Special offer

Too Many Agents

By
Education & Training

Do We Have Too Many Agents?

Do we have too many agents in real estate?  Yes, we probably do!  A broker recently shared a list of sales in our county over a 10 year period.  In 1999 there were only 1800 agents who closed a total of 10,914 sales - approximately 6 transactions per agent. 

In 2009 there were 3189 agents dividing up 8269 transactions - approximately 2.5 transactions per agent.  That is a huge drop in income for many agents.  But it isn't just the count that is worrisome.  The quality of performance has also gone down.  Agents are struggling to survive and when that happens it can be "no holds barred" when it comes to putting, and keeping, a transaction together. 

I constantly hear complaints about a lack of knowledge and ethics and it is getting worse.  The training that is so important doesn't exist in a lot of offices.  And the designated broker is often as ignorant as the agents in the office.  I am personally aware of an office where the designated broker qualified as far as licensing went but had never actually listed or sold a property before stepping into the DB's position.  The agents made a mass exodus.  And today I heard of another broker who has just achieved the license with only 2 years in the business and clearly doesn't understand the basics of contract law. 

Obviously some agents do 20, 30, 40 or more transactions a year so there are lots of agents not making a nickel in this business.  Why do they stay in it?  It is a cost factor what with dues, education, license fees, etc., and it would seem they would be better served to "hang" their license instead of hoping they might get a listing or a buyer that might result in an extra $3-$4k income.  Not enough income to make a difference in one year.

But a bigger question might be why do offices hire agents that don't produce and then continue to keep them?  Non-producing agents, or NPU's as one broker called them (non-producing units), cost a company money and raise the liability level substantially.  There are a few quality brokers running offices who only hire agents who are focused on a career in real estate that makes a liveable income and will only keep agents that produce - it is always a pleasure to be in a cross-sale with an agent from those offices. 

In December our Department of Licensing said we had 26,000 active licensees - a drop of about 15,000 from 3 years ago.  But clearly not enough of a drop.   Hopefully this year will weed out some more agents who make the choice to move to another career. 

And the change in the license law with the increase in education to get in to the business will help keep more marginal folks out of the business.

Bill Hicks, Designated Broker, Keller Williams Federal Way

Administrator, Evergreen Professional Training, Inc.

Posted by

 

 

Follow Me on Twitter   Follow Me on Facebook   Lets get Linkedin   My Outside Blog   --

Douglas Lovitt
Washington Management Company, Inc. - Mill Creek, WA

Bill, there is a lot of truth to what you are saying here.  I do believe we will see more leave the business this year and the higher barriers of entry will help.

Jan 18, 2010 09:52 AM
Taylor Shults Philley
Austin Realty Firm - Austin, TX
Broker, Realtor , GRI

I think it's because holding on to these NPU actually don't cost firms money. What money does it cost them? These days, agents buy their own signs most of the time. It may take money to keep the ink cartridge full at the office; but the office would do this with 10 agents or with 15. Ya know?

Jan 18, 2010 09:53 AM
Bob Anderson
Remax Jazz Inc. - Oshawa, ON

Well written.

 

EDUCATION.

In Ontario we have mandatory ongoing training.  Not only does it help keep the agents up to date but the time and cost also helps to weed out those not committed to a career,

SHARE OF BUSINESS,

We spend a great deal of our time looking for clients. 

If there were fewer agents would that mean more time could be spent lising and selling houses rather than looking for business.

But it can be a lucrative career and that attracts people.

I  find  that whenever we have a slowdown in the market it seems like the number of agents actively working drops so that the number iof deals available per working agent actually increases.

 

Jan 18, 2010 10:00 AM
Bill Hicks
Federal Way, WA

Hi Taylor,

In Washington it does cost the company about $200 or so per agent in Labor & Industries costs.  That is the portion the agent can't pay.  And yes, a lot of them do run up costs in an office with paper, ink, etc., and not producing any income to the office to contribute to their share of expenses.  There is also the staff time keeping track of them - not huge but wouldn't the staff be better off helping the producing agents than the non-producing agents?  There is also the liability - folks who don't come in to the office, don't participate in meetings, don't keep up with the changes in MLS forms or the laws are a source of potential lawsuits. 

In our office the worst headaches for me as Designated Broker have been from the "lone rangers" - most of whom are no longer with us since I started in May.  But I am still cleaning up some of their messes.

 

Bill

 

Jan 18, 2010 10:12 AM
Rob D. Shepherd
RETIRED - Florence, OR
RETIRED

Theres always room for one more good one! In my small tow,n population 8k we have close to 90 Realtors, fortantly for me only abot 20 really work.

Jan 18, 2010 10:32 AM
Jeanne Dufort
Coldwell Banker Lake Country - Madison, GA
Madison and Lake Oconee GA

Best thing about the downturn is fewer "part-time" agents - even though their individual volume is small, collectively they are many and ensure that the agents most people remember are not serious professionals.

Jan 18, 2010 10:34 AM
Wayne and Lynda Gomillion
Real Living Hagan Realtors | Pinehurst ~ Southern Pines, NC - Pinehurst, NC

Agreed... A license to sell is too easy to obtain and there are too many "part timers."

 

Jan 18, 2010 10:46 AM
Eric Bouler
Gardner Realtors, Licensed in La. - New Orleans, LA
Listening to your Needs

The strong make it and the weak ones do not. That is the nature of a commission business.  The real estate companies are betting on each new agent selling a couple before leaving the business. The cost per agent is much more than you would think to the brokers. The Brokers spend plenty of time and energy to get that one agent...

Many time that one good agent will leave the broker for a better split and they start over again.  My broker is like a farm team for Keller Williams.

Jan 18, 2010 10:59 AM
Bill Hicks
Federal Way, WA

Doug

I believe you're right.  I know in my office and in many others offices, brokers  are now looking at both the committment and production of agentsare .  There those agents who would be hgh producers if urged to do so.  However, like any good business production has to to be a key factor.  Also, I am appalled at how many keep uncommitted, non-producing agents not realizing how great a liability they create.

It is nice to hear others feel as I do that this industry requires the highest level of professionalism

Bill

Jan 18, 2010 12:36 PM