Special offer

Is a Seller's "pre-listing inspection" a good idea?

Reblogger Roger Johnson
Real Estate Agent

Seller's getting a home inspection done prior to listing their property for sale is a good idea.  Athina Boukas of Keller Williams in Greensboro, NC writes a good article detailing 8 good reasons to get a seller's home inspection.  Thanks, Athina

Original content by Athina Boukas

Lately, I have been recommending to most sellers that they pre-inspect their home prior to putting it on the market.  This often comes with resistance because at first, it doesn't seem like the expense will be recouped on the sale.  I advise that this is a good strategy and could net a seller more in a slow market.  Here are some reasons:

  • a pre-inspection catches what the buyer may find during their own inspection so that the seller can repair and/or price the house accordingly from the outset
  • by making necessary repairs in advance, the seller can better manage the repairs on their own terms and there is no time constraint to having the job done; the seller can shop around for estimates
  • the pre-inspection report can be offered to potential buyers to provide disclosure and evidence of repairs and/or defects that a seller may choose not to repair
  • a report gives nervous buyers more confidence to submit an offer, especially if the home is older and competes with new construction
  • it is less likely that the buyer will "renegotiate" the offer after their own inspection because it is less likely they will find a surprise or a "new" deal breaker; the buyer will likely submit their highest offer at the outset
  • a pre-inspection can uncover a huge potential "deal breaker" like toxic mold, termite damage, code violations, etc.  If a buyer discovers this after submitting an offer they are more likely to back out, rather than adjust the price or ask for repairs
  • if the first buyer backs out due to a large defect, the seller stills has to make the repairs for the next buyer while the house remains on the market longer; possibly needing a further price reduction
  • making the repairs after the buyer discovers them does not "add value" after the fact, it only prolongs the sale process
I'm sure my colleagues can add more good reasons here....and maybe add any reason why this would not be a good idea?
Posted by

__________________________________________

Hickory Home SearchForeclosure Hunter

 

Roger Johnson is a Realtor with CENTURY 21 American Homes in Hickory, NC.

 

I service the Catawba and surrounding counties, and the Hickory, Newton, Conover, Taylorsville, Claremont, Statesville and Charlotte, NC real estate markets.

Visit us on the web at: www.HickoryNCHomes.com

You can contact me via Email or give me a call at 828-381-9245 or 828-568-2121 ext 310

Google Plus Profile  facebook button  LinkedIn button  Twitter button RSS feed button

 

 

Richard Mielke
RE/MAX Results - Gettysburg, PA
REALTOR, Gettysburg Pennsylvania Real Estate

The seller will have had the experience of going through the inspection as the client, and will be able to observe and ask questions, rather than the recipient of a repair request.

Dec 01, 2009 10:34 AM
Bristol Restoration
Bristol Restoration, Inc 661-294-1812 - Santa Clarita, CA
When you need it done right and done right now!

Roger,

Perhaps a pre-listing inspection should be part of marketing the property. The termite report is mandatory so why not get it done right away? In fact, it could save your client money in the long run, and , you are right, you can avoid potential problems in closing escrow. Good post. 

Dec 01, 2009 10:58 AM
Roger Johnson
Hickory, NC

Thanks for the comments, all.  Please make sure you visit Athina's original article and comment there as well.

Don, yes, that could be perceived as a downside to a pre-listing home inspection.  But, I look at it from a different angle.  If there are latent defects, wouldn't it be the wiser seller to know of them and either have them repaired OR at least disclose them upfront and make the price adjustment now, rather than in 6-8 months after the first contract falls through because the buyer's inspector found those 'latent' defects, which would then need to be disclosed?

State laws vary, but in NC a owner has to disclose very little, if they so chose.  On our residential property disclosure statement, they can opt to choose "no representation" which basically means that they're not saying anything about the house good, bad or indifferent.

Now, IF I, as the agent, knows about specific 'latent' defects, I do have to disclose it to any potential buyers, whether the sellers do or not.

Dec 01, 2009 12:47 PM