th Street S.W. Room 8270 Corporate Headquarters Washington, D.C. 20410 3900 Wisconsin Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20016-2892
Nevada State Mortgage Division Nevada State Real Estate Commission
3075 E. Flamingo Rd. Suite 104A 2501 E. Sahara Ave. Suite 102
Las Vegas, NV 89121 Las Vegas, NV 89104-4137
Nevada State Attorney General American Civil Liberties Union Nevada
Bureau of Consumer Protection Mortgage Fraud Division
555 E. Washington Ave. Suite 3900 1700 E. Desert Inn Rd. Suite 113
Las Vegas, NV 89101 Las Vegas, NV 89109
Re: Mortgage Fraud, Predatory Lending, Money Laundering, Conspiracy,
Promissory Estoppel, Collusion, Extortion, & Unconscionable
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
We built our home six years ago in Nov. 2000 and rolled our construction loan to an FHA Mortgage for $162,000 (Wells Fargo lender) with an appraisal value of $350,000 (sweat equity). My husband broke his neck twice in construction work and we went into a foreclosure situation last March 2005 which was listed in the newspaper. Under the direction of Maggie Bird, President of Remcor Real Estate, a real estate agent/broker, Allan Zane, came by our home Friday evening and stated that his buddy, a private investor, Scott Dugan, would loan us $20,000 to cure the foreclosure secured by a Promissory Note and Deed of Trust. Two days later on Sunday we went to the First American Title Company, to meet with the agent/broker, investor and title loan officer, Sher LeGault. We were presented with the Promissory Note and Deed of Trust for the foreclosure loan then immediately given many more papers to sign with the explanation that "they were all necessary to prevent our home from being sold at public auction in two more days, the following Tuesday." (We were not given a written Three Day Right of Rescission as mandated by law.) We were afraid to loose our home overnight so we signed the papers. We had in fact, unknowingly and unwillingly, signed a Grant, Bargain & Sale Deed to our home. These documents were all amended and rescinded for the next 2&1/2 months (even after the Title Company's Settlement Date) all to the benefit of the investor and charging us extra fees, deposits and fines.
It was further explained to us that it was mandatory for the investor to assume our FHA Mortgage Loan however, the loan would stay in our names with the existing terms and conditions. This was in violation of the HUD Reform Act of 1989 which states that private investors may assume FHA loans only as owner-occupant and for their primary residence and not for investment property. The Act further states that the investor must be preapproved by the FHA lender prior to assuming the loan.
The real estate agent/broker and investor specifically stated in writing on the Contract that "the investor will assume the FHA loan under the existing terms and conditions, and the lender is not to be informed." (This is in violation of 42 USC 3604 wherein they have committed fraud against the Federal Government Lender Wells Fargo to prevent the lender from calling the "due on sale clause" payable in full, which is their legal right to do so.) Their arrangement was for us to pay the investor, to make our mortgage payment in our names for the next six months, with an additional monthly charge to us for that privilege, under the cloak that we could re-build our credit. (Again this is in violation of 42 USC 3604 per rental price discrimination and commonly referred to as "Loan Slamming") These payments would apply to the investor's Consideration essential element of the (invalid) Offer & Acceptance Contract to purchase our home from us which we had also unknowingly and unwillingly signed at the first meeting.
Six months later in Sept. 2005, the investor wrote us a letter that he needed more money from us if we wanted to stay in our home and with the FHA Mortgage Loan still in our names. We were again afraid we would loose our home overnight so we paid the investor another month's mortgage payment for Oct. 2005. We then filed a Complaint with the Nevada State Attorney General's Office for Mortgage Fraud, Predatory Lending and Equity Skimming. (Title 24 HUD Chapter 1 Subpart B Sec. 103.25(a)(3) states: "Complaints my be filed in person or by mail with any substantially equivalent State or local agency. Complaints filed with a substantially equivalent State or local agency will be considered to be complaints dual filed with the agency under its own law, and with HUD under the Fair Housing Act.)
In violation of 18 USC 1014 regarding knowingly making false statements or willfully overvaluing any property or security to influence mortgage lenders’ actions, we were offered to purchase our home back from the investor for $300,000 after he paid off our FHA Mortgage Loan balance of $160,000 on Oct. 28, 2005, which was seven months post his illegally assuming the FHA Loan in March 2005 as stated in the Title Company Settlement Statement of April 2005. (The investor's lender is World Savings Bank FSB for a mortgage loan of $195,000.) This is representative of $140,000 sole profit in equity skimming for the investor and $14,000 commission for his best buddy, the real estate agent/broker, not to mention their title company's fees and loan officer's commission that we paid according to the Settlement Statement.
Since our Complaint with the Attorney General’s Office was considered to be dual filed with HUD according to the federal law cited above in 24 HUD 1B 103.25(a)(3), "all further legal proceedings concerning the subject FHA mortgage loan and property should be stayed until HUD issues its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law." However, the investor and his friend, the real estate agent/broker, once again, feel they are above the laws of this Country as long as they do not get caught in their actions. ("Apparently an all-expense-paid stay at Club Fed appeals to them!" Thomas J. Lucier) On May 5, 2006, we received a response letter from Milton F. Turner, Director of Compliance & Disability Rights Division with HUD Washington, D.C. stating that our discrimination complaint had been forwarded to the Pacific Office of Fair Housing in San Francisco, California.
After 50 consecutive days of no contact from the investor after we had advised him of our filing a Complaint with the Attorney General's Office, in retaliation, (and at the insistence and advice of his friend, the real estate agent/broker,) the investor obtained an Eviction Order from the Justice Court. (Retaliatory Actions prohibited per 42 USC 3601) We appealed the Eviction Order to the District Court #CV06-00520 and filed a three month rent bond with the Court pending the Appeal. (It is our understanding that if the investor prevails at the conclusion of the Appeal Hearing, the Court will award the rent bond monies to him. However, if we prevail, the investor was never entitled to the funds in the first place. The investor’s attorney attempted to argue NRS118A.490(2) which refers to the tenant in possession pending Appeal should continue to pay rent. However, we attempted to post additional rent bond monies with the Appeal Court Clerk who refused to take the funds since the Judge had not Ordered additional rent to be posted.
The investor went back to Justice Court (now void of jurisdiction) and obtained a second Eviction Order, intentionally without disclosing to the Judge that the case was on Appeal in District Court with a three month rent bond posted. We were adamantly not allowed by the Justice Court Clerks to answer this second Eviction Order since the case was already on Appeal so we obtained a Stay of Eviction Pending Appeal from the District Court with the proper jurisdiction as our only legal recourse.
The investor then hired an attorney (with the $140,000 equity skimming profit off the illegal assumption of our FHA mortgage loan) who successfully removed the Stay as a result of the misfeasance and misrepresentation of our attorney, Mitchell C. Wright, that was retained to help us pursue the Appeal case. We have never been to Court yet on the Appeal case but have only filed Opening Briefs! This is in violation of our Constitutional Rights in the Amendments Five and Fourteen regarding "due process of the law."
The investor then (1) changed the locks at our home, (and barred our windows resulting in three broken blinds that can be seen from the street and screwed a wood bar into the garage door frame on either side;) (2)"gutted" our house of all our personal household belongings which are presently in two 40yard dumpsters in the backyard of the residence due to be removed and disposed of within one or two days of the date of this letter 9/26/06, since we have no money to pay the removal dumpster fees or to store the dumpsters some where else off the property, (these dumpsters contain our business & personal tax records, our entire District Appeal Court Case file that is in current litigation, our irreplaceable family geneology histories & photographs, as well as several personal items of sacred religious practice, and our personal contents in the sliding drawers that the investor maliciously emptied out into the dumpsters;) (3) opened our mail and retaped it, (and possibly confiscated whatever items that we are not even aware of at this time;) (4) took our pets to the humane society (which resulted in the deaths of two of our little finch birds and our betta fish;) and (5) pushed our three vehicles out of our driveway and across the street in the County maintained water run-off ditch which vehicles have now been impounded by the Sheriff's Dept. since the neighbors complained of the unsafe street conditions in front of our house and that the teenagers would vandalize the vehicles, (this can be verified by our neighbors Ed & Katie Campbell of 8465 Mohawk Lane, Reno, NV 89506.) (These actions of the investor and his friend, the real estate agent/broker, are in blatant violation of NRS 118A.460 1(a) which states, (in a lawful eviction, as ours is not even legal,) "The landlord shall reasonably provide for the safe storage of the property for 30 days after the abandonment or eviction or the end of the rental period. The landlord is liable to the tenant for his negligent or wrongful acts in storing the property. (c) Vehicles must be disposed of in the manner provided in Chapter 487 of NRS for abandoned vehicles." (The two 40yard dumpsters are the property of Jeff, owner of Empire Contractors at (775) 831-2246 located at 70 Industrial Pkwy, Moundhouse, Nevada.)
Now, as our final legal recourse, we have filed a Complaint with the Federal District Court #3:06-CV-00472 for a violation of our Constitutional Rights of the Amendments Five and Fourteen concerning "due process", violations of the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3604, 18 U.S.C. 1014, and 42 U.S.C. 3601. We have also filed a Stay of Eviction and Restraining Order for the two 40yard dumpsters not to be removed from the property or disposed of but the Judge has not yet signed the Order.
ANY ASSISTANCE THAT YOU MAY OFFER US TO GET THE ORDER IMMEDIATELY SIGNED BY THE JUDGE WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU!
Since the filing of both our Appeal case and our Federal case, we have had many reputable real estate professionals and lawyers contact us testifying of this current and repeated pattern of behavior for this organized conspiracy group of real estate agent, broker, investor, the real estate company as a whole, and the title company and its officer. Legal documentation will substantiate that just recently, Stefani Real Estate Agent, Steele Spengler at (775) 232-0257, reported the Remcor Real Estate Agents for illegal actions which resulted in their fine of $5000.
We even had an Independent Real Estate Reviewer, Morgan Alexandra at (775) 972-1255, testify to us that she has personally taken the local real estate courses and seminars as taught by Remcor Reality. She stated they teach these exact same illegal tactics to their students in the community so that they can make huge profits by mortgage fraud, equity skimming, and predatory lending through bullying and aggressively enforcing their illegal actions to the point that the mortgage holders give up in exhaustion, financially, and the embarrassment and humiliation that they were taken advantage of when they were in desperate circumstances. Morgan currently teaches a Mortgage Fraud Class at the Community College of Truckee Meadows in Reno, Nevada.
The Las Vegas Sun Newspaper also has many archived, very extensive articles concerning Mortgage Fraud occurring in the Nevada area, nationally and globally. The FBI reported to CNN News that, "Rampant fraud in the mortgage industry has increased so sharply that an "epidemic" of financial crimes which, if not curtailed, could become "the next Savings & Loan crisis." Nevada is one of the top ten "hot spots" for mortgage fraud .
Not only would we like to have our own home back but we feel that it is our responsibility to our friends, neighbors and community to do our part to eliminate these "players" and this piece of the puzzle in the fight on mortgage fraud, equity skimming, and predatory lending practices. We realize that many elderly people who have nearly paid off their mortgages, veterans, legal immigrants, those below poverty level income, and young couples with infants and small children who qualify for federal housing assistance programs are primarily and consistently targeted by these type of predators. We feel that is a very scary and sad situation for anyone!
We believe it is our local, state and national governmental agencies’ responsibility to protect the American public from deceitful, fraudulent, dishonest, larcenous, embezzlement, unethical and misrepresentative practices related to real estate and mortgage fraud.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION. CHERYL & THOMAS HANNEMAN cell (775) 815 - 8010 email: mydailymiracles@yahoo.com
URGENT!! Please call the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada at (775) 686-5800
(400 S. Virigina Street #301, Reno, NV 89501)
and ask them to sign the Emergency order to Stay so that you may review our Case No. 3:06-CV-00472. THANK YOU!! The dumpsters are due to be removed TODAY 9/28/06 unless someone can intervene on our behalf. Thank you. Cheryl & Tom Hanneman
I see a lot of things in here, but nothing indicating that these people have a lawyer. They have filed documents it appears, but no lawyer?
They should have had one before signing all the document the first time giving up the house. If they don't have one now they need one.