Ar_home_b_search
 

 

I had an interesting conversation with with a residential mortgage lender yesterday regarding the new changes that went into effect on January 1, 2010. For regular readers of our real estate blog, I covered these changes a few months ago in an article about RESPA reform.

His point is that while the changes appear to be based on good intentions, they might also be throwing mortgage underwriting and mortgage origination into chaos for the next few months. New methodologies are having to be created to process the new federal requirements.

With this in mind, I felt a review of these regulatory changes regarding the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), Final Rule, which went into effect on January 1, 2010, was something that would assist our readers.

Changes In RESPA

As of this past Friday, HUD requires that lenders and mortgage brokers provide consumers with a new, standard Good Faith Estimate (GFE) that clearly discloses key loan terms and closing costs. Closing agents are also required to provide borrowers with a new HUD-1 Settlement Statement that clearly compares consumers’ final and estimated costs.

The new RESPA rule became effective in January 2009, but HUD had provided a one-year transition period for the mortgage industry to incorporate these changes. That time is now up and we are going to see these changes begin to affect the flow of our real estate settlement operations.

While the responsibility for the implementation of new GFE and HUD-1 documents primarily impacts the mortgage lenders and law firms who must provide these documents to consumers, RESPA applies to everyone in the real estate profession.

Your Tallahassee real estate professional should be well aware of these changes to the documentation that you will receive from your lenders and at the closing table. Proper preparation will allow for a much smoother real estate transaction as well as insuring that an actual settlement takes place. Nobody buying or selling real estate in Tallahassee wants to see their contract fall through due to the ignorance of the real estate agent.

No Relief From RESPA For Tallahassee Mortgage Originators

Image of RESPA Reform Results In Tallahassee FloridaAlthough HUD recently announced a 120-day restraint in enforcement for non-FHA originators and other settlement service providers who demonstrate good faith in implementing RESPA’s new rules, the department still expects all loan originators to begin using the new GFE and revised HUD-1 beginning January 1, 2010.

Mortgage Origination Tip: The new RESPA rules might create a burden on your mortgage originator, so be proactive! Before you meet with the originator, ask him or her what documents could you bring to make the process go smoother and faster!

Bring all of them (not most of them!). Additionally, you could fill out the Fannie Mae Form 1003, which is the Uniform Residential Loan Application that the mortgage originator will be required to complete before discussing with you your full qualifications.

Again, the intent of the new RESPA rule is to clarify disclosures to and reduce closing costs for consumers. Unfortunately, history teaches us that the more cumbersome the administrative process, ultimately the higher the cost to the consumer. It is our intent at CENTURY 21 First Realty to make sure that does not happen to our customers!

 
This post has been included in Florida Real Estate News Leon County, FL Real Estate News Tallahassee, FL Real Estate News
Post is included in group: Almost Anything Goes
Post is included in group: Realtors®
Post is included in group: The Lounge at Active Rain
Post is included in group: "Whacked"!!!
Post is included in group: RESPA

67 Comments on Will RESPA Rules Clog The Real Estate Recovery?

JAN
05
2010
320,285 Points 5 Featured Posts Outside Blog

These new rules make it harder and harder to get a mortgage loan. Everyone should be proactive and get all the information up front.

7:12am • #2
1,546,393 Points 417 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Excellent. 

I'm not impressed with the new GFE Form.  But, it is what it is and we'll have to live with it.  I suspect that it will provide more agents with more excuses to let their eyes glaze over when mortgage financing is mentioned by home buyers. 

I am impressed when I see a real estate practitioner who has "taken the form by the neck and understands it".

 

7:14am • #3
512,109 Points 41 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Hey Brad and Angela, I suspect you are right. I wonder if most lenders know what's about to hit them?

7:22am • #4
512,109 Points 41 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

That's what I'm pushing our clients to do Laura. The more proactive they are, the less these changes will affect them.

7:23am • #5
512,109 Points 41 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Thank you Lenn. I suspect it might take 6 to 9 months of a new learning curve before the impact on settlement times will return to normal. Who knows, maybe it won't even have an effect ... :).

7:24am • #6
284,081 Points 5 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Joe,  

Good post on the new RESPA changes.  I am with you in your concern that while the intentions are good, not sure it will actually work out that way.  Time will tell.

 All the best, Michelle

7:24am • #7
512,109 Points 41 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Thanks Michelle. I just cannot imagine that we throw this at the settlement process and expect it to help right now....

7:28am • #8
115,737 Points 2 Featured Posts Outside Blog

While the intentions are good, this will definitely impact the processing of the loan over the next few months. In addition, while the GFE is intended to clarify, fees are being lumped, the payment information is not totalled in a way that the buyer can understand (which is probably the most important thing the buyer is looking at). The one thing that will probably occur with this is overestimating/padding fees on the part of the lender to avoid penalties, which will really throw a scare into buyers - as if they aren't tentative enough to commit in many cases.

There are some aspects of the form that will probably be very helpful in helping the buyer understand, but I think overall that a lot of effort went into the process of developing this disclosure that probably is going to create even more confusion and not provide some of the information the buyer really needs.

 

7:31am • #9
512,109 Points 41 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Well put Susan. Isn't there a saying about the road to Hell is paved with good intentions....

7:36am • #10

The lenders and title folks have been talking about this for months now-but the reality of it is staring us in the face. We all need to be patient and help each other through the process. The old way of just slopping things together isn't going to work any longer and careful preparation (and LOTS of paperwork and disclosure) are the new names of the game. "Rush" closings are going to be a thing of the past, I think.

The title companies are "bundling" our fees as well to make quoting easier for the loan side (e-doc fees, overnight fees, endorsements, etc. which are typically confusing to the borrower/buyer). I don't think there's necessarily "padding" going on for our side, but many title companies are taking an 'average' cost--so in some cases there are savings and in others, it's going to cost a little more. Title companies are regulated by our fees though, so once it's filed, it's set in stone.

On the loan side-it'll be interesting to see what happens.

Wendi
8:04am • #11

Being a broker of both a real estate company and a mortgage brokerage, without question, the new RESPA guidelines are going to have a very adverse effect on the mortgage broker and mortgage banker. Basically, the broker is not only held to the exact dollar amount of fees, but may have to pay for any discrepancies or costs incurred if the loan is turned down.Now that all sounds great, but think of all the things in a transaction you don'tdirectly control...your client,the other agent, title, escrow, time frames,etc. Now imagine that YOU are responsible for accuracies months down the road. And with some exceptions, YOU have to pay any difference out of your commission. Or worse yet, YOUR transaction has to be canceled entirely.

In my opinion, the broker.banker are being scape goated for the whole mess. By making it far more difficult and costly to perform, it opens the dooreven wider for the large banks (BofA, Chase, Citi,etc) to gain a larger market share. As poorly as they service clients now, just imagine what it will be like when they have an even greater market share.

The new RESPA rules will only lead to inflated GFE's, more confusion, less productivity and ultimately, less choice for the public. Great post on a terrible new set of laws.

8:42am • #12
303,700 Points 69 Featured Posts Outside Blog Hit Router Called Shot Master

Joe:  As with anything else, there is a good side and a bad side to this.  With time, we'll see which ends up being greater.  One thing is for sure.  Changes are being made in reaction to the many problems we see from the past.  Although all the changes may not end up being the correct or best move to have made ... the powers to be ARE trying to correct problems, inform, and protect consumers.  Adjustments will most likely still have to be made to RESPA and etc., but it's a start. 

The requirements for licensing are now tougher than in the past.  Testing demanded will winnow some less knowledgeable and less capable lenders out of the business.  That's good and ultimately elevates and helps the entire industry.   Consumers benefit.

Thanks for the post ...

Gene

8:45am • #13
278,556 Points 15 Featured Posts

About to attend my third meeting on this because repitition helps the child to learn. I don't want to be part of the problem.

9:01am • #14

Hi, Joe

I think the lenders and title co. are going to get the brunt of these changes. It just our job as real estate professionals to inform our consumers. See you are a C-21 professional too, in the great state of Flordia. It's the best. I am in Northeast Ark. Good Luck in 2010...

            Tinker

 

9:05am • #15
3 Featured Posts Outside Blog

It certainly is going to slow things down. I agree with their intent, but not the execution.

9:42am • #16
754,632 Points 7 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Joe,  thanks for this informative post on the new RESPA changes.  I just sent this post to some lenders and mortgage brokers to see if and how they are getting the word out on the new forms. Also forwarded the post to agents in my office.

9:49am • #17
263,147 Points 3 Featured Posts Outside Blog Hit Router Called Shot Master

Joe - unfortunately, although these new changes are designed to help the consumer, it unfortunately will slow things down and the consumers will have a difficult time understanding this.  We all need to try to have patience while we work through this at the beginning of the year.

10:50am • #18

If you all are the 'real estate professionals', why can't you make this supposed difficult process easier? Why not be proactive in interpretations when they "lump fees together"?  Sheesh.  Who cares if it slows things down a little  if it keep people from getting in over their heads?   What are you whiners getting 6% for?  

Reality
10:59am • #19

Thanks Joe- I'll be forwarding this to other agents as well.

11:04am • #20
4 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

For some reason this rule reminds me of the opening of the book The Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy where is was posted on the wall behind the filing cabnet in the basement of a building far away that there was going to be an intergaltic interstate built and the main character's home was slated to be vanished from the universe. He should have kept up with this.

Why are some simple things made so difficult? It takes very smart people to go to more than 3 meetings to figure out how to fill out a form? It must be a horrible document!

11:24am • #21
118,333 Points 2 Featured Posts Outside Blog

It is going to slow it down which isn't a good thing.  Hopefully with respect to timelines in a contract listing agents will be aware of it just as much as agents representing buyers.  Contingency removal periods go by quickly and even if one document is missing, being able to remove the loan contingency may be an issue.  As we experience yet another transition into something new in our industry...I hope we all work together to integrate it as smoothly as possible.

11:35am • #22

Joe,

Thanks for the post on the new RESPA rules.  I agree with many of the comments offered up in response to your post in particular the comment made by Pat Palmer.

Perhaps RESPA did require restructuring, but generally when you restructure something you want to make it easier to understand than that which went before. 

From a consumer standpoint I (speaking as a consumer at this point) fail to see any real value in the new Good Faith Estimate as formatted.  Customers want the bottom line, they want to reasonably know what  the costs are.  The new GFE makes zeroing in costs more evasive than the former GFE form. 

I am a strong consumer advocate, but we need to be clear and work even harder to better educate our borrowers and assist them in reaching their mortgage loan finance goal.

11:40am • #23
962,013 Points 12 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Joe

Over regulations for any business is not a good thing and I fell the RESPA is over regulating.

Good luck and success.

Lou Ludwig

11:52am • #24

I need to agree somewhat with #19 in that we shouldn't complain if it slows things down a little.  It's just one more reason to let a potential buyer know they must get pre-approved and be serious about buying before they get in my car to view properties.  I also agree that if we can help speed the process up by being more proactive for our mortgage lender then we should do that and I need to built that into my process.  Thanks for the post.

12:38pm • #25

That is exactly what we do not need. slower lenders. Everything in my life and I am sure many other lives, has been complicated and exasperated by slow and unresponsive lenders. Why is it that none of these plans include making things simpler, easier to understand and faster.

12:47pm • #26
214,368 Points 5 Featured Posts Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

I'm not sure, but the whole system just may need a big bottle of Drano.  I realize that the powers that be are TRYING to make good, but it seems that right now, we need to fix one problem at a time.  The bottleneck of short sale/loan modifications/foreclosures needs to be fixed first, or we won't need the loans OR the GFE's

1:13pm • #27
292,057 Points 5 Featured Posts

Joe: I think not. Those of us in the loan business need to adapt and adjust. I plan on having a great year and wish you well!

1:20pm • #28

Thanks for the information.  It seems like we are constantly having to prepare for changes!  I think the biggest key is communicate, communicate, communicate.

1:22pm • #29
1 Featured Post

Thank you for the informative post. I hope you have a prosperous 2010.

1:25pm • #30

More red tape. The only thing that is good is that the more difficult it becomes to survive in this business - the more the competition will fall by the wayside. We all hate to see things become more caught up in needless requirements and regulations.

1:34pm • #31

Response to the sales people complaining about the 'inconvenience':  this regulation is NOT all about YOU.  Repeat: not about YOU.  It is to help prospective homeowners who are stuck with approx. 30 years of payments so they don't get into something the taxpayers have to bail out later.  YOU are out of the picture after you get your commission; before they even make that first monthly payment.  

It is to stop people like that couple in CA with 5 kids living in a $1.3 million home that was financed through interest only loans and HELOCS from being foreclosed on, like what is happening now.  They have a web site up now begging for donations.  Good luck with that.     

YOU are the professionals who are supposed to be able to navigate all this.   Adapt like all other professionals do and be glad there are forces finally trying to help folks make smart(er) financial commitments - those are your CUSTOMERS who pay a lot for your services.   YOUR timetable is not the focus here.     

Unbelievable.  Truly, if all this is too much please do NOT try a career in security operations, medicine, law, or other professions where regs change constantly.  And the paperwork is much worse.  

 

Excuse me???
1:44pm • #32
128,299 Points 1 Featured Post

Joe, you are right, people need to bring ALL of their paperwork & information to them at loan application. Without it, a GFE can't even be done! It will sure slow things down -- thinking we should be putting minimum 45 days for settlement to ensure all of the paperwork can be done ontime!

2:27pm • #33
6 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor

It's funny that you would write on this today...  I too just got off the phone with one of our lenders who was dealing with the new RESPA regulations.  He was bemoaning all the red tape...but more critical...the closing.  He told  me today that if for some reason someone in the processing line makes a mistake by even a quarter percent on the closings documents...they have to start all over again.  There will be no more changing the number to reflect the correct rate, initial, and move on down the road...it's starting back to square one. 

Although I know this is a HUGE hassel...it does mean that EVERYONE has to do their job before closing to make sure that interest rates are quoted right...closing costs...fees...etc.  Although the majority of that responsibility lies with the lender and title company...we ALL need to be on our toes. 

Good post!

2:30pm • #34
1,180,599 Points 134 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

I am going to be a dissenting view but not harsh, like the anonymous peeps would have it.

I just had a close and it is not that bad............  IF the lender & title knows which way is up.

On the flip side I have a severely delayed closing (I am list on this one) and the BA is warning me not to "mess with the HUD or CCs".  (trying to get my sellers to not impose penalties.)  Seriously, this was in the works and "messing with the HUD" will only delay things slightly.

While I am NOT a huge proponent of more and more and more regulation, I am no stranger to "change".  Lending UW guidelines and HVCC implementation have HURT this market drastically so the answer to your question about clogging the Real Estate Recovery is a resounding YES.

The lenders are black and blue.  We need to just look at it as "we are lucky that rates are still <artificially> low and we have lenders willing to lend."  Period.  And we should probably roll with the changes.  Or look for some cash buyers.

2:36pm • #35

The complaining here about the new RESPA requirements is like listening to a contractor complain about some tougher building codes after a lot of homes collapsed.     

Kathy
2:43pm • #36
100,113 Points 1 Featured Post Outside Blog

Joe,

I agree.  These rules do more harm than help!  Some of the LO's I know are retiring - they are fed up!

2:45pm • #37
4 Featured Posts

I am concerned about not only slowing an already slow process, but some of the changes regarding appraisal are well intentioned, but will cause an already slow market to have some very difficult issues.....

2:54pm • #38
1 Featured Post

Joe, as a lender, I must say that the new GFE does not clearly identify the loan applied for, or the downpayment, or the sellers contribution to the transaction. In addition it does not actually show a full PITI payment for the consumer. It also lumps some of the lenders charges together so that a consumer can not see the breakdown of individual coast. In my wasy of thinking this document will not clarify anything for the borrower except that all lenders will be using the same form which will make it easier to compare the bottom lines.

3:39pm • #39
419,224 Points 3 Featured Posts

We had a closing that was just delayed 10 days because the lender had lost the paperwork that the buyer had signed off on the new disclosure form.

3:44pm • #40
512,109 Points 41 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Kathy wrote "The complaining here about the new RESPA requirements is like listening to a contractor complain about some tougher building codes after a lot of homes collapsed." LOL. Point well taken.

 

I think the bulk of the responses have been pro uniformity. Change was needed. Creating an industry standard GFE and HUD help the consumer shop and compare.

The timing on the implementation and the actual structuring of the GFE are what you see most of the "whining" about.

3:51pm • #41

From the mortgage broker's standpoint, the ability to deal with the new GFE can be dealt with relatively effectively by overstating all costs so as not to come into the danger area of having under-disclosed and then being on the hook for the difference above the 10% buffer. This being said, the ability to do so works directly against the name and concept of the form itself... "Good Faith Estimate"

By being forced into over disclosing costs to borrowers in order to avoid re-disclosure and financial penalty, violates the "Good Faith" aspect of why the disclosure was designed to begin with.  While there has always been an understood "buffer" in this disclosure, the broker was never forced into buffering the costs.

By being held accountable to 0 tolerance on some fees and a 10% margin of error on others, it no longer becomes an estimate... the costs you quote at the beginning of the process are basically being treated as cast in stone... What happened to the "Estimate" part of the disclosure?  On top of this, some of the costs that the broker is being held accountable for are not in the broker's control.

I've been in retail and wholesale mortgage sales for over 25 years and NEVER have seen a debacle quite like this one.

www.illinoishomemortgagerates.com

Chuck Murphy
4:18pm • #42
356,705 Points 5 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp

Excuse me??? - the changes in the Good Faith Estimate came about not for the reasons you state.

Chuck - the changes in the Good Faith Estimate came about because of the reasons you state. The purpose of the new GFE is to hold mortgage originators to the quote they provide. In order words, it puts the "Good Faith" back into the Good Faith Estimate, and quite frankly, it's about time. There were way too many loan originators who low-balled rates and/or fees in their quotes only to "stick it" to the borrower at the settlement table.

However, the new GFE goes overboard. Now, we have to account for fees that MIGHT be charged later on in the process - i.e., a potential 2nd appraisal or appraisal review because the appraiser didn't do his or her job properly. If we don't, then we get stuck with the extra fees. That, and lenders are going to overestimate some fees "just in case." So, how do you really know how much that loan is going to cost you? Sorry, can't tell you that.

And, if a consumer wants a GFE, he or she MUST provide some essential information such as social security number so the lender can pull a credit report, and an address on which to base the estimate. It will actually make it more difficult to shop for a loan and to compare rates and fees as many consumers I'm sure are not going to provide their SSNs just to get a GFE.

And what about that origination fee? What goes into that fee? Sorry, can't tell you that either. HUD says we can only dislose the total origination fee. We can not break it down for you.

Your government hard at work. At what, I don't know.

6:18pm • #43
288,572 Points 38 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Chuck I love your comment. I agree whole heartedly. IMO just another case of the "leaders" doing things wrong, albeit well intentioned. Personally I think so many people have left the business that the majority of scum have left and the current SAFE testing going on should take care of many more.

6:19pm • #44
288,572 Points 38 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Great conversation here - good one Lewis. I'll have to come back later for more!

6:22pm • #45
608,883 Points 26 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

We've already had an entire meeting on it - and there's a webinar explaining it. There will be unintended consequences, as there always are when change is made, good or bad.

9:26pm • #46
290,496 Points 14 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

I totally understand the need to regulate the lenders further, because it has become routine to throw in junk fees at the end, because the lenders figured out that most people have their guard down and will sign anything to get the process over with.

11:11pm • #47
JAN
06
2010
350,978 Points 5 Featured Posts Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

RESPA rules definitely need an overhaul.

3:31am • #48
681,586 Points 130 Featured Posts Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

I know that the intention is to allow buyers/consumers to be able to really compare loan options....this is a good thing. I'm just wondering if it will do that in practice. It might slow things down a bit, but good to get things right. I think we need to prepare buyers and sellers that the 30-day escrow is gone....other than cash offers, we need about 45 days to do everything that now needs doing.

9:22am • #49
Localism Sponsor

I wonder if the lenders REALLY understand how to use HUD's new GFE form. I got my first glimpse at one yesterday, when a lender provided me a copy of a GFE that he had emailed to my client. I was immediately struck by the following:

1. There was no line item for escrow fee -- it seems to have been lumped with "lender's title fee" charges, which makes it look like the lender's title policy is more costly (almost double) than the owner's policy. That of course is not true...the lender's policy is typically 1/2 to 2/3 the cost of the owner's policy.

2. The GFE shows an amount that seems WAY too low for tax impounds. This same lender gave me an estimate last week for another borrower on their old proprietary GFE that showed them collecting for 6 months worth of taxes. This new GFE shows them collecting for only 2 months of both taxes & insurance. At this time of the year, that definitely is WAY, WAY too low!

3.The borrower is getting a large seller credit, which the lender indicates in his email should cover all the closing costs. But nowhere on the form does the credit appear, nor is there a line item anywhere on the GFE showing an estimated bottom-line amount that the buyer would need to bring in (after taking into account the down payment & any seller credits).

4. The GFE shows an amount for "transfer tax," which is ALWAYS a seller cost in our county. Yet, it appears as a buyer's cost.

So at a quick glance, the form I rec'd, which is supposed to give the buyer a true picture of their anticipated loan, is full of all sorts of holes. I know there's going to be a learning curve for lenders to figure out what info goes where.

But right now, not impressed!

9:22am • #50
193,276 Points 1 Featured Post Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router Called Shot Master

As usual, additional burden on the consumer. Amazing how little the government can see what they do to the companies that serve the consumer, actually hurt the consumer. All these additional costs WILL be beared by the consumer. More time and paperwork, etc. to process and close will increase costs. Additional costs are ALWAYS paid for by the consumer. Close in 30 days, 40 days, 50 days, as a Realtor and business man, I don't really care, but my buyers and sellers do. 

 

9:40am • #51
1 Featured Post Outside Blog

It will be interesting to see the consumer response when they can't close on a house as quickly as they could before.  It's the me, me, me - now, now, now generation!  My current (well-qualified) buyer is already impatient to close - but we're dealing with a 3-week wait time on appraisal due to the new rules.

9:46am • #52
3 Featured Posts Outside Blog

It will be very difficult for the borrower now to decipher the real costs of the loan because they are all lumped into one line. the intent of Washington may have a negative effect on the recovery of the real estate market because of the new red tape.

10:03am • #53
Attended Rain Camp

We all here in Arizona are watching to see how this will impact buyers, closing dates, and of course the sellers who are anxious to get their homes closed.  I have been to a few classes to understand the changes more.  I hope for the best and set expectations with buyers from what I learned.

10:35am • #54

I think the govt once again is missing the whole problem.  Our current mess was caused by adjustable rate mortgages.  Not stated income.  Not 100% financing.  Not too many mortgage fees. Not under disclosure.  I've been in this business for 30yrs.  Never has a client asked for a pmt they couldn't afford.  The problem was all they heard was the starting payment.  No matter how you tried to explain to them what could happen, they only heard the starting pmt.  Maybe it's our 'want it now' culture.  The attitude was 'I can handle this pmt.  I'll deal with the increased pmt later.'  If we had had fixed rates, they wouldn't have had to deal with the increased pmt and they wouldn't be losing their house now.  Adding more disclosures wouldn't have changed that.   Actually, that was part of the problem.  They were overwhelmed with disclosures.  Preliminary discl packages were 30+pgs.  Loan docs 70+ pgs.  Borrowers looked at that and their eyes glazed over.  It was like asking them to build a rocket ship.

What we need to do is simplify - simple fixed rate mortgage.  Simple paperwork - one or two sheets that doesn't scare the borrower to death.  This is your rate.  This is your pmt. This is the loan cost.  This is the title cost.  This is the escrow cost.  This is how much you need to bring to the closing.  If things change, a simple page saying this is what it was  - this is what it is changing to and why.  Buying a home is stressful enough for the buyer.  This new GFE is just adding to it.

 

Nancy Fenoglio
11:07am • #55
815,800 Points 7 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Called Shot Master

The more they try and "help" the consumer the more expensive and less helpful it gets. 

11:08am • #56
Outside Blog

It will slow the process down, in the big scheme of the goal of buying and selling, that isn't a major problem.  It will mean that we as real estate professionals will need to teach our clients to have a proper expectation of the time line to the transaction.  People may need to adjust the timing, but like all change people will learn and adjust to it.  To make someone accountable for their good faith estimate isn't bad, far too many times buyers found out that their lenders/brokers numbers were an estimate that wasn't full researched out for the uniqueness of the area, taxing entities and other issues that affected the numbers.  Subsequently the buyer, getting to closing, had to make up this difference that they weren't expecting.

Mortgage lendors/brokers don't have a fiduciary duty to borrowers, we as agent do.  As we work with our clients we keep their best interests first, if we mess up we normally fix it.  If the deal doesn't close the money we've expended is lost.  These changes force the lendors to have some accountability for their business decisions.  The new time elements will be confusing at first, but like all change, we will accept it, plan for it and succeed.   Those who can't adjust and want to sit back and complain about the change will be left behind or continuously creating negative energy.

11:11am • #57
277,620 Points 8 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

I think that it will be more difficult but it will also be all the more reason for REALTORS to firm up their relationships with lenders.

11:21am • #58

Just think lenders ,mortgage brokers and title service providers have to be accurate. 

It is about time!

Happy Real Estate Agent
12:40pm • #59
2 Featured Posts

While I think this new disclosure is LONG overdue, I agree that it's going to put a wrench in expediancy. By posting blogs like this, we are being proactive. Spread the word to all the agents you know, forward this post so you can be proactive and know what to expect... Great post!

3:08pm • #60

As a mortgage advisor I can say this; Correctly quote all fees and there will be no problems. Get loans done in a timely fashion and have your numbers correct, and this barely affects you. This is what we finally needed to get certain brokers (not going to name any names) from low balling a client to get their business and then increasing certain fees. This is a problem I have delt with frequently and I'm glad it will be coming to an end!

4:06pm • #61
282,573 Points 19 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Great Article on this important topic - Changes with RESPA.

I recently wrote my own article on the topic and could not find a group to post it to - so I created the RESPA Group, here in ActiveRain.  In just 4 days we are up to 39 members and 23 valuable blog posts.

I would like to invite you to join the group and repost this important resource to the group so many will be able to easily find it, when researching and following the topic.

Thanks for your consideration,

John

8:21pm • #62
JAN
07
2010

I have certainly enjoyed reading all the posts and comments.

I am so un-educated on this topic that I do not know how to comment.

It looks like I had better get educated though!!

Thanks again,

Jeanette Hemmer, Re/Max Plus Realty, Clarksville, Ar

Jeanette Hemmer
9:05am • #63
107,181 Points

in my opinion....no respa will not slow the recovery....borrowers/buyers will still buy a house ONLY AFTER THEY  have given up a escrow deposite will they find out what a hassle it is to get a loan

9:18pm • #64
JAN
09
2010
107,343 Points 16 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Real estate recovery?  There's a real estate recovery?

RESPA is only one of the things we can point to as a potential problem to the "recovery".  My biggest problem is that lenders are not lending.  I'd like to get back to worrying about RESPA.

9:42pm • #65
JAN
11
2010
512,109 Points 41 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Thanks Karen, the only concern is if RESPA changes add more of a burden to the recovery.

11:27am • #66
FEB
07
2010
404,479 Points 6 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router Called Shot Master

Excellent post.  Good question.  Changes are coming from all directions.  We just have to get set and be ready to adjust.

10:26pm • #67

What does the graphic say?

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Joe-redbackground Rainmaker_large

Joe Manausa - Tallahassee Real Estate

Tallahassee, FL

More about me…

Century 21 First Realty

Address: 1140 Capital Circle SE, Suite #12, Tallahassee, FL, 32301

Office Phone: (850) 386-2001

Cell Phone: (850) 508-1544

Email Me



Listings

Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog