User1314_1_t Kaushik Sirkar
Search MLS Listings by city:
Members: 123,106 - 3,250 Online Now  Login
 

Should licensing be easier or harder?
by Kaushik Sirkar, Chandler AZ REALTOR
Chandler Arizona Real Estate

I had run across an article by Greg Swann of Bloodhound blog recently in the Arizona Republic.  To summarize, Greg suggests (and Greg please feel to disagree if my synopsis is inaccurate) he states that licensing requirements for real estate agents is a joke.  No disagreement here!  He points out that passing the test only proves a persons ability to remember rather useless bits of information and in no way predicts future success as a Real Estate Agent.  He backs this up by stating that more than 90% of licensees do not renew their licenses.  Complete agreement so far Greg - the licensing process is a relative joke.

  • It does not prepare one to sell real estate
  • It is not an indicator of future success or competency with regards to selling real estate

But rather than promote stricter licensing requirements, as folks typically seem to do (myself included) Greg suggests that licensing for real estate agents should be completely eliminated.  All prospective Real Estate Agents should get positions with established top-producers and subsequently be hired by clientele post internship/apprentice ship when they have gained the necessary skills to actually sell real estate.

I had been planning to blog about this topic for a little while...lo and behold Jonathan Dalton beat me to the punch!  He discussed this topic and stated that, though he was in agreement with Greg regarding the poor makeup of the test, he did not want the test to be eliminated.

Greg - I completely agree with you about the status of the current licensing exam.  However, I will side with Jonathan here and expound further as well.  I think the test is a relative joke.  But eliminating licensing?  Then wouldn't we all just go in the direction of used car salespeople?  I believe the test MUST remain for some of the points Jonathan makes.  At a bare minimum, it weeds out criminals and makes people put forth a minimum level of effort to attain the ability to sell Real Estate.  As a matter of fact, I think licensing should become more strict as there are obviously many people who obtain their licenses that have ZERO business ATTEMPTING to sell real estate.  How to make the test more difficult/comprehensive?  This is likely the topic of another blog.

With licensing in place, I then have no problem with one of the items that Greg points out, ie an apprenticeship/internship period.  As a matter of fact, I have blogged about something similar in the past where the first year in real estate really could/should be considered an internship!  Maybe not let the new licensee 'practice' real estate on their own until the completion of said internship or probationary period?

What does everyone else think?

Thanks for Reading :)

Kaushik Sirkar, Chandler AZ REALTOR
http://www.homesphx.com

 

 
This post has been included in Arizona Information

19 Comments on Should licensing be easier or harder?

I think if it were a bit tougher.. we wouldn't have such an inundated market now.. that's for sure.   There are MANY weeding 1 by 1.....

06/12/2007 03:23 AM by Tampa Real Estate | Tampa Florida Homes Property for Sale MLS | Katrina Madewell (Charles Rutenberg Rlty- More than 3,500 agents(813) 235-9889)


Hi  Kaushik!

Thanks for sharing this info with us. Keep posting !

Nalliah Thayabharan

Commercial and Residential Building Inspector

Expert Building Inspections Ltd

06/12/2007 04:35 AM by Nalliah Thayabharan Home Inspector Commercial Building Inspector Toronto (Expert Building Inspections Ltd)


My sister-in-law is a loan officer. She needed to get a criminal background check/fingerprinted to get her license. I think this makes sense for realtors as well. Do you want a criminal assisting you with the purchase/sale of your home

06/12/2007 04:51 AM by KRISTINE CROWE (COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL BROKERAGE)


Depending on your State- in Florida for example, we have finger printing and background checks. It is one measure to protect the general public. There are also post licensing requirements. There are laws and ethics as well.

As for the number of licensees...yes too many!

06/12/2007 05:04 AM by Allison Stewart REALTOR ®St. Cloud Florida (Florida Pines Realty, Inc)


It should be harder and more oriented to practical real estate matters. Too much time is spent (at least in California) on things real estate agents have not had to do for decades... like reading plot maps for instance. 

06/12/2007 06:06 AM by Robert Whitelaw, Broker, CEO, Realtor®, ePro (Whitelaw & Sons Real Estate Services)


Hi, Kaushik!  I wish the test were more closely related to what we actually DO in our jobs.  Instead, the test is just something you have to pass in order to GET the job, and it seems that most of what you learned for the test is useless.  We learn as we work, in most cases.  I also wish licensing classes would give more info about what it takes to succeed in real estate.  The failure rate is just too high, too many newbies have dollar signs in their eyes and don't realize that they are starting their own business and they will have to invest in it to get it to work.  Very nice post!

06/12/2007 06:10 AM by Sarah Cooper (Real Estate Shows)


I can only speak for Pennsylvania.  Our requirements should be much tougher to get a license.  I think this would discourage many of the "get rich quick" mindsets who flood to the usiness when times are good.

06/12/2007 07:30 AM by Steven Shewell, The Mortgage Maverick (Primary Residential Mortgage, Inc.)


Kaushik, I have never taken the test so I can not speak about it, but what I will say is even if the test is weak at least Realtors have to take a test to be licensed, as opposed to the Mortgage Industry were no test or license is required in many states.  There should be tough tests for both Realtors and Loan Officers, and maybe we would not have some of the problems that exist in both fields.

06/12/2007 06:04 PM by George Souto (McCue Mortgage Co.)


Katrina - agreed!

Nalliah - My pleasure!

Kristine - Agreed!  Actually, I think licensing for lenders is not compulsory in all states...

Allison - Protecting the public is definitely a big part of it.

Robert - I doubt there are too many who would disagree with you there..

Sarah - Couldn't agree more!

Steven - I think many of the get rich quick folks 'flunk' out quickly....

George - Agreed.  I think we've spoken about this b4 with regards to licensing of mortgage professionals...

06/13/2007 12:37 AM by Kaushik Sirkar (Call Realty, Inc.)


I would just like it if they taught you to be a real estate agent in the classes instead of spending 35 minutes discussing riparian rights...when I was getting my license in Oklahoma.  Like Oklahoma has tons of navigable water ways.  Jeez.   Can't remember the last time I used a R-T-S in a legal description. 

How about breaking licensing own to a practical class targeted towards the kind of real estate the candidate is thinking about taking.  Commercial is a great example. 

06/13/2007 01:50 PM by Chris Lengquist, RIPS (Keller Williams Realty)


Chris - Oooh, there is something new.  Nobody had yet commented about separate licensing for commercial versus residential but i think its an excellent point!

06/13/2007 06:03 PM by Kaushik Sirkar (Call Realty, Inc.)


Kaushik --- I agree. I have been in Real Estate 12 years now. It seems as time goes on we get more, lets say...less intelligent agents that get a license. I agree, if you can remember something, you can get a license. This needs to change.

Everyone jumps on the band wagon and they think it is easy to get into real estate and be successful. Look how many have failed. The ones that have failed should have never been given a license to begin with.

Along with licensing classes, I believe potential agents should have a four year degree in some type of business background. This is a PROFESSION, I do not think my doctor or lawyer just took classes and passed a test.

Also they need take classes on....BEING POLITE, HOW TO DRESS PROFESSIONALLY, HOW TO COMMUNICATE, HOW TO BE HONEST, WRITING SKILLS, MATH SKILLS, SPEECH SKILLS, and HOW NOT TO BE LAZY.

06/14/2007 12:28 AM by Chuck Dellorto "Talk To Chuck" (McColly Real Estate - Licensed in INDIANA & ILLINOIS)


I think the requirements should be harder and I like the idea of an apprenticeship(not sure how it would work).  I luckily have a great manager and I could call her at anytime when I was new and it was like have a personal mentor.  I give credit to my manager all the time for helping me be so sucessful so quickly. 

06/14/2007 02:24 PM by Linda Box Taylor -- Your Plano, TX Realtor (Virginia Cook, Realtors)


Chuck, Just as an aside, I've heard that Lawyers may indeed "just pass the test" without benefit of college if they have the where with all to do so. I don't know of any who have.

Kaushik, I had no idea that you and other agents thought of the test as easy. I've always thought it would be a bear to pass. See what I know? At any rate I glomed (is that a word?) yes, I glomed on to this statistic, 90% of licensees do not renew their licenses. There have been times when I'm sitting in my car and hardly moving along I-17 when I've only wished the same statistic held true for the holders of driver's licenses. Now, that is one heck of an easy test to pass which does nothing to assure anyone the holder of the license has a clue about anything concerned with automobiles or the use of them.  

06/16/2007 08:19 AM by Yvonne Root Northern Arizona Home Stager (rooms b.y. root)


I like the idea of an apprenticeship because it would protect the public from new agents who have NO CLUE what they're doing and it would cause real estate agencies to take more responsibility for their new hires.  However, I disagree that all or even most failures in real estate are due to easy testing.  The majority of new businesses that fail do so in the first 3-5 years.  It is no different in the real estate industry.  It's not easy money like some think - it's hard work owning your own business.

06/19/2007 09:18 PM by Robin Willis, Tucson's Expert Agent, Realty Executives (Realty Executives Southern Arizona)


Chuck - I think you hit many of the high points, ie what agents need to focus on!

Linda - A great manager can certainly help!

Yvonne - Well, let me rephrase a little bit.  There is some wrote memorization involved.  But easy or not, it is definitely not relevant to what we do on a day-to-day basis!

Robin - 100% agreed!

06/28/2007 03:17 AM by Kaushik Sirkar (Call Realty, Inc.)


I agree with many of these posts ... the licensing requirements need to be tougher.  I think this recent market is weeding out a lot of fly-by-night agents and the good agents hanging in there. 

I don't think agents need to have a college degree, but they should be required to take continuing ed classes (Virginia requires this) and they need a good broker who will teach what new agents need to know.

I've found most brokers are more interested in the bottom line dollar - rather than making sure the agents know what they're doing.

07/21/2007 08:39 PM by Rita Gibbons Virginia Hometown Realtors (Linton Hall Realtors)


Great post, and my answer is a resounding "Yes."  All you have to do is think back to your licensing courses.  Remember some of the people sitting in the classroom? I remeber my initial thought was I'm going to make kiliing if this is my competition!  As your career progresses and you start concerning yourself with the betterment of the industry as much as yourself, it's not so appealing to swim in a sea of undereducated and ill prepared agents (none on this board, of course!).  It leaves a stain on the profession and is harmful to the public.  I have posted on other forums that I would like to see minimum transaction quotas in addition to more practical education and higher licensing fees.  Some might accuse me of simply wanting to minimize competition by driving agents out of the industry.  Nonsense.  I am not losing any business to these "agents."  A little quality control would be beneficial for everyone.

On a tangent subject, I'm not thrilled with the new 4 year licensing cycle either.  At least the nonperforming agents scrubbed out in 2 years previously.  Now they hang on for 4.  Yikes.  Sure there is a lot of weeding out right now, but if you go down to any Real Estate school, they are still churning out brand new licensees in record numbers (what the heck are these people thinking jumping in right now?)

07/24/2007 11:51 PM by Paul Slaybaugh, Scottsdale AZ Real Estate (Realty Executives)


Along the same lines, I think there should be some kind of competency testing to renew. If not every time, then at least every so many years. I'm in a del right now with another agent who has been in the business long enough to know better, but who IS NOT doing his job, It's very frustrating.

07/25/2007 12:55 PM by Leslie Prest, Prest Realty, Payson, AZ


Leave a response…

Name:
Notify me of new comments:
Comment:
What does the graphic say?
 
Real Estate Agent: Kaushik Sirkar (Call Realty, Inc.)
Kaushik Sirkar
Chandler, AZ
More about me…
Call Realty, Inc.

Cell Phone: (480) 600-2808
Email Me
Check out my Real Estate commentary - my entry topics vary from real estate investing, to first time buyers in Phoenix to strategies for professionals.


Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find AZ real estate agents and Chandler real estate here on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2007 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved