Special offer

Shouldn't Realtors be fighting this bill?

By
Real Estate Agent with Real Estate One

I have been seeing alarmist ads of TV about the American Clean Energy & Security Act of 2009 for some time now, but it took an email from one of my past customers to get me to look into it a bit further. I certainly had no idea that it may have such a dramatic impact on housing and the ability for owners to sell their homes as it appears that it may. A part of the problem is that very few people anywhere, including the Congress, have any real idea of what is hidden in this bill and what impact it might have on everyday life.

The name of the bill is innocuous enough. I mean who can argue that we don't need cleaner energy and that saving on energy use and costs wouldn't somehow make us all more secure. But in this nice sounding bill, as in many things in life, the devil is in the details. The bill, as it was passed by the House of Representatives and sent to the Senate, is 1427 pages long. It has 835 Sections dealing with all sorts of rules regulations and programs. The bill was sponsored primarily by Representative Henry Waxman of California, which in itself explains a lot.

When I received the email from my past client, he passed on some comments that he had received from someone who apparently took the time to read through the bill and highlight the areas that should be of concern to homeowners. Below, in parentheses are a few of his comments. The author has obviously reached his own strong opinions about the bill, so take these with a grain of salt. Since this Arthur has interspersed so much of his personal opinion into the content below, you may wish to go read the bill yourself, which you can do at  http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-2454 . I have also put a complete PDF version on my Web site at http://www.themilfordteam.com/PDF/HR2454_Bill.PDF

Beginning 1 year after enactment of the Act, you won't be able to sell your home unless you retrofit it to comply with the energy and water efficiency standards of this Act.

    H.R.  2454, the "Cap & Trade" bill passed by the House of Representatives, if also passed by the Senate, will be the largest tax increase any of us has ever experienced.  The Congressional Budget Office (supposedly non-partisan) estimates that in just a few years the average cost to every family of four will be $6,800 per year.  No one is excluded.  However, once the lower classes feel the pinch in their wallets, these voters may get a tax refund (even if they pay no taxes at all) to offset this new cost.  Thus you, Mr.  and Mrs.  Middle Class America, will have to pay even more since additional tax dollars will be needed to bail out everyone else.

    But wait.  This awful bill (that very few or no one in Congress has actually read) has many more surprises in it.  Probably the worst one is this:  A year from now you won't be able to sell your house.

    Yes, you read that right.  The caveat is (there always is a caveat) that if you have enough money to make required major upgrades to your home, then you can sell it.  But, if not, then forget it.  Even pre-fabricated homes ("mobile homes") are included.  In effect, this bill prevents you from selling your home without the permission of the EPA administrator.

    To get this permission, you will have to have the energy efficiency of your home measured.  Then the government will tell you what your new energy efficiency requirement is and you will be forced to make modifications to your home under the retrofit provisions of this Act to comply with the new energy and water efficiency requirements.  Then you will have to get your home measured again and get a license (called a "label" in the Act) that must be posted on your property to show what your efficiency rating is; sort of like the Energy Star efficiency rating label on your refrigerator or air conditioner If you don't get a high enough rating, you can't sell.  And, the EPA administrator is authorized to raise the standards every year, even above the automatic energy efficiency increases built into the Act.

Sect.  202:
    Building Retrofit Program mandates a national retrofit program to increase the energy efficiency of all existing homes across America .

    Beginning 1 year after enactment of the Act, you won't be able to sell your home unless you retrofit it to comply with the energy and water efficiency standards of this Act.  You had better sell soon, because the standards will be raised each year and will be really hard (i.e., ex$pen$ive) to meet in a few years.  The Act allows the government to give you a grant of several thousand dollars to comply with the retrofit program requirements if you meet certain energy efficiency levels.  But, wait, the State can set additional requirements on who qualifies to receive the grants.  You should expect requirements such as "can't have an income of more than $50K per year", "home selling price can't be more than $125K,. 

Sect.  204:
    Building Energy Performance Labeling Program establishes a labeling program that for each individual residence will identify the achieved energy efficiency performance for "at least 90 percent of the residential market within 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act." This means that within five years, 90% of all residential homes in the U.S.  must be measured and labeled.  The EPA administrator will get $50M each year to enforce the labeling program.  The Secretary of the Department of Energy will get an additional $20M each year to help enforce the labeling program. 


Sect.  304:
    Greater Energy Efficiency in Building Codes establishes new energy efficiency guidelines for the National Building Code and mandates at 304(d) that 1 year after enactment of this Act, all state and local jurisdictions must adopt the National Building Code energy efficiency provisions or must obtain a certification from the federal government that their state and/or local codes have been brought into full compliance with the National Building Code energy efficiency standards.

I'm generally not a fan of alarmist rants by people with a particular ax to grind and the author of the comments above may have misinterpreted some things however, this bill appears to have lots and lots and lots of things buried in it that will cost everyone lots of money to comply with in the future. It deserves to be exposed too much more scrutiny than it has received and hopefully the Senate in its deliberate style will find and remove or modify some of the more onerous provisions that the House bill contains. I'm generally in favor of doing things to decrease our use of energy in all aspects of life; however, having the government come into my home and tell me that I must do this or that to improve it's energy efficiency before I can sell it feels more like a home invasion than a helpful program.

The American Clean Energy and Security Act appears to be another misguided attempt by our so-called leaders to save us from ourselves. I think they should stick to passing legislation that lawn mowers need labels that say that one shouldn't stick their hand under the mower while it running. That's still stupid, but at least it didn't cost us much.

I checked to see if this topic has been posted here before and it has, but with surprisingly little follow-up comment. It would seem to me that anyone not already living in California would be at least a little alarmed by the provisions of this bill as they apply to homeowners, especially the need to meet some ill-defined set of energy standards before one is allowed to sell. It will be too late to get up-in-arms after the fact, if this bill passes as it is currently written.

Posted by

 

 Norm Werner

Real Estate One

 

                                       Visit my web sites

 

 

 

 

                                              Find me on...

                                      linked in logo                                    

Norm Werner 2009-2011 All rights reserved

Paul Silver
Tiverton, RI
Rhode Island full service real estate firm

So basically, from reading the ACTUAL bill, I see nowhere where this bill REQUIRES energy efficiency upgrades in order to sell a home or other property. I does require compliance to receive government grants, loans, etc., but otherwise does not require any such things... in fact in each section there is language to the effect that the bill should not be construed to imply any such required compliance, except fior grants, credits, etc.

 

So, if you do not want to comply, you need not do so, but if you want to receive grant money, tax credits, loans, or other government sponsored Green Incentives, you will need to comply...

 

Why all the hubub for this? Sounds completely reasonable to me.

Oct 26, 2009 04:20 AM
Chris Olsen
Olsen Ziegler Realty - Cleveland, OH
Broker Owner Cleveland Ohio Real Estate

Not having read it, I know how easy it is for people to take strong stances based on people's opinions, news shows, blogs, etc., but the devil is in the details and since I haven't read it, I don't know.  I can tell you that we are leaving future generations saddled with unreasonable debt and an environment that continues to degrade (whether manmade or not), and a global economy that will not be able to support even food production with 12 billion people over the next 75 years, so I am not happy with the mess that we are leaving future generations.  No one in power will stand up and do the right thing as all the special interests and even our own partisan nature would see to it's undoing.

I find the previous comment by Focus Professionals interesting, as he seems to be the only person who actually read the bill.

Oct 26, 2009 04:37 AM
Daniel J. Hunter
REALTOR® - New Port Richey, FL

If NAR is supporting it, you know it must be bad

Oct 26, 2009 04:37 AM
Anonymous
Rhonda Rowland

I think it's important that we do not overeact to this unless and until we actually read the bill.  Thank you to Eric for posting NAR's response to this. 

Oct 26, 2009 05:00 AM
#29
Christa Ross
RE/MAX Select Realty - REALTOR and Green Homes Specialist - Pittsburgh, PA
Helping you buy and sell Pittsburgh's Best Homes

The bill does not require upgrades or energy audits. It does seek to help homeowners that want to make their homes more energy efficient. Might I suggest reading the actual bill, rather than the original post.

I focus my business on green and energy efficient homes and even I am not interested in requiring people to get an audit on their home to purchase.

But you can be sure that I am looking at the value to market more energy efficient homes, use Energy Efficient Mortgage and ENERGY STAR designation as a tool that will blow other homeowners with leaky costly homes out of the water!

Should REALTORs be fighting this bill? Only if they want to stick their heads in the sand and believe that better built homes, better energy efficiency, less dependence on fossil fuels and foreign oil and a cleaner environment aren't important.

Personally, I think they are important and I commend NAR for looking for a compromise that can both encourage energy efficiency while not hurting existing homebuyers and sellers.

 

Oct 26, 2009 05:16 AM
Betty Knowles
Southwest Missouri Realty - Springfield, MO
Ready to sell? Call Betty!

Congress needs to slooooow way down and stop trying to rush this stuff through. Read the bills and let the public read them before voting on them. Each state should be able to decide these type of issues, not the federal government pushing it on us.

Oct 26, 2009 05:18 AM
Vince Smith
Gorilla Real Estate Solutions - Atlanta, GA

We definitely need to keep an eye on this.  The unintended consequences can be damaging to many industries.

Oct 26, 2009 05:23 AM
Leslie Prest
Leslie Prest, Prest Realty, Sales and Rentals in Payson, AZ - Payson, AZ
Owner, Assoc. Broker, Prest Realty, Payson,

This is another example of emails circulating trying to scare people with misinformation The following is a quote from Factcheck.org: (my bold)

"We've combed through the portion of the House-passed bill pertaining to residential buildings and found no point-of-sale mandates for owners of existing homes. Major trade groups representing home builders and real-estate brokers also say these claims are false.

Home Sellers Beware?

It's true that the bill sets new national efficiency standards for new residential and commercial buildings. It calls for buildings to be 30 percent more efficient by 2012, and 50 percent more efficient beginning in 2014. It ultimately calls for buildings to be 75 percent more efficient by 2029. But those efficiency benchmarks apply only to homes constructed after the bill becomes law, not currently existing ones.

We found no requirement for energy audits or energy-efficiency inspections in the bill, either. Nor did the National Association of Home Builders, according to Calli Barker Schmidt, the organization's director of environmental communications. "Inspections are usually required by banks and mortgage companies when a home changes hands - but if you are talking specifically about energy-efficiency checks, or an energy audit, it is not required for existing homes," she told FactCheck.org in an e-mail.

Owners of existing homes would be able to get energy audits if they wish, and if they volunteer for programs established by the bill, such as the Retrofit for Energy and Environmental Performance (REEP) program. That program would provide federal funds to states to encourage homeowners to reduce energy consumption. According to the bill, the purpose of REEP is to "facilitate the retrofitting of existing buildings across the United States to achieve maximum cost-effective energy efficiency improvements and significant improvements in water use and other environmental attributes." But facilitating energy efficiency improvements is not the same thing as requiring them."

That said- I DO agree that the number of pages in these bills is WAY out of control.

Oct 26, 2009 05:29 AM
Tim Krueger
Morovish Properties - Costa Mesa, CA

I hope this does not pass!  I am disappointed in our government right now! 

Oct 26, 2009 05:29 AM
Dave Hymes
RE/MAX Gold - Placerville, CA

As usual the devil is in the details. There is no doubt that government needs to be regulatory agency, when appropriate, but I believe the government is becoming far to intrusive in our daily lives. It would probably be a good thing if politicians behaved more like public servants as originally intended, not as life long professional politicians. Life long professional politicians seem to lose touch with what life is really like for your average American.

Oct 26, 2009 05:57 AM
Shana Haugen
Century 21 - Gold Key - Fargo, ND

Good intentions produce some very silly methods of accountability.

Oct 26, 2009 07:21 AM
Nancy Deichman
Re/Max Premier Realty, Inc. - Ocala, FL
CDPE

Where do they come up with this stuff? Yes we need to keep our eye on it. As if we weren't busy enough working through the mess we have now.

Oct 26, 2009 10:49 AM
Jake Planton
www.JakePlanton.com - Portland, OR

I am not going to delve into the Cap and Trade bill, because there is still a lot of work to be done on it.  As I was reading the posts on this though, it struck me to wonder how many of the people railing against this are FOR an extension of the tax credit.  People all up in arms about the government trying to put things in place for the future, are also up in arms about keeping the tax credit...if ya'll do not see the irony in that...then I have nothing more to say.  Kind of like 'stay away from my medicare for your socialized medicine.'  So many in this industry are so conservative, until it gets to their pocketbooks...seems hypocritical to me.

 

PS~ Man made global warming is not up for debate, it is happening, open up Google and search for it.......www.google.com.

Oct 26, 2009 11:51 AM
Lane Bailey
Century 21 Results Realty - Suwanee, GA
Realtor & Car Guy

The real estate provisions aren't as onerous as some seem to imply...  However, we can certainly see the direction that some in DC want to take us. 

However, the Cap & Trade bill in general is not only onerous, but stupid.  It will not reduce greenhouse gases one bit... only push jobs overseas to places that DON'T have these stupid taxes. 

And Anthropogenic Global Warming is a myth...  Check it out... use Google.com.

Oct 26, 2009 12:43 PM
Ann Hayman
Norville Realty - Jacksonville, FL
GRI,CDPE,IRES, Jacksonville, FL. Gated Communities , Real Estate

EVERYTHING congress does everyday should be posted to the internet, daily. What is voted up or down, by name and bill number, and who voted Yay or Nay by name, after all how can you be represented if you don't know how or if your Representive votes and on what, in Your name. This is not the 1700's, nobody has to get on a horse, Google can feed it faster than they can write it.

I have not read the Cap and Trade bill, but will tonight. I agree with Jake about the tax credit. 

 

Oct 26, 2009 12:52 PM
Gary Woltal
Keller Williams Realty - Flower Mound, TX
Assoc. Broker Realtor SFR Dallas Ft. Worth

Norm, some cities like Austin are already requiring these energy audits. Ridiculous!

Oct 26, 2009 12:52 PM
Aaron Hoffman
Florida Homes Realty & Mortgage - Jacksonville, FL

Ann, everything congress does IS posted on the internet daily.  Also, you can see them every single day live on C-Span.  If you watch for more than an hour and don't fall asleep, you are ahead of the game.  It's pretty boring and they don't move very swiftly on anything, but that's the nature of our government.

Oct 26, 2009 02:38 PM
Christine Donovan
Donovan Blatt Realty - Costa Mesa, CA
Broker/Attorney 714-319-9751 DRE01267479 - Costa M

"Brave New World" and "Big Brother."  They sneak up when the gate keepers aren't watching.

 

I'd like to hope the bill is too over reaching to pass, but we'll see.

Oct 26, 2009 04:39 PM
Paul Francis
Francis Group Real Estate - Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas Real Estate Agent - Summerlin Homes

Certainly amazing how the current Federal Government wishes to emulate failed polices from the likes of states like California and countries such as Spain...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/06/25/tilting_at_green_windmills_97168.html

My experience... when somebody knows they are going BK... they go on a spending spree to put the nail in the coffin.

In the past...Governments such as Argentina, Venezuela, Cuba, Zimbabwe and Germany seized private assets when the crap hit the fan...

Never waste a Crisis....

Hmmm...

Oct 26, 2009 06:29 PM
Jon Budish
Resident Realty - Fort Collins, CO

I don't believe for 1 second this bill is well intentioned! Since Jan. 2009, all of the proposed legislation coincidentally, (LOL) is full of govt. controls over us serfs.

Oct 29, 2009 10:02 AM