|
Find NM real estate agents and Albuquerque real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
50 Comments on Is it time for more stringent regulation in the real estate industry?
Hi Lloyd~ We just need the rules we have to be enforced! New regulations would not really be needed.
GOod post today, makes sense.
Patricia/Seacoast NH
Hi Lloyd, Certainly there were enough bad agents who found ways to scam people during the last 3-4 years that the Feds might want to take a close look at us. The bad guys are better at scamming us than we are at protecting ourselves from them !
Wow! I am not sure how to approach this. I was not expecting this level of response to my post. Let me thank each and everyone of you for your comments. Let me also say that I am indebted to Lenn Harley and Ruthmarie Hicks whose blogs I cited to make this one possible.
Regards,
C. Lloyd McKenzie
www.LloydMcKenzie.com
Good post and information.
AS a 1099ed individual I would hate to see big government throw any more wrenches into our real estate life !!!
Being relatively new to this industry (just under 3 years), I am still amazed at how much of it seems to already be regulated! I also wonder how there was so much fraudulent lending as to cause the downfall of the housing market BECAUSE it seems like Big Brother was already watching. Needless to say, with the current troubled housing market, I think there will be further regulating to come. Which is also the reason that I will most likely never want to have my own brokerage. I own another small business which has NEVER had the kind of hands on regulating that the RE industry has. And I am very grateful about that!
The People voted for change and the People received a BIG Government in return. There's some change for you. The writing is on the wall for reform. We will all be waiting with bated breath to see what reform will come. I am hoping the reform and regulation will remain with the individual states.
How about this... Do away with licensing. And then get the NAR or other trade organization to grade the members... You don't need a license to work on a car, but screw up a brake job and people can die. The trade group (NASE) requires tremendous amounts of testing and CE. You can't get a Brake Cert. until you have shown that you deserve it... Or Tune-Up... or anything else.
If you think a broker has a lot of liability, look at a service center. But they seem to do it without onerous regulations...
Just sayin.
Good and well told information. Thanks! I appreciate it very much. Great stuff.
Good and well told information. Thanks! I aprpecaite it very much. Great stuff.
That's what Aaron Vaughn says on all his commenets. He's SO BORING!!
Real estate is local, and local it needs to stay. That said, whatever changes and overalls that are given, I really think it would be better served to be enacted by NAR, and not Uncle Sam.
I expect there will be more regulation coming. Big government can't seem to help but create more regulations and more bureaucracy.
The Writing is On the Wall...
Barney wants the Federal Government in the Housing Business
"But Frank tells Weisberg that he isn’t planning to leave Congress in the near-term. “I want at least two years with President Obama and a solidly Democratic Senate so that we can get the federal government back in the housing business,” he says."
C. Lloyd,
Both writers that you have quoted bring up some good points as do you. I have thought for some time now that we need to have better CE, ie. broker related topics for brokers or those that are thinking about becoming a broker. But we do need to do a better job of policing ourselves if we want to have big brother stay out of our business..
Just keep raising the entry level, and increasing the fees would help this proble. Unfortunately large organizations like NAR don't see this as a good idea. Physician heal thyself.
I might be missing something here, but I'm confused as to what the blogs about whether a team is a valid business structure or discussions about the size of a big real estate company has to do with regulation?
Lloyd,
In the first place, real estate is local. In the second place, real estate salespeople are licensed by their respective states. Therefore, the federal government has no role. :)
Steve
LLoyd, I think a large part of the blame for the financial crisis was BECAUSE of government intervention and the last thing we need in any industry is more government intervention. It seems every time government gets involved in trying to fix something they screw it up even more...HVCC would be a perfect example. That said, I think it would be a good idea if the industry did a better job of policing itself in regard to ethical and educational standards.
Any changes brought on by the government will probably make a sick market even worse. The problems we have are not caused by realtors, they are caused by lending money to people who can't make the payments. I don't know how regulating realtors can help that, except to find another opportunity tax for the Obama team.
Wealth redistribution as he says. Don't we all feel wealthy?
The overwhelming majority of respondents to this post are opposed to more government intervention. I agree with that point of view also. But let's face it, there are problems in the real estate industry. This blog merely suggests the possibility of government intervention. It is a subject that all of us should be talking about. To take it one step further, we should be brainstorming ideas of how we are going to address problems that exist in our industry. If we do not, the government might just step in and fix them. Far fetched? Look at the financial industry.
Here is Chris Olsen's idea, "total transparency to remove the hype, spin, exaggerations, puffery, false claims, misleading self-promotion and the like so consumers can truly determine what it takes to be competently represented."
Sorry Linda, it wasn't meant to confuse anyone. Actually, "discussions about the size of a big real estate company has to do with regulation?" was not the subject of the blog. The two excerpts were merely used to support the premise. There is a lot of chatter, that might have already caught the attention of lawmakers.
Login or register to leave a comment