As an observer of the real estate industry from a technology standpoint, I’ve always marveled at the relative ugliness of agent websites. 

Now, before we go any further, I’d like to clarify a few things – first, that I certainly don’t want to paint every agent with the same brush; there are some outstanding agent websites out there that are both highly functional and beautiful.

Secondly, that beauty is of course in the eye of the beholder, and this holds true for design and user interface layout.  I don’t claim to hold a monopoly on what’s esthetically acceptable, but I can offer food for thought. 

Templates

The majority of agents wisely look to a third party to develop their website (as opposed to a do-it-yourself approach).  Most agents spend their money on the hosting and management of the site, and spend little or none on the look and feel, opting instead to select from a variety of supposedly customizable templates. While fees for this sort of service vary, one thing is obvious – the development company that developed your website is turning a profit because they sell the same set of templates over and over – leaving customization options (sometimes very little) up to you.  It’s a great economy of scale and it works very well for web developers, but it doesn’t make you stand out from the crowd.

One big offender here (in my opinion) is Point2.  I can spot a Point2 website a mile away – just about every one of their websites has the same font styles, the same layout, and the same “generic house” or “happy family” imagery.  These sites also have the same focus on lead generation – almost ad nauseam – with every link promising ‘free information’ or ‘find out what your home is worth’, just type in your email address and phone number please!

My feeling is that while it may cost more up front, the benefits of a custom designed website that doesn’t look like it just rolled off an assembly line are hard to ignore.  I would find it difficult to select any professional if they did nothing to demonstrate that their services are unique, high-quality, and not like the pack.

Links

A huge usability barrier that I see on many agent sites is the vast number of links and menu options.  Exacerbating this is the fact that many of these links point to the same information or end point, which lead users into circles of redundancy – and frustration.

A key decision to make is to really decide what side of the transaction your website should cater to – buyers or sellers.  The focus should be tailored to that – if your business deals with both, separate those into two distinct sites (you don’t need two domain names, just two sites that don’t overlap) and really streamline your site to what’s really important to someone who is trying to select a reliable, competent agent.

Listing-centric or Client-centric?

Another issue that I see with many agent sites is that some go to great lengths to show me ‘featured listings’.  This is a great feature when done tastefully, but with the mish-mash of listing engines and feeds, it’s rare to have this displayed seamlessly on your site – which adds confusion when your visitor clicks a listing and is whisked away to ‘listings-R-us’!

One thing to consider is that the type of customer that is web-savvy enough to even seek out and find your website is probably knowledgeable enough to use MLS-based websites, for example, and already has an idea of the homes they want to purchase.  What they *are* seeking is a reputable, trustworthy agent to provide them with respectful service first, and listings second. MLS sites may have won the game of publicly accessible listings, but they can never replace good, quality relationships and customer service.  I’m not saying you shouldn’t have listings on your site, but do focus on the battles you can win. 

Site Rot

Site rot is what I call websites that take up space on the internet and are like old billboards on dusty roads.  Sure, they have information, but it’s stagnant.

Thankfully, with the proliferation of blogs and other dynamic content (RSS feeds, etc.), site rot is less of a problem than it once was.  The best thing you could do as far as ‘keeping up appearances’ on your website would be to have some content on the first page dated for TODAY.  It means you’re active, you’re in the mix, you work for a living.  The death knell for me would be to visit an agent’s website and see “Last Update: 2005” or a posting about median home values in 1999!  Don’t just have a website to seem “with it” or because everyone who’s successful has one.  It’s like a corn field – you reap what you sow. 

Bottom Line

I’m a technology guy – I make a living helping people select technology solutions that harmonize with how they work in the real world.  I don’t claim to know all of the nuances of real estate marketing – but I can tell the difference between a website that resonates with me, and one that has zero pizzazz.  How you answer the phone, how you stage a home, how you dress and speak – all of these are a reflection of you – and your website is no exception.

 

11 Comments on Why Are Real Estate Agent Websites So Ugly?

JUN
16
2007
Not a lot of time for most folks to work on the site are not willing to spend the money  
12:21am • #1
121,089 Points 22 Featured Posts Outside Blog
I have about a half dozen websites. They're all templates and each one accomplishes different things. The "prettiest" one I have does not get much traffic but some of my busier ones do.

If you could get the looks and still get the traffic, that would be great. But usually, in my experience, the best looking sites often don't get the results on Google as some of  the ugly ones....
12:28am • #2

Yes, I agree that the goals of quality presentation and search engine optimization often are at odds with each other - it's a shame that Google is attracted to pages that are heavy on keywords, and light on relevance or context.

I think my experience has been that a website is a fine balancing act between drawing potential customers in with SEO, keyword optimization, etc., and keeping them - or inspiring them to take a desired action such as contacting me, or purchasing something, etc.

I would wager that the Point2 sites (again, not to pick on Point2Agent, but for example's sake) are great for reeling in traffic, but how good are they in generating clients?

I'd be interested in some figures on bounce rates - what % of visitors leave these sites, how long do they visit, what pages do they click/avoid, etc.?

12:41am • #3
126,028 Points 5 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Steve, your comments are right on target. Templates are usually unimaginative and rudimentary, with a row of buttons on the left, an agent photo at top, a "masthead" section with some sort of cheesy graphic and too much copy. 

Agents aren't always good consumers. It seems they look for a quick solution in order to get online. And for most agents, I think it's too tempting to set up a website and then walk away from it.

The words "free market reports", "free information", "number one" and "premiere" have become overused to the point that they have lost their meaning.  Web pages jammed with miniature flash graphics, "School Reports" with ringing school bells and flashing icons (I'm not mentioning any company names, but this is another templated site) are a personal pet peeve of mine.

Not everyone can afford a custom website, but It's truly unfortunate that the companies that offer templates can't make them more adaptible and customizable.

12:51am • #4
3 Featured Posts

I use Z57 for my site and love them.  While they have a great template system the ability to not only customixe you site as a whole but pages really gives them a great platform.

If you have 30 minutes a day tops you can really make a site work well for you and give you a great return on your investment.

I really think that the problem is that to many people think that if you build it they will come.  they get a site spend a few hours setting up the basic info and then never readdress it for several months.  Then the site goes dry in the engines and they blame the company for there poor placement. 

Just like any other marketing tool a website needs to be updated and maintined on a regular basis

1:00am • #5
Steve I agree with almost everything you wrote. However from my personal experience I have found that the majority of people visiting real estate sites are looking for homes and in many cases if you do not provide them with listings but with a lengthy paragrapg about how superior your service is they normally just click out.
1:02am • #6
1 Featured Post

Has anyone ever done a survey to see what consumers want? 

I would be interested in knowing their priorities when they are searching for homes on the web.  Do they want to see listings first?  Do they want to read about the area or the individual neighborhoods?  Schools?  Do they want this info from a real estate agent site? 

What is their expectation when they land on my website. 

p.s. I don't have one yet. 

3:31am • #7
10 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog
I have to agree. I have done the whole "Real Estate Site Provider/Template" thing and it was nearly useless. Once I took more control and started creating regular updated content, my site went from being relatively useless to generating clients weekly.
4:02am • #8
252,124 Points 7 Featured Posts Outside Blog

I have a templated site, provided by KW.  I have been working with a fellow to put together a new site.  Lo and behold!  He has gone through a few renditions that look just like a real estate website. 

We are now getting down to business on my "vision."  Good, bad, or in between, beautiful, acceptable, or ugly, it will look a little different from the other 2,000,000 agent websites.  And I will prove to myself that I have a clue, or I'm mistaken. 

No good?  No problem.  We'll go again.

 

6:42am • #9
4 Featured Posts
My site is probably the ugliest site on the internet. But it has a really long tail, is very sticky and makes me a lot of money. I would like to gussy it up but I am afraid to fix it when it ain't broke.
8:33am • #10
JUL
21
2007

Steve,

You are so correct, but so is Greg. The personality of individuals will attract some and disengage others. The niche that Greg has carved out, although by his account is ugly is indeed a thing of beauty.ugly telephone weighs 8 lbs.

I have never heard of Agent accelerator before but it looks extremely interesting.

11:56pm • #11

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Rainmaker_large

Steve Moores

Calgary, AB

More about me…

Provericon Software Development Inc.

Office Phone: (403) 263-9111

Email Me

Information about software & technology from a real estate perspective.


Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find AB real estate agents and Calgary real estate on ActiveRain.