Ar_home_b_search
 

This is part 2 of my "Are you crazy" post. You can read part 1 here. I referenced the so-called "strategy" of those who voluntarily stop paying their mortgages.  And, based on your responses, I wanted to do a second posting on this issue and why it is so important that we as industry professionals encourage not only our clients, but also our friends and families, to stay the course of continuing to make their monthly mortgage payments-even when they are hearing other ideas from the media and other sources you reported in your blog comments. 

 The 7-Year Credit Hit

Most of us know that negative credit listings stay on our report for 7 years.  But what many don't realize is how far-reaching those effects are-or how they've become far more significant over the last few years.  

It used to be that you could file bankruptcy or go through a foreclosure, then go out and buy a car within a few weeks.  Sure, you'd pay a slightly higher interest rate, but other than that it didn't slow you down much.   Well, not any more.  One of my cousins recently went through a bankruptcy and then tried to buy a $3,000 car.    No one-and I mean NO ONE-would lend them money.    His mother had to lend him the money.  But that's not where it ended.   He had a hard time getting insurance because-you guessed it-they checked his credit report.  Later, they had difficulties trying to switch electric companies for their home...because they checked his credit. 

The scariest one to me?  A friend mistakenly decided to "give" her house back to her bank.  Quite the gift, no?   Well, this one kept on giving:  she was later turned down for a really great job because they pulled her credit and believed that her failure to make payments was a reflection of her level of (or lack of, as the case may be) responsibility.    And she's not alone in this type of situation. 

In short: making payments isn't just about keeping your house.  It's about keeping your future.

Long-Term "Forced" Savings

For a lot of Americans, their home has always been a part of their retirement plan.  My folks worked hard and, even if they couldn't put a lot into their savings account, they made their mortgage payment religiously.  The result was that when they were ready for retirement, their home was paid for and their retirement income stretched a lot farther.

Those who believe that retirement planning should only include investments in the stock or bond markets are amazingly short-sighted.  I've been in the financial services industry for over 30 years, and I can tell you that most folks aren't going to have enough money in the long run to live a comfortable lifestyle if they still have a mortgage payment. 

As you make your payment every month essentially translates into a forced savings.   Your mortgage balance decreases and your equity ultimately increases-even if it means that you have to wait for the market to correct.   If you eventually owe nothing on that house, imagine the world of possibilities that are opened to you.   And the worlds that will be closed if you pay rent for the rest of your life.

Life-and Real Estate-Are Always Full of Ups and Downs

Anyone who's ridden the real estate rollercoaster before understands that it's full of ups and downs.   The market can't always be peaking.  It has to slide in order to climb again.  California goes through real estate "bumps" about every ten years: it climbs, it falls, it climbs, it falls.   Admittedly, we've seen it take a hit over the past few years-but we'd also seen it climb higher than ever in the previous five. 

Voluntarily deciding to stop making your mortgage payments because your entry into the real estate market was ill-timed is not only unwise, but also smacks of a spoiled child who cries because he can't have a cookie until after dinner.  Sometimes you just have to exercise a little bit of patience to get the reward.  Both when it comes to cookies and to profiting in real estate.

Adding to the Problem

I made mention of this one in my last posting, but feel that it cannot be emphasized enough:  with every foreclosure that takes place on its streets, the property values in a neighborhood tumble.  And that's not all that declines.   

Mortgage banks, who have suddenly found themselves with a flood of properties on their books-properties that they never wanted to own despite some public opinion-hire companies specializing in REO properties to secure and market them.  They're also supposed to try to maintain the properties as best they can. 

A guy I've known for years is in the REO business, and he tells me that they are so overwhelmed that they simply don't have time to care for the properties.  That means that the grass goes unmowed, windows that are broken may never be repaired, and pipes burst in the winter because they were not properly winterized.  These properties not only pull down neighborhood values-they also become a blight on that neighborhood. 

In truth, if people want to see their home, neighborhood-and investment-maintain their values, they should do everything to keep it looking good rather than becoming part of the problem.  Hey-if mowing my former neighbor's yard on occasion meant that my property value wouldn't tumble irrevocably, you'd better bet I'd be on my John Deere getting the job done.  I wouldn't just say "hasta la vista" to my house, walking away after tossing the key through the mail slot because I didn't think there was anything more I could do. 

Agree or disagree?  Tell me what you're thinking.

 

101 Comments on Are you crazy? Stop paying your mortgage is "strategic"? Part 2

JUL
21
2009

Look that's all nice you want to worry about other homeowners but the truth is: EVERY HOMEOWNER NEEDS TO MAKE THIS DECISION BY THEMSELVES.

There is no right or wrong here if you owe to much on your home you are a renter plain and simple. You will be debtor zombie if you are under water on your home to far.

Let the market do what it is supposed to do, give your home back the bank will price it right so it will sell and the next owner will have the ability to own a home at the correct price.

There is a need for a stable housing market and this will be done by market forces not homeowners keeping property thousands of dollars upside down for a credit rating.

GIVE IT BACK!! GIVE IT BACK!! GIVE THE OVERPRICED HOME BACK TO THE BANK!

 

Ken
2:37pm • #1
1,156,078 Points 116 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Interesting thoughts by Ken.  I think we are going to see more strategic foreclosures in the next two quarters.  If an owner can't refinance and lenders won't lower the mortgage value to the market value, should homeowners be foreced to eat up their entire savings to stay in their home?  I think this should be a wake up call to the mortgage companies.  If they think they have a mess on their hands know wait until this next round of homeowners takes a walk! 

2:41pm • #2
285,915 Points 20 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Called Shot Master

[they are so overwhelmed that they simply don't have time to care for the properties . . . grass goes unmowed, windows that are broken may never be repaired, and pipes burst in the winter  . . .]

And you should see the pools! (We FINALLY got this cleaned and 'shocked' right before COE fortunately but the banks are overwhelmed. I thought the loan goddess was gonna faint when she saw it. ;) )

 

 

 

 

 

 

3:17pm • #3
3 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Ken,

Remember we are talking about people who can afford their mortgage payment and decide to quit paying. They will reap the rewards of their decision. In the case of those who can't afford the payment then the market forces will reprice the home and eventually (hopefully) the inventory will be eaten up and we will get a floor to prices on homes.

Thanks for your comments and I agree that not everyone fits into the shoebox I was trying to address my comments to.

7:17pm • #4
JUL
22
2009

Obviously, you are't in Florida or one of the top 10 states for foreclosures or you must be working for the banks.  Your advice is historically correct, but we are in an unprecedented meltdown that will be going on for at least another eight years. 

Keith Kropp
8:24am • #5

Please define the word "afford". 

Matt Kofsky
8:32am • #6
146,218 Points 38 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp

Interesting thoughts Mark.

Compare your article with the research data that you will find in my recent article - apparently "life's ups and downs" does have its limits, according to the article and report.

My article on "Strategic Defaults" is at WALK AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY - STRATEGIC MORTGAGE DEFAULTS GROW TO 26%

8:36am • #7
787,333 Points 20 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

In some cases the homeowner has no choice other than to become delinquent if they want a Short Sale approved.  While we have closed Short Sales where the Seller is current, we recently ran into a situation where the servicer (Chase) "approved" it and Fannie Mae declined it because the Seller was current!  It's an easy fix - but takes an additional 6 to 8 weeks.....

8:40am • #8
Hit Router

Mark,

This is a too simplistic and polyanna-ish an approach to a monumental problem. Many people simply cannot afford the homes that they bought which were over-priced which some lender told them they could afford. Yes, we's like to think that everyone researches and makes informed decisions, but who among us (not many) saw the ulitmate proportions of the bubble burst? For many people it is not a choice to go or stay, but an inevitability of how long they can hang in there - and some are hanging in far too long -depleting all available credit and savings and still leaving the homes broke and broken. it is a sad scenario and I think for the lion's share of people who are deciding to leave -it's not about irresponsibility but survival for their families.

 

8:42am • #9

Myself as a broker have made the decision to walk away from my rental property. after attempting to negotiate a loan modofication for over 1 year, with no end in sight, i made a conscious decision for a rental that has a balance of approx. 650k and now worth $175k...., and hard nosed banks who state that the loan mod offered would still not cover but 60% of the rental value.. This is not rocket science to me in my decision at all, historically speaking i have had a 780 credit score all of my adult life; however this mortgage meltdown didnt start with me abd wont end there either.. Despite my ability to maintain 3 major credit cards, I have made major shifts in dealing with debt on a CASH ONLY LIVING Basis.  I believe if more of us employ that philosophy, we will help ourselves and the next generation to not have to start over again economically for buying what we cant by cash afford....(food for though, I feel totally liberated and in control of my own life now).

Jacquelyn C.
8:44am • #10
1,480,027 Points 275 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Mark, these are both great posts.   Still, I think a lot of people are finding it increasingly easy to rationalize taking this route.  They are seeing the banks whoi won't help them rework their loans getting bunches of their taxpayer money.  They are seeing their home's value fall into the toilet, and it's becoming easier and easier to rationalize a walk away strategy.

8:44am • #11

Having experienced first hand the absolute arrogance of the banks and lenders who will not lift a finger to renegotiate or even attempt to provide temporary assistance to the homeowner, I think that in many instances owners are RIGHT to stop paying the mortgage, perhaps not morally but certainly strategically. MONEY is the ONLY thing the banks understand - withhold it and suddenly they want to talk, want to be your new best frend, want to explore solutions.  The thinking goes a little like this - if the banks can get a bail out, then I want some of it.  Difficult to fault in this 'its all about me' society in which we live.

8:46am • #12
149,138 Points 6 Featured Posts Outside Blog

I have no idea how the reo and short sale market is near you but here anyway in SW Florida we're seeing many people default. Whether they can afford the payment or not. When they look at the fact that they owe $800,000 on a house worth $300,000 and know that it may never get back to $800,000 they can't see the light at the end of the tunnel. I would never encourage someone to default but put in that same position I would certainly consider it. Sure the market continues to decline because of all of this but by having a few rigteous people holding out isn't going to change the big picture. I think everyone in a sticky situation should seek legal counsel right away to decide what makes the most sense for their specific situation.

8:49am • #13

I have a friend in California who owns a house that he purchased for about 1.2M. Took a 2nd mortage during the boom and now owes about 1.4M total.

Now since this whole housing "crisis" comps for his home at are about 700k and the REO homes in his area are going as low as $500k. he told me he pays $8,500/month for PITI and HOA dues. He also said there are now rentals in his development (same house pretty much) for 3k per month.

He tried to get a loan mod with his bank, but because he makes his payments and because of the value of the home they wont due it. So what motivation does he have to keep paying his mortage for a house that he is 700k upside down in? Its value is 50% of what he owes. It could take forever for home prices to rise enough to ever get him back to just even.

Why pay the $8500/month when he can rent the same home for 3k per month? Making that payment on a house that much upside down makkes no sense.

Mark
8:55am • #14

It's not all the homeowner. The banks are not listening and not helping when someone WANTS to stay in their home. In the real estate industry, my income went from $140,000/year to $40,000! think I could make payments? heck no, I could barely eat. I was 4 months behind, talking with my lender almost weekly, and asking, PLEADING for help. Once things picked up again and I could afford the payment all I asked for was them to put my arrears at the end of the loan. (by then 6 months behind) Would they help, NO. Instead they foreclosed and sold the house for HALF what I owed. Smart business?? They are idiots. I was willing to keep the house, did not ask for a loan reduction, (many have and got it) only a shift of payments due, to being "paying as arranged". Its not all the consumers fault, the big guys don't give a darn about us. Now my credit is ruined, renting instead of owning, really bites!!! And I was just a victim of the real estate collapse, I did not cause it! I was willing to be a player. Bitter, YES, I am, my retirement home is now someone elses and for so much less!!! 

MERT
8:59am • #15

We have a lot of forclosures around here in Madisonville, Tn. Not only forclosures but 'Short sale' properties also. And the same problems for both. I have several 'short sale' properties listed and the neighbors are calling me every day ( a different neighbor every day), complaining about the condition of the property ( the broken windows, yard needs mowing, guttering falling off etc....). They expect me to do something about the problems. Most of the 'Short sale' properties are empty. But the neighbors  should not take responsibilty and do the work because  they may havean accident on the property, people will sue. One side or the other.

Sheila Scruggs
9:04am • #16
188,613 Points 23 Featured Posts

Mark,

Nice post. It is relevant to a small portion of folks that have no skin in the game. If they followed your advice, it would have minimal impact. The large majority of people that are falling behind would not understand negative equity if you stapled it to their forehead.

They can not afford their payments. 

They are neglecting other bills or living expenses to send the mortgage payment. They are sinking. The value of the property is not the issue. They can not afford to stay.

They can continue depleting all resources and then find themselves homeless because at that point no one will even rent to them or they can stop paying a couple months, use the money to move into a rental and let the bank have the home or negotiate a short sale.

When an agent has a fiduciary relationship with a client, the agent can not be concerned with the impact of their advice on the neighborhood. The agent can not be concerned with what others may think is the right thing to do. The agent has to have their clients best interest at heart.

I believe that doing everything you can to make sure they continue having a roof over their head is at the top of the list. 

Your obligation is not to the holder of the first, second or third trust. There are documents that outline the agreement with all mortgage holders. You must explain to your client the real facts. 

In many cases, if they stay and continue to attempt to pay, they are throwing money in a black hole. It will not make their situation better. The do not have the capacity to fix the situation. 

It does not matter what government dollars are being allocated elsewhere. You are sitting with people that need to hear the truth. 

The truth often is.........stop paying, rent a new home and then deal with this problem.

9:08am • #17

I have been involved in 5 or 6 short sales and the banks wouldn't consider them until they were on the market for at least 30 days and they had to be 30 days behind.

 My thoughts were let them get 30days late, pay interest only on the mortgage and get it under contract ASAP. This way the seller would just have a couple 30 day lates on their reports and should be able to escape their problem without any long term distruction of their credit report.

 Rent for one year and buy themselfs a home that won't be upside down at that time.

 

9:09am • #18

I totally agree. Neighbors need to help each other. As we all learned when we were little, that's what a good neighbor does. good blog. Sue

9:14am • #19

I'm sorry I completely disagree with some of the statements. I'm in Florida and responsibilty or not the Banks are not making financially wise decisions when it comes to modifications and they deserve what they get. I tried to refinance and even offered to pay down my Mortgage 60-70K and they said no. All I wanted for them to do was lock in my adjustable rate before my payment sky rockets and I really cant afford it.  I asked for no principal reduction besides what I pay down myself and I didnt ask for a lower interest rate and they wouldnt do it. My house is upside down 150K already and getting worse. When I called Citimortgage the guy basically told me we wont do any thing till your 3-4 payments behind. So even though I can afford payment right now I have to force the issue and default till they talk to me and believe me they will eventually. I have over 30-40 clients I have told to stop paying and put the money aside so you can bring it up todate later before you lose home and 75% of them have been able to refinance or modify. Some times you have to force the issue.

Greg
9:18am • #20

I have a client who was upside-down on a rental property.  He spoke with his lender, who advised him to do a short sale.  He had never been late with the mortgage but the lender said he had to miss payments for at least 3 months to qualify for the short sale.  He stopped paying the mortgage and the short sale closed last week, 10 months after I listed it.  Now he finds that the same lender--in this case, Bank of America--listed all of those missed payments as "lates" on his credit score.  These will haunt him much longer than the short sale.  What a crazy system!

Joanna Hynes
9:19am • #21
125,670 Points Attended Rain Camp

I'll bet that many of those who can "afford" their payments are working 50-60 hours a week to pay for their houses.  I really want to know what "afford" means from this study.

I am saddened by what has happened, but I am thrilled that the lenders are wising up and tightening credit terms.  This market will stabilise in due time and unfortunately, all of us will have to pay the price.

Someone said, "never say never" - but let's hope this travesty in the market NEVER happens again.

9:21am • #22

Keep in mind with credit repair you can get a FHA loan in 2-3 years after a foreclosure and can clean up credit to be right back out there in a short period. Yes it stays there for 7 years but with credit scoring now days most people dont go back more then 3 years.

Greg
9:22am • #23
Outside Blog

Walking away from your mortgage seems "unamerican"".  We are by nature honorable people.  It's such a shame that folks are pushed to the limit like this.  I know it hurts them to the core to have to do this... especially the boomers.  I was showing waterfront homes yesterday, and I told my client that there's a sad story behind every one of the "good deals" you see on the market.

We don't have many foreclosures here in Williamsburg, VA.  But, we are starting to see an increase in short sales.  It's very frustrating for buyers to try to buy one of these because the banks are so unresponsive.  I guess they don't have the staff or the systems in place.  Hopefully, management will "wake up" soon and start putting more resources here.

We are feeling the pain of the buyers who are coming here to retire.  Most have their homes on the market elsewhere.  And those that have sold took big hits!

9:23am • #24

In reading the original post, along with all the responses, it is obvious that there is no one solution.  The ramifications of walking away from a home mortgage are long lived in todays society. 

However, when a bank refuses to work with the existing homeowner, I believe they share a huge brunt of the repsonsibility.  Over and over again, the banks have shown that they have little to no regard for the homeowner when it comes to keeping the owner in the home.  Until that scenario changes, I believe you will see more and more homeowners walking away from an upside down mortgage, even when they are current on the payments.  Some mortgage companies are telling homeowners that they have to be late before they can even help them.  Once the homeowner is late, there is no going back and many times when the homeowner does what the mortgage company tells them, a modification is NOT completed and the homeowner loses all the way around.

Banks need to annie up and walk the talk.

 

Michelle
9:24am • #25

Lenders will ALWAYS do a short sale even with no delinquency.  Thoise who were told otherwise did not push hard enough.  I agree with John McArther, who said that a brokers responsibility is to the seller, not the bank, however, as a licensed professional, you should NEVER councel someone to not pay their mortgage.  That is a lawsuit waiting to happen.  While I understand that it may be best to conserve money that would be going to the mortgage for other living expenses, and that missed payment credit damage will effect credit for around 24 months, we still can't tell them to do it.  I will let them tell me their intention not to pay, and I will then say, "You need to do what is right for your family, and I will explain the consequences."  That is as far as I will go.

www.short_sale_expert.activerain.com

9:25am • #26

While this sounds good on paper, it is not always unavoidable. My daughter bought a home with a friend. Then she lost her part time job working on tags for new car dealerships since that industry was hard hit. The other person that bought the home with her lost their job since they were in the construction world, which was also hard hit.

She then asked the bank to work with her, they said no because now their income was substantially less. Then they put the house for sale. Two CASH offers were refused because the bank decided that the BPO was accurate when in fact it was $50,000 over what it should have been. The cash buyers walked away since they could get a single family home for what the bank felt was the value of her townhome.

I am not an agent, I work for the agents, and I have a top agent who deals with this help her and even he could not get the bank to understand that they were asking way too much for the short sale. They were in an area where there were no nearby comps.

After 2 good offers walked away the bank has now decided to get another opinion. So where does this end? My daughters mortgage is way above what she can afford and unemployment is at an all time high!

If she pays the mortgage, then none of her other bills get paid, so credit will still be ruined. Why wouldn't the bank work with her when now they will get $170,000 for a home she paid $320,000 for. She would have been willing to do whatever it took to stay in the home, but they refused to help her. I am sure when this is said and done the bank will have lost a lot more than if they had worked with her.

You have to be in these peoples shoes to judge whether they are right or wrong!

Gail Cruz, Marketing Director, RE/MAX Premier Associates
9:29am • #27

Mark, I am sure that you have never tried to work anything out with banks.

Real estate would be just fine if banks got out of the real estate lending business. Owners will do seller-financing, people will live within their means and only enough properties will get built.

9:30am • #28
391,486 Points 4 Featured Posts Called Shot Master

It really is an individual thing.  I spoke to someone last night who had heard walking away is a good idea. After talking for 5 min., I found that she has a 5% fixed loan, which will be paid off in 11 years, and her monthly payment is only about $300 more than she'll pay to rent an apartment if she lets the house go.  Where's the smarts in walking away from that?  Yet, because she reads things like some of the rants above, she assumed her house is worth less than she owes (it's not), and she should walk away because the bank won't do a loan mod. ????  Listen more, talk less. 

9:30am • #29
1 Featured Post Localism Sponsor

I think this point of view should be considered by folks who choose to default rather than try and "tough it out" to the end - but everyone's situation is unique and we cant' make a blanket statement that defaulting will provide the worst possible outcome. IMO, this is not something  about which a Realtor should be advocating one position or another to a consumer

The other thing to consider ( and yes - this will vary widely by region, local market and specific situation) is that banks and PMI companies are granting principal or interest modifications all the time to borrowers - even if they are not behind on their payments.  There are a lot of specific qualifications to get this done and my guess is that the odds are against being one of the cases where this can work out - but consumers are doing themselves a disservice by not even investigating this option.  I Blogged about this very topic last week HERE.

 

 

9:32am • #30

Irresponsible lending practices by the lenders is the root cause of the market crash.  I have no pity for the banks. Why should an owner who has done nothing wrong be saddled with a home now worth half of the purchase price while the banks take the bail out money and do nothing to help?  There is no honor among thieves.

9:37am • #31

I can not agree more Mark.  I am not going to judge those that make the choice to stop paying as a strategy.  I also would view it as unethical of myself to advise that course of action. I also see liability attached to the advice given tortuous interference, but unethical is good enough to stop me.

9:37am • #32

Well said, Mark! You make a great point about employers pulling credit- more and more do! People need to think long term. If a person could very easily walk away from a house, they could probably easily walk away from a job or leave fellow employees in a lurch.

Danell Merren
9:46am • #33

I think everyone should just stay for free and fight their mortgage companies....question the validity of the debt, sue them in court, save thousands for a few years and then reasess.

 

This article is blah blah...offers no interesting insight whatsoever...other than finger pointing at the working class in tough times.

Lets see him write an article when/if he's faced with the inability to pay a mortgage.

just stay
9:47am • #34

Yes, let's all take personal responsibility for the mortgages we sign for. Bad credit can ruin you in so many ways, and for so long. This is a big lesson that will force us to live within our income and not take risky courses that could jepordize our financial well-being. I know we will all come out stronger in the end!

Linda Pliagas editor of Realty411 Magazine
9:50am • #35

Mark:

I can't speak for anyone else but in my case I did get a modification and it was only after I missed some payments.  In fact I talked to a neighbor who also received a modification from Chase and after she sent her payment in the bank actually reversed her payment. 

In both our cases, our home values on the custom homes we had built tumbled to almost half of what we paid for them several years ago due in part to all the builder foreclosures in our new subdivision.  Couple that with the other foreclosures caused by folks that could not afford to stay in these homes for one reason or another. 

I am all about doing the right thing but had the modification not gone into effect I would be forced into making the judgment and business decision for my family as to stay or walk away for our dream home because the market of the home would never in my lifetime reflect what we invested in it originally.    

9:52am • #36

The truth is there is no magical fix for our financial crisis, and as professionals we should not give blanket advice. Laws are different state-to-state and individual situations vary greatly. I recommend each one of my clients who are struggling to speak to an attorney and an accountant. Then we create a plan according to what is best for them and their individual situation.

Keller Williams Realty of Greater Nassau

Cristina Callegari Kanellopoulos
9:52am • #37

I find it hard to disagree with either side of this discussion, damned if you do and damned if you don't. I would do everything to ride the storm out as things will turn around, they always do just a matter of how long.

On a brighter note what a great time to be a qualified buyer (especially in south Florida, what deals)

9:55am • #38

One other thing to consider about walking away from a mortgage is this: I live in TN and the lenders can file for deficiency judgment on the borrowers that have been foreclosed and/or "short sold" their home. And a judgment sticks to your credit report like glue...and can be renewed every 10 yrs by the lender, if they so choose.

I completed a short sale a couple of months ago for a client that had more than enough assets to pay for their cabin and the bank made them sign a promissory note---for considerably less than the shorted amount, but they still had to pay or the bank would file a deficiency judgment for the full amount.  If they default on the promissory note...they will have a judgment placed against them for the full amount.

So for those that are considering this option add this one to the consideration list. 

I tell all of my clients that are considering a short sale or about to be foreclosed, that this can also be another downside to choosing either.

Lisa Hatfield, Realtor(R), Century 21 MVP, Sevierville, TN
9:59am • #39

Mark, I agree with you that it is generally short-sighted to think you can just "walk away" from the house and the debt without any lasting consequences.  But to say that is the real reason people shouldn't be "strategically" defaulting on their debt is to miss the point.

People shouldn't be "strategically" defaulting on their debt because it's morally wrong.  Plain and simple.  The fact that the bank has a lien on the house and legally has the right to pursue a foreclosure action does not relieve the borrower from their moral obligation to repay the debt, nor does the arrogance, foolishness and greed on the part of the banks.

Yes, I realize this sounds overly idealistic.  But consider the inconsstancy of our logic when we condemn the banks and our government for bilking millions of Americans out of hundreds of billions of dollars and then turn around and advocate the merits of "strategic default."  What you're really saying is when a bank makes a decision which is profitable in the short run and catastrophic in the long run in the form of issuing easy credit and then going to the taxpayer for a bailout when things turn out badly, that's "greed," but when an individual does the same thing in the form of borrowing money on easy credit and then defualting on the loan simply because they are underwater, that's "strategic."  Be consistant... you can't condemn the banks and give a pass to the borrower who could pay the debt but doesn't think they should have to.  Personally, I think both should be ashamed.

...and yes, I live in Florida and work with short sales everyday as a listing agent.  There are too many folks out there who have no other choice than to do a short sale, we don't need to be encouraging others to join in.

10:01am • #40
Outside Blog

People are going to get through these times as best they can.  Some will use the system to their advantage in a way others would regard as unethical and eventually it will cause others, who are truly just trying to keep their noses above water will have a harder time because of it.

Just be sure never to advise any of your clients to miss a payment as that may be looked at as conspiracy to commit mortgage fraud.

10:02am • #41

There are many Homeowners who put themselves in this position. In the hey day escalation clauses were used to "beat out all other offers". For those who actually bought smart, and now have endured financial distress do to layoffs or financial hardship do to medical reasons I feel bad for. Real estate like stocks have risk. If you loose money based on the advise of your financial advisor should his company make up the shortage? The decision to purchase was made and now they should live with the consquences.

NW guy
10:16am • #42

Remember,  FICO scores only mean something when we borrow.  We need to keep borrowing to a minnimum and pay with cash for everything else. 

Mike
10:21am • #43

"Myself as a broker have made the decision to walk away from my rental property." Jacquelyn C wrote this in an earlier post, and I applaud her for her courage in writing this.

This is a tough issue for everyone. But just to add some balance to the noise made by the finger pointers, we need to understand that the now banks are starting to earn real money again. They are able to do this, at least partly, because their losses on mortgages are reduced by the payments made by the mortgage insurance and reinsurance compnies such as AIG.  And AIG, for example, has received big taxpayer bailout funding so that they could make these payments to the banks.  Now, who are these taxpayers?  You and me, including those who are having to walk away from their mortgages. So the taxpayers bail out the banks, but the banks still want to hold the taxpayers responsible for their upside down mortgages.  Hmmmm . . .

 

Tom Mccombs
10:23am • #44

And this is bad...why?

 

Banks make their decisions regarding the loan on my house as well as my credit card based on business factors...not emotional.

 

Why should I look at the arrangement any differently.  If you are not at least modifyng now, there is something wrong with you. 

 

Or do you think it is a wise business decision to pay for everyone else's mistakes yourself?   Try again kid.

Robyn Jacobnson
10:24am • #45

My feeling is this: so many folks are in the same boat that soon everyone appliying for the the job, the rental, and the car loan will all have the same credit dings. Our 800 credit scores will become a memory. We will all be starting from the same creditworthiness. Or, credit worthlessness.  I am already counselling owners who wish to place tenants not to expect too much inthe way of a credit score---these are tenants who used to be homeowners. When that tide falls all boats float downwards.

Amy

10:25am • #46

If you run the number, then you know you are down a losing path to hold on to your property.

Home Price when house first bought: $700,000

10% down Interest only mortgage Amount: $630,000

Current Home Value: $350,000

Future Annual Appreciation: 5%

Time in years to break even with Mortgage: 12.05

Time in years to break even with Home Price: 14.21

 

10:30am • #47

One aspect of your post that I agree with is that Foreclosure hurts us all. It's a shame that banks grabbed TARP funds, yet continually do NOT address Homeowner's pleas for help. Many Homeonwers walk since when they call they are directed to a foreign country only to talk to a rep that will run them around the mega-banks voice mail tree and after talking to 5 or 6 bank reps finally give up.

I know I get frustrated with the banks aloof attiude toward homeowners and even their own bottom line. Too bad there's not some sort of mediation required for the banks. At least here in Nevada, there seems to be such a thing... problem is the mediation is NON-BINDING. Too bad. Too bad for the banks... but even more "too bad"" (I know grammatically incorrect) for the homeowners.

Jeff Burnham
10:31am • #48
3 Featured Posts

I have known people that have done this, but they tried every other possible way to sell the house and get a short sale or a modification, and the banks simply wouldn't work with them.  One person said that their first was willing but the second wouldn't budge since they wouldn't get much from the short sale.  Well guess what?  The house was foreclosed on and what did the second get? Zilch.  So why did they not want to work it out?  This person said that the second started calling them about a week before the foreclosure wanting to work it out, and they were just so upset that all of a sudden the second wanted to help, but it was way too late.  They wanted to keep their home.  THey put money and love into that home, and they just couldn't afford the payments anymore.

We bought our house right when the market started tanking, and at that time it was the cheapest house on the market.  Our value has dropped about $30K, and as much as we'd love to get a house with 3/2, we're going to have to consider doing an addition since there's no way to sell it and buy a new one and have it be financially reasonable.  But we got a payment we could afford, and I think that is what is the biggest thing a lot of folks did wrong.  They got a payment that they couldn't afford, or were stretching too much to afford. 

10:34am • #49

This has nothing to do with the walking away from the mortgage but what advise is being given to people who do want to negotiate with their lenders.  I have a client who has built and invested in real estate in my area.   He has EXCELLENT credit and a good financial back ground.  He would make any realtor/mortgage banker drool on a NEW loan.   He wanted to renegotiate with the lenders on some of his duplex's since the value has dropped.    They ( I say they since he talked to more than one lender/bank) told him the only way they would be able to do that is if he STOPPED making payiments on them.   He told them "why would I trash my credit?   Then you won't work with me because my credit is bad".   So to quote others on this blog until the banks/mortage companies can get their acts together it will effect us all.   My client is not going to default on his properties but he is also going to pull back on some of his investments at this time.   Which in turn effects my bottom line and anyone elses involved in a closing.  Just my 2 cents.  :)  To end this positivly I belive things will turn around but it will be a long process.  

10:41am • #50
813,393 Points 7 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Those that can afford the mortgage should make the payment.  There are other reasons than inability to pay for walking away, such as need to relocate, but then that goes to affordability issues.

10:44am • #51

Hi Mark,

Very nice post! It really reiterates what I tell my clients, friends and family.  Just last night I was having this exact discussion with a neighbor.  I am going to forward this to them so they in turn can tell their family member who is thinking of just walking away from a house that has lost equity. Again very well done!

Lynnell Woodward
10:54am • #52
135,401 Points 1 Featured Post Attended Rain Camp

As is the case with most of these threads, the responses are all over the board.

There is an awful lot fingerpointing going on. It's not just the banks fault, it's not just the lenders fault we're in this mess and it's not their fault that homes are worth 50% less than what we paid for them.

The fact is: IT'S EVERYBODY'S FAULT!, and until we quit pointing fingers at each other, we don't have a chance of coming out of this any time soon.

Whether or not someone, "strategically" decides to walk away is a personal decision and like the original post said there will be dire consequences to their credit and they have to accept responsibility for those consequences.

The banks don't have a contractual obligation to modify your loan or accept a short sale. Should they? If the borrower has a hardship and the only other option is foreclosure, their losses will be significantly less if they loan mod or short sale, but that is their business decision. The government and their stockholders will hold them accountable as the losses continue to mount.

Current FHA guidelines allow for a new loan within 3 years after a foreclosure if the borrower can document it was due to "circumstances beyond their control". I'm not Carnac but I don't think "I made a "strategic decision" to walk away is going to float.

Greg

10:56am • #53

In my area, the average income is about $30,000/year.  There's a fine line between putting food on the table and paying the bills.

11:05am • #54

I'd like to hear more from Joseph Alfe about how he always gets every short sale approved.

Chucki Cooper
11:13am • #55

Joseph Alfe's statement, "Lenders will ALWAYS do a short sale even with no delinquency," is ridiculous on its face.

Consumer
11:26am • #57

There is a niche group of Americans, retiring Baby Boomers, who have been hit particulary hard by the recession.  Through no fault o their own, their savings have been slashed by over 50% in some cases, and their home equity has often vanished.  There are no jobs and not enough time for them to recover these devastating losses. 

But this experienced generation recognizes that these are the cards they have been dealt.  They are making plans to retire as best they can with what they still have.  Believe me, continuing to pay a painful mortgage on an upside down loan is not part of that equation.  Maintaining your credit is good, but we're talking survival here.

As noted in this discussion, banks and lenders are not particulary amenable to working the problem.  Rather than "buy and bail," most retiring Baby Boomers will honestly try to rent out their properties or achieve a short sale.  But if that doesn't work, they're walking!

11:46am • #58
534,111 Points 11 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

I agree with a lot that has been said in the original post as well as in the responses....we really can't tell the Sellers to not make their payments they have to decide if that is right for them....I agree that there will be a lot of repercussions to lates in the future but what else can a person who has lost their job or needs to relocate or has a death or a divorce do when there no longer is no equity!  THey have to get out of their property whatever way they can!  

I do see a lot of people just walking who should stay in thier houses for a while longer til the market adjusts....that I don't agree with...but if it is a hardship case then they need to sell it at any cost.    What do i say to a friend who is in her late 60's...never been late on her mortgage....been trying to sell her house for nearly 3 years and now in order to sell it she has to short sale it....I don't know why it hadn't sold before...(I wasn't the lissting agent.....)  but she is in chronic pain and can not take care of the yard and house any longer not to mention the financial aspect of owning the home. 

I don't pretend to have all the answers...and I agree that it is different in all areas but all in all who ever said that it is ultimately the sellers choice said it right!!

11:52am • #59

Sad but true this is unprecidented and I am no spring chicken so I can attest.  As a homeowner, I have deliberated this quandry.  I am still making payments on a mortgage for the roof over my head which are about $500 a month more than what I would pay in rent for the same property. As a new agent I can see the comps in my neighborhood continue to decline and foreclosures and short sales continue to increase which indicates the pattern of lower property values will stay on the horizen for at least another six months to a year.  Currently, my philisophical view point is my property is a residence and not an investment.  I will continue to be underwater to maintain my good credit. I will continue my attempts to work with Wachovia for a loan mod on an ARM.  That being said, if things worsen rather than improve I may change my mind.

12:09pm • #60

Ken: I say "Amen," I agree with every single word you said. Yes, sir--you got it right. I believe that there are dire circumstances in which people cannot save themselves from financial heartache. But we should have compassion for the exceptional cases, and not just believe that it's OK to jump on the bandwagon of letting our responsibilities go. I think you said it very well, we can stand up for right behavior even as we acknowlege the many wrongs in our industry. Shari Kay Hunter, Loan Officer

Shari Kay Hunter
12:11pm • #61

When the consumer bought the house and comitted to making the payments (possibly obtained by falsifying income information on a mortgage application or through a liar loan), what did they think would happen to their payments.  They agreed to live in or rent out the home AT THAT PAYMENT.  At some point in the buying process they said "yeah, that payment sounds OK for that home".  NOW they are changing their minds?  And the majority of the comments blame this on the banks?  What about the homeowners fault for contractually agreeing to make the payment.  What has changed in their financial situation that all of a sudden they have decided not to make the payments?

Remember, we are not talking about folks who lost their job or had medical issues, but people who CAN afford the home and choose to stop making payments.  This seems to encourage the "don't blame me" society.

If credit is not important to you than go ahead and hand it back to the bank.  You don't deserve a loan in the future.  Nice blog Mark.

12:30pm • #62

My picMark, I couldn't agree more. I was brought up in a country, Sweden, where it was a natural to honor your debts. However the short sale mess complicates things. As far as I know most lenders demand that you default first, for them to even consider a short sale. I sure hope someone "up there", can straighten out the short sale rules for good! Nothing makes sence to me!

12:45pm • #63
2 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Ken,

"Strategic" is different to different people in different situations as you know.  Here in Vegas where the catastrophic plunge in values has put 67% of homeowners upside down  (even those who put down 20% on their homes) "strategic" is a much more appropriate word than it would be in Tulsa.  Asking a client if they would be willing to take a hit to their credit and not be able to buy a home for 3 years in exchange for erasing $300,000 in negative equity and you will invariably hear a resounding "yes." 

Staying in a home that is that much underwater often turns a house into a prison--they can't leave.  The emotional component of that can't be measured in financial terms, especially for those who did the "right" thing and actually put money down.  It could be a decade or more before their property value goes up enough to get them to 100% LTV.  That being said, there is a moral and ethical side to this that can't be ignored.  A big part of life is living up to your responsbilities and promises, and isn't that what a NOTE is?

The solution that has been working for some of my clients here in Nevada is the Short Refi.  Just like a short sale in that the bank takes less than the NOTE amount(borrower must qualify for a new 30 year fixed loan with a new lender at 90% or so of the CURRENT value) only the borrower remains the occupant.  It's essentially a principal reduction for the home owner, but the lender changes.  Select Portfolio did a number of these for me in conjunction with Taylor Bean.  Turns out it was substantially less expensive and time consuming for them than a short sale and much less expensive than a foreclosure.  The Operations Manager there told me they were thinking of it as "preventative medicine."  They said they would rather lose a portion of the principal now, get the loan off their books, and get an infusion of capitol than potentially lose even more down the road.  Great part is (other than keeping the borrower in the home) it stabilizes neighborhood values--my appraisers love this solution.  Chase just accepted a $3,000 payoff on a $62,000 2nd and a $165,000 payoff on a $240,000 1st, allowing my client to stay in his home.

Keep up the great post topics.

12:50pm • #64

I think everyone needs to be even more concerned with the socialist views our government is taking.  Our forefathers have to be rolling in their graves right now.  56% of all mortgages are owned now by our government.  What do you call it when the government owns the land on which you live?  Maybe more bailout money would help.  YEA RIIIIGHT!  We need a major overhaul, and we need it now.  Our housing market is going to continue down it's current path until our "LEADERS" get their heads out of their greedy @$$'$.  I think most people fail to realize that the problem starts with JOBS and WAGES, without those the housing market keeps going down the toilet.

1:22pm • #65
1 Featured Post

If you wish to be a pawn of wall street and and the bankers keep paying those loans. 

The fed allows lending standards to loosen as prices are reaching bubble stages?

Lenders pay mortgage brokers 5% to set up 100% stated income loans to people?

Lenders give loans in excess of 100% of value?

Lenders provide second loans for the last 20% of the pruchase price to people in states like california which are essentially non recourse loans?   These same loans used to come at a 3-10 % premimum from hard money lenders.

Lenders drove up the price of property by giving away money to an unqualified buyers pool.  Naturally prices should come back down as the lenders now only lend money to qualified buyers.

Instead of letting the markets function - wall street and the banks have influenced our governmnet to wastefully spend  trillions of dollars.  (inflation may someday increase salaries which will may bring back the price of the upside down assets.) . 

Bankers may have altered our standard of living forever.  They have unclean hands in this matter.

Whether to pay back your loans or not should be a business decision.  It is for the banks.

 

 

 

1:45pm • #66
123,923 Points 4 Featured Posts

Aloha Mark,

There is a reason why usury (Modern Banking) was illegal for thousands of years. Why do we need to prop-up an inherently convoluted and corrupt system that creates money from debt? Fractional reserve banking needs to be wiped from the face of the planet and recognised as a scourge of humanity that it truly is.The reason we are in this financial mess is quite simple but the Banks who profit enormously from the ignorance of the general population whould like everyone to think that it's some unexplained mystery, which it isn't.

Money equals debt, debt equals money. You make more money by creating more debt, the more debt you have the more money you have and then the inflation kicks in. The devaluation of the dollar combined with the ever increasing money supply will keep us locked in a never ending cycle of boom and bust until the inevitable crash. The only way out is to spend more and create more debt, it's insane and serves no one but the Banking elite. So your right, if you want to keep this corrupt and insane system, keep buying on credit.

Peace,

 

2:21pm • #67
3 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Kendall,

Great comment, it makes a lot of sense to keep paying your mortgage so that you have the possibility of a short refi. In my understanding, if those same borrowers would have had a 30 day late on their credit report a short refi would have been impossible.

 

2:22pm • #68
243,682 Points 1 Featured Post Outside Blog

I am always appalled at the numer of agents even that think walking out on your debt is the sure sign of freedom. Some people really did hit upon hard times , health issues. lose of employment etc.  - the rest just spend, dump and run. Would I encourage that?  Never! They voluntarily took out these loans that if just one thing in their life changed they could not make payments.  Then they bought houses they could not afford and were far above what they needed. Do I help them - you bet - do I encourage them to default - no and neither should you be. Where does that fits into Ethics?

2:58pm • #69

TWO GREAT ARTICLES,I missed the earlier one and appreciate the link so I could read it.

You have a really good outlook on the situation,but I am sorry to say I FEEL it may not be so realistic.If only because the burdon to the home buyer even if they could struggle and make the payment are then desimated when they fall.They can money that may be needed to save their lives and no longer have an chance to recover.

Perhaps if lenders were morrally responsible  (Their sole purpose is to make money)

and tried to make the situation AFFORDABLE,in some way SUSAINABLE ,85% of the 8 to 10 million homeowner that are Defaulting and soon to be defaulting would START PAYING and continue paying until the PROPERTY become an asset that is 100% equal to loan value.

BUT THE LENDERS have so leveraged the notes that they have loss more money then they have and can not MODTIFY in a manner that could work because there is no one out there that will MODIFY the losses they have to pay up.

The loan amount may be 4 to 6 trillion,what we are not being told is if that amount were modified where will the banks get the additional 8 trillion that they have already spent from the profits they made leveraging those notes?

There is already a way to solve the 8 to 10 million loans even at a 100% asset value,even 110% being given to the banks,but they cannot afford to take the DEAL!

You should also put a link to Zaretky's article "Should I stop paying my mtg?'

If you have an opportunity check my "Everybody wins Plan"

a special 10 year mtg that allows for a payment of $500/ per month per $100,000

for PITI which makes the bad loans affordable.

I am neither an accountant or lawyer so I would like to have both reveiw all Short Sales and Foreclosure advice I give.

For a free copy of "The Everybody Wins Plan" request via email ..bestsolutionsfl at aim dot com  

Basilovecchio
3:10pm • #70

I am a 73 yr old real estate broker that's not too good at this,but here goes;


Subject: Please Read then TRASH or POST:The solution to the finanial crisis?

DAVID STEVENS,FHA COMMISSIONER could single handed STOP the speeding bullet (recession,foreclosures)
Armed with the "Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008" the FHA could, at no cost to the taxpayers
and with no new money needed , put an to end this crisis.Stabalize housing prices and their increase tax revenue.
JUNE  2009  " We do have options for changing the HECM program",HUD Sect Donovan told a  Senate commitee.
FHA and HUD could modify the terms and conditions of the HECM
and allow all loan modifications at a lower rate with a longer term-
100% asset GUARANTEED and very AFFORDABLE! Please HELP!This may be long,but I guarantee it may keep you up at nights wondering,OH MY GOD,Can it be???
Just PROVE if the MODEL,Business Plan, is correct or not.Challenge it.
"The Everybody Wins Plan"
All home loans could be modified so that they would be AFFORDABLE;
thereby ending ALL Foreclosures and Short Sales.
Regardless of how the loan amount is negotiated the payment plan
makes it 100% AAA+ and very affordable.
The formula:The Solution:A LOW RATE OVER A LONGER PERIOD OF TIME
AT NO COST to the taxpayers.
This new loan is GUARANTEED by using the already legal Home Equity Conversion Loan(HECM)
A loan that uses the lenders money(not taxpayers) that has a government (FHA,HUD
guarrantee of payback.
Since the TOTAL PAYMENT of Prin.Int.,Taxes,and Insurance are so low and affordable
everyone will pay PERIOD!
The "Everybody Wins Plan" loan:
TWO PARTS:

Part one-a 10 year note,120 payments with payment 121 being the payoff of the balance owed.

Part two-payment number 121 is a 30 year fixed rate mortgage.

The FULL monthly payment for this special mortgage would be $500 per month
per $100,000 for the first 120 payments.
This is for Principal,Interest,Taxes,and Insurance.A mortgage payment PITI
$500/month per $100,000!!
Now that would be affordable.
Of the 8 to 10 million homeowners in trouble ,the nightmare would be over.
Payment number 121 a new fixed 30 year mortgage for the 90% balance
PAYMENT DISTRIBUTION FOR PART ONE:
Prin...........15% of total note
Int...........100%.times 10  (10 years interest on total note)
Taxes and Insurance....15% of total note.
End foreclosures,short sales,makes for affordable homes Can you help me keep my sanity?
I am ,I believe "That one poor fool" that believes this could be  the answer as to HOW: The Foreclosure,Subprime Mortgage,Housing and Economic Crisis can be resolved at a PROFIT to the taxpayer.
THE END OF FORECLOSURES AND SHORT SALES
AND THE BEGINNING OF AFFORDABLE HOMES FOR ALL AMERICANS.
Would you please challenge this plan?Post this plan?It is not copyrighted.
The HECM,Home Equity Conversion Mortgage provide by the "Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 could end this recession.End all foreclosures and end housing prices declines.
Please read on if for no other reason than to prove a plan wrong , that states it could end ALL this grief for all AMERICANS.    
"The Everybody Wins Plan" by BASILOVECCHIO
  BASILOVECCHIO wrote:  Would it be irresponsible to resolve at least the portion of the financial crisis that pertains to ALL underwater mortgages
subprime and of course , now even those that were prime in such a manner
AS TO BE PROFITABLE to the taxpayers????
Thank you,Paul Volcker......"An outside agency" 
                     Robert Shiller...."properly funded"
                     Dr. Yunus..........." a profittable business that does
                                                      a  social  good."
The legality is already there.
Funding is already there.Actually NO NEW MONEY NEEDED,This is just a government guarantee of payment.
And in  90 days or less 8 to 12 million homeowners
would be paying their mortgages not only on time but one month in advance.
85% want to stay and pay,the other 15% will have a waiting list of those who would
wish to pay for the home using THIS FEDERAL APPROVED REGULATED PROGRAM.
 EVERYONE knows about the $700 billion TARP program Where the feds gave away
 $350 billion and are looking to give away the other $350 billion.
Everyone knows about the $787 Billion Stimulus package
to create jobs etc.....but why is it That
IT is so difficult to get the word out on TV or internet
that the feds passed the Economic Recovery Act Oct 2008
in which  THE FHA  AND HUD WILL GUARANTEE PAYMENT OF
BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN HOME LOANS!
This program could be the basis for 100% recovery of ALL
defaulting mortgages,ALL and with no cost to taxpayers ,
with  A PROFIT to the taxpayer. "THE EVERYBODY WINS PLAN"
TAKE ALL LOANS MARK THEM TO 100% TRUE MARKET VALUE.
YES 100% Fair Market Value"
NEW MORTGAGE (TWO PARTS)10 Yr plus 30 YEAR
with A VERY LOW PAYMENT is the solution.
Just as in the 1930's
A LOWER RATE OVER A LONGER TERM got people back to buying the ranches
 because it turned the 5 year loans into 25 year loan-
Thank You ,Dreyfus School for the Arts and Wellington High School Debate teams for that bit of info.
 Please feel free to:
print- edit- copy- trash-challenge or endorse .This is not copyrighted.
A SOLUTION TO THE HOUSING MORTGAGE CRISIS AT NO COST to the taxpayers,rather at a profit to the taxpayers.
Using today's rates and knowledge,the entire inventory of troubled homes will become EXTREMELY AFFORDABLE and thereby
AAA and 100% asset based. A special 10 year year mortgage with an automatic 30 year mortgage that includes
PRINCIPAL
INTEREST
TAXES and
INSURANCE. PER $100,000 loan there would be a total fixed 10 yr. PITI payment of
.........$500........PITI followed  with a 30 year fixed mortgage that will
pay the loan in full..
FOR HOMEOWNERS;
Let them stay in their homes,
Let them be able to afford it,
and be able to manage it.
THIS IS THE REAL AMERICAN DREAM.
Turn this challenge into a greater good for all.Re-establishing "CREDARE" .Faith in the American people and home values.
This is a fast and great solution to the problem and it allows for time
to fix the blame and to do what is necessary for  future prevention. We simply must get off the idea that we should only help "the good" people and leave the "reckless" ones to their own ends. Whether the foreclosed house next to me was owned by a good guy or a reckless flipper doesn't matter.. my home value goes down either way due to the foreclosure.
We simply have to set aside moral judgments and fix the problem.Why not at the same time create revenue for all taxpayers. 
The Housing and Economic Recovery Act allows the FHA and HUD to guarantee the FULL payment of a Mortgage  until  the homeowner either sells the home or dies.The asset value of the home is the 100%  security for the loan.We need only modify the conditions for this loan:
(a) change age conditions from 62 Plus to NO AGE REQUIREMENT.
and (b) instead of age percentage base asset required,use 100% of REAL APPRAISED VALUE.
Problem solved: All homes  become owner occupied.All housing supply will be eliminated by demand,demand by end-users.(85% that wish to stay and 15% that wish to get an AFFORDABLE home) ACTION:Solve this trillions of dollars crisis  at no cost to the taxpayers,and allow for a taxpayer profit.
RESOLVED:ALL "underwater" loans and foreclosed homes to be re- purchased (by present lender or any FDIC insured lender)at 100% of FAIR MARKET VALUE.Old Loan to be marked "paid-in-full"This is a one time deal and could be done in 6 months or less,as all that is needed is an appraisal and a closing,settlement.
PURCHASE to be made by any lender willing to take 10 year treasury rate on note FULLY BACKED 100% by FHA,creating a 100% backed,100% asset!
And why not?a loan on the books that would require NO reserves!
 
Legislation is  already in place for FHA to do this and NO NEW FUNDING IS REQUIRED.
PAYMENT IS GUARANTEED.We need only to enhance the present HECM rules
to allow 100% asset without any owner age restriction to be made for the ten year portion
will be very low and for that reason perhaps 0% ,yes, 0% loss.Anyone that wishes to default will have people in line willing to pick up their payments and even give something for the right to do it.
NEW LOAN: is a special  "EVERYBODY WINS PLAN" loan
A 10 Year  loan that has fixed payments (120)  with  payment number 121 (the magic bullet) ......  paying the balance in full.Because of the low cost of the funding(12/31/08 @ 2.08%)now @ 3% and maybe even lower because upon announcement of this solution which does not require $4 Trillion in federal borrowing.This is a  special long term payback that will  be a very affordable payback.
TERMS FOR THE NEW LOAN:120 fixed, low, and affordable monthly payments that consists of........
.............. (A) payment  of  total interest (10 yrs);
                (B)15% of principal ; 
                 (C)15% for  taxes and insurance.
This is a total payment ,known as  P.I.T.I.   
MAGIC BULLET:Payment number 121..the new 30 year mortgage.. is given by a third party lender to the owner at a fixed prevailing rate,for the 85% balance,PLUS 5% TAXPAYER PROFIT ,then the  NEW 30 year NOTE  is to be 90% of what  the original modified loan was.(If $4 Trillion needed that's $200 Billion profit).
Example:$100,000 "EVERYBODY WINS LOAN"
LOAN AMOUNT $100,000 with payments to include:
A...Total 10 years interest.(3%).............. $30,000
B...15% for principle reduction........... .$15,000
C..15%..TAXES and INSURANCE.....$15,000
TOTAL.......................................................$60.000
paid by 120 fixed equal  payments of $500.00 each...... wow, how affordable is a $100,000 mortgage at a total
P.I.T.I.
payment of $500.00 per month???)
Then the  with payment number 121 the note is paid in full with a new
30 year loan that is 90% loan to value (or less,if values increase)
To calculate payment for 10 year portion use a factor of $5.00 per $1,000.
Example:, if loan amount is $250,000;payments of $1250.00
 ($250 X 5.00 = TOTAL PITI FOR A HOME VALUE OF $250,000
at an unbelievable low $1250.00
 REPEAT: Extremely affordable.A sibling working at a minimum wage could pay the mortgage for the entire family! It is total payment...P.I.T.I. Thank you,Paul Volcker......"An outside agency"  THE FHA AND HUD
                     Robert Shiller...."properly funded" 100% ASSET BASED GUARANTEED LOAN
                     Dr. Yunus..........." a profitablebest business that does
                                                      a  social  good." STOP ALL FORECLOSURES AND SHORT  SALES,REPLACE              
 WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL AMERICANS "EVERYBODY WINS PLAN"
 
An anouncement of this plan with details could create an immediate RELIEF and "CREDARE"-CREDIT-TRUST in the AMERICAN SYSTEM.
"THE EVERYBODY WINS PLAN"    REQUEST DETAILS,ASK QUESTIONS:email
bestsolutionsfl at aim dot com
7/17/09 ADDED:
The 5% tax payers profit does not have to be a given.That 5% can be used to pay off loses for the lenders.This could make it better for them to use this modification becuse If they modify they may lose some recovery benefits they might have otherwise gotten.(Insurence?) Hi,
Just wanted to cover some questions.
I believe at least 75% of lenders would accept this plan,because they are doing foreclosures and shortsales
that are netting them 20% to 25% LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE.
Some banks may not OK 100% of  todays value as payment in full on the old loan.
All loans would of course be subject to each lenders approval and there could be
a point where they would have to be worked on to reach a yes.
IF THE CORE BASE FORMULA IS CORRECT,It has room to cover different conditions.
EXAMPLE:
The 120 payments allocation could be;
10%....prin
30%....Int
15%..Taxes and Ins.
5%...cover lenders loss.,instead of taxpayer profit.This still makes the payments very affordable at $500 per month for ten years,
.We could live with that.
The 121st payment would be the 90%  which is the balance of the note.
DOES A LOW RATE WITH A LONG TERM make an affordable solution? If the model is correct,it simply becomes a question of how the money is to be allocated.
Hope to hear from you soon
Carmen
PS
A charity or 501 (c3)This illustratesthe point that LOW COST MONEY (no cost) makes for more affordable housing.
Could buy forclosures,short sales and let people regain home ownership with a $250 per $100,000 PITI payment.
Example;
Organization receives $1,000,000 Gift,or better yet grant from State.
Buys 10 homes @ $100,000 each
PAYMENTS EACH per month per $100,000
10%...principal...................................................$10,000
15%...taxes and Ins............................................$15,000
 5%... Recovery,expences...................................$ 5,0000 
 equals $250/month per $100,000
NO INTEREST COST AS MONEY IS DONATED MONEY THAT HAS NO COST AND THE MOST UNBELIEVABLE PART IS THAT WITH PAYMENT NUMBER 121 THE ENTIRE MILLION IS RECOVERED TO DO THIS OVER AGAIN FOR AN ETERNITY! God Bless American and thanks to Dr Yunus "Banker to the Poor'
Giving money away creates a problem,it cost time and money to replace it.Why not have
the money replace itself but in a very affordable manner. Carmen Basilovecchio

Basilovecchio
3:18pm • #71
132,705 Points Outside Blog

Even though this post was well done, I don't give a damn about the banks. They are getting what their little overwhelmed butts deserve right now.  Most of the time they won't cooperate and offer the homeowner no recourse.  The word 'strategic' bothers me, but so be it if you have to do it to get out from under.

4:25pm • #72

There are comments on here stating that the comments are all over the board.  They are not.  Mark, you got it wrong here and except for a few self-rightous and mislead colleauges in your corner, you need to join the rest of society.  If you can afford to pay, then you are smart with your money.  If you are smart with your money, you know that 10-20 year window to reach parity is absurd from an investment perspective.  if you realize this from a business/investment perspective then you realize that you and your buddies see this as a moral issue, rather than one of self preservation (credit score my ass).  It's about fear and underneath it all- judgment, for you and your few pals.  "How can I get a job?", "How can I buy a car?" , "Those schucks just want a free ride!", etc....

Mark, life throws us ALL curves of different types and unless we lash out with the intention of hurting another human, it is up to the individual to figure out the best path.  Banks are a hard sell in terms of compassion my friend, and if an employer thinks you are a bad ass at what you do they will find a way to get you in there.  If yur lot in life is to be a cookie cutter "employee" then you probably are not reading this anyway as 99% of us are commission based self starters. (You are not preaching to the choir on this one believe me.)

Ideas, solutions etc...

Hey, how about re-inventing ourselves to fit the new paradigm?  You know, change our career, get an education, start a small business, and just get creative generally.  I'ts the only way.

Isnt it possible that credit got us all into this mess in the first place?

Perhaps this should be a repository of solutions or ideas for help.  (Anyone reading this far who cares to add something, feel free)

For instance, if you cant get a car loan, how about renting an apartmant close to work and ........ WALK.  (its actually good excercise).  I used to ride my bike to work, 4 miles, and get there in 20 minutes, and the office thought I was cool (not at first) because they came to realize I was saving money, getting to work faster than they were, and getting fit!\

If you cant get an apartment, then rent a room close to work. etc....

THERE IS ALWAYS A SOLUTION AND YOU CAN MAINTAIN YOUR DIGNITY IF YOU EMBRACE CHANGE WITH GRACE.

And without the need to mention deities, rest assured we are able as a group and individually to get through this current curve......but we might have to walk away from material pinnings (mortgage etc..). sorry :)

frank
4:58pm • #73
133,539 Points 2 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp

I have read a lot of incredible ideas here and I think most of them make sense given a certain situation.  The problem is that almost every homeonwer now has some sort of problem and each one is unique to that particular homeowner and the banks and the government are trying to resolve these problems as if they were all exactly the same.  Too many plans and no solutions.  And it is not just about mortgages.  I have a couple of credit cards that jumped to 22% interest.  I cannot even afford to pay the interest, let alone the principle.  When you talk to them about it, they say they can close the account and then set up a payment plan for you.  I told them to put a hold on my account, keep it open, lower the interest to under 10% and I would pay it off.  They cannot do it.  So, I have a choice of closing my account and getting a decent interst rate. (which lowers my credit score) or not paying anything and lower my credit score even more.  They don't care, so why should I.  We have to look at each case individually and solve all the problems one by one and do it quickly or there is no end to this mess.  Think about all the examples in this blog and the million more that could be written about.  The canned solutions work for hardly anyone.  And we need to crreate a million jobs like yesterday so people can pay their bills.  And how stupid are we to be the only western country that does not pay health care for all of its citizens?

5:50pm • #74

I'm all about responsibility; however, for some they have NO CHOICE.  Lost jobs, lost fortunes (stock market, etc.) and no money hidden under the mattress ... what are these folks supposed to do?

6:42pm • #75

Mark, at the beginning of the year I gave a CREDIT presentation to the agents at the offices I call on.  I stressed what you were talking about.  People think that being late on a payment or two so that they can "qualify" for a loan mod, don't realize the ripple effect this has on their credit.  In my presentation I mentioned the same things you did about how it affects insurance, car loans, and even employment.  A lot of people who haven't been looking for a job in the past few years don't realize that employers are pulling a credit report.  (They should be telling people that they are doing so.)

6:46pm • #76
124,162 Points

An interesting perspective of everything across the board.  I think I'll blog my own opinions.

6:46pm • #77

Walk on the banks and they will take their revenge via the credit reporting system.  A foreclosure will probably guarantee future employment problems.  New cars will be out of the question and the used car interest rates will rival credit cards.  The insurance tab will also be astronomical unless you want to just pay cash for a clunker and kind of skip that pesky insurance thing.  Forget keeping your credit cards, as the available credit will get chopped to zero and every time you give yourself a little credit availability by paying more than the minimum, your credit line will be reduced.  Oh, and Amex will cancel you as well.

A strategic walk on a house will almost guarantee a cash lifestyle for the strategist. If you are OK with that go for it.

 

6:55pm • #78

You paint the picture of people doing this as an investment strategy its more of a live to fight another day strategy or maybe just live through today strategy. I am currently doing exactly this on an investment property. I would love to keep it for the down swing and sell in the up unfortunately a series of bad events has me choosing between paying the investment or the primary properties mortgage. Which do you think I will choose. I am 46 years old and have never missed a payment on anything in my life until now. These times are different then anything we have ever experienced and I fear the worst is yet to come. I missed a credit card payment that I made up a month later and my rate jumped from 11% to 20+%, where i grew up in Brooklyn we called this loan sharking now its called Visa.

I always thought my house would be paid off by the time my kids started college. Now my goal is to just keep it until they are off to college. Once they are on their own whatever happens to me happens at least I kept the roof over their head until they were old enough to lead their own lives.

8:47pm • #79

I tried to read all of this. It is overwhelming. The problem is not the banks or mortgage lenders. The problem is the buyers, real estate brokers and lenders who believed that prices would continue to go up forever. My son  in the Ft. Meyers area is upside down, but I am encouraging him to not sell now. He would like to take advantage of the depressed market and eventually may do just that. His circumstances are significantly different than most people. He can actually take his lumps in this case. He would hope to take advantage of good buys in his area. Back to the market situation we saw prices that were $200 to $400 or more per square foot. Materials costs are fairly stable, land costs don't escallate forever.I couldn't ever justify pricing in many markets based on replacement costs. That would have been enough for me to stay out of these markets.   

9:31pm • #80

Mark-

 

Thnaks for having th guts to speak the truth.

 

I am about to puke all over the unbridled entitlement of stupid Americans that think they don't need to hold their commitments.

Consequences for those in the actions that are walking away will and should prevail, especially when they have the capacity to pay Hold the line!

 

Kenton

Kenton K. Brown
9:36pm • #81

I totally disagree-did you forget the taxes-I know seniors that there house is pay-off and they can afford to pay for the taxes.  what good is it if the township is going to take your house anyway.  In NJ is a major issue. Banks they don't want to help anyone-why you think they don't want to short sale a property that the owner is current on the mortgage( Indy mac is very good at this)- Credit Cards! as soon as one credit card company finds out that you were late for one month on your mortgage-they will close it- it does not matter to them how long you paid on time-

My advise depending on your situation-do what is best for your family and you-forget about the credit score.

 

Nicaury Miller
9:55pm • #82

It is fairly easy for someone to be under water on their mortgage. Anyone who bought or refinanced a home three years ago with less thatn 20% down is probably under water with prices having fallen by more than that in most communities. 

Mortgage management companies aren't stupid. They understand a lot of people would like their lender(s) to assume a part of their loss. They aren't going to modify a loan to do that just because they are asked. They need to be convinced it is in their financial interest and the lenders will come out ahead.

The people we are talking about are people whose income allows them to make the payments on their mortgage. So the mortgage company is very unlikely to be convinced they need to do anything. The question is whether it still makes sense for the homeowner to continue making payments. That is not a simple question with a variety of factors that effect the decision:

1) How much would it cost them to move and find another place to live.

2) Do they want to stay in their current home.

3) How far under water are they? How long is the term of their mortgage, is the interest rate fixed.

A home is a great hedge against inflation. If you have a 30 year loan at less than 6% fixed rate, it may well pay you to hold onto it if you expect high inflation and higher interest rates in the future. While housing prices in REAL terms may never get back to where they were, its likely inflation will eventually get people out from under water.

On the other hand, if you have a $500M mortgage on a $300M house that you aren't really fond of, living in it for 15-20 years until you can get out from under water may not be the best choice. You will have spent far more than the house is worth when you are finally able to leave.

Will walking away from a mortgage cause problems on your credit record? Sure. And that is a consideration. Another consideration is that, in some states, the mortgage holder could come after you for the difference between your mortgage and what the house sold for after you handed them the keys. Its not a bankruptcy where your debts are expunged. 

One thing you should NOT do is feel guilty about it. This was a business venture where the price you paid included the possibility that you would default. The lenders who bought your loan knowlingly took on sharing the risk that your home value would fall. It did and there is nothing wrong with you letting them take their part in the consequences. 

Ross Williams (SimpleMindedInvestor.blogspot.com)
10:37pm • #83

though i have many opinions and views on this topic, i can only speak of one at the moment. i am going to explode...i am outraged that qualified people are being denied employment due to credit.  this practice will exacerbate the problem.  as unemployment continues to climb our economy will not recover. it doesn't take a rocket scientist to look at a credit report and determine whether or not a person has had a history of financial irresponsibility or not.

let's say someone paid their bills on time for the past 10 years and their credit was damaged in 2008.  you look at their resume and see that they have been unemployed for 6 months or longer.  duh... their credit is likely to be damaged!!!

this should be illegal. 

janice
11:09pm • #84

after 6 years of being a new home sales agent, i lost my job, for obvious reasons. i didn't earn an exuberant income but it was much higher than i had earned in previouspositions. over the six year period my average income was about 80,000 a year.  however, i paid much higher taxes than a w2 employee at the same income would pay. in new homes sales, you don't have many expenses to write off, if any.

i can't find a job to save my life. not even a job i was over qualified for 10 years ago. it seems as though anyone associated with real estate in any capacity is on some kind of "DO NOT HIRE" list.  often times i feel as though i am being punished for a crime i did not commit or take part in.

i remained in my 115,000 dollar home though i could afford and qualify for a more expensive home during that time. i didn't have much credit debt and paid for most purchases with cash.  i have been unemployed for nearly a year. ran out of money months ago... now running out of time.

i didn't qualify for unemployment because i was 1099.  there are millions of people that are not suffering because of irresponsible behavior but as innocent bystanders to this crisis. where is our help? is this American?  why did i pay those high taxes? it seems so unfair.

what's that saying... "there is more than one way to skin a cat." there is no one size fits all solution to this problem, however, there are deserving people that need help and it's unfortunate that it's not available. to add insult to injury our lives will be even more difficult because of damaged credit.

i am not walking away, i'm being thrown out!

hopeless
11:37pm • #85

If we all would take heed maybe we collectively could make a difference.

11:54pm • #86
JUL
23
2009

Spoken like a true expert of the mortgage industry.  You all stick together, don't you?  Mark, your bio is very impressive and you seem rather intelligent, but your blog just goes to show how ignorant you truly are about the real world. 

7:37am • #87
328,455 Points 2 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp

I was just talking to a trusted lender this morning about a short sale for one of my clients. He said that people must continue to make the payments to not hurt their credit. He also said the bank must was say it's paid as agreed, not a chargeoff.  It certainly it a hot topic.

9:00am • #88

<<"stay or walk away for our dream home because the market of the home would never in my lifetime reflect what we invested in it originally."

So your investment tanked, and, while you can afford the mortgage payments, it's just "not worth it"?? This is part of what is dragging down, further down, this awful mess.

Some friends bought a house in the mid 70's...inflation soared, values plummeted, and these friends were making payments on a house they'd bought for $250,000 that soon dropped to a $175k value. But they kept making the payments. They paid the house off a few years ago. It was worth 675,000 in 05, but only about $500k now. Oh well. It's paid for.

IF YOU CAN AFFORD THE PAYMENTS, MAKE THEM. If you can't afford them, then seek other options. But for goodness sakes, don't just walk because you can! It's  HOME, not a part of your portfolio.

2:11pm • #89
3 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Charlene,

My point exactly, well said, plus your friends didn't have to put up with all the baggage that comes with default, especially in this enviornment.

thanks,

2:52pm • #90

I so agree with Cindy Jones...after awhile a home owner can only deal with so much stress.  I've said since the very beginning of all of this mess that the lenders need to lower the monthly payment and rate, no question ask, when a home owner has been making the payment out of their savings, or retirement funds. This gives them a chance at least to get on their feet, and hopefully get things under control.

Carolyn Hawkins, Realtor Associate, Allison James Estates & Home
6:47pm • #91
350,397 Points 2 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

i have little sympathy with the banks who are unable to maintain the properties.  If they were more responsive about responding to short sale requests in a timely fashion a lot more of these properties would be sold before they go into foreclosure.

8:59pm • #92
JUL
24
2009

Mark,

Nice point, nobody, and I mean...NOBODY would like to loose their credit;

however, stoping mortgage payment is not a simple desicion. In some cases a borrower must take the determination to feed his family, or pay the mortgage...

On the other hand, it could be an strategic financial plan. 7 years in the dar, vesrus 1000s of dolalrs lost in the next 10-15 years.

It all depends on a case by case basis. For example, not everybody would qualify for a loan modification, not everybody lost their job, not everybody is upside down, and not everybody would file for bankruptcy, and not everybody has the same amount of debt; lastly, not everybody has run a business and took risk, have lost everything, and so on....see my point?

I have filed for BK, and have already recieved 3 offers to buy a brand new car, open a credit card, I am renting, I am working, and have move from and to a different company. It all depends on the circumstance.

 

Carlos
1:52am • #93
JUL
26
2009
Outside Blog

I don't agree, but I understand why some people have to go this route.  I believe that most people will try and do the best they can but when they are forced into  hard spot alot of people have no choice.

5:59pm • #94
JUL
27
2009

I live in the Northwest and we are seeing a lot of shortsales.  Most homeowners just cant afford the monthly requirements.  They are sinking. Staying afloat is hard....If the bank had the opportunity they could throw a life preserver.  They dont care to. 

 Business decision. 

Some people have negative equity and dont want to stay since they are upside down by hundreds of thousands dollars usually.

Every situation is different.  We can see there are a handful of scenarios, the bottom line is theres a problem that the homeowners and lenders created.....who has the ability, power and influence to do it?

Suzzanne
9:25am • #95

Things are so tough, so tight out there now for a lot of people that "strategic" doesn't even come into play.  Those people who can actually stop and make a strategic decision are a different category of people.  Because if they can "decide" then they must have the money.  Frankly, those who can and do make a strategic move to not pay the mortgage might be better off trying to overcome the stymie of the late payments - down the road - especially if the mortgage was the only bill paid late.

But many people in their responses are thinking of the people who have to "decide" between feeding the kids and paying the mortgage this month.  So their decisions are not simple or strategic at all.  These people are not concerned about credit scores any longer.  It's survival.

Do some people stay too long in their homes trying to make it?  Perhaps.  But those who cannot conceive of themselves in that position also cannot imagine what it would take to move the family to another location.  Moving is not cheap.  And if your credit has already taken a ding, moving somewhere else and getting utilites turned on could be problematic.  The deposits alone could be too much.

I am all for people trying to keep their homes.  They should explore every conceivable program out there  - legitimate ones.  This has so much merit too when you realize that buying another property after losing your home will be so very difficult for a good while.

The exception I would make is that if the home value is way out of line with the mortgage owed, then the homeowner should weigh their options.  These numbers are relative for everybody.  What John might consider out of line is not what Joe considers out of line.

Families these days have a lot of personal decisions to make.

1:31pm • #96
AUG
09
2009

It's easy to run numbers and figure out if continuing to pay is a sound financial decision. I'd say that in many, many cases it does not make financial sense and, in many cases it's financial stupidity to continue paying.

The moral question is, for me, a good one to stay away from. I sell homes. I'm not my clients spiritual counselor. If I don't like how a deal smells I'll walk away but I do that for myself and not as any kind of judgment about that client, how they live their life, or the financial decisions they make based on knowledge that only they possess.

Good advice from an old friend of mine: "If it doesn't have your name on it, don't pick it up"

1:48pm • #97
OCT
15
2009

If you really want to look at refinancing a mortagage you'll want to check out: http://refinance-mortgage-refinance-loans.com

and http://homeloanmortgagemortgagerefinance.com

they both have good refinancing information on them.

www.nomortgage4u.com and the http://therefinanceunit.com also have some good pointers on mortgage and refinancing options.

 

I'm not sure that NOT paying your mortgage is a good idea, uinless you like a bad credit history of course.  Refinancing or moding your loan is generally a better long term option

8:07pm • #98
NOV
02
2009
145,486 Points 10 Featured Posts Attended Rain Camp

Mark

This advice is all good, but if you were in California or Florida, the 2 hardest hit states, this advice would really not be applicable in all circumstances. Most Lenders will not even approve a Short Sale if the owner is current on payments, and thus a Deed in Lieu or a Foreclosure is the only alternative. To then apply your advice, would you say walking away from the home is the only way to do it?

12:24pm • #102
NOV
06
2009

Just came across this site while searching for answers to our dilemma , my husband and I hold a deed of trust along with a promissory note that stated 3 payments of interest due once a yr for 3 yrs and on the fourth year balance due.  The borrower has not paid us the 3rd payment and now we are forced to pay a lawyer to foreclose. That " contract " the borrower agreed to was our main source of income . Now we are screwed . I don't pity banks but what about us private lenders ??? Where is our recourse ???  Just because the borrower( in our case ) decided to be irresponsible. This is pertaining to a commercial property which he shut down business and gave up , rather then try to lease it out , etc. In my research it is all about the borrower what about the lender , not finding anything that cares about us .

Debbie Smith
12:55pm • #109
JUL
12
2010

Ken, I would like to here your opinion on my situation. My husband and I are about to, as you say, "Walk Away" from our mortgage. At this point we do not feel we have any other choice. We have exhausted our options. As it stands we are current, but our County is requiring us to replace our septic system @ a cost of $12,000.00. if we don't they eventually will shut off the water which will make the home unlivable. We will be filing banktruptcy as we cannot dig our way out so obviously we don't have $12,000.00 laying around anywhere. There isn't a bank that will work with us nor will our mortgage company rework our loan. The reason being is that we are upside down and needing the new septic falls under needing repair and they don't do anything with homes that need repair. If you know of a way we can stick with it I would like to here it. We have been here for 20 years. Husband had been unemployed 3 years out of the last 8. We make $30,000.00 less than when he first lost his job 8 years ago. Unfortunately our bills went up as we were raising 2 children and all other costs have gone up with inflation.

Johnna
8:17pm • #113

What does the graphic say?

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Orig_17058_035 Rainmaker_large

Mark Warner

Plano, TX

More about me…

RealEspace

Address: 5208 Tennyson Parkway, Suite 140, Plano, TX, 75024

Office Phone: (888) 880-0071

Email Me


RateWindow on Facebook



Listings

Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find TX real estate agents and Plano real estate on ActiveRain.