Special offer

Fannie Mae to Tighten Guidelines

By
Services for Real Estate Pros with Marte Cliff Copywriting

This probably isn't news that anyone who sells real estate wants to hear, but getting approved for a mortgage is about to become more difficult.

From what I've read here, and what agents have told me in person, you thought it was difficult enough all this year!

Fannie Mae has announced regulation updates meant to reduce its risk... beginning with a requirement for a credit score of 620.

Other changes include options regarding mortgage insurance. Buyers whose loan-to-value ratio exceeds 80% can choose to accept higher monthly mortgage insurance premiums or pay a one time fee at closing to compensate Fannie for the higher risk. Either way, they'll be paying more. It would be a good idea to talk with your favorite mortgage broker to see just how much the increased fees will add to a monthly payment before helping buyers decide on the maximum price they can pay for a home.

Debt to income ratios are also under fire. Fannie Mae will no longer approve ratios exceeding 45%, unless the borrower has very strong assets and exceptional credit scores. In no case will they approve a debt to income ratio over 50%.

These changes are due to be implemented during the weekend of December 12, so serious buyers who may be on the edge of not qualifying under the new rules should get their loans closed prior to then.

So what can you do? Get going on a buyer letter!

Let your buyers know what's about to happen, and encourage them to take the plunge if they've been waiting to see if rates will fall or a new buyer tax credit will be announced. After all, financial gurus are predicting that rates are now as low as we'll see in the next ten years. And... a buyers' credit won't do them much good if they can't get a loan.

This is looking like a big game - so it won't surprise me at all if a new credit is announced immediately after the new Fannie Mae regulations go into effect.

Something else you can do right now is to start providing your buyers with information on steps they can take to raise their credit scores. According to the chart provided on the Fannie Mae announcement, one point can make a considerable difference in the amount they'll pay for mortgage insurance, especially if they're making application for a 95% loan.

The cut-off points are at 640, 660, 680, and 720. A score of 740 or more pays the least mortgage insurance. If you can provide the tips that raise them from 639 to 640, or from 739 to 740, they'll love you!

New Desktop Underwriting guidelines will call for a credit report less than 90 days old on an existing home purchase - so everyone who has been struggling to get approval for a short sale for 4 or 5 months will have to submit a new credit report. Construction financing gets a break - 120 days.

Other Regulations:

"Trailing Secodary Wage Earner Income" will no longer be considered, and loan officers will be required to get verbal verification of employment within 10 days of the loan closing.

Borrowers using stocks, bonds, or mutual funds as assets for reserves need to remember that only 70% of their current value will be counted, while retirement funds will only be counted at 60% of value.

If Fannie Mae had used guidelines like these a few years ago, instead of making loans to anyone who could fog a mirror, you probably wouldn't be faced with the glut of REO's and short sales you're dealing with today. Seems like they can't find any common-sense middle ground.

 

Comments(36)

Marcelo Da Silva
Homesmart - Phoenix, AZ

These are common sense regulations. Although it will make tough due to the current of state of mind people have (everything should be free), people eventually will adapt to the new reality. Awesome Info!

Sep 30, 2009 03:33 AM
Rashel Beaver
Phoenix, AZ

I also agree with the credit score being raised. As much as I don't want to lose business from those clients, I stil find it hard to believe you CAN buy a home with such a low credit score and so little down.

Sep 30, 2009 03:55 AM
Greg George
Mortgage Guru, Specializing in Jumbo, FHA and Conv Loans - Charlotte, NC

Marte'.

thanks for posting that. I agree with Paul, that most all of these changes have been in place for a few months now.  As for you repsonse about verifying the place of work, there is SO much employment/income fraud now days, that the lenders have to be able to find somewhat of an existence of the persons employer without the help of the buyer or employer.

Keeping everyone honest.  :-)

Sep 30, 2009 04:17 AM
Christianne O'Malley
Dickson Realty - Reno, NV
Exceptional Service - Delivering Results in Reno!

These are welcome guidelines that will hurt in the short term but will stop future foreclosures from occurring. I am glad these changes are being made.

Sep 30, 2009 04:40 AM
Marte Cliff
Marte Cliff Copywriting - Priest River, ID
Your real estate writer

Thanks for all the great comments!

I agree that it needed to become more difficult to get a loan - had it been harder a few years ago we wouldn't be in the mess we're in now.

When I first started in real estate conventional loans required 20% down - so hardly anyone in our "economically depressed" area could get them. FHA would do 5%, and there was VA for a few - but very few of our houses could qualify under rules such as "no wood to earth contact." At that time we saw a lot of seller financing.

We saw very few foreclosures - people had too much to lose to let a house go if they could find any way to hang on. With the zero down programs we saw a few years ago, buyers were really only paying rent and had nothing to lose (except their credit rating) if they walked away.

I've been reading a lot about the new appraisal rules - and read that they're considering an 18 month moratorium on the new regulations because they're realizing that it's a bad plan.

Using an appraiser who is unfamiliar with the neighborhood is just asking for an inaccurate appraisal - something they didn't stop to think about before they made that rule. This is another example of something that needed to be addressed, but in a more reasonable, common-sense manner.

It's a shame that we need to have so many regulations to prevent cheating, but I believe that the die-hard cheats will find a way around them while the honest folks just have more hoops to jump through.

Thanks again for the comments!

Marte

 

Sep 30, 2009 05:08 AM
John Swaino
WJ Bradley Capital Mortgage - Scottsdale, AZ

These changes along with the removal of extremely risky loan products.....

Sep 30, 2009 05:10 AM
Maureen Megowan
Remax Estate Properties - - Palos Verdes Estates, CA
Palos Verdes Real Estate Blog

I agree that credit standards needed raising. People always try to take on too much debt

Sep 30, 2009 06:00 AM
Emily Lowe
RE/MAX Homes and Estates, Lipman Group - Nashville, TN
Nashville TN Realtor

Marte - Thank you for this valuable information.  I will send a letter to my buyers.  I agree with you - I wish that they had had this in place when we really needed them.  Now we are just cleaning up the mess and it will take a while.

Sep 30, 2009 06:57 AM
Tim Maitski
Atlanta Communities Real Estate Brokerage - Atlanta, GA
Truth, Excellence and a Good Deal

I agree with the changes.  It stinks that they let the standards slide so much in the past.

Sep 30, 2009 07:40 AM
Steve Lauver
Nebraska Realty - - Papillion, NE
Omaha Realty -- 402-689-7550

People will need to plan more before buying a home. I was always surprised to see loans approved at close to 50% dti.

Sep 30, 2009 08:12 AM
Chuck Carstensen
RE/MAX Results - Elk River, MN
Minnesota/Wisconsin Real Estate Expert

I would like to see lending loosen up somewhat but in reality it wont happen so it is what it is.

Sep 30, 2009 08:19 AM
Kendall Aschoff
SecurityNational Mortgage - Las Vegas, NV
NMLSR ID: 372723 - Henderson Las Vegas, NV - Mortg

Marte--this is simply the pendulum swinging too far the other way.  The days of "have a pulse, get a loan" are long gone.  Now it's a struggle to get lenders to release their grip on the lending dollars.  Even more annoying are the PMI companies.  You didn't hear them complaining about all the money in premiums they raked in over the years, but now they are refusing to insure homes in "declining" markets and finding reasons to jack up rates.

Sep 30, 2009 08:53 AM
Marte Cliff
Marte Cliff Copywriting - Priest River, ID
Your real estate writer

Kendall - do you mean to say we're seeing another form of red-lining rear it's ugly head? Years ago we had a community here where lenders refused to lend. Red-lining was illegal, but they got away with it.

From reading posts here, it does appear that lending practices vary from place to place. Our area, for instance, didn't get the number of risky loans that other areas are suffering from.

I have to believe that we were not a "target market" for making sure that every breathing person could buy a home. That hasn't stopped prices from falling after the bubble burst. I just got a letter from a local Realtor today saying that prices here have fallen 15% to 25% from their peak. And that still puts most homes out of range for a large percentage of "locals." When the bubble expanded here almost the only buyers were those coming from out of area with bundles of money in their pockets.

I should call that agent and find out if that's still true.

I agree about the PMI - before we feel too sorry for insurance companies we need to consider all the loans they were paid to insure that never went into default. Just like all the car owners who never have a wreck and humans who remain healthy - the insurance companies never complain when they collect and don't have to pay out.

Tightening lending practices is a good thing, but I hope the pendelum doesn't swing as far away from granting loans as it did toward it a few years ago.

Anyone for balance?

Thanks for all the comments,

Marte

Sep 30, 2009 09:11 AM
Keisha Hosea- KASIHomes.com
KASI Homes - Chino Hills, CA
Real Estate Solutions For Real People

We're in for lots of changes for a long time. We just need to figure out how to roll with the changes and make business still happen.

Sep 30, 2009 12:28 PM
Damon Gettier
Damon Gettier & Associates, REALTORS- Roanoke Va Short Sale Expert - Roanoke, VA
Broker/Owner ABRM, GRI, CDPE

Is anyone doing less than a 620 credit score now?

Sep 30, 2009 02:57 PM
Marte Cliff
Marte Cliff Copywriting - Priest River, ID
Your real estate writer

Keisha - You have the right attitude! Just figure out how to make it all work. And I'm sure you will.

Damon - I've spoken with mortgage brokers who say yes, they can place those loans. But it's private money. I didn't ask how much down payment, but all the private lenders I've met want a pretty no-risk loan to value.

 

Sep 30, 2009 03:37 PM
Christine Donovan
Donovan Blatt Realty - Costa Mesa, CA
Broker/Attorney 714-319-9751 DRE01267479 - Costa M

Some of these changes make sense, though I agree that looking at the debt to income ratios makes sense when it comes to higher income individuals.

Oct 01, 2009 05:49 PM
Marte Cliff
Marte Cliff Copywriting - Priest River, ID
Your real estate writer

Yes - there's a big difference in what's left over for other things between a person who makes $2,000 per month and one who makes $20,000.

 

Oct 01, 2009 08:55 PM
John Swaino
WJ Bradley Capital Mortgage - Scottsdale, AZ

                           In responce to Damons comment #31.  We can do Fannie down to 580 with DU approval and FHA down to 560.  This includes high balance to county limit with DU approval.   Also DTI to 60 on case by case.  As mentioned by Marte there is a big difference between those two incomes in the whole scheme of things.  

Oct 14, 2009 08:48 AM
Marte Cliff
Marte Cliff Copywriting - Priest River, ID
Your real estate writer

HI John, and thanks for chiming in. We hear so much about what's going on, and know that a lot of it is probably just talk - good to get news right from someone who is out there doing those loans.

Oct 14, 2009 03:45 PM