Special offer

The Great Loan Modification Hoax

By
Services for Real Estate Pros with TheHousingGuru.com

snake oilIn February of 2009 President Obama made a speech in which he promised to help between 7 and 9 million families avoid foreclosure, a promise that if kept might truly have helped stabilize the U.S. housing market. Unfortunately, the promise upon which millions of homeowners have placed their hopes and committed their savings, seems to have been little more than political rhetoric.

 

To address the housing crisis, the President outlined announced the Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan, a program which although not described as such, would require billions of dollars, would be impossible to administer, and that, in the end, would benefit banks more than homeowners. The plan included several initiatives under the umbrella of Making Home Affordable, and includes subprograms such as HAMP, the Home Affordable Modification Program, and Hope for Homeowners.

 

Thus far, as described by the TARP watchdog, the administration’s efforts have been disappointing, and it appears that in some cases, modification programs may have worsened the financial situation for homeowners facing foreclosure. By providing an element of “hope,” HAMP has caused many homeowners to continue making mortgage payments thus draining their financial reserves when such funds could have been used for moving expenses and rent deposits. Hundreds of thousands of homeowners entering the modification program have received nothing more than disappointment and frustration from both their lenders and the government’s promise to help.

 

How could Treasury, which runs the program, not have known that such programs were doomed from the start? It’s conceivable that they did know, that political posturing was more important than providing meaningful help. And this is not to criticize the party currently in power; politicians and bureaucrats on both sides of the political spectrum have regularly demonstrated their incompetence and inability to successfully address major issues.

 

And now, more than a year into the program, Treasury’s own records show a total of slightly more than 228,000 permanent modifications, or about 3 percent of the President’s original commitment. The administration has failed to meet its promise to save millions from foreclosure and now seems more interested in placing the blame for its failure with banks and homeowners. In recent testimony before Congress, a Treasury representative complained that servicers “were slow to implement HAMP.” What the official failed to mention, however, was the difficulty and confusion Treasury created for lenders by constantly changing the rules, an issue pointed out by the TARP watchdog that I discussed in a previous POST. However, instead of working to revamp its failed program, Treasury is now changing the metric for determining its performance, by counting the number of loan modifications “offered,” as successes, with little or no concern for the impact upon homeowners or the housing market.

 

Here are a few important points:

● The original promise to “help between 7 and 9 million families restructure or refinance their mortgages” has been ignored and subsequent press releases have focused upon helping only 3 to 4 million, and even that number seems out of reach.

● Treasury was not ready to implement the program when announced and has confused lenders by constantly changing the rules.

● Treasury’s own estimates forecast as many as 40 percent of those receiving a modification will re-default.

● None of the plans proposed to date have the ability to meet the original goal.

● The modification guidelines allow borrowers to have debt loads that are unsustainable.

● The program fails to adequately address the millions of “underwater” homeowners.

● Almost 300,000 new foreclosure filings are added to the problem every month.

● While HAMP is now averaging about 50,000 loan modifications per month, lenders were averaging twice that amount prior to interference from the government.

 

So what could be the purpose of committing billions of dollars and valuable resources to a problem that, in reality, government programs cannot solve? Politics, and nothing more. Most of those participating in HAMP will not receive the “rescue” they expected; permanent modifications will be extended to a relative few; and millions of Americans will ultimately lose their homes. Estimates from Treasury now predict as few as 1.5 to 2 million permanent modifications, with that number ultimately reduced by 40 percent due to re-defaults.

 

HAMP has been nothing more than a cruel hoax designed by politicians and bureaucrats to “kick the can a bit farther down the road.” With this program, however, their actions are likely to do more long-term harm than good, bringing financial ruin to millions of homeowners, and extending the housing and financial crises for years longer than necessary.

 

The Housing Guru: The expert source for all your housing questions

John Mulkey
TheHousingGuru.com - Waleska, GA
Housing Guru

Pauline - The "financial reform" bill we'll ultimately wind up with will offer little to protect consumers, but will just add to the benefits for Wall Street.

Barbara - There have been many modifications completed that made the situation worse for the borrower.

May 05, 2010 03:50 PM
Christine Donovan
Donovan Blatt Realty - Costa Mesa, CA
Broker/Attorney 714-319-9751 DRE01267479 - Costa M

I tend to agree with much, though not all of what Drew, Lenn and BB.  I fear this has done huge damage to our economy and that reducing the balance of the loans to market value.

May 05, 2010 04:25 PM
Anonymous
John (2)

I am curious how many people are out there like myself.  I am 35 and I am interested in buying a home.  I live in SE Mass.  I have no debt, $ saved, and excellent credit.  But, as I look at the housing market it has continued to fall.  People who bought over the last 3 years have faced foreclosuers, short sales, continuing PMI, and basically a loss (unless they plan on keeping their house for a few decades or so).  I can't see the benefit to buying over renting.  My rent is less than the depreciation I have seen thus far and small surges are not rebounds.  Are there more people like me?  And if so, how can the market recover when people like myself with steady income and excellent credit see no advantage to buying in this climate?  we look to the government to pour our tax $ toward people who bought a house they could not afford.   They do not need a small sum to get by, they are set up for failure and need to stop diggin the holes they began.  Relaxed mortgage standards got us here with fault on the buyers and brokers.  Let the foreclosures happen, allowing people to lose their homes equals high home supply (low demand) It will bring down prices and people like me will come out of the wood works and start buying.  People who lose a home can still rent.  I don't want to see them on the street, but a high 30 mortgage and the inability to pay cannot be solved by government, the market has to correct itself.  I rent, they can too. 

May 05, 2010 05:28 PM
#69
John Mulkey
TheHousingGuru.com - Waleska, GA
Housing Guru

Christine - Unless the system is changed quickly, it won't make much difference. We've begun a long and painful journey.

John - Yes, there are lots of folks like you, choosing to rent over buying.  However, for those who do want to own and who are willing to put forth some effort, there are bargains available. The key is understanding the market and getting some expert advice and help.  Additionally, there is the very important point of interest rates.  A significant increase in mortgage rates can negate the benefits of waiting.

May 06, 2010 02:43 AM
Denver Johnson
West USA Realty, Mesa AZ - Gilbert, AZ

You know, I am sure getting tired of seeing political rants and opinions here in the active rain blog-- I get plenty of that in the regular news. Can't we stick to the material relevant to helping everyone improve their real estate skills so they can better help their clients, and improve their skills in their chosen profession? Sheesh.

And the little thing I have to type in below to get this message delivered is "farkleberry." Farkleberry??? Sheesh.

May 06, 2010 05:31 AM
John Mulkey
TheHousingGuru.com - Waleska, GA
Housing Guru

Denver - Just like with your TV, with Active Rain you have the ability to "change the channel."  And much of what I've presented here is being avoided on most news programs that want us to believe that things are working.  They're not.  And if having accurate information about the loan modification program isn't pertinent to real estate, nothing is. 

My objective is to present information that may not be readily available, so that agents, consumers, and others can make the best real estate decisions possible.  I'm not a real estate trainer or cheerleader; for that you'll need to look somewhere else.

May 06, 2010 06:47 AM
Chris Richter
Wintrust Mortgage - Chicago, IL

John, I'm looking forward to seeing you take the counter-argument to your posts as mentioned in #37.  Takes a smart person to pull that one off.

Be careful though.  If you start sounding too American with "personal responsiblity" type of talk the ActiveRainers will take you to task. 

May 06, 2010 08:18 AM
Radmila Khamzina
First World Mortgage - West Hartford, CT

@ John 2 comment #69, if you have any questions in regards to mortgages you can e-mail me at rkhamzina@fw-mortgage.com.  I'll be glad to answer them. Radmila

May 06, 2010 09:53 AM
Jirius Isaac
Isaac Real Estate &TriStar Mortgage - Kenmore, WA
Real Estate & loans in Kenmore, WA

This stuff is way to complicated for us or the government to figure out.  The solutions need to be a lot simpler and need to be determined by people on the ground (Real Estate & mortgage brokers) not by people in D.C.  They have no idea what is really happening.

May 06, 2010 10:04 AM
John Mulkey
TheHousingGuru.com - Waleska, GA
Housing Guru

Chris - Oh I'm always for personal responsibility. And while I've advocated that the govt. take a stronger position on support for housing, I've done so knowing they were going to spend the money anyway--so why not put it to better use.  And if it takes smarts to do the counter-argument, I may have to re-think the idea.

Jirius - There is no super simple or painless solution, but you're right, the guys in DC seem clueless.

May 06, 2010 10:10 AM
Radmila Khamzina
First World Mortgage - West Hartford, CT

John, thank you for sharing your posts. I enjoy reading them and they are very informative. 

May 06, 2010 11:13 AM
John Mulkey
TheHousingGuru.com - Waleska, GA
Housing Guru

Radmila - Thanks for your comments.

May 06, 2010 02:09 PM
William Queen
William D. Queen, Real Estate Broker, Richmond, Virginia - West End, VA

President Obama and I have a lot in common. I have just demonstrated one of those items we have in common. I turned the conversation to me. In addition if you folks would make me President Of The United States I would enter that office with absolutely no knowledge of what to do. However, you might have an easier time of it because I am fully aware that I don't know what to do. Therefore little if anything would get done for a long time while I tried to figure it out. That could be a blessing.

Bill

May 07, 2010 09:56 AM
Jay Markanich
Jay Markanich Real Estate Inspections, LLC - Bristow, VA
Home Inspector - servicing all Northern Virginia

It's worse than that John.  It is intended help for buddies in private, while pretending to villify them in public.  And we are due another three years of this crap.

May 07, 2010 10:42 PM
John Mulkey
TheHousingGuru.com - Waleska, GA
Housing Guru

William - Have you registered as a candidate?  I'll give you my vote!

Jay - Yeah, all the noise about Wall Street is just as much a hoax.

 

May 08, 2010 03:24 AM
John Mulkey
TheHousingGuru.com - Waleska, GA
Housing Guru

Kelly - Home buyers could not be expected to foresee the potential disaster that became the housing crisis.  Most experts missed it too.  What we have to do now is work with what we have; and hopefully the banks will be cooperative, for it is ultimately in their best interests to do so.

May 08, 2010 07:35 AM
Rhonda Burgess
Southern Living Realty Partners - Smyrna, TN
Moving to Nashville TN Real Estate Specialist

Radmila, while I appreciate you addressing your comment towards me, I wonder where were you from 2000 to 2008?  In case you missed it, there was a good ole boy from Texas in office during this time period when the record number of mortgages, especially subprime mortgages were originated.  Clinton was long gone by the time the tsunami hit.  I'm not saying that the Clinton administration is without fault for promoting increased home ownership and implementing programs to achieve those objectives and I am not picking political sides either.  What I am saying is that the present administration, whether democrat or republican, cannot fix in 18-24 months what has been coming down the pipe for many years.  While the efforts tried thus far have certainly been less than intentioned and disappointing, I do not believe there is a quick fix.  I believe in trying something - anything rather than doing nothing.  You never know if something is going to work unless you try it.

And as John pointed out, Goldman Sacs does not have clean hands.  Just because you CAN do something because it is LEGAL, does not mean that you SHOULD DO IT.  Smoking for adults is legal in the U.S. but should adults smoke?  Are there not consequences for whatever decision you make? We're talking about morals and ethics when it comes to the actions of the likes of Goldman Sacs.  You can explain all day long how legal their actions were but it still does not make them right.  There comes a point when you should put your ethics and morals ahead of making a dollar.  But I guess if it is legal, it is okay to lay your ethics down and do what you want to do.

May 09, 2010 07:03 PM
Chris Richter
Wintrust Mortgage - Chicago, IL

How could this be a partisan debate?  The leverage cycle began post WWII and fueled a very comfortable lifestyle for the US for over half a century.  This is the hangover. 

The only person who doesn't receive blame is Ford because he really may not have understood what was happening.

Rhonda, I think you need to tweak your smoking model.  Goldman would be more like the Philip Morris/Altria.

The thread on loan modification really addresses whose job it is to provide treatment for that cancer.

It's a question that isn't just unanswered in financial products.  Beyond smoking, you have obesity, high cholesterol diets, illegal drugs, etc.  Do you blame the demand side or supply side?

John, get typing.  We need all these issues sorted out :)

 

May 10, 2010 01:52 AM
Esko Kiuru
Bethesda, MD

John,

The underwater issue is major and the banks and the government need to find some sort of a cure for it. Things are probably going to get worse because of it before they get better.

May 10, 2010 12:13 PM
Matthew Bartlett
Corcoran Global Living - Hill Top Team DRE Lic. #01353034 - Glendora, CA

John - the bottom line is government cannot fix anything. The framers of our Constitution desired less government. They wanted to get government out of the peoples way. There has not been one program that the federal government has created and run successfully, not Social Security, Medicare the US Post Office, nothing! The Politicians in Washington had no intention of fixing the problems, infact they're the ones who created this mess in the first place. Now we are depending on the same people who messed everything up to fix the problem it makes no sense. TARP 1 & TARP 2 and every other program this administration has created will not fix the problem. It will only make it worse, and I'm sorry to say that is exactly what they want. However, I believe the people are finally waking up and come November you will see many people thrown out of Washington once and for all.  

Best wishes,

Matt

May 18, 2010 01:50 PM