Special offer

FHA takes risk management seriously

By
Services for Real Estate Pros

Dollar sign, Las Vegas NVAs FHA's market share has soared over the past few years, thanks to the vacuum left by conventional mortgage lenders whose fortunes have suffered terrible setbacks in the ongoing real estate calamity. But it hasn't escaped the anger of the sinking housing market either. It has bravely insured mortgage loans with only the minimum 3.5% down all along and as prices have continued spiraling south these loans have gone underwater sometimes in a few months - particularly vulnerable were many Las Vegas mortgage borrowers, as well as those in Miami and many parts of California -  and that often spells trouble. That's one of the reasons to its climbing foreclosure rate.

FHA has been talking for a while about streamlining its risk management policy and now it's ready to act on it. The new regulations will be published in the coming days. Here are the highlights.

- All new lender applicants must have a net worth of $1 million, up from the present $250,000. This will ensure all FHA mortgage providers are properly capitalized to better meet testy real estate market conditions.

- Present FHA lenders have one year to comply with this $1 million requirement once the new rule goes live. And a category called Small Business lenders must have a minimum net worth of $500,000 also within one year.

- Three years after ratification of this regulation approved lenders and new applicants doing FHA's single-family programs must possess a net worth of $1 million and 1% of total mortgage loan volume over $25 million.

- Mortgage brokers won't receive any longer individual FHA eligibility approvals. They are able to originate home loans via their affiliations with FHA-approved lenders, though. This adjustment actually mirrors the relationships brokers now have with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Those already approved can continue to sign up business through the year, but after January 1, 2011, they need a sponsorship from an FHA-backed lender.

Arguably these changes will strengthen FHA, and quiet its critics. At least for the short term. Some of whom were already suggesting the agency would soon be ripe for a government bailout similar to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. A sound FHA is one of the main factors that the housing market sorely needs now to pull it out of the gutter. Without FHA's mortgage insurance function it wouldn't have much of a chance. The new rules predictably will limit some lender participation but it should minimally affect mortgage applicants' access to its products.

Posted by

_______________________________________________________________________________

Provided by: 

Esko Kiuru
Mortgage, real estate and apartment industry analyst 

www.BluefoxToday.com - syndicated mortgage, housing and property management blog

eskokiuru@gmail.com
My cell: 702-499-1006

David Saks
Memphis, TN
Broker / Industry Analyst

Everyone's taking extra precautions to protect their resources, FHA, the FED, all the GEO's. I can't think of a single reason why they wouldn't want to. I'm going to climb out on a limb and predict 7% prime by the end of 2011.

Apr 11, 2010 03:47 AM
George Souto
George Souto NMLS #65149 FHA, CHFA, VA Mortgages - Middletown, CT
Your Connecticut Mortgage Expert

Esko, these changes are bound to eliminate a few Lenders.  I am not sure if that will be a good or bad thing, but it will not take long to answer that question after these changes take place.

Apr 11, 2010 01:33 PM
Lee Walsh
SecurityNational Mortgage - Lake Mary, FL
Executive Talent Scout for Mortgage Professionals

Esko,

I am not sure that the new rules from HUD are a good move. Although they are much less than the proposed rule which would have set the net worth bar much higher at the three year mark.

I think the new net worth rule will eliminate at least 30% - 40% of current HUD approved lenders. If a lender is funding 4 million a month ($48 mil per year - that would be a small lender) their net worth requirement would be $1,ooo,ooo plus 1% of production over 25 mil (23 mil = $230,000) = $1,230,000 net worth.

Few small lenders have that level of net worth.

The smaller lenders will be eliminated by this rule,  and we all know that size of a company has no relationship to their ethics.

 

Apr 12, 2010 01:44 AM
Esko Kiuru
Bethesda, MD

Edward & Celia,

Appreciate you stopping by to read the latest on FHA.

Apr 12, 2010 03:26 AM
Esko Kiuru
Bethesda, MD

David,

It's better to tighten things up than go begging for a bailout.

Apr 12, 2010 03:28 AM
Esko Kiuru
Bethesda, MD

George,

I see other approved lenders filling much of the void.

Apr 12, 2010 03:29 AM
Esko Kiuru
Bethesda, MD

Lee,

Good points. It's unfortunate that some smaller lenders will be eliminated. Your ethics argument is solid.

Apr 12, 2010 03:33 AM
Gene Riemenschneider
Home Point Real Estate - Brentwood, CA
Turning Houses into Homes

There is a reason I do not do loans.  That area of business is getting way to complex.

Apr 12, 2010 04:30 AM
Karen Fiddler, Broker/Owner
Karen Parsons-Fiddler, Broker 949-510-2395 - Mission Viejo, CA
Orange County & Lake Arrowhead, CA (949)510-2395

Raising fees and eliminating competition among lenders....government at work. The dumb leading the stupid. just MHO

Apr 12, 2010 05:31 AM
Karen Fiddler, Broker/Owner
Karen Parsons-Fiddler, Broker 949-510-2395 - Mission Viejo, CA
Orange County & Lake Arrowhead, CA (949)510-2395

uh huh....I'm not impressed. They are charging more, raising the down payment and limiting lenders....just government trying to feel useful by doing SOMETHING instead of anything truly useful. IMHO

Apr 12, 2010 05:32 AM
Fred Sweezer Sr. CMI, LLC.
Hud Certified 203K Consultant - Long Beach, CA
HUD 203k Consultant

Ok, Thanks for the update!

Apr 12, 2010 06:00 AM
Jirius Isaac
Isaac Real Estate &TriStar Mortgage - Kenmore, WA
Real Estate & loans in Kenmore, WA

the problem is really these days that change is just happenning too fast to keep up with.

Apr 12, 2010 06:21 AM
Kate Kate
San Diego, CA

Esko, thanks for the FHA update. Call me a skeptic but is FHA planning to keep only those with a high net worth to more easily refill its own coffers?

Apr 12, 2010 12:12 PM
Renée Donohue~Home Photography
Savvy Home Pix - Allegan, MI
Western Michigan Real Estate Photographer

I agree that it is better to tighten up things rather than begging for a bailout!  Great stuff as usual Esko!

Apr 13, 2010 10:09 AM
Esko Kiuru
Bethesda, MD

Gene,

Arguably it's pretty hard trying to keep up with all the changes.

Apr 13, 2010 10:38 AM
Esko Kiuru
Bethesda, MD

Karen,

It's either tighten up or face taxpayer bailout. Former sounds better.

Apr 13, 2010 10:41 AM
Esko Kiuru
Bethesda, MD

Fred,

Thanks for stopping by.

Apr 13, 2010 10:42 AM
Esko Kiuru
Bethesda, MD

Jirius,

You are right. Constant change is the name of the game.

Apr 13, 2010 10:43 AM
Esko Kiuru
Bethesda, MD

Kate,

It's unfortunate that this will eliminate some smaller mortgage firms, but FHA needs changes to build up its slim reserves.

Apr 13, 2010 10:46 AM
Esko Kiuru
Bethesda, MD

Renee,

The housing market needs a functioning FHA right now, so this was a must-do move.

Apr 13, 2010 10:48 AM