I received an email from a buyer who wanted to know if he was getting jerked around on a request by the seller. The seller would only accept his contingent offer if he listed his home with a real estate agent.
He stated that his area is pretty hot right now and thought that he would be able to sell his home himself without the help of a real estate agent. He thought that the listing agent was making an unreasonable request in wanting him to have it listed with an agent.
I thought I'd throw the question out and maybe he could see various opinions here.
As a seller, I would never take an offer that was contingent on the sale of another home that wasn't under contract, let alone a home not even listed yet. I just don't see the reason to do that. You take your home off the market and hope that another one sells instead? Throw in the possibility of the other transaction being put together and proceeding without any professional guidance and I think you have the makings of a very stressful situation.
I get nervous when a contract is contingent on completing the sale of a home that is already under contract. Before this is acceptable:
- I want to see a signed contract
- I want to know that the buyer of the other home has his loan approved.
- I want to have it past the inspection contingency period
- I want to see a large amount of earnest money.
- I also want to talk to the agents involved in that transaction to get a sense of how solid the deal is.
Do you think sellers should accept an offer that is contingent on the sale of another home?
Do you demand that the other home be listed with a real estate agent?
Comments(12)