Time and time again I see these "Get a 1,000 followers overnight " schemes. You’ll notice I didn’t call them Scams. That’s because they are real and yes you can add massively to your follower list and do so in an automated way.
Is that a good thing? That depends on who. Talk to the marketing/spam machine guy who looks at Twitter as a giant billboard for what they’re selling and I’m guessing they’ll say that’s a very good thing. Why can’t they add 10,000 followers overnight? Why can’t they just add them all?
Then there’s the other side of the coin. The many people who look at Twitter in a different way. They are not interested in follower numbers. As a matter of fact they struggle to keep their following in the hundreds not the thousands. Why?
Rain Clouds
I’ve written about this before. (http://areweconnected.com/2008/12/ive-only-got-two-ears/ ) Think of each follower as a tiny rain cloud. Each rain cloud adds it’s own trickle to your Twitter Stream (the combined tweets of all those you follow). Add enough tiny rain clouds and your stream turns into a swift moving current. To them Twitter is a great place to build real relationships by having real 2-way conversations with them. Too fast a stream and they lose the ability to catch those conversations that are most important to them.
Personally I have a foot in both camps. I don’t subscribe to the arbitrary following of mass people but I do want to reach out, meet and start a conversation with as many people as possible. I’ll follow most anyone who follows me first as long as they abide by my Twitter Follow Policy . Currently I’m hovering around 4,000 follows (I trimmed almost 700 in deadwood the other day). Can I possibly hope to have real conversations with 4,000 people? Not a chance.
Slowing Down the Stream
Like the mass following people that have automated their twitter marketing machine we too can use technology to achieve our goals. It’s really very simple. I’ve created in both Seesmic Desktop and Tweetdeck a special column that I’ve called my “Slow Stream”. It’s a Group or UserList of 100 of my closest twitter friends. These are the people I want to make sure I catch. Think of it as a slowly moving eddie off the side of a Class VI Rapids. People come and go in my slow stream. I’ll put people on who have engaged with me in the past, or ReTweeted something numerous times, or even some of those that are icons (like many of those in the top row of my header).
Now that you’ve got the idea, here’s how to slow down your stream using the Seesmic Desktop:
This post brought to you courtesy of Mike Mueller. Feel free to ReBlog or ReTweet as you like as long as you credit the source (him). Did you know? He's for hire! He builds Blogs, Graphic Images and Widgets and Facebook Pages and besides… He knows lots of really cool stuff.
Lane - I'm ok with 10,000 followers after all that gives you a much larger social reach. Just as long as you slow a section of it down enough to make it easy to engage with those you wish to.
I love using http://untweeps.com/ to trim the deadwood. I cna mass unfollow those that have not Tweeted in 30 60 or 90 days. That's fodder for another post : )
Mike - Thanks for the information. Fortunately, or should I say unfortunately, I don't have a problem like you with 4,000 followers. I am still trying to reach 100. When I do get too large, I will look into seesmic to slow down my stream.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
;)
;)
I have about 1000, and that is bad. Looking at the stream with 4000 would make me crazier. I need to trim some brush, too...