ARE YOU FRIKKIN’ KIDDING ME????????crappy standards

They’re the damn guys that took all of our money and bought out troubled Countrywide and Merrill Lynch! I mean honestly folks- HOW IN THE HELL DO YOU GET BILLIONS OF DOLLARS FROM THE GOVERNMENT and STILL lose money????

Since the Countrywide acquisition, I personally withdrew all my money from B of A and put it elsewhere. If someone’s gonna screw me, at least pay me for it!

Oh what's that? You say you're the "Bank of Opportunity"? Who's benefiting? Ken Lewis or my old .0000345% savings account?

Read the article below for more info.

—-

By IEVA M. AUGSTUMS, AP Business Writer

CHARLOTTE, N.C. – Bank of America Corp. said Friday it lost more than $2.2 billion in the third quarter as loan losses kept rising, providing further evidence that consumers are still struggling to pay their bills.

The nation’s second-largest bank said it wrote down loans on its books by almost $10 billion during the July-September period, up almost $1 billion from the second quarter. The bank also added $2.1 billion to its reserves to cover bad loans, bringing its provision for credit losses to $11.7 billion. The bank’s total allowance for loan and lease losses now totals $35.83 billion.

Bank of America’s results were aided by profit from investment bank Merrill Lynch, including income from bond, stock and currency trading.

Its earnings follow the pattern set earlier this week by Citigroup Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co., which also reported more loan losses during the third quarter as consumers struggled to keep up with their credit card and mortgage payments. And on Friday, General Electric Co. reported that its GE Capital business, which includes credit cards, saw an 87 percent drop in profits, although it was also weighed down by commercial real estate losses. Together, the reports depict a financial industry that is still deeply troubled.

Banks have predicted for some time that their loan losses would keep rising. And Bank of America’s CEO Ken Lewis confirmed that this trend continues.

“Based on (the) economic scenario, results in the fourth quarter are expected to continue to be challenging as we close the year,” Lewis said on a conference call with analysts.

Bank of America said it lost $2.24 billion, or 26 cents per share, after accounting for the preferred dividends of $1.24 billion. That compared with earnings of $704 million, or 15 cents per share, a year earlier.

Revenue in the quarter increased 33 percent to $26.04 billion.

The loss was 5 cents more per share than the 21 cents forecast by analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters Inc. Investors sent Bank of America shares down 90 cents, or 5 percent, to $17.20 in morning trading.

“Obviously, credit costs remain high, and that is our major financial challenge going forward,” Lewis said in a statement accompanying the earnings report. “However, we are heartened by early positive signs, such as the leveling of delinquencies among our credit card numbers.”

During the analyst call, Lewis said the bank believes it may have peaked in total credit losses this quarter, “although the levels going forward will continue to be elevated and certain businesses will still experience higher losses.”

Bank of America is considered particularly vulnerable to unemployment, which climbed last month to 9.8 percent in the U.S. Economists predict the jobless rate will pass 10 percent in the coming months.

The bank’s massive portfolio of credit-card loans could help investors determine where the economy is headed and how well the industry at large will fare, said Doug Dannemiller, senior analyst at Boston-based research firm Aite Group.

“As unemployment rates are in the 10 percent range, the results on consumer lending aren’t going to improve until that number gets lower,” Dannemiller said.

The bank has about 53 million consumer and small business customers, making it vulnerable to delinquencies and defaults, yet also ready to thrive when the economy recovers.

Bank of America’s global card services unit loss widened significantly to $1.04 billion from $167 million a year ago.

The loss in the bank’s home loans and insurance division grew to $1.6 billion from $54 million a year ago, as credit costs continued to rise.

The bank, which being investigated by federal authorities for its Merrill acquisition, has received $45 billion in bailout funds as part of the Treasury Departments $700 billion financial rescue package. It’s not known when it will repay the government.

Lewis, who is retiring at year’s end, has agreed to give up his salary and other compensation for 2009.

(end of article)

Tags: , , ,

 
This post has been included in Texas Information
Post is included in group: Texas Real Estate
Post is included in group: Realtors®
Post is included in group: News Junkies - The Great Debate!
Post is included in group: Austin Texas Realtors
Post is included in group: 1st Time Buyers

7 Comments on Bank of America loses $2.24B as loan losses rise- GIVE ME A BREAK!

OCT
16

I love this bank stuff....but you did notice that while Ken Lewis will retire in December ... and has declined his salary this year (because of questions and investigations surround the takeover of ML), he will walk away with over $53M in pension, etc. 

12:00pm • #1

Exactly, Amanda. I'd give up my salary (wait I don't have one) ANYDAY to walk away with that kinda loot!

12:03pm • #2

Selling Loans from failed banks (both performing and non-performing) I understand the loss that B of A is going through.   I have a feeling that B of A was forced in a back room deal to take on Merryil Lynch as part of the deal to get gov't funds.   We'll never really get the full disclosure on that deal no matter how many investigations there are.

With that said, B of A needs to get away from their bad debt loans.  Selling them off is the only way to do it.   But, part of the TARP program is one reason that there is a problem.   By accepting money through TARP all those that went that route agreed that they could foreclose on property but could not force anyone out of the home.  

So what are they to do, sell the loans to a third party that can foreclose and force out those that are living in the home.  Sounds tricky, and a bit nasty, but it is the only way to recoup the loss on the loans.

12:09pm • #3
Outside Blog

Really this is to be expected, regulators from the FDIC are coming down hard on all banks to be realistic as to the true value of the collateral (real estate) underlying their loans and also forcing them to foreclose on loans that the FDIC feels don't meet their requirements. Therein lies the true problem, banks aren't being allowed to try and salvage clients that they feel can weather the storm, so to speak, and are instead having to apply a one size fits all solution to all their loans, thus causing a spike in foreclosures and continuing the downward pressure on prices, thus causing more loans to be non-performing, thus causing more foreclosures, and so on. The same loans that banks were told to make years ago they are now being told to foreclose on. Unfortunately government intervention always swings too radically from one side to the other, what we need know is a return to the middle so that some normalcy can return to real estate and credit markets. Also, remeber that the government money came at a cost of a little over 6% to the banks that took it, that is not cheap money, which is why you see so many banks trying to pay those TARP dollars off as quick as possible. Most of BofA's losses stem from the pile of bad loans they got from CountryWide, not trying to be an apologist for them but their are some valid reasons for the big loss.

12:09pm • #4

You guys are spot on and I agree with you on it 100%. It just aggravates me how their "euphoric" commercials make consumers want to take out a home equity loan on their soul.

They do what they have to do to stay above water and answer to the shareholders I guess- I just personally don't agree with taking money from our pocket to correct their wrongs, and still be in a heap of dog ****.

12:17pm • #5
4 Featured Posts

give credit where credit is due.

it wasn't easy for them to show those types of losses, they had to work at it.

it took a lot of effort and hard work to lose that much money.

the big question is why do people still do business with them? 

9:16pm • #6
OCT
17

I'm looking at both sides of the fence.   B of A made some mistakes, but the Federal Gov't forced them and other banks into some of the mess.  Here's how I came to this:  Community Reinvestment Act  (CRA) was signed into law in 1977 by Jimmy Carter.   CRA is/was designed to encourage commercial banks and savings assoc. to meet the needs of borrowers in all segments of their communities, inclucing low and moderate income neighborhoods. (http://en.wkipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act).

That's the start of no doc loans, no deposit down loans, loans to those that normally would not qualify. Over the years our gov't (Presidents) further forced banks to make loans that came back to bite the housing market in 2007/2008, what is known as the "bursting bubble".  It's not a dem/rep. thing, this is our gov't and while we stood by and enjoyed a great housing boom, the empire burned from within. 

Now, if the Gov't forced the banks to take/give these loans that were on shaky ground, does it not make it fair that the banks ask for relief from the mess that the gov't created in the first place?   And who IS the gov't of the US suppose to be, that's right, you and I.  So we pay for the play of those that we elected and did nothing about their decisions.....

11:15am • #7

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Rainmaker_large

Tommy Xintaris FHA VA & Conv. Texas Mortgage Home Loans

Houston, TX

More about me…

Envoy Mortgage

Address: 5100 Westheimer Road, Houston, TX, 77056

Office Phone: (832) 212-6969

Email Me



Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find TX real estate agents and Houston real estate on ActiveRain.