Special offer

"Enhanced" Field Reviews

By
Real Estate Appraiser with North Country Appraisal Services

A rather recent product requested from appraisers is an Enhanced Field Review.  These products are generally requested through AMC's for problem loans.  They require a retroactive review based upon the date of the original appraisal which is typical procedure.  But then, the appraiser is asked for three additional comparables and MLS and public data for the subject property, the original comparables, and the newly provided comparables.  Herein lies the pitfalls.  Even if the reviewer is in agreement with the original report, three additional comparables leads to the assumption that there may have been better, but overlooked comparables than those originally utilized.  Providing MLS and public data for all comparables and the subject generally violates most MLS Board Rules which allow the information for members only. 

Those who have been in the appraisal profession 20 years or more, fully remember that appraiser licensing was a direct result of the S & L meltdown.  While licensing and regulation of the appraisal profession is a positive result, poor appraisal practices were far from the major cause of that crisis.  Rather, it was the appraisal industry which became the major scapegoat.  As a result, the changes and regulations on the banking industry were never enacted which would have prevented the abuses which came back to trouble our economy during recent years.  History tends to repeat and the Enhanced Field Review can only be viewed as an attempt to place the blame for the most recent financial disaster of the banking industry once again on the appraisal industry.  We have already seen the enactment of the HVCC and a multitude of additional requirements for appraisers to meet in their reports.  The only rational explanation for the inclusion of MLS and public data is the assemblage of court cases against appraisers of foreclosed and troubled properties.  This pits appraiser against appraiser and the result will be the elimination of the appraisal industry since every appraiser is subject to lawsuits.

Appraisers should refuse Enhanced Review report assignments and put an end to this effort. 

Myrtle "Mert" Lemon
Nomel Real Estate, Eagle One Appraisal - Hagerstown, MD
Certified Appraiser & Real Estate Broker

I turn them down, USPAP says we are doing an appraisal, and I will get paid for an appriasal if doing one!! No matter WHAT they want to call it!!

Mar 01, 2010 03:05 AM
Anonymous
ryTy

I was recently suspended from a lender becuase a enhanced field review of a report of mine came in $30,000 less than my report.  The field reviewer agreed with all my comparables and added two additional. One he added sold after my effective date, is this possible?  The second home is not not comparable and the communities can not be compared either, Subject is in a simple community, no ammenities  $48 month HOA. although the comp he used is in a exquisite french style community described as mini mansions and full ammenities including clubhouse, pool, fitness center,etc $480 month HOA.  The homes in this particular community are being dumped because the community was hit with major mtg fraud meltdown and it is all over the internet.  30-40% of the properties are in foreclosure.  The subject property is in a community with maybe 1% distressed sales.  How is this possible. Do the lenders check these reviews before they punish the good guys? Then they got a additional appraisal 2 1/2 month after mine, and because that one came in lower I am again being punished.  well hello, newer comps available!!!

May 11, 2010 04:30 PM
#2
Richard Glesser
North Country Appraisal Services - Gaylord, MI

It amazes me that the lender puts more value in a drive-by review at partial fee than a fully interior inspected appraisal done at full fee.  A second problem I personally have with this system, is that more times than not, even while I'm a Certified General, the reviewer is a licensed appraiser with far less experience, knowledge, and training.

May 11, 2010 05:15 PM