I'm a survivor in real estate long enough to make a lot of observations. Those observations are also often points to ponder. In real estate we are in a commission only. That means, unless a home sells, there is no money to be made. It is a fact also that if a home does not sell there is a cost. Not only do we not make money, we lose more business as word of our inabilities travels faster than the speed of light! From neighborhood to neighborhood, and our competitors start to track our numbers to use on their next listing presentation! So there are home sales, listings, and there are also a lot of expired and withdrawn listings in real estate.
I had a thought the other day on why one agent that is a full time real estate professional will walk away from taking a listing if the listing is not on their terms. Price, paint, and appearance must be in order, and the product has to be a desirable one that there is sure to be a buyer for it somewhere! If the seller doens not agree, "ADIOS!" So it really makes me stop and wonder why an agent will list a dirty home, or take a listing that is way overpriced...even if it never sells! It just doesn't make sense at all! If an agent asks a home seller to paint, replace carpets, kennel the vicious dogs, and price the home to market...if the seller refuses, why list them? "Next.." is a no brainer!
The problem lies in an agent listing a home of a seller that refuses to do anything the agent requests. The seller even refuses to pay the requested commission! The agent still takes it! Is the agent in need of a listing fix? Is the word "No!" in the agent's vocabulary? It must be a low self esteem sort of thing! When an agent takes a listing that will never sell is it because they in an office race to get more listing units on a chalk blackboard even if the listing never sells? Where are we going with this? Are they enabling seller's that will never sell because of a really bad attitude? If this some sort of perverse penance? Does the agent have serious issues when they list a home with a totally uncooperative seller? Does their broker need to intervene and actually train an agent not to bother to take a listing if it is not on their terms? I would tell an agent to not bother, or fire the seller!
The problem does not always lie with the seller. We must ask, "Is the agent more interested in listing homes than selling them?" If so...it doesn't make any sense at all! I've been licensed since 1979, since 92 in Atlanta, and if I do not think there is any chance of a sale, I do not take the listing. Why bother? It is that simple. On those listings we do not take, many times I see the home languish on the market for quite a long time. Agent after agent, the home expires once, then expires again, and then withdrawn. Then the process starts all over again. So when we take a listing with an uncooperative seller, it doesn't get better. If experience shows us that, why bother? It will only get worse! When a contract comes in they will not accept it or work with you on it. When the Inspection counter is placed in front of them that shows their home needs repairs they will look you straight in the eye and say "Who's going to pay for this?" If the buyer needs closing costs an unappreciative seller will say "Pay for it! I'm already paying you a fortune!" Why would this happen? Because these agents have enabled the seller to believe this is how they can treat you. When I look at it this way, I do not feel sorry for the agents. I often think that a lot of the messes agents get in are of their own doing!