foreclosureOver the past 6 years I’ve been in real estate, I’ve done a lot of owner financing and lease option deals for owners and buyers. But until this last summer I had never had a situation where a property was given back on a lease option or a home owner had to foreclose on a buyer.

But, there was a difference with the buyers and sellers of these properties versus the ones that were in pre-foreclosure with the banks. The sellers (who also were the bank on these sales) were willing to listen to the buyers and their situations and if they could help they did. A loan modification took only one day and wasn’t full of false promises and the seller did exactly what they said they were going to do and so did the buyer.

In one case the sales price didn’t change, but the amount they were paying each month did, the seller lowered the amount they were paying and extended the length of the loan 10 years and lowered the interest rate for the buyer by 1%. The seller was happy, they didn’t have to foreclose, and the buyer was happy, they were keeping their home, it truly was a win-win!

But, what happens when the seller does have to foreclose? I had this happen this last summer as the buyer had lost their business and was filing for bankruptcy. The buyer called the seller, the seller answered the phone, and guess what, they talked it out. The buyer was willing to move out as long as they promised not to put the foreclosure on their credit since they had been paying up to that point. (A deed in lieu of foreclosure.)

The buyer was out in 30 days with their credit in tact. The seller had two years worth of payments totaling $48,000 and the property had only lost $23,000 in equity during that time and they got a $10,000 down payment when the person bought it. From first phone call to being back on the market was a total of 13 days! Net loss to the seller was a big zero, because they acted quickly and worked with the buyer for a win-win for everyone.

But, what if the seller had to take a loss? Let us say the property value went down more than the amount paid to them had been? What then? Would they have taken longer to make a decision? Would they have called their congressman for bailout money? Why should the banks get bailout money, while the government talks about ending owner financing? These owners weren't predatory, they were just trying to make money like the banks were, the only difference was they didn’t have red tape and stupidity on their side when things started to go south on the payments. They didn’t tell the buyer that they couldn’t help them until they were behind on their payments, they didn’t say sorry can’t help you now your credit has been ruined.

Maybe the government should learn from the private sector and stay out of business and let business take care of itself as the private home owners have.


Todd Clark's Signature

Todd Clark - Broker / Sales Coach
Palazzo Realty Group
Phone: (503)524-9494
Fax: (503)622-8739

Contact meSubscribeSearch the MLSView my website

Most recent post Last post before this one

Daily list of short sales available in Beaverton, Oregon

Twitter Bird by Janko.

©2009 Todd Clark - Banks aren’t the only ones being hit with foreclosures, but there is a difference – NO BAILOUT!
 
This post has been included in Oregon Information Washington County, OR Information Beaverton, OR Information
Post is included in group: "Whacked"!!!
Post is included in group: Real Estate Trends
Post is included in group: Dedicated Bloggers
Post is included in group: Club Chaos
Post is included in group: America's Best Agents

36 Comments on Banks aren’t the only ones being hit with foreclosures, but there is a difference – NO BAILOUT!

JUL
09

Todd,

Working personally with someone, as in these situations, does add a warm touch. The banking institutions have so much on their plate and they don't know these buyers, their families, and usually they are too busy to listen to a family's struggles, so their response would not have been "let's work through this together and make it work." It's usually, too bad so sad.

2:05am • #1
401,407 Points 15 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Todd:  This is quite a story.  It is obvious you perform a wonderful service for both your buyers and your sellers.  There are so many who would never have bought or sold if it were not for you.  What a great job you do... and what a "win-win" tale you tell.   :)

2:15am • #2
333,826 Points 5 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Todd, I can assure you that the banking institutions can not follow the private sector when it comes to foreclosures because. .it just makes too much sense and their jobs will be eliminated.

5:32am • #3
6 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Never thought of this aspect, Todd. Thanks for the heads-up in case it comes my way.

5:52am • #4

A big round of applause to you, your sellers, and your buyers for working together to find a solution.

Of course the government and the banks don't get it.....

1. It's simple

2. It works.

3. It's the moral and ethical thing to do.

5:56am • #5
289,520 Points 4 Featured Posts Outside Blog

We only wish the banks were as smart. Something I use on lease options or is a third party collection service to ensure the mortgage is being paid. It work great on owner finance as well. Virgin money.com

6:50am • #6
140,456 Points 4 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor

The reason they don't is they don't have too.  The government gave them our money to enable them to continue to act irresponsible and not be accountable.

Bailouts are a cancer.

7:04am • #7
596,659 Points 82 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Todd...

I think that these these "common sense" approaches would do wonders for the system. Of course, banks having common sense is an oxymoron!

7:13am • #8

Morning Todd, this seems like the logical way to deal with the buyer. I guess that the key here and what banks are obviously missing is being simple & logical.

Your last paragraph sums it up well, the only difference was they didn’t have red tape and stupidity on their side when things started to go south on the payments. They didn’t tell the buyer that they couldn’t help them until they were behind on their payments, they didn’t say sorry can’t help you now your credit has been ruined.

 

7:29am • #9
261,758 Points 2 Featured Posts Hit Router

Hi Todd -- I find it dismaying that with all the TARP money, bailouts, etc., have been and are being spent, we are still in a big fat mess with no end in sight.

7:44am • #10
401,392 Points 1 Featured Post Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

It is too bad the bank representatives don't think of it as their money. How would you try to help the buyer if it was your money? Too many rules and hoops to jump through and everyone trying to move the problem loan to a different department so they don't have to deal with it.

7:48am • #11
341,367 Points 4 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Todd - the government can't allow something this simple that works without their interference, and especially without their lobbiests getting a piece of the action that will be passed along.

8:03am • #12
305,107 Points 27 Featured Posts Outside Blog Hit Router

Todd -

This makes sense, of course!

But when you add the levels of bureaucracy and business ego - "If we're easy on one borrower, everyone will catch on and take us to the cleaners," say the banks - it will never work.

In reality, a very small number of owners are holding paper on defaulting borrowers, so the attitude of those holding notes is not likely to rub off on the economy, and lending environment as a whole.

Too bad, though!

DEAN & DEAN'S TEAM CHICAGO

8:04am • #13
119,842 Points 1 Featured Post

I don't think the banks will ever follow a common sense approach. Remember, they have been bought by the government.

8:37am • #14
357,931 Points 22 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Home Run dude....the government needs to back out and quit ruining things.  Today's news????  A second ""stimulus package?""  Come one!!!!

8:52am • #17
Localism Sponsor

Keeping the dialogue going is the best way to achieve a positive outcome. The government has good intentions but is mired by the ineptness of the bureaucratic processes.

8:55am • #18
154,401 Points 4 Featured Posts

Great work on your part. For the same reason I stay more involved pon local politics and local charities because as individuals we can make a difference. Insitutions set rules that sometimes seem like we don't care about your shape, we are going to force you down the round hole. I wish as local professionals we were trusted more so that the type of success you are having can be a bit more global.

9:53am • #19
5 Featured Posts Outside Blog Hit Router

Great share of your experience.  Not having done much seller financing, this was good to hear.

10:01am • #20
223,372 Points 2 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Hi Todd...Great Post, Congratulations on yet another Gold Star...can I get you to write my Posts too:O))

When a Home owner and Mortgage company come to terms on giving back a home, the Sellers signs a Quick Claim to move the change of ownership quickly and saving the mortgage holder the time and costs of a foreclosure..

Talking does help.

Cheers, thanks for sharing :O)

10:29am • #21
260,536 Points 30 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Todd....what a great Post for my first read in weeks :)  Communication cannot be stressed enough, and you are right if the Banks and Big Business listened to us instead of the high paid experts things might be different :)

10:47am • #22
189,849 Points Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Todd, simply stated and so true.  I love Richard's comment on "common sense:.

10:52am • #23
Outside Blog

I hate to disagree with everyone, but I really think it's unfair to lump all banks together.  I've found that if you approach most banks properly, you can get great results from many of them.  I will admit that there are some that are TERRIBLE to deal with, and that most take longer than I would like, but in general it is not as bad as all the hype.  I've even had some short sales, deeds in lieu, and loan modifications approved in as little as a few hours.

11:18am • #24
216,866 Points 34 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Todd,  your examples show you the beauty of the free market.  There was no government interference and these people worked it out.  That's why I'd like to see government downsized to it's Constitutionally stated functions.  Most of the time government interference distorts the common sense solutions of the free market.  Thanks for the great post.

2:00pm • #25
206,131 Points 19 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Wow! Todd,

"Maybe the government should learn from the private sector and stay out of business and let business take care of itself as the private home owners have."   That nails most of the problem!

Your comparison between home owners/sellers and banks gets most of the rest. Even the rest came about because of government demagogy! There was a time when bank officers had responsibility and made decisions. Government interference forced a change now no one has any vi sable authority.

Bankers hide behind committees, nurmous layered committees so that one one person is identifiable as rresponsible, the home owner can make a quick decision because they speak and think for themselves.

Great post!

Bill

2:03pm • #26

I definitely see eye to eye with you - The more we can keep the government out of our affairs & work things out on a private/preofessional level the better!

Best,
Dan

3:16pm • #27
231,691 Points 5 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Todd -- "Maybe the government should learn from the private sector and stay out of business and let business take care of itself as the private home owners have."  --- Amen --- Congrats on your feature -- hey, we both got features --- mine was yesterday.

Mama Liz's Signature

4:03pm • #28
156,749 Points 1 Featured Post

Finally something positive coming out of seller financing.  Usually you hear the stories about the home they are supposed to be purchasing being foreclosed on.

I spoke to such a buyer not too long ago.

6:24pm • #29
160,935 Points 9 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Todd - It's sad to think, but oh so true, those of us who are entrepeneurial in spirit can and will get things done in a faster, often easier way, to the mutual benefit of all parties. It's because we're not bogged down with rules and bureaucracy that solutions can happen. A smaller government would be a good start, but how do you foster the desire to be an entrepeneur and be in charge of your own destiny? It seems to be a message lost on future generations...

6:33pm • #30
319,990 Points 8 Featured Posts Outside Blog Hit Router

It is a rarity to see a BANK making a decision that makes sense. Perhaps if the decision makers had skin in the game and it was THEIR loss or their house, they'd care more and make smart decisions.

8:24pm • #31
592,815 Points 34 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Common sense doesn't come FROM government... it is forced UPON government.  It is getting closer to the time they are going to have that forced upon them soon...  I hope, anyway.

8:26pm • #32
467,619 Points 13 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Todd common sense seem to escape many these days.  I am sure both your buyers and sellers are happy to have you and your negotiation skills in their corner.

10:48pm • #33
361,431 Points 3 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Todd,

Why does it seem the owner financing has so much more common sense?  Is it because they know they can't go running to Uncle Sam?

What would happen to the whole housing market if this could happen with the banks?

11:39pm • #34
JUL
10
325,844 Points Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Todd

Recently I had to forclose on a property. We were fortunate enough to get it back and recoup all of our losses and do a cash sale the second go round wihin a couple of months. No government help here.

10:24pm • #36
JUL
12
872,828 Points 68 Featured Posts Outside Blog

I think the government would be better off listening to the people on the street rather than the bank executives and the lobbiest that got us in to this mess in the first place, but like we said, that isn't the governments way.

Todd Clark - www.LivingBeaverton.com

9:13pm • #37

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Helping_families_home_-_activerain Ambassador_large

Todd Clark (Broker) (503)524-9494 (Beaverton, Oregon Real Estate Expert)

Beaverton, OR

More about me…

Palazzo Realty Group

Address: Beaverton, Tigard, Aloha, Hillsboro, Tualatin, Portland, Oregon City, Sherwood, Lake Oswego, Gresham, West Linn, OR

Office Phone: (503) 524-9494

Cell Phone: (503) 524-9494

Email Me

Helping Families Home is a blog set up to teach you to invest your money and maximize your profits in Real Estate. Starting with your first home all the way to your 150th investment property. Creating wealth through real estate is the best way to financial freedom.


rets



Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find OR real estate agents and Beaverton real estate on ActiveRain.