Below is a news brief published by Busines Week Magazine today. My question is, if the banks make it harder to obtain a short sale, will this adversely affect the rate of foreclosures? Perhaps an "unintended Consequence" of making short sales tougher to gain permission on will result in an increase in foreclosures, which will then drive home prices down further, resulting in even more strategic defaults, and a viscious cycle of downward spiraling values, sales.

What is your opinion? How would you recommend banks handle this sort of thing so that there is less negative impact?

From Business Week today, as quoted at Realtor.org:

Banks are backing away from short sales, forcing sellers to pay extra at closing or demanding a promissory note for the amount due. One-third of borrowers owe more on their mortgages than their properties are worth, according First American CoreLogic.

When their situations were really tough, most banks preferred short sales because they were their best opportunity to get the most money back. But with an improving economy, and because the losses on many of these properties have already been written off the books, banks are increasingly reluctant to negotiate a short sale.

Today, banks demand 9.5 weeks to respond to a short-sale request, compared to 4.5 weeks a year ago, according to research firm Campbell Communications. Their reluctance is frequently stymieing sales and frustrating real estate practitioners.

"It drives me up a wall," says Robert G. Hertzog of Summit Home Consultants in Phoenix. "[The bank is] holding my client hostage."

Source: BusinessWeek, Christopher Palmeri (10/09/2009)