Hello everyone - it is June 21st - Father's Day and everything here is lush, lush, lush! We were in a drought here in Atlanta for the last few years but it has rained cats and dogs here and all the
lakes are now at full pool.
Here are some examples of listing agents that don't deserve to be paid to market homes. These are agents that I know personally charge at least 3% to the seller.

This house is listed for $ 7,920,000
It has acerage!
This is an example of how Lush the landscaping is right now.


Nice blue winter sky and dead grass!
Listed at $ 1,875,000

Another beauty listed at $1,800,000
What are these agents thinking?

Yet another mansion listed at $1,695,000

How about this one - know any buyers who want to
buy a SPOOKY home for $1,599,000
I could spend all night doing this - I only made it through 32 listings to find these beauties.
The question is, is the real estate agent doing their part to bring buyers to the property by having this as a representative of the property? I really have a bone to pick with this type of marketing and a high fee
to boot! No wonder the public is confused. The sad thing is that the sellers have probably not even bothered to look at their listing. They just wonder why no one stops in to see the house...
Rhonda - As I pointed out in a post earlier this week, in this market, presentation is critical--inside and out. If you turn off a buyer when they turn in, you've lost them.