, they will find you! So, as a broker - however you deliver that support to your agents, whether virtually or not - you just have to make sure you do it. This is the key. Business will happen wherever it's convenient.

Gloria Jackson
9:37am • #182
Stewart...thanks for the article. Since I have passed my exam I have been out of state. Plan to return in June to look for the perfect broker. I am still leaning towards an independant broker vs " one of the big guys". I like the vitual office as well. Can't see why I need to sit in an office when I have a laptop, iPhone, and Internet at my finger tips.
Nancy Larson
9:39am • #183

I agree with you Stewart.  In 2006 I opened up my own company.  In the 90s I worked at Coldwell Banker and when I decided to get back in to real estate I got my brokers license.  It has been working out great and what a difference when it comes to the commission!  I can also offer to my clients anything I want without having to worry the manager isn't going to like it.  Sometimes I do miss the camaraderie though but know I can always go to a course, open house or real estate board function to get that.

Thanks for taking the stand for us independents!

Cindy

9:39am • #184

The one question that needs to be answered by every agent is what value do you receive from your ‘brick and mortar' office?  Real estate agents and brokers are independent contractors who should justify their complete overhead just as every business person should.

As I recruit agents, one of the questions that I am always asked is, "What about an office"?  Then the agents admit that they have never had a seller in their office and buyers no longer come to the office because they preview listings via the internet from home.  Further more the agents rarely go to the office except to turn in or pick up checks.  Why pay for something you don't use?

The question is still what value do you receive from your office?  For each agent the answer will be different.  In the "Goggle Era" we now work in an environment of abundance of information no longer the information scarcity of the past.  The business models of the past that allowed the large firms and franchises to create their need by scarcity and ownership of the tools of real estate (listing books and technology only available in the office) are not needed by most agents and brokers any more.  Goggle has taught us all that our ability to achieve is greatly enhanced by the knowledge that we have right in front of us and we no longer have to get it from the old ‘brick and mortar' of the past.

9:42am • #185

Stewart, I agree with you completely, I don't get anything out of the 50 plus office brokeage that charges me $80 bucks just to cut a commission check. The corporate air is getting to breath and I do not see any happy faces in my office that went from a 2 floor office to one floor  to cut their overhead and forced all of its agents to take less than half the space than they had before, even if you had an assistant which I do, you had to fit the space and share it with other people and then raise the fees that they charge for tech etc. I am moving in the same direction and plan to follow your foot steps, thank you.

Tim Buffham
9:42am • #186
814,368 Points 7 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Called Shot Master

I work for a 100% fee firm that is internet oriented.  I pay a small monthly and $499.00 per escrow.  There is some tech support for that. 

 

I note that a lot of the agents that like the bigger companies do so because the get some support.  I think that is good for them and will not dispute it.  However, the larger companies will only continue to thrive when they can provide this dynamic leadership and support.  I did not feel I got this at other companies.  I may not be getting it now, but then I am not paying for it either.  I do find I am paying in other ways.  I pay for coaching and most of my own marketing.  If I want any office support I pay for it myself.

10:00am • #187

Stewart, your post has given us lots of informtion about resources for vitual brokers, such as www.ebrokerhouse.com and www.virtualbrokeroffice.com. I wonder are a lot of independent brokers using professional coaches to help with support and motivation? In my opinion professional coaching could take the place of franchise office support systems.

Dolores Mauriello
10:03am • #188
130,756 Points 5 Featured Posts Called Shot Master

Stewart ~ Right on!  I believe it is coming however, I do feel though that there will be some sort of a transition between the traditional large brick & mortar offices and total virtuality.  My guess is that the office of the (near) future will take on a physical location but will be more of a meet and greet and work center, and the internet will play the major role as the storefront itself.  There was a RIS Media article a short while back about the office of future and it looked more like an internet cafe (starbucks style) than anything else.  This could be reality coming to fruition in your community, sooner than later.  With a national franchise brand for recognition and the support and training that they make available to their agents, the onus will surely ride on the shoulders of the ingenious and independent agent.  The franchise of the future I believe is already upon us, you just have to do some homework and you will discover who they are. 

Independence, a place to meet clients, mentorship and a support/training system will all go hand in hand.  And just maybe the overhead costs of such a venue could be kept in check, providing better splits to the agents, with a small cost sharing structure for the facility.  This can be a win-win for all. 

While many of the comments on this post were in agreeance, some were still dissenting.  Resistance to change will ultimately spell the end to the traditional thinking agent and the belief in progressive realization will see everyone else through.

I'll save you a spot on the couch.  See you at the real estate cafe!

 

10:21am • #189

With this discussion about old vs. new, now is the time to educate yourself on one of the most critical tasks an agent/broker does.  That is creating your online listing.  Buyers/sellers are not just looking online at properties, they are shopping your services by looking at your listings.  You do not have to spend a bunch of money on marketing yourself.  Creating effective listings will provide you with more marketing than any other other media.  How?  Your online listing directly reflects you, your broker, and your agency.  The way it's done, is a direct reflection of you!  I've been working with agents, and a local broker on obtaining more listings, and getting sales results with my approach.

     My passion is in educating other sales professionals on a proven listing system to get you results!  It doesn't matter if you use an "Enhanced Listing Service Provider", or do it yourself.

"The Sale Starts With The Online Listing" Webinar, Tonight May 20 7-8pm Cost = Your Time, to register click here

10:48am • #190
284,607 Points 37 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Stewart, EXCELLENT post and incredibly valuable comments.  For me personally this couldn't have been timed better as I just gave my broker 60 days notice and I am in the process of creating my own company.  After 18 years with private and franchise brokers I feel confident that I can actually give BETTER service to my clients because I truly only care about them and don't have to follow directions that might not be in my client's best interests.  I loved your response to Weichart!  You were spot on with every issue.  My personal blog is ranked #1 in my market above all of the franchises and large independents.  My business comes from referrals and my blog.  And, I love marketing.  There is really nothing I need from a company that I can't get right here on AR.  What a great resource for us!

10:50am • #191

Stewart,

I, like you, started out in Real Estate with a big name brokerage...and I have to admit without the training I received while being with them (I was there for 3 years), I may have missed out on a lot.  My income crashed with the "crash", and my percentage level also came down substantially.  I knew I needed to find a brokerage that didn't penalize me with me diminished income, and found a boutique firm that fit my needs.  I would eventually like to get my Brokers license, but am content to share my commissions with them just to have the bi-weekly sales meetings and work floor time if I so choose.  I love the opportunity to mingle with the other sales asssociates during these times, as we are required to have home offices and therefore do the majority of our work from home.  We also do caravans for new listings within  our office, and there is no pressure to participate in any of these events if we so choose.

No venting here...just speaking my piece (peace)...lol

11:15am • #192

OK, I'll bite also as this is one of the more engaging discussions I've seen in a long time.

First of all, I'm an executive with one of those big brands.  I've also owned my own independant and I've also been a partner in a non realogy franchise so I think I have a good perspective on this this topic that makes my viewpoint different or perhaps more comprehensive than most on the topic in that I've personally seen it from all angles.

Steve Shull's posting earlier hit the nail on the head and is a very insightful reflection on where the big brokerages are today.

I was hesitant to chime in on this topic however as it seems to me like a broker bashing session versus the topic of virtual brokerages.  The big brokers are testing virtual brokerage offices.  Our company has one in Manhattan Beach, CA and Huntington, CA. There are pros and cons of these offices also and they are by no means the answer to the fundimental issues our industry faces.

I think as the market returns to normal (what is normal anyways), the real issue at hand is not the value proposition of the brokerages to the agents (or lack thereof in some cases) but the value proposition from agent to consumer.  This discusion should revolve around the issue that consumers aren't going to want or be willing to pay these huge commissions unless you can articulate what you do that creates more value for them than the other guy.  I believe consumers will demand more value for less money in the next cycle and unless you can clearly articulate that value at the kitchen table you will have to lower the price drastically.

At that large brokerage I work for, its the company's job to help the agents add more value propostion through brand, scale and resources that they wouldn't otherwise have by themselves.  This isn't going to magically solve the foundational issues this industry faces however.  It will always still go back to the individual agent and the value prop of that one person.

The root discussion of virtual offices will be that they will be necessary to meet the economics of the changes in value prop as the larger brokerages won't have the funds available to pay the big rent checks if the agents give their commissions away and the consumers push for lower prices.    The model will need to evolve substantially from where it is today.

Great discussion (minus the brand bashing)

 

 

Chris C
11:15am • #193

If you read through the posts you will recognize one common thread...."I started with a large corporate brand". I really think there can be a happy medium here. I've been a broker/manager with Prudential for a few years and it seems to me that new agents coming into the industry really need the support and supervision a large corporate brand offers, to begin their career. It's probably that support and supervision that has enabled those of you with independent companies to know what it takes to open and run a business. Somewhere along the line, you learned how to succeed. I certainly don't think that an agent that's new in the business could go out and open their own company and run it successfully out of the gate.

I read a post a while back where the owner had created a small storefront type of office that had desks and computers out in the open where an agent could stop in and write a contract, or sit and take walk-ins and board calls. He had tons of agents and they interacted in meetings on a regular basis, as well as seeing each other in the office. Agents can learn a lot from being around each other in an office setting. I think we are seeing a trend where the large office buildings are going to be viewed as wasteful, but large corporate brokerages can still stay strong and function without huge buildings.

Being part of a franchise affords you an opportunity to get to know associates from around the country and interact with them at conventions. It's good to learn the different markets, how they're using the tools offered by the brand, what's working, what's not, and also to be able to know them and confidently refer clients back and forth. There's definitely room for both in our industry. Name brand or independent, there will always be customers that choose Diet Coke over store brand soda, or vice-versa.

Joanna Williams
12:14pm • #194
175,687 Points 1 Featured Post Called Shot Master

Great post! I operate a small office of 4, including myself. We all have broker's licenses, and we all enjoy the open, sharing, environment we have created in our office. The interaction really works for us, and keeps our morale and productivity up. That's why we have a bricks and mortar office!

12:49pm • #195

I am staff at a RE/MAX office in South Florida where the real estate busines had taken a large hit. It all depends on the broker, we have an awesome, experienced broker who is diligently trying to help all the agents survive this market. We are like a family, agents that left in fear of not making it in real estate when the market was changing are returning to us. We offer training for those that want it, and our agents work together helping each other. More than 80% of our agents work from home but have access to our media room, meeting rooms, work area computers, etc. or just help from the staff when they need it.

We signed up 6 agents this month, even in a bad market, and one of those was a returning agent. Not all agents are cut out to be brokers and run their own office, they are good sales people, not managers, so some of them would never be able to make a brokerage work efficiently. Been there - seen that.

Please don't judge all RE/MAX offices as the same. We pay for local advertising, unlike most RE/MAX offices. Our agents listings pull automatically from the MLS and are all shown on local newspaper sites. These listings appear on over 140 newpaper real estate sites around the country and we refer the leads to the listing agent at no cost to them. 

We also have an exclusive lead generating system for the Fort Lauderdale area. We distribute these leads to agents who want them, and they pay us a small referral fee on closing.

Agents are all busy here, some have more leads than they can handle. Additionally, we just opened a new office for commercial real estate, we are the first exclusive commercial RE/MAX commercial office in florida.

Gail Cruz, Marketing Director, RE/MAX Premier Associates & RE/MA
1:04pm • #196

Stewart:

As a consultant and workhop presenter of mobile technologies to real estate, I meet more and more Agents who are wanting to be independent and virtual as possible. Today's technologies do allow a professional to set up office just about anywhere, all done relatively inexpensively.

I think the flexibility is a win-win for the Agent and the client alike, and in my opinion, the best is still yet to come.

G. William James
2:32pm • #197
130,756 Points 5 Featured Posts Called Shot Master

Pat ~ Actually I've had a little office for over 6 years now and through that period it was tough to recruit agents in this market because of no "personal" office space.  My office consists of a reception area (no receptionist), meeting room, floor duty desk and computer, copy and fax center, and a work center room where a couple of agents can plug up their laptops.  Total space: 1,000ft. Overhead: low.  And it works!

I've had to compete against two, 10,000 sq. ft. big box stores, and the 'personification' they create.  My indivudual and agent personal productivity has been amongst the top 5% of the agents in our community, and it's accomplished with very low overhead, responsible good training, and an empathy orientated office.   

For whatever reason, I am considering upping the ante and re-locating to a strip mall for the purpose of foot traffic and exposure. I will be paying more for space, but I hope to create a more "retail"  based "cafe" environment that will attract more consumers (and agents).  I'm looking for independent minded agents who want to learn and leverage technology in order to provide better personal service.  

This is sorta out-front thinking for this community and I may have been spending way-too much time on the inversion table but, I do whole heartedly agree with "better" is BETTER! 

4:46pm • #198
3 Featured Posts

Stewart,

After considering my options and the value that I had received from working with one of the smaller, almost national brokerages I decided to cut bait and go with a virtual office broker.  I feel that working in my home office is more productive than the alternatives. 

I am sure that some agents feel that they are getting a real bang for their buck.  I was not.

7:12pm • #199

I've been working out of virtual office for a year now and while it took some getting used to, I can now say I prefer it. I think the best thing about going to an office is that it kind help with self-discipline and you get the benefit of human interaction. The latter can be benficial in that we sometimes work in a lonely profession and we can share information and learn from one another. The downside is that it can lead to trivial banter and be counter productive. To work in a virtual office, you need to be organized and self-disciplined if yu are to be successful in real estate.

11:18pm • #200
MAY
21
2009

Stewart~Thought provoking.  I was with a small RI company that got bought out by CBRB back in 2000.  When they came in, they restructured the splits.  They did not charge a $250 fee, what they did was charge a 5% fee on each transaction and called it an "advertising fee".  Whoooaaa!  I thought that the 50/50 of 60/40 split was supposed to cover the advertising.  Floor time was required, and I actually needed it to catch up on all the paper work that was required when I did a transaction.  Most of the paperwork was CB generated.  Whoaaa!  Again, what was I paying for?  When I actually looked at what I was giving back vs. what I was receiving per transaction, I left.  Now I'm with a small local company and am very happy.  I am in the process of taking my broker's exam.  One never knows.... be prepared! Always have a "Plan B"!

12:56pm • #201

Stewart,

Kudos to you for seeing the writing on the wall.  I did the exact same in 2006 and haven't looked back.  Those who disagree have different needs as you wrote.  I currently have over 20 Agents working under the virtual office environment and more coming!  We are constantly fine tuning the virtual office atmosphere to make it more efficient and convenient to run a business.  This system is really for professionals who are self motivated and independent.  Best wishes to you!  If you know anyone interested in the virtural office environment in Sacramento or San Diego, send them my way! 

Michael

Greenrock Realty

2:03pm • #202
MAY
22
2009

So there was no way I had time to read every comment on this post!  I breezed over it enough to be impressed that agents are starting to see the light!

I was at the point where I was considering just starting my own RE company as I didn't find value in most models.  I was having to personally pay for all the tools I found necessary to have in order to be productive and not only compete with, but blow other agents out of the water!  That takes a lot of money, online transaction management, contact management tools, REALTOR.com Showcase listings, Virtual Tours, websites, marketing etc....long list!  And frankly it Pissed me off that I was giving money to a firm in the way of commission splits and fees on top of all of that.  What value was there in return...NONE! 

So if I go it alone, I'm still paying for all those tools, yes I would make 100% commission ( still had the same level of leads and clients that I produces myself with no help from the BRAND) so I would come out a little better.  But that still puts my in a position where if I had to stop working for some reason ( sickness, accident etc)  my production would grid to a halt and those bills would not!

I was fortunate enough to come across a company that offers me all those tools and a 3 level residual that makes it silly for me to run my own company. Instead of shelling out $300- $500 a month to pay for those tools, I pay $29.95 and NO FEES EVER.  I get paid sooo much more now than I would at 100% on my own.  Best of Both Worlds!

9:12am • #203
291,720 Points 5 Featured Posts

I think the virtual office is definitely here to stay. Thanks for the post! We've seen telecommuting in other industries. This is really no different. Have a great 3 day weekend!

9:32am • #204

Great comments. I myself was associated with a large national franchise for several years.  I thought I had the best deal in town. I was one of the top five producing agents in the office. That is until one of the top producing agents in our region decided to depart from another large national franchise and open an independent virtual office.  At first I was skeptical.  The "virtual" model is not for everyone. If you are an agent who needs the daily office and coffee pot contact, are not able to generate your own leads then the virtual concept is not for you.  Granted, the large companies can provide training and support systems on an ongoing basis, but it is not without a cost.  In my previous office, I had to pay a monthly fee just to be associated. In addition not all that great training was free either. Then you add up copy fees, franchise fees, traditional split even with a decrease to a 100% commission, I found myself paying in an average of $15,000 per year in routine expenses. 

My switch to a virtual office was the best move I could have ever made. I made the move about 5 months ago and haven't skipped a beat.  As a matter of fact the amount of money I saved by making the move allowed me to expand and license in another state with the same company. One must understand that real estate is a localized business.  It doesn't matter what company sign is in the client's yard, it's the agent's name that is on the sign. We build our businesses and client base.  Where you go, your clients will follow. The virtual office offers fixed flat fees per closed unit. No office fees, no copy fees, no desk fees, no desk duty (not that it would matter anyway), no fees for leases, referrals, or property management. You manage your own business, lead generate as you would anywhere you opt to operate, manage your own expenses, and put twice the money in your pocket.

It is the shape of the future of real estate.  The big companies are struggling and will continue to struggle and impose additional fees to the agent and the client in order to cover the overhead in managing the office.  When was the last time you had a walk-in client in your office? The internet and the virtual office is the way of the future.

It won't be long, it's already cathcing on at a rapid rate.

 

 

Scott Palumbo
9:35am • #205
412,293 Points 1 Featured Post

I liked the way real estate was....not the way it is regarding office/atmoshpere...

Patricia Aulson/Portsmouth NH Real Estate

10:16am • #206
895,700 Points 43 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

You can learn when starting out from a franchise, then you see many of the largest offices are independent brands with in house improvement on what the franchise that was expensive dictated and now as an independent you have better control over.

11:10am • #207
549,360 Points 7 Featured Posts Called Shot Master

Stewart,  great post and loved all the commentary and discussions.  We are independents at heart and  we will aways be.  In commercial real estate after working for two firms, we opened our own boutique firm.  In order to compete with big name brand firms, we defined our niche very clearly and broadcast it as a firm specializing in the LA entertainment industry and high end retail as well as retail development. 

Our former colleagues stayed where they were.  They just preferred the coziness of a large office and bantering around the coffee machine.  It is not in everyone's nature to be trail blazers, and in their hearts of hearts they liked the safety.  That factor was the price of admission.  It is very similar to folks that buy a diamond ring from Tiffany's rather than from someone else.  Same diamond, same cut, both ethical certified gemologists.  They feel better knowing their ring came in the blue box and cost a lot more.

When we sold our house in LA, we listed it with a wonderful Coldwell Banker agent, (we did not want to list it ourselves and deal with all the details that were not savvy in), there was a $500 fee!  I immediately negotiated that one out of the listing contract.  I found it an irrational fee as no one else in the area was charging (still would not have paid it).  We loved the agent, she was great! If she were to become an independent, I would still send business her way.

Congratulations on the wonderful participation you have engendered.  Wishing you continued success, and if someone asks, for a condo specialist, we knew who to send them to.

12:43pm • #208
1 Featured Post

In our market area brands matter and independent offices are having a tough time in the current market environment. The traditonal office setting will eventually evolve but the benefits of branding to agents who use that brand power will continue to be evident to most successful agents.  Century 21 Corporate's move to internet marketing just happened less than 6 months ago.  I believe the effects of that move will slowly change the over 7000 Century 21 offices througout the world and real estate as we know it today.

4:18pm • #209

As a former co-owner of a brokerage, I have to say, the hassles that come with owning your own real estate company can get quite strenuousand expensive. Legal costs and risks, company expenditures, it can get quite daunting. For me, I have found that belonging to a larger company can alleviate some of those issues and allow me to focus on other things. Again, this issue is different for everyone. But after 30 years, I need a break!

4:47pm • #210

As a former co-owner of a brokerage, I have to say, the hassles that come with owning your own real estate company can get quite strenuousand expensive. Legal costs and risks, company expenditures, it can get quite daunting. For me, I have found that belonging to a larger company can alleviate some of those issues and allow me to focus on other things. Again, this issue is different for everyone. But after 30 years, I need a break!

4:47pm • #211
576,615 Points 3 Featured Posts

Wow Stewart, once again you have created a thought provoking post. There seems to be as many opinions as there are offices.

I don't think big box will go by the way side but they will be one per town vs many because as long as the franchises have schools they will have agents.

7:15pm • #212

Thanks for the post. I've been with a couple of big name brokerages in the past, but now am with a core group of men and women who run a local brokerage in Olympia, WA. We are literally swimming in a sea of sales while the big companies are high and dry. I've noticed that the company that I was with previously is down to only a few money making agents. Bigger doesn't mean better. It's sad, but true.

7:22pm • #213
1,007,363 Points 36 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

I asked the same question when I was queried by large companies why I wouldn't come join them and didn't get an answer that satisfied my needs.

11:38pm • #214
MAY
23
2009
105,233 Points 12 Featured Posts

Nice post Stewart,

As a former Broker/Owner of my own little luxury real estate boutique opened up at the absolute wrong time... you make great points and I wish you the best of luck.

However.. my current Brokerage I am with (BIG name in Las Vegas) is nimble enough to have changed with the current times and is VERY accommodating to the changes you mention.

Result... we have the top producing agents in Las Vegas and while I can't speak for all of the agents... I have a very comfortable commission split that makes it well worthwhile to be with a big name company.

The owner is very forward thinking and has adjusted the business model to meet and beat all of the other franchised systems.

 

2:05am • #215

I don't think the idea of a Virtual Office has caught on yet in the Northeast but I like the concept myself. I think people list and sell with people ....there really isn't any company (the company is the people) I was with CB for 15 years but now in my own brokerage I pay my agents very well but they do all the work and have their own expense, we keep the overhead very low.
If your franchise company is producing leads and income for you maybe its worth 40% of your income. But most of my clients are people in my sphere or netwrok so why give 40% away.
Your right "do less" and "make more"
The internet has changed everything, your as big as you want to be with the internet.

 

 

6:23pm • #216
MAY
26
2009
Outside Blog

The market has changed, as so have we. We left a big name brokerage (where we were the highest producers of approximately 100 agents) for Allison James Estates & Homes two months ago. We didn’t see much value being part of the big name traditional brokerage. We have been very pleased with the company and we have already closed several transactions with AJ being the broker. It is really an eye opener to keep 100% of the commission and not having to pay any franchise fees, commission splits or other fees. We also enjoy receiving the commission checks directly from escrow. No more waiting a week or two for the checks. Another positive note is that we have received several referrals, and also provided referrals to fellow AJ agents. We were concerned about not being affiliated with a large traditional brokerage, but it has not been a factor at all while dealing with sellers or buyers. We sell luxury homes and we are also REO agents and the banks have not had an issue either with our new brokerage. This model is perhaps not for everyone. Especially if you’re brand new agent and requiring a traditional office with floor time. Going forward we’re considering opening a small office in a “retail” environment. Also networking with fellow Allison James agents in other markets to share ideas and success stories. Lisa and Goran Forss www.teamforss.com 951-760-6027

7:43pm • #217
MAY
27
2009

Working virtually is around to stay. However, I will be one of the first to admit that working virtually does not suit everyone (and I'm a virtual assistant). Some people really need that personal interaction in an office environment from time to time. Others are quite happy doing their networking online or at the occasional business get together.

It doesn't make sense to me that agents have to pay a high percentage of their commission to a company who is only lending its name and no additional support. The agent is paying for their own assistant (unless they share an overworked in-house assistant with several other agents who may or may not have the time to devote to their specific needs, thus leaving them to either hire their own or do the admin tasks themselves), marketing, cell phone, contact management, transaction management, etc. I'm sure if more big name real estate offices provided some of these tools to their agents instead of making them pay for their own, there would be more of an incentive for the agents to stay.

However, with all the technology available today, and the list getting longer and better every day, there is not much incentive for a real estate agent to not find their entrepreneurial spirit, a great virtual assistant (or two - hey, we specialize) and go out on their own with a greatly reduced overhead. Granted you do have to remember that the buck will stop with YOU when you choose to go this route...but for many agents, that is the choice that is right for them.

9:19am • #218
MAY
29
2009
358,265 Points 31 Featured Posts Outside Blog Hit Router

Stewart -

The old debate ranges - does the company bring in the business, or the agent/broker associate himself?

I'm a firm believer in the AGENT driving the business into the company - but many new to the business feel they need the security and name of the big corporate name.

Usually,, they pay dearly for this affiliation - splits, desk fees, etc.  Added credibility - perhaps?  Worth the extra $$$ - don't know.

Our Team re-affiliated with Keller Williams just over two years ago - smartest move we ever made - in terms of culture, lifestyle, and business model.  But KW is a rather independent place, compared to many of the national franchises.

In the past couple of years, here in Chicago, I have seen many Broker Associates go independent, only to come back to a company after not being able to handle the overhead and legal culpability of a separate entity.

Indeed - going alone is not always as it seems.  I have been told the word "Broker" is abt - most Brokers are "Broke-er" than many of their agents!

Have a great weekend!

DEAN & DEAN'S TEAM CHICAGO

12:04am • #219
716,293 Points 69 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

I also find that when I am really busy, I spend less time at my office.

Just the nature of being busy.

12:51am • #220
501,812 Points 1 Featured Post Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

The best model over time may be:   join a big office, gather a team around you, then go it alone and skip the national franchise fees you no longer need.

4:10am • #221
1,017,121 Points 25 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

I will summarize this post and the 220+ comments made. . 

If you are a rookie and will sell only 3 to 5 properties in 12 months. ..join a franchisee and get trained

If you are selling between 7 and 15 transactions per year. .an independent company will suffice

If you are selling 15 + per year. . you should have your own brokerage

 

If you are selling and paying over $20,000 in fees per year to a franchisee. .. you aren't a good business-person

4:45am • #222
733,596 Points 136 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

I was on the verge of going independent and virtual at one point during the past year, as I contemplated leaving RE/MAX after 20+ years.  Fortunately, I allowed myself an open mind and interviewed with a major traditional firm.  I happened to luck into one of those rare large offices and companies which has a really dynamic Manager and Leaders who motivate, educate and inspire their team of agents - including me. It's a place where an agent goes to get recharged, encouraged, nurtured and energized (as you said) - no internal politics and corporate drudgery.  Fortunately, we all have choices - including consumers - and what's right for one is not right for the next guy.  The trick is to figure out what that is.

6:21am • #223
381,835 Points 19 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

"It's interesting to see how large Brokerages are now demanding an increased share of agent's commissions in order to cover their increased overheads and reduced income as market turnover has plummeted over the last 12 months"

 

My  commission structure has not changed by even one percentage point. There was a recent merger in our area of two large companies and the rumors have started about how the agents will be paying for a lot more than they have in the past with regard to advertising, signs, etc..

7:08am • #224
428,341 Points 8 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

I think it really comes down to personal choice and comfort where someone chooses to practice and also which agent a consumer chooses.  

9:21am • #225
412,293 Points 1 Featured Post

I wouldn't want to be on my own completely, I do like the more traditional office where there is a "good manager who can interact and stir things up"  Energy is lacking in the virtual offices and it's so generic and boring. zi like working from home but it's important to go to an office that is inspiring and there for you when you need it....in every way.  Not many of these left these days.

 Patricia Aulson/Portsmouth NH Real Estate

11:27am • #227
1 Featured Post

While I know you have received tons of comments already, I wanted to give my two cents as well. :)

I obtained my broker's license right out of the gate.  My mother is a real estate agent and has been in the business for years (won't go into how many :)). So I understand how things worked, and I originally had the mind set to start my own private real estate company.  However, after I evaluated the large nation wide brokerages, I realized that they did have some benefits to offer that I would not be able to afford as a small private firm such as discounts for computer software programs, discounts on membership to online programs, discounts for training (such as CCIM), etc.  So I started to dig a little deeper. I eventually joined Keller Williams Realty, and I will tell you why.

  1. Money - lets face it we are all in business to be in business and money keeps the lights on. :)  I realized the cost involved with renting office space, while I would not need a lot of space, still a 800 SF office in a good location runs about $800/month plus NNN.  Then I would want (not need - want) a secretary to be there in case anyone walked into the office. I did not want my customers coming to my office and finding it closed - I find that tacky.  So I would have to hire someone at minimum wage to be a secretary who could also serve as a personal assistant.  So this would run about $240+/week or $960+/month. So for the office setup alone, I figured it would be over $2,500/month by the time you figured in insurance, electricity, etc.  For $40/month, I get my errors & omissions insurance covered and access to all the online KW training, marketing templates, knowledge forums, market statistics, etc. For being a part of KW and for no additional cost, I can use their office building for all my meetings, there is a receptionist there 6 days a week, leverage copy machine, fax, and computers (if I don't have my laptop with me), and I can host any of my training classes there. They have a state of the art projector and AV system. I can choose to have a desk, cubicle, or enclosed office for an additional fee, if I want to.

    Now there is also a commission split involved with a corporate brokerage company. I don't want to forget this in the cost as well because you definitely pay more than $40/month for all the things listed above.  At Keller Williams, you start with the typical 70/30 split (at least I did but everything is negotiable, right? :) ), but there is a yearly cap.  Once you reach that cap, your commission is 100% yours.  Each office has a different cap, depending on market prices, etc.  Our office cap is $23,000 (I hope I can share this. :))  So lets work the numbers:

      office rent, secretary, etc.:  $2,500 (month)        $30,000 / year
      training programs:                                           $1,000 / year
      equipment cost (copier, fax, etc.)                      $5,000
      TOTAL:                                                           $36,000

      KW Monthly Fees  $40/month                           $480 / year
      KW CAP *                                                      $23,000 / year
       TOTAL:                                                         $23,480

    *This amount is only paid in IF you cap, if you do not cap this amount is lower.  So if your business is not doing well you are paying less in for the cap and you are still being able to use all the benefits of the office, meeting rooms, etc.  Where if you have a defined lease term, those costs become fixed costs and have to be met.

    Please note I intentionally did not calculate marketing, computer, telephone, etc. into these prices as they are costs that you are going to have regardless.  I did not put costs for forms as I believe everyone will be using digital forms if not already, so it won't be a cost. This is also meant to be done at a high level.  Also for team members, they are half cap.
  2. Profit Sharing - money part 2 - Keller Williams offers profit sharing to their agents. When you bring an agent into KW, they become part of your profit sharing tree.  The agent does not have to be on your team nor do they even have to be in the same office to be included in your profit sharing tree. I have an agent in my profit sharing tree from Chicago.  You receive profit sharing from the agents in your profit sharing tree from the money that they pay into KW.  So it comes out of their split. There is no additional charge to the agent or to you.  I have a friend who is an agent in Atlanta and she has tracked her profit sharing since starting with the company.  In 2001, her first year of starting in profit sharing she made $521.99 a year, while this doesn't sound like much but it is better than nothing which is what most agents receive for bringing someone into their company.  Plus when someone you have in your profit sharing tree that brings in someone else, you still benefit from that, at a lesser percentage, but you still benefit. If you want more details, please email me. It will get too complicated to go into the details here.  So to go back to my friend and not go on too long about this, she has made an extra $109, 890.86 from February 2001 to 2007 from profit sharing (2001-$521.99, 2002-$5,146.81, 2003-$10,314.13, 2004-$13,863.77, 2005-$22,961.11, 2006-$27,724.52, 2007-$22,696.10).  She always says "this is the only company I know of that you can pay them $18,000 (her cap) per year and receive 120% commission."
  3. Marketing Flexibility - At Keller Williams, I can market my team brand and not the corporate brokerage. Now I do have to include them on marketing materials, but their logo can be at the bottom of the page while my team's logo is at the top of the page. So if I ever choose to do an individual brokerage, my clientelle knows my brand and not my corporate brokerage's brand.  My cell phone number and website address is on all of my marketing materials, not the general corporate brokerages.  Keller Williams provides a website for me to leverage if I choose or they redirect users who search www.kw.com to my team's website.  A lot of other corporate brokerages make you use their website, their template, and do not give a lot of flexibility or function through them. Keller Williams provides marketing templates that are 100% customizable.  So you can take all the work they did, build on it, customize it to fit your team and brand and save time and energy.
  4. Culture - if there is a brand that I wanted to be associated with, it was one with the mission:  God - Family - Business.  It is an amazing place to work and the people go out of their way to help you succeed.  On May 14th, Keller Williams offices around the country (and Canada) gave their time to give back to the community in their Red Day event.  I am sure you can find pictures all over the internet, Facebook, etc. to show you what different offices did for their Red Day celebration.
  5. Training - Keller Williams training is free to all agents.  There may be a cost for the books or materials for the class, but their inhouse training is free.  When they have speakers come in for specific sessions, there might be a fee to cover the speakers costs, but again, these sessions are open to all agents. So anyone on my team can receive free training which lowers my training bucket. I know some agents feel that only new agents need training. I am sorry but I do not agree. If you are not going to some training every year, you are falling behind. You may not realize it, but you will over time. If you are ever learning and ever adjusting, you are going to be able to move with the market and the trends before other agents figure out what is going on.
  6. Family Reunion - Keller Williams hosts their annual conference called Family Reunion. It is a great way to meet agents throughout Keller Williams and learn what other agents are doing in their area, what is working and what is not working. I find it cheaper to learn from others mistakes instead of my own. :)  I have been able to build up an amazing referral database through Family Reunion. Also, as a real estate investor, I am on more distribution lists and learn about emerging deals in all parts of the country. So I am able to be informed of these deals and inform my investor clients who want to get into other markets, get a commission off the deal (or a referral), and add more value to my clients. During the conference, market statistics and an economic outlook are given which again give me great statistics and figures to send to my clients and also leverage in newspaper articles when the press has asked me to comment on the market condition.  I can go on and on about the amazing things you get from Family Reunion, but really, you should check it out for yourself.  That's right - Family Reunion, while it is Keller Williams annual conference, it is available to all agents. So if you want to check out the Keller Williams culture, please come to KW Family Reunion, ask questions, meet the agents and see how great it is. I met several agents from other corporate brokerage firms or who own their own private brokerage this year at Family Reunion that just came to see what Keller Williams is all about.
  7. Charity - Keller Williams does not force me to donate to a specific charity or contribute a specific amount to a charity.  Some of the brokerages around town take a contribution out of their commission check and put it towards the brokerage's contribution to the charity.  I am not against donating to charities. We donate a lot of time and money every year, but it is on our terms not the brokerages.  Keller Williams does have KW Cares which is an organization that helps people in need, and you have the option to donate through your commission check if you want - not a requirement!  KW Cares helped one of our fellow agents pay for medical bills while her family was hit hard with some health problems this year. It felt great to be a part of a company that helps its own during hard times.
  8. Husband-Wife Cap Split - I put this last because it will probably not apply to most of the agents, but for me, it was important. At Keller Williams, husband and wife split a cap, which makes KW especially attractive to husband and wife teams or individual agents.
  9. Less management headaches - by having a team run the office and brokerage, you can focus more of your time on selling and real estate.  Keller Williams does have an ALC - Agent Leadership Council - which you can choose to be on that makes recommendations for the branch.

I am sure this is more information than you were looking for, but I thought I would share my thoughts in some detail.

Best Wishes in 2009!

Katie Kim
The Kim Group
www.thekimgroup.com

 

1:05pm • #228
230,796 Points 7 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Holy cow - it would take me all day to read the comments, but I LOVE the post. I'm on board with you 100%. And from what I've read recently about the 2nd and 3rd waves of foreclosures, I only see it being more difficult for agents to make a living. I left a national franchise and started my own brokerage and am so happy I did. I can afford to sell less, but make the same b/c of the % I'm saving. It should be interested to see how things shake out in the next few years.

1:36pm • #229
367,965 Points 38 Featured Posts Outside Blog Hit Router Called Shot Master

Hi Stewart -  I think every person has different requirements.  Large franchises can be great- the office culture is set by the broker in any case- franchise or independent, large or small.  I love going to a physical office, away from my home.  I function better that way.  Others can work from home.  As a broker/owner-  I support whichever way my agents work.  I don't believe that "inspiring" management is -rreeallllly- going to change someone's internal motivation and work ethic. That always comes from within, it is inherent, and cannot be changed except by oneself.  Excellent topic.

7:04pm • #230
294,624 Points 1 Featured Post

Great post and great comments. I thoroughly enjoyed reading it.

Thanks to everyone for their great comments.

It makes me think about the pros and cons of being with a large franchise.

7:26pm • #231
2 Featured Posts Attended Rain Camp

Stewart,

Great post! Great responses & exchanges!

Due to a lack of time, I will only comment on that "all-important" fee referenced numerous times above (frequently referred to in the DFW part of the world as a "transaction fee").

One of the male agents who commented above is w/CB Corporate said that he does NOT pay that fee, and that if any CB offices charge it, it must be the franchises.

I have been w/CB Corporate AND currently a CB franchise, and that fee is /was charged at both. In fact, the corporate office I was with will charge the agent the fee if the client refuses to pay for it.

I am beginning to think there is NO consistency with it, as I also know KW agents who have been charging that very same fee for several years.

It is what it is.....my personal opinion is that it should be included in the standard commission rate that is charged.

Onward & upward!

Edith Schreiber - Dallas, Texas

8:32pm • #232
230,656 Points 14 Featured Posts Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Stewart: Nice post, and I've followed your other posts along this same theme. I'm a title guy, but I work with agents, brokers, realtors (whatever you want to call them)... And, I work for one of the biggest title companies in the US... (and, we need to be paying attention to this too!)... 

I will now stick foot in mouth, and try to keep talking... The future as I see it is going to challenge big box real estate stores, because as time moves forward and the internet services become richer, more robust, the individual agent is going to (for all intensive purposes) have the same resources. Also, big box doesn't mean what it use to. The consumer (sorry dated term now) is more interested in what VALUE they can recieve, with the least cost, and want it delieverd to them on a more personal level.

We all (can look) and be BIG or SMALL, what ever is appropriate to the customer, on the web. We just need to be able to deliver the goods.

Rene'

9:40pm • #233
JUN
01
2009
Start your own practice. It's the only way to get what you are worth.
12:13am • #234
JUN
03
2009

Leaving the RE/MAX office that I had been with for a dozen years was a hard decision. For years I had worked from home in an office that I had outfitted with way better technology than the office that I was paying a desk fee for. In reality I had been a virtual office Realtor for years.

Cutting the bricks and mortar tie has been liberating and rewarding. Real estate is fun again. I'm now investing what had been my desk fees in areas that give me the greatest ROI. I also have a healthier bottom line.

My advice to any high producers who just can't bring themselves to leaving their broker is "just do it". Then if you feel really bad about leaving your ex(broker) send them on a cruise with a portion of the money you saved not by not paying them a desk fee.

Tryggvi S. Jonsson, CCIIM
8:35pm • #235
AUG
04
2009
1 Featured Post

Stewart,

Man, you really hit a "Nerve" with this topic. LOL It's great that you brought such a controversial topic to the forefront. I enjoyed reading the comments---especially since I've seen witnessed huge transitions from some of the firms members in my area who actually replied to this thread. Maybe corporate headquarters failed to notify some of these members of the companies profits and loss sheets. Sadly, when the market goes south the employees or associates are almost always the last to know.

In all, I think agents gravitate to what works and what suitably fit their DISC personality. There may never be a world with all exclusive virtual offices or all exclusive brick and mortar societies. It just isn't natural for mankind. There will always be great leaders ---willing to dive iin and take risks vs. followers who can thrive and produce fantastic results behind close doors. However, there will never be a society with just one or the other. Take a look around folks: The world is full of Employers and Employees. Who usually reaps the most benefits?

Ownership = Empowerment

Isn't this exactly what we try to educate our Buyers

11:14am • #241
OCT
31
2009

Great post. Thank you for sharing such a nice and important information. Now a days virtual office are becoming more popular among all the business people. They are so interested in using the virtual office. 

 

www.palmbeachvirtualoffice.com

 

ldcls53
7:18am • #243
NOV
05
2009
191,379 Points Attended Rain Camp

Stewart,

 You obviously started a wave!!  I am seeing lots of agents leave the Big Nataional companies and working for themselves!  Great Post!

6:26am • #244
NOV
17
2009
130,756 Points 5 Featured Posts Called Shot Master

Stewart ~ While I've read many of the comments to your post, I'm thinking that this could be taken a step farther into a whole different concept, in real estate anyway. What would the world think of say 4,7, or even 10 small brokerages operating out of a central facility?  Sounds far fetched but the economies of scale combined with power in numbers make sense and would also make it easier to compete in a very competitive environment. 

10:16am • #245
DEC
11
2009
2 Featured Posts

we are going virtual ya'all..it is just a matter of time. It is just a matter of time before business model changes. Our profession needs to get ahead of the curve instead of behind it.

10:09pm • #246
NOV
20
1 Featured Post Outside Blog

Paying so many fees to a brokerage, I would assume that they would give you solid leads. I have read many comments about people not receiving any leads. I am still leaning on going solo.

5:29pm • #247

This blog does not allow anonymous comments