I have a borrower at the moment that has had to fire three real estate agents. They have specifically told them they could only afford $200k. (In our market that is difficult to find) The agents, knowing that they were pre-approved for $250k, were only showing them houses in the $225k-250k range. When they were confronted they said "well I'm sure you could find a couple extra hundred dollars if we find the right house for you."
If a buyer comes to me, applies for a loan, I can't legally deny them a loan that they qualify for, even if they have told me they can only afford to pay a certain amount per month, and this loan would be $200 more per month.
So Now, who is being predatory?
I often here this same scenario where the real estate agent is showing people homes $10k-50k over what they were told they could afford.
I realize that there are predatory lenders but this problem can't be solely placed at the feet of the lending industry.
Why do you agree or disagree?
*Update* This was originally written when it was still a sellers market and offers were above listed price not below.
It depends on the market. We're in a market where negotiation is bringing prices of homes down a good 3-10%. I look at the SOLD stats and see homes selling for much lower than list AND with lots of buyer credits.
In a $200K range, I'd be looking up to $220 or so, long time on the market, significant seller equity and easy to show and they should be able to get a good buy.
Perhaps the buyers aren't satisfied with homes that are listed for $200K.
I've had buyers want homes with features and size in the $300K price range but only qualified for $200K. They get rid of the agent because the agent can't find what they want. Not the agent's fault. Could be the buyer isn't going to be satisfied with the $200K houses.