Over
the past 6 years I’ve
been in real estate, I’ve done a lot of owner financing and lease
option deals
for owners and buyers. But until this last summer I had
never had a
situation
where a property was given back on a lease option or a home owner had
to
foreclose on a buyer.
But,
there was a difference
with the buyers and sellers of these properties versus the ones that
were in
pre-foreclosure with the banks. The sellers (who also were the bank on
these
sales) were willing to listen to the buyers and their situations and if
they
could help they did. A loan modification took only one day and wasn’t
full of
false promises and the seller did exactly what they said they were
going to do
and so did the buyer.
In one case the sales
price didn’t change, but the amount they were
paying each
month did, the seller lowered the amount they were paying
and extended
the
length of the loan 10 years and lowered the interest rate for the buyer
by 1%.
The seller was happy, they didn’t have to foreclose, and the buyer was
happy,
they were keeping their home, it truly was a win-win!
But,
what happens when the
seller does have to foreclose? I had this happen this last
summer as
the buyer
had lost their business and was filing for bankruptcy. The buyer called
the
seller, the seller answered the phone, and guess what, they talked it
out. The
buyer was willing to move out as long as they promised not to put the
foreclosure on their credit since they had been paying up to that
point. (A
deed in lieu of foreclosure.)
The
buyer was out in 30 days
with their credit in tact. The seller had two years worth
of payments
totaling
$48,000 and the property had only lost $23,000 in equity during that
time and
they got a $10,000 down payment when the person bought it. From first
phone
call to being back on the market was a total of 13 days! Net loss to
the seller
was a big zero, because they acted quickly and worked with the buyer
for a
win-win for everyone.
But,
what if the seller had
to take a loss? Let us say the property value went down more than the
amount
paid to them had been? What then? Would they have taken
longer to make
a
decision? Would they have called their congressman for bailout money?
Why
should the banks get bailout money, while the government talks about
ending
owner financing? These owners weren't predatory, they were just trying to
make
money like the banks were, the only difference was they didn’t have red
tape
and stupidity on their side when things started to go south on the
payments.
They didn’t tell the buyer that they couldn’t help them until they were
behind
on their payments, they didn’t say sorry can’t help you now your credit
has
been ruined.
Maybe
the government should
learn from the private sector and stay out of business and let business
take
care of itself as the private home owners have.
Todd Clark - Broker / Sales Coach
Palazzo Realty Group
Phone: (503)524-9494
Fax: (503)622-8739




©2009
Todd Clark - Banks
aren’t the only ones being hit with foreclosures, but there is a
difference – NO BAILOUT!
Todd,
Working personally with someone, as in these situations, does add a warm touch. The banking institutions have so much on their plate and they don't know these buyers, their families, and usually they are too busy to listen to a family's struggles, so their response would not have been "let's work through this together and make it work." It's usually, too bad so sad.