Ok, So I received this updated email last night with news that they have reached an agreement for Tax Reform.  Below are the details of what they have reached.  I think I'm thoroughly confused now!!  Looks like they are only cutting 3-9% off of what your taxes were from last year if I read it right?  And then they will apply the new "super exemption" next year?  So the real savings doesn't start until next year?  Am I reading that right, or are you confused too? 

$15.6 billion in Immediate Tax Relief and Reform (Statutory Changes)

  • Beginning this year, every category of property taxpayer will benefit from the cut and the cap that the statute imposes.
  • All cities and counties will be required to cut taxes in the upcoming 2007-2008 fiscal year to the 2006-2007 revenue levels.  These local governments will then be required to make an additional cut of 3%, 5%, 7% or 9%.  The level of cuts will be determined by a formula that analyzes their taxing performance over the past 5 years, measured against a statewide average.
  • Special taxing districts and fiscally limited cities and counties will be required to cut taxes to the 2006-2007 revenue levels and make an additional cut of 3%.
  • A cap on future property tax revenues (based on the rate of personal income growth and new construction) will be imposed to ensure that government cannot grow faster than personal income.
  • Local governments may override the cut and the cap.  The method for the override will vary based on the magnitude of the local government's action (escalating from a supermajority vote of the local governing body, to a unanimous vote of the local governing body, to a referendum).

$16 billion in Further Tax Relief and Reform (Constitutional Amendment)

  • The estimated average savings for a homestead property (combining statutory and constitutional changes) will be $1,300 in 2008-2009.  This average savings represents a 44% reduction.
  • "Save our Homes" is replaced with a new "super exemption".  An estimated 73% of homesteaded properties will receive a greater benefit under this new exemption.
  • The new "super exemption" will be as follows:
    • Level 1: Homestead Property will receive an exemption of 75% of the first $200,000 in value of the home.  The minimum exemption is $50,000 per homestead.
    • Level 2: In addition to Level 1, homestead property will obtain another 15% exemption for the next $300,000 in value.
  • We will grandfather the tax savings and assessment cap for the minority of property owners who have greater benefits under the current "Save our Homes" plan.
  • We will preserve all existing constitutional exemptions based on special circumstances, including those now provided to disabled veterans, low income seniors and agricultural lands.
  • Because the tax base for all taxing authorities will decline under the constitutional amendment, the fiscal analyses reflects a reduction in school funding.  We intend to hold schools harmless from these cuts.

Other Constitutional Changes

There has been agreement to address remaining issues such as additional relief to low income elderly taxpayers, offering incentives for affordable housing and providing tax reform for "working waterfronts" and small businesses.  Small businesses will receive a $25,000 tangible personal property tax (TPP) exemption resulting in a total exemption for $1 million of the 1.3 million businesses who must pay this tax.  Furthermore, those who receive a total exemption on their TPP will never have to file the burdensome paperwork associated with the tax again.

 
This post has been included in Florida Real Estate News

17 Comments on Florida Property Tax Relief & Reform Agreement Reached

JUN
09
2007

Hi   Becky !

Thanks for sharing this info with us. Keep posting !

Nalliah Thayabharan

Commercial and Residential Building Inspector

Expert Building Inspections Ltd

6:48am • #1

Looks like they are trying...however as an investor, many of these programs do not provide relief.  One of Florida's problems is the overtaxation of investment and season resident properties that were not provided protection under the "Save our Homes" program.  With the market adjustment and investor interest declining in that area....I hope it's not "too little....too late".  For a government program, at least they are making strides.

 Devon Cerniga
www.ISellNWA.com

6:50am • #2
134,128 Points 18 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor

Thank you for sharing. I am confused and will have to sit down and run a few numbers to see how this actually will help my clients.  I don't see the portability issue covered, where homesteaders would have been able to transfer some of their savings to a new home.  THat would have REALLY helped real estate move here in FL

 

7:12am • #3

Hi Becky.  I think all they are doing is pandering.  This so-called reform is nothing more than trying to keep the voting homeowners quiet.  If we think they are sincere, then of course we will re-elect them.  And you're right, it is confusing.  Don't you think they meant it to be that way so we would all revel in the new scaled back taxes not really knowing what its all about?  I don't trust any of them.

Terry Haugen - STAGE it RIGHT!

9:25pm • #4
JUN
11
2007
373,486 Points 3 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Well at least I'm not the only one confused....LOL

Maybe over the coming weeks they will better explain what exactly they are trying to do.  Who knows!!

6:11am • #5

Devon:

 

You are right, and unless they get taxes under control for investors, rental prices are going to continue to be unaffordable. It's tough for investors right now if they've purchased as current prices.

Dan Dowling

6:26am • #6
373,486 Points 3 Featured Posts Outside Blog

I thought when they were first talking about all this, that they were going to do something for the investors and their taxes.  Are they no longer going to do anything for the non-homesteaded properties? 

If they don't, then that means anyone that owns a second home or any investors that own multiple properties won't see any sort of relief.  And that's not right.  Those people are willing to spend their money to buy homes here, they should also see some sort of tax relief as well. 

6:45am • #7
1 Featured Post

Plus, so many of my snow bird friends, and retiring baby boomers...won't see the value in moving here. And, we want them to come. Is there any way we can help, Becky ...petition or something?

8:18am • #8
373,486 Points 3 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Lois, I don't even know if they have excluded the investors totally or not.  The above posting was emailed to me, and that was all that was in it.  I don't know if that was just a portion of what they plan on doing, or if that is it.

I would hope that would make an effort to help everyone and not just the homesteaded properties and leave everyone else behind.

I was hoping someone else that maybe understood this more could help clarify.

1:19pm • #9
JUN
12
2007
Not to rain on your parade of realtor angst... but the locals are happy with their SOH  property tax caps and are more than happy to stick it to the speculators/ "investors".  If high property taxes and insurance rates keep y'all snowbirds and retiring baby boomers at bay, we consider that a side benefit.  There is no organic/grassroots call for property tax reform (see MIA Herald today,Zogby poll). 
sofla_surfer
8:40pm • #10
JUN
13
2007
373,486 Points 3 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Sofla Surfer

I'm sure the locals are happy with the changes because obviously it brings some sort of relief to them.  And I'm sure they really could care less if it affects someone else because they got what they wanted. 

Isn't that what the world is today?  What's in it for me and screw everyone else?  As long as I get what I want then I am happy?

And people wonder why this world is so screwed up!!

Meanwhile you'd happily have one of those investors or snowbirds by your property if it was for sale or spend their money in your city if they were here on vacation for a few months.  Wouldn't you?

If those people are willing to spend their money here to buy a second home or several investment properties, then they also should have some sort of tax relief!

Nothing is a done deal until it has been totally signed and implemented.  So once everything is done, hopefully they will have not forgotten about the investors!!

6:13am • #11
SEP
13
2007
I am really confused, I think that the reform should benefit all parties involved be it investors or local homsteaded property owners, I almost got into investing tilol the market took a dump here, and I am a local, I live in so.florida, my kids go to school here, so why shouldn't somone like me benfit from tax relief so that I could actually get into property investments myself.. lets not forget that many of the investors are also local people and should enjoy the same benefits as every one else, and as for snow birds coming in, well it probably wouldnt be so bad if it was not so crowded by illegals and others that seem to stay right here instead of spreading their wings and moving to some cities outside of Florida.. In my opinion we may as well draw the US boundry line at the florida state line as it is, our congress persons and local officials really need to get a grip..and no I dont habla espanol, and am proud of it...
TroyInPlantation
6:46pm • #12
SEP
14
2007
373,486 Points 3 Featured Posts Outside Blog

The fair thing to do is to allow some sort of Tax relief for everyone.  Though from what I have read, I don't think they are going to do that.  I still don't really understand it all. 

If they don't give some Tax relief to everyone that owns real estate in Florida, more and more people will start to sell their Florida properties and move to other states. 

Some think that is a good thing and others see it as a bad thing.

9:03am • #13
OCT
25
2007
As a business owner, we need relief in the form of a tax valuation rollback and cap and the cap needs to continue if business/property is sold. Thank god my family had the save our homes cap on our homestead, but our business property taxes have skyrocketed! It seems as if our county is screwing the commercial sector while they can and when they have to give a little up it won't hurt so bad. We were told by the appraiser for the county when we called to complain that we(everyone)have just not been paying our fair share for years and the assessments are just now being corrected!!!! Between 2006 and the proposed 2007 our assessment came in at more than 47% increase. That's why a cap is a must for personal and business property!
Sandy Cook
6:11pm • #14
NOV
23
2007

Why can't some relief be brought about for second homeowners at the same time as the other cuts. We have seen our property taxes increase more than several thousand dollars in two years. We are still being taxed, having bought when the market was at its highest, without a down adjustment for the market lowering and now are suffering a second blow since we are not homesteading.

One of my neighbors pays only $500 while I pay $7,600+ for a similar property. The tax increase has created a burden on the disposal income I would otherwise spend on such things as eating out, having the car washed more often, vacation things, etc. All things that also help the economy. We were very willing to pay a fair share and more to have our second home and perhaps full time homesteaders deserve something greater for being in FL but this tax burden is beyond extreme.

Stephen Simmons
8:43pm • #15
NOV
24
2007
373,486 Points 3 Featured Posts Outside Blog

"One of my neighbors pays only $500 while I pay $7,600+ for a similar property."

That I think is a lot of the problem.  People that have lived in the same home for many years are paying a lot less taxes then people that have purchased recently.  It makes no sense to have 2 people that have near identical homes to be paying that drastic of a difference.  They really need to figure something out.  Those people paying only $500 for taxes probably will never move because they probably wouldn't be able to afford the new taxes. 

I'm sure those only paying the smaller amounts of taxes won't agree they should be paying more, but they can't put the burden on everyone else that is purchasing real estate to pick up the slack.  It's not fair. 

The longer this drags out, the more it becomes clear to me that they aren't going to be doing anything about it anytime soon.  What a shame.  They will continue to run people out of our state because they can no longer afford the taxes and insurance on top of a mortgage.

10:21am • #16
NOV
30
2007

Personally, I think it is well past time to punish those that created this HUGE problem.  The housing market is a big part of all the US economy, including Florida, and in Florida it is in a depression.  It is not dying, it is dead. And experts do not see a turn around for several more years.  And much of all businesses are related to the housing market. 

Those responsible are those that control the local millage rates and their associated budgets.  Mayors and county commissioners should have lowered millage rates.  Instead, they increased their operating costs.  They did that because they are selffish, short sighted and stupid.  They did that because they also had to keep the budget in balance, by law.  They hoped to help themselves to a great political legacy. They could spend a new gold mine for the public good and their political legacy.  Instead they ruined the Florida economy and millions of lives.  Now our property taxes are keeping people from buying new homes, or even moving to a new Florida home.

There are several articles in the Florida Constitution and Florida Statutes that should have kept mayors and county commissioners from increasing their operating costs to meet revenues, INSTEAD of lowering millage rates, which they should have done.  And if none of those laws can be used, just the one law that says the ones entrusted to handle public funds should act to keep the publics' TRUST.  Well, how many Florida citizens now TRUST those same mayors and county commissioners?  Even the state legislature must not trust mayors and county commissions to act trust worthy because the first thing they did was to pass a new law that will not let local government operating budget increase by more than 3% per year.

I wonder where are the investigations that should show us who was responsible for letting local government operating cost to increase 2 times the speed of population growth?  Where is the State Attorney General?  Where is the local newspaper?  Where are the state legislatures?  They are all supposed to protect us from these CRIMINALS.  If the cost of local governments had stayed in line with population growth, we would not be having this debate.

 

RKerns
12:32pm • #17

Login or register to leave a comment

 
File2

Becky Troutt

Bradenton, FL

More about me…

Reynolds Realty of Manatee Inc

Email Me



Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog