I shot some video of our hike to Flat Rocks yesterday.

I've been wanting to show a comparison of a few video services and this is the right video to use.

Video sharing reviews are good, but most don't give you a common video to compare them. I wanted you to be able to see the quality differences. This video is a good test example because it has a great deal of detail in the trees, light reflecting off of water in the creek and some jittery movement. It was shot with the Kodak v705. So, you'll be able to see the difference in video compression quality.

Veoh, Brightcove, Photobucket, VideoEgg and YouTube

I love how quickly YouTube compresses video once you've uploaded your videos, but not the end result. The compression is weak. I'm a big fan of Brightcove, which we use for all of our How To Videos at RealEstateShows.com. The best for pure speed is VideoEgg. Because it uses a downloaded video plugin to manage the upload, your videos are ready the moment they are uploaded to their site.  Veoh delivers a great end result, but the compression can take a long time to complete. So, if you're wanting to get a video up and post it quickly, it can be a bit frustrating. But if you're not in a hurry... Veoh is good opton. Photobucket is a good all-around tool for storing photos and video, so there may be some added benefit to using this service. Flickr doesn't have video upload. But depending on traffic, the upload time can take exceptionally long. Facebook also has a good video upload engine, but you can't embed the video in your blog posts. You can share Veoh, YouTube and Photobucket videos on Facebook. If you'd like to see the Facebook quality, and you are a Facebook member, you can see a version of the video here.

These are all shown in their default embed codes sizes. If you turn off your sound, you can click on all three in succession to judge the quality yourself. To reduce upload time, the original video was saved as 640 x 480 VGA MP4 at 15 frames per second with a data rate of 1000 kbit/sec. You may get better results by uploading higher quality video. This is especially true for VideoEgg, since there is no upload time penalty.

Here is the Veoh version:

Here is the Brightcove version:

Here is the VideoEgg version:

Here is the Photobucket version:

Here is the YouTube version:

 
Post is included in group: Gadgets, Tools, & Extras
Post is included in group: Tech Corner
Post is included in group: The Art Of Marketing You
Post is included in group: Rainmaking - Internet Marketing Strategies
Post is included in group: Project Blogger

57 Comments on Video Service Comparison - Veoh, Brightcove, Photobucket, VideoEgg and YouTube

JUL
09
2007
318,562 Points 22 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

The image quality of VideoEgg strikes me as best.  Clear, bright, no artifacts.   But maybe that is just because the default embed size is smaller than your other examples. 

And Flat Rocks looks like a very pleasant place to spend some time!

 

9:35am • #1
105,224 Points 2 Featured Posts Outside Blog
I agree - VideoEgg was a sharper image. Love the Flat Rocks Boogey song!
9:37am • #2
582,505 Points 95 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Jeff, glad you r on vacation so I can get caught up on all your tricks. Which embeddes the easiest on activerain. I've had problems with utube. I agree with Cheryl and Paula the videoegg is the clearest.

Make sure you check the kids for ticks. :)

9:43am • #3
429,373 Points 17 Featured Posts Outside Blog
Jeff- How do these other sites compare to You Tube, as far as the community aspect goes. I know your post is about the video quality, but do the other sites allow ratings, comments, and comment responses?
10:05am • #4
231,237 Points 64 Featured Posts Outside Blog

LOL!!  Love the flat rocks boogie with the boys!!  :o)

The different video styles are cool, but I'm just left wondering if there's going to be a creek (wv'ese -- "crick") for me to play in on Saturday.  Please say there is -- I haven't tried to catch crawdads or salamanders in ages.   

10:12am • #5
278,462 Points 14 Featured Posts Outside Blog
Great examples, Jeff!   On another topic regarding video sharing: is there a link on AR (has someone done a good one) about SHARING of videos such as YouTube or others?  THANKS ahead of time.
10:13am • #6
110,262 Points
Hi Jeff, I have to agree with the above that Video Egg is the best. Now....if I can just figure out all the technical stuff about putting them on my blogs!
10:34am • #7
16 Featured Posts

I find Blip.TV to be one of the best in terms of quality, plus you can choose either Flash or Quicktime (which is FAR superior delivery).

Both Blip and Veoh also have the ability to automatically shoot your videos to other sites like Google, Yahoo, MySpace, a blog, etc.  So you upload once, and it goes to all of these others automatically.


10:35am • #8
218,966 Points 5 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Jeff, you have a knack for clarifying the sometimes tedious high tech maze. Its a great idea to have the major video programs head to head. I've used photobucket for some time and the quality is high. Videoegg I agree is the clearest. Its still hard to compete against Youtube if you want a much large audience, even though they often look fuzzy. I saw one of Sting's Desert Rose http://apps.facebook.com/ilike/artist/Sting/track/Desert+Rose

 and the quality was good. They are very uneaven. Perhaps it all depends if they have plug ins or not and how good your own  video cam is. It is a choice then: either we go for lower resolution, less room on your drive and it is compressed faster but we will loose in quality? Thanks for taking the time to put all this together.

 

11:22am • #9
264,980 Points 67 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog
You know I LOVE how you lay this all out. I never really gave it much thought ... Just used YouTube. I really, really like BrightCove, though - IMHO the best quality of all the videos that you have here. And Output is more important tio me than initial upload time... I think. Thank you, Jeff.
11:44am • #10
429,121 Points 90 Featured Posts Outside Blog
Fred... I noticed BlipTV seems to require a Brightcove login and password. Are they using the Brightcove engine? Also, VEOH, in their pro service, will also upload automatically to many different networks, including YouTube, etc. 
12:45pm • #11
429,121 Points 90 Featured Posts Outside Blog
All... I tried to keep the focus of this post on video quality. For me, that is as critical as anything else. If I were doing this for greatest exposure, I'd want my videos to be in as many places as possible. So, using VEOH's PRO service might be an option, since it will automatically submit to many services, as does Blip, according to Fred above. 
12:47pm • #12
192,154 Points 11 Featured Posts Outside Blog
I have to go with the videoegg version it is the clearest of all however, just one question why is the screen smaller than the rest?
12:49pm • #13
429,121 Points 90 Featured Posts Outside Blog
Mana... I kept the screen sizes at their default settings. These are the sizes they give when you copy and paste the embed code. You can change those numbers to increase or decrease the size, but this is how it comes "right out of the box."  :)
12:57pm • #14
16 Featured Posts
Jeff...   I'm not aware of any connection between Blip and Brightcove.  I've uploaded 200+ videos to Blip and never see them ask that!  So don't really know what you're talking about!
6:08pm • #15
429,121 Points 90 Featured Posts Outside Blog
Fred, if you sign up for a new bliptv account today, it asks, as part of the sign up process, to either sign up for a Brightcove account or input your existing Brightcove account. I just found it interesting. I'll take a harder look later. Thanks!
6:11pm • #16
16 Featured Posts
That is interesting... I've been registered there for probably a year or more....  at that time there was no such thing...    
6:19pm • #17
480,278 Points 151 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Jeff T.... I only know youtube.... so thanks for sharing this. I guess I have some playing to do... or you can do this for me...  ;o)  Or did you?

                                                                                                              jeff belonger

9:52pm • #18
JUL
10
2007
153,695 Points 2 Featured Posts Outside Blog
thanks for the update Jeff, great research for us all thanks for the comparisons...
9:52am • #19
1 Featured Post
Jeff, this is great for me.  I am videoing a seminar this evening and knowing the differences between them all really helps.  Thanks so much!
3:40pm • #20
JUL
11
2007
429,121 Points 90 Featured Posts Outside Blog
Jonathon... I'm so glad this came at a good time!
12:20am • #21
JUL
12
2007
409,999 Points 72 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Hubba...

I think Brightcove has my vote.

Once I get my new V705 I'll let you know what I decide :)

TLW...ROAR!

5:58pm • #22

My use is for photos and as Jeff said,Photo Bucket is good.Some forums require you enter a URL address and it is great for that kind of use.

From my laptop they looked rated in decending order.I was using richness of color as a judge since the smaller shot will always look sharper.

7:54pm • #23

The thing about it is Youtube is just the number one choice for video clips. If you are using video as part of your web presence you cant beat the name brand effect of youtube and being associated there plus the back links you can get.

You can have your own channel with good clips from your area. It's so easy to do all agent should have a town/city site here is mine to see as an example http://www.youtube.com/user/escapetosaltspring

Good post Jeff the future is Video clips great comparisons.

9:10pm • #24
429,121 Points 90 Featured Posts Outside Blog
I think you should upload to as many as possible and pick the one with the best quality to use when you want to have a great display. 
10:35pm • #25
JUL
20
2007
429,121 Points 90 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Mike, here is the definitive guide:

http://activerain.com/blogsview/51461/Putting-Video-in-Your

Thanks, Nick. 

10:39pm • #27
JUL
24
2007

Thanks for the help on getting my youtube video on my blog.

 

Thanks

Mike Lefton

American Homes Real Estate

2:34pm • #28
JUL
28
2007
14 Featured Posts

Wow!  This was super informative Jeff.  I've always wondered which one of these websites had the best quality video but there was no way of comparing until now.  Thanks for doing this very tedious comparison!

5:42pm • #29
429,121 Points 90 Featured Posts Outside Blog
Tracey... it's my pleasure. Glad it helped.
5:54pm • #30
JUL
29
2007
16 Featured Posts

Don't forget the MOST important thing about ALL of these options:  garbage in, garbage out.

The quality of your source video has more to do with the quality of the uploaded video than the site itself.  Even pathetic YouTube videos look MUCH better if you upload a high quality source video.   

10:39am • #31
1 Featured Post
Thanks for the review I am overwhelmed by the choices that I have for video on the web.  Here I was thinking Flickr and YouTube where the way to go.  Another day learning in the Rain.
3:37pm • #32
JUL
30
2007
429,121 Points 90 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Fred... no question. But if I've got garbage and I'm willing to share it with the world, I want that garbage to look as good as possible. :)

Tim... there are lots of other choices as well, Tim. And they are all free to try. 

9:34am • #33
AUG
29
2007
Jeff, thanks for doing all the legwork for us! You saved me a ton of research time.
9:18pm • #35
AUG
30
2007
429,121 Points 90 Featured Posts Outside Blog
My pleasure.
10:40am • #36
OCT
03
2007

http://activerain.com/boulderite  Is using the Photobucket.  I like the idea of being able to put more than 5 photos - which I think is the restriction with RES.  I've created a slide show and have generated the HYML code but none of them give me the show like this one without throwing the extra photos all over my website. 

I'm looking for something for AR and websites.

Any suggestions

Virginia Tatseos
12:05pm • #37

Virginia since this post started Goggle now has online storage.You may know the program as Piccasa.

 

1:10pm • #38
MAY
22
2008
Jeff - what kind of camera are you using?
2:56pm • #39
NOV
27
2008
NOV
28
2008

Nice presentation, Jeff.  I am a director/producer, I recently did some videos for  The Gardner Team of Realtors, and with their encouragement to join AR,  I have posted an AR blog on flash, file size and video quality here , so that you can see how good flash can be when encoded and hosted privately, and this is not that hard to do!  It's a format that is improving daily.  Also this blog discusses viewer criteria:  will they watch? 

Burnit Studio Pro

12:17am • #88
7 Featured Posts

Thank  you Jeff for this awesome information.  You continue to teach me things I need to know!

5:58am • #102
16 Featured Posts

Just an update:

As of this week, YouTube now serves up widescreen video AND high quality video (if you upload a high quality source).  Of course, it's still full of fat people in spandex dancing around to Beyonce...... but I digress....

Brightcove no longer allow user generated content as of Dec. 2008.  It will be "paid only" service.

AOL Video is shutting down their services in December 2008.

And many sites ban commercial videos, such as Blip.TV, Vimeo, Spike.com, etc.  If you upload to those sites, your account will be closed, and you will be notified after the videos have been removed.

Still your best bet is to stick with sites who welcome commercial (and real estate) video, such as WellcomeMat.com and Zipvo.com.

7:12am • #107
Outside Blog Hit Router

Jeff:

I don't like any of them really Their compression is too strong. You have to do your movie and save uncompressed and you get it better. My understanding is Youtube for a subsciption will give High Def. have aquires the technology to do my own in flash,and all the big media formats. Then you can offer on own site high quiality for high speed and lower quailty for slower,

It takes and effort, but it will be worth it.

Richard

Richard

10:38am • #119
429,121 Points 90 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Dang, this post is old. The world has changed quite a bit since this post. :)

12:06pm • #122
NOV
29
2008
NOV
30
2008
Localism Sponsor

wow... an real expert that can sing!

10:11am • #191
409,999 Points 72 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Old?

Then perhaps some smooth talking bald Guy would like to give us an updated one? :)

Please do not allow the tapping of my nails on the table disturb you :)

TLW...ROAR!

1:41pm • #200
DEC
01
2008
3 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor

I liked VideoEgg the best.  The picture quality and overall feel was superior to the other platforms.  To me the picture quality is so important I don't care about the time it takes me to upload something beause if the picture quality is poor I think the people watching the video will think poorly of the video.

6:37am • #221
DEC
02
2008
DEC
03
2008

Does anyone have a list of websites that let you embed your RE video on their site? IE: Forsalebyowner.com won't let you embed, but you can link to the video. Curious about Realtor.com and others.

thanks!

4:00pm • #348
16 Featured Posts

You can embed on Realtor.com  Just upload the .mp4 or .flv file to their video section (where you upload photos).  It plays embedded in the listing page.

4:28pm • #349

Hi Fred- so Realtor.com is not really embedded, but you upload the video to their site? I have my own web server and want to use my custom Flash player. Are there any other sites that actually let you embed? Where are people posting the vids that they load on youtube et al? Sorry for the n00b questions!!

good day

5:49pm • #351
16 Featured Posts

Yes you upload the video to their site and it's embedded within the listing. You must have the "enhanced listing package" in order to do it however. 

9:54pm • #361
DEC
04
2008

I fully understand the upload part. But I'm looking for sites that will let me embed my own code to stream from my own site/server. Maybe they don't exist?!

thanks!

 

 

 

12:26am • #368
16 Featured Posts

Erin:  I don't know.  Not sure I understand why this is important to you - the important thing is getting the video exposed to viewers, but you'll just have to check around. 

5:40am • #377
429,121 Points 90 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Erin, if it is important to you, there are some simple and effedctive ways to do it. We do it now at Real Estate Shows with our How To videos and samples. We use JW FLV Media Player 4.2. It allows us to host the videos ourselves and provide embed codes for placing them anywehre we wish. You can see examples on the Real Estate Shows Tutorial Videos Blog.

Fred, thanks for your great comments here. I appreciate it.

9:56am • #386
1 Featured Post Hit Router

Very helpful.  Thanks, these are good things to know.

2:01pm • #403
DEC
05
2008
DEC
06
2008

Jeff, I have used JW's player for quite some time now, building sites for clients. It's a good basic player. I have my own custom player though. (I'm new to real estate, not new to technology...) The "placing them anywhere we wish" is the part I'm after. Where do you embed your videos? Which RE sites allow you to embed (not just upload)?

Fred, exposure is good. Controlling the delivery of the content is better!

Didn't mean to hijack this thread, but thought it was relevant.

11:50am • #442
JAN
08
229,744 Points 1 Featured Post

REally wonderful breakdown, thank you. I am a huge youtube fan,.

12:03pm • #443
MAY
20
107,321 Points 1 Featured Post

Nice comparisons. Given that almost two years have passed, hopefully the video sites have improved in quality.  YouTube recently began to show videos in highdef.

5:07am • #444

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Jeffblack800 Rainmaker_large

Jeff Turner

Santa Clarita, CA

More about me…

Real Estate Shows

Office Phone: (661) 244-5812

Email Me

Helping businesses grow by effectively using evocative Internet-based services. I am the President of Zeek Interactive and Founder of RealEstateShows.com.

Jeff Turner Info

The Real Estate Shows Blog

Active Rain Member Discount








Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find CA real estate agents and Santa Clarita real estate on ActiveRain.