Ar_home_b_search
 

A while back I was reading someone’s blog and saw these quotes in different people’s comments.

“I've never doctored a photo I'm happy to say.”
 “We don't alter photos. What you see is what you get.”
“…touching up photos in Photoshop is just wrong.”
 “Absolutely right on the doctored photos. Can't do it. No way. No how.”
“In my opinion, doctoring a photo is unethical.”
“…nor do I touchup pictures.”


I must admit I was a bit surprised by how adamant these people were. But with all due respect to people’s opinions, there's nothing inherently wrong with retouching, Photoshop, or any other image editing program. They're just tools - just like a camera is. Nothing more. Nothing less.

In fact, a lot of the so-called ‘doctoring’ that needs to be done is no different than what the camera is doing when a photo is taken. But for whatever reason, maybe a camera setting was wrong and the photo came out bad. It might have been the exposure was off, or the white balance was off, or whatever.

But one the biggest reason’s to retouch an image is because no camera (no matter how good it is) is nearly as sophisticated as the way God designed the human eye. And no camera can capture exactly what our eyes see. A professional photographer can come a lot closer, but it’s still not the same.

Below are just a few examples of situations where retouching needs be done. And not correcting photos like these could be far more misleading than if you do correct them. To me, it’s also a real disservice to your client if you don’t fix problems that are obvious.



EXAMPLE 1- Windows: One example is blown-out or overexposed windows. This typically happens from the outside light overpowering the interior light. Your eyes automatically compensate for this. Your camera doesn’t.

Here’s a quick TUTORIAL on how to fix this.


EXAMPLE 2 - Skies:  Blown-out skies are another common problem, and can sometimes happen for the same reason as blown-out windows. You set your exposure for the house, and even a slightly overcast sky can come out looking white.

Here’s a quick TUTORIAL on how to fix this.


EXAMPLE 3 – White Balance:  Photos with a yellow or orange cast is a very common issue, and it’s caused from light source with a different ‘temperature’ than what you have your camera set for. And inside and outside lights are typically not the same temperatures. Again, your eyes will automatically adjust for this.

Here’s a quick TUTORIAL on how to fix this.


EXAMPLE 4 – Exposure: A photo that’s improperly exposed is another very common problem. There are several things that can cause it, but whether it’s over-exposed or under-exposed, it’s usually pretty easy to fix.

Here’s a quick TUTORIAL how to fix this.


EXAMPLE 5 – Verticals: This one isn’t as obvious as the others. But if you’re shooting with a wide-angle lens you may often see barrel distortion and/or verticals that appear to slant in toward the bottom or top. Your eyes don’t see things this way, but your camera does.

Here’s a quick TUTORIAL how to fix this.


As I said at the start, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with retouching, Photoshop, or any other image-editing software. They’re just tools. And in my opinion, very valuable tools. Now, if those tools are used to create something misleading, that’s a completely different issue.

But if people still feel that you should never retouch any photo under any circumstances, then I ask if the ‘before’ photos in the above examples are really an accurate representation of the property? Or… maybe they’re just an accurate representation of photography skills.

I’ll say it again, Photoshop is NOT a dirty word.
--

Create your own high-end virtual tours in minutes, using your own photos. It doesn’t get any easier.
CPG Tours

 
Post is included in group: Photography
Post is included in group: ActiveRain Guerrilla Marketing Station
Post is included in group: Marketing 101
Post is included in group: Realtors®

21 Comments on Photoshop is NOT a dirty word!

JUL
23
2009
238,989 Points 2 Featured Posts

I have a program that I love and always use when I am editing my pictures, Michael.  I don't see this as any different than what happens at a good camera shop when you drop off your film to be developed.  We are just the developers for the digital film, that's all.  I don't see any harm in this at all.

10:59pm • #1
JUL
24
2009
279,118 Points 1 Featured Post Localism Sponsor Hit Router Attended Rain Camp

Michael,

Thanks for all this information. I have a great camera and I don't know how to do some of these things. I can wait to try this...

6:53am • #2
107,606 Points

Hi Heather: You're right, whether it happens at the camera shop, in your camera, or with an editing program - it's lot like being the 'developers'. Thanks for the comment.

Hi Monique: You're most welcome. These tutorials are pretty basic, so hopefully they will help a little. But if you have any questions, please don't hesitate to let me know. And thanks for stopping by. I appreciate it.

9:57am • #3

Michael,

Thanks for the information in this excellent post.  I have used PhotoShop myself from time to time, in much the same way as you've described above.

By the way, I think I prefer the un-retouched image in Example 3 because it has such warmth.  That said, I can see why you'd consider retouching the photo.

Dave

3:56pm • #4
107,606 Points

Hi Dave: Thanks for the comment. I know what you mean, sometimes a 'warmth' can actually help a photo. But to me, this one was way too much. Besides, it made a great image for my tutorial.  : )

6:28pm • #5
JUL
25
2009
214,365 Points

Hello Michael,

Thank you for all the great information in your post!  The tutorials are very helpful!  Thank you so much for sharing!  Have a fabulous weekend!

Rita

 

12:36pm • #6
JUL
27
2009
107,606 Points

Hi Rita: You're most welcome. And I'm glad you found the tutorials helpful. If there's any retouching topics you'd like to see another tutorial on, just let me know. Thanks for the comment.

1:46pm • #7
JUL
28
2009
587,697 Points 2 Featured Posts Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Well, it's not like you are putting stuff in the photos to hurt the potential buyers, like the one with the cloudy day, and you brightened it up.  What????? If you buy this home you MAY not ever see a bright day?

8:01am • #8
139,948 Points 15 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Great Blog - it has been featured in the Photography group.

7:54pm • #9
JUL
29
2009
2 Featured Posts

Michael, I think we all know why the naysayers rage against Photoshop ... it's because they don't know how to use it and it scares the you-know-what out of them! 

There's absolutely nothing wrong with modifying exposure, contrast, brightness - even replacing a sky now and then.  Truly "doctored" photos are those where power lines or telephone poles have been removed or anything else that misrepresents the true condition of the property.  You just have to know where to draw the line ... it's usually pretty clear.

2:47pm • #10
JUL
30
2009

I think I read that same blog, and I also had to comment on it in my blog. You did it better with your examples and tutorials. In fact, I feel a re-blog coming on!

2:00am • #11
751,897 Points 7 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Michael, I am so excited about photoshop. thanks so much for providing this useful information.

6:28am • #12
567,159 Points 21 Featured Posts Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

I totally agree.  I have been using Photoshop and Picnik to touch up and correct photos and I see nothing wrong with it.  Now if you photoshop out a big hole in the wall...that's a different story. 

8:58am • #13
249,848 Points 3 Featured Posts

Hi Michael! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! You are so absolutely right on this - I too use Photoshop, (as you know), and see virtually nothing wrong with it. There is not a professional photographer that I know of that DOESN'T use it, or a similar program, to repair or enhance  their photographs. Again, as you so well point out - the goal is to reproduce what the eye sees. I think many who voice the opinions you've stated above, either don't have Photoshop, or don't want to take the time to learn how to use it, (there is a learning curve involved, LOL).

Debi

9:32am • #14
107,606 Points

Thanks for all the comments everyone!

Hi Evelyn: A little blue sky never hurt anyone. And I think most places eventually will have a sunny day or two. Won't they?   ; )

Hi Maureen: Thank you for the compliment, and for the feature! I really appreciate it.

Hi Glenda: You may be right about the naysayers. I tend to give them the benefit of the doubt, and think maybe they just don't understand what's really going on when it comes to photo editing or even what the camera is doing. But as you point out, it's usually pretty obvious as to what's acceptable and what's not.

Hi Russel: Thanks for the comment and for the 'reblog'. I appreciate that.

Hi Rebecca: You're most welcome. And you're right about Photoshop. It's an amazing program.

Hi Sharon: Yeah... patching holes, removing power lines, and those types of things fall into that category of misrepresentation. But I'm all for making the photo look at little better, without crossing that line.

Hi Debi: You're welcome (times 3). You're right, I think people would be shocked if they really knew how much retouching really goes on. And you're right about Photoshop, there's definitely a steep learning curve. I've been using it for years, and have barely scratched the surface. Or, when I think I'm making progress, they come out with a new version.

 

1:02pm • #15
AUG
30
2009

Michael:

You are "right on" with this post.  The human eye adjusts for white balance, high contrast, low contrast on an "instant" basis.  The camera does not, it just records.  Making a photo look like it did to your eye while you were there is not Photoshoping, it is only makeing it look correct.

Michael

6:43pm • #16
AUG
31
2009
107,606 Points

Hi Michael: Yeah, I think sometimes people just don't realize what it takes to make a photo look like what you actually saw. It's not as easy as just 'point-and-shoot'. Thanks for the comment.

9:48am • #17
SEP
08
2009

Tweeking a photo is perfectly ok.  You're not doing anything false, like adding a tree where there is none, you're adjusting the photo to be more like the true house itself.  What could be wrong with trying to show as true an image as possible?

9:17pm • #18
SEP
09
2009
107,606 Points

Hi Greg: My feelings exactly. That's why I'm always a bit surpirzed when I see such adamant comments like those referenced above. Thanks for stopping by.

6:06am • #19
JAN
02
2010

Hey, Michael - Just stopped by to go through a couple of your excellent tutorials.

Happy New Year!

4:03am • #20
107,606 Points

Hi Russel: Thanks for stopping by, and for the compliment. As you probably saw, these are just quick and easy ways for a Photoshop novice or Elements novice to address some of the more common problems.

5:31am • #21

What does the graphic say?

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 

Michael Cole

Orange, CA

More about me…

CPG Tours

Office Phone: (888) 525-5251 x 701

Email Me



Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find CA real estate agents and Orange real estate on ActiveRain.