|
Find WI real estate agents and Lake Geneva real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
8 Comments on The Power of the Referral May Be Losing Its AV...Will the FTC Recall Your Client Testimonials?
I heard about this last night - its amazing what they choose to regulate and what not..........at Raincamp they talked about how critical word of mouth and testimonies are to our business - people choose more because of what someone said then something that was advertised..........interesting post!
Rebecca --- wow --- a lot of information -- you are right -- disclaimers on our testimonials would be rather ridiculous --This will be interesting to watch.
Mama Liz
There have been a few posts on this lately. I wonder how effective they are going to be in enforcing this. They just don't have the manpower. I would imagine this is targetted at the big guys whomever they may be. However, I don't quite get what it is all about. What major infringements caused this new law. Referrals are subjective anyway. So let someone right "in my opinion", that will take car of one part of the problem. Another part is to disclose that you are being paid for your recommendation. In that case, what kind of a recommendation is that anyway. The whole thing is wacky.
Liz M., Liz L- This is indeed an issue which needs to be followed. Any cash or prize needs to be disclosed. Even here on ActiveRain, when the consumer testimonials was launched, points were awarded. I believe these points would fall under the prize category though I am not an attorney.
Jane- This would be applicable to all bloggers and they are "Now put on notice". This has been worked on for awhile and WOMMA has an ethics division....FTC has listened to WOMMA in this regard. Disclosure for payment is part of the ACT. Key is whether it is a sponsored communication or an advertised communication OR is the communictor acting completely independently.
IS the blogger part of an overall marketing campaign?
Rebecca: Timely post... As one in Title, we're so regulated that we're getting paranoid to do anything. I'm beginning to feel like my first amendment rights are in question. I've already had the order from corporate to remove statistical marketing reports from some of my blogs as they may be 'an inducement to do business'... (which is nonsense) It's really frustrating because they were posted as something to benefit the consumer and anyone on the planet with an internet connection has access to them, not just realtors. Who loses here? I thought I was being a consumer advocate, which is what all the regulation is supposed to be protecting.
Renee- I feel for you. I used to work for a real estate attorney who owned a title company and so I have an idea of the restrictions placed on you to blog. It is that line always that is walked, that grey area and if it is grey, with more and more restrictions placed it is best not to post. And yes in some cases that will be unfortunate because consumers will truly lose.
Larry,
Oh yes we haven't seen the end of big brother. The webinar from WOMMA is a good start for clarification. Now Angie's List, from my understanding, is a pay to use site from consumers but I did not think that consumers are paid for their submissions and testimonials on companies. IF they are there HAS to be clear disclosure.
An example, I think, of sites that would not have to pay are those in which consumers freely give their opinion and are not at all rewarded, not with points, prizes, cash, anything....like question and answer sites- Yahoo Answers is one.