|
Find WI real estate agents and Manitowoc real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
54 Comments on Let's Hope Short Sales Become More Timely
Dawn- I just looked through this paperwork! WOW! 43 pages of red tape, complicated to say the least! I am wondering who is going to be trained to decipher all of this! I am going to read every word of it tomorrow. I just get that icky feeling in my tummy about now! Katerina
BTW- Congrats on your feature and gold star!
Another thought about the time element agents complain about in short sales.
I was first licensed when there were no fax machines, no cell phones, no personal computers. The buyers had to wait until the bank had their committee meeting and their name came up for review for a loan. The answers would come through snail mail. Even telegraphs were quite expensive so rarely used. It took an average of 4 months and most of the time 5 or 6 months to close on house. If it was a VA loan, it would take longer. So we don't have much to complain about these days. As long as we get our short sale listings closed, we are doing fine. We just have to be more prepared and budget wiser.
Who said this was supposed to be a cake walk anyhow?
Of course, the horrible lack of customer service at Bank of America is another issue altogether! It is one thing to need time to get a short sale down the path to approval, quite another to be incompetent, inept and downright ignorant in how to run a business.
Thanks fo r the update. Good post. Will have to see how the servicesor adjust to changes
Have a great day
Tony
Wow - I didn't know I had been featured! Thanks Katerina for bringing to the table a rounded point of view. If we run around with the mind set of "Big Bad Nasty Banks" we do ourselves and our clients a disservice. The people at the end of our call or email to our servicer are just like us - doing a job, trying to make ends meet. And the lenders do have a fiscal responsibility to their shareholders to be diligent and handle these investments wisely.
On the other hand, it is hard to feel empathy for some serivcers that continue to be inept in the processing of short sales.
Katerina -I don't think I am featured. Wow , I got excited there for a moment, didn't even know I cared.
If this becomes somewhat of a standard, then it will be a much easier process for everybody involved. This looks similar to the FHA Pre Foreclosure Sale program, in that there is a provision for a relocation allowance and a net to the seller that is based upon a current valuation. And of course there are relatively short time frames for the decision process. Even the investors who are being asked to take a loss will have a set of standards with which to measure any proposed transaction. It will be interesting to follow this.
Dawn- Yes you are featured. That gold star is still there:) Congrats!
Dawn - I have several short sales I am negotiating right now that are trying to cut my commission. It really burns my hide. Can you send me a link to where you pulled your info so I can make some phone calls and stir up some good old fashioned American crapola this morning? :-) Thanks!
this all sounds good etc but it will be one of those things to see just how it will work out since so many govt ideas have not been all to helpfull lately
Dawn, How wonderful, if only it would come true, thank you so much for the information. have a great evening Barbara
I need to read the 43 page directive tonight so I can get up to speed. Are you gonna buy the Gucci bag?
Interested to see how things pan out. Thanks
Melissa - I am currently reading and blogging on each section of the directive. Check it out. No - no bag for me!
Ten days sounds unrealisitcally short (no pun intended). I hope the process will improve, but I'm not banking on it (OK, that time pun intended)!
As you said, it will take Congress to put some teeth into this. I just don't think they can pass a law to force someone to give up part of a legal deal.
We tend to forget that they are losing money on these deals.
I like to think that this will work well, but I am skeptical.
Wachovia works well because they are a portfolio lender and don't have to deal with investors.
We will see how much this really affects our day to day business. Very little of what is passed seems to have a real positive impact on what we do.
Dawn, I've been given this hope before. I'd like to see this work, but I have my doubts. Thanks for posting this one though.
I think it would be very good to read the document with a pen handy to make notes in the margins. They want loan modifications, and then short sales after a loan mod has been looked at or tried. I don't see where lenders are forced to participate. As with other proposals, this is a proposal. It will be several months before it takes effect. So it would be good on any short sale situation to know what procedure is in effect for that short sale. Some people look at a proposal and act as if it is already in effect.
Dan - your right everyone should take the time to understand this directive. You can ask the servicer you are working with if they are participating. If they are you need to know how the program works. I am bloggin on each section of the Supplemental Directive. However no one is visiting them. They are dry but informative. I believe it is our duty to know the programs out there and how to navigate them, so we can represent our clients to the best of our ability.