Special offer

How I Chose a Real Estate Representative in Port Hope, Ontario

By
Real Estate Agent with Independent Real Estate Agent FCNB LICENCE # 190089546

As a New Brunswick real estate professional over the years I've advised executors and executrices. Now for the first time in my life it became my duty to administer an estate. Specifically in this case as an "estate trustee" under Ontario law.

The major part of the estate was a principal residence in Port Hope, Northumberland County, Ontario. My top criteria for selecting a real estate representative to market the real property was that I wanted no part of dual agency. I wanted a guarantee of single agency representation. I know that would pretty much rule out any large agency/brokerage. I looked first on ActiveRain and found two candidates. I also looked on RealtorLink.ca and found another.

I emailed the candidates and set up appointments coinciding with my trip to Port Hope to attend to matters of the estate. I also set up an appointment with an appraiser, an AACI. In an estate I always advise obtaining an independent appraisal.

After meeting two candidate representatives in person at the residence in Port Hope I had to choose between the two well qualified representatives. I never asked either for a CMA because as executor I rely on the independent appraisal to establish a listing price. It was a tough choice but I had to do it. I chose Lindsay Martin licensed with Royal Service Real Estate. Although the Brokerage is large, Lindsay is the only salesperson in the Brokerage working in the Port Hope and Cobourg area. There was little chance of a double agency situation arising. Also the OREA Listing Agreement representation section was modified with a "No multiple representation" stipulation.

Within 30 days of listing the property for sale there is an unconditional Agreement of Purchase and Sale in place. The estate trustee (myself) was fully represented in single agency and the buyer was represented by another brokerage.

In my opinion single agency is the best choice for sellers and buyers.

Comments (4)

Cathy Polan
Royal LePage ProAlliance Realty,Brokerage - Trenton, ON
Royal Lepage Proalliance Realty Sales Rep.

Hi Larry:

 

You made a great choice in Lindsay Martin.  Lindsay and I have worked together with a military client.  He was very professional and I enjoyed working with him very much.  I hope he would say the same of me.

I love the clause about multiple representation - have the same coach for both teams doesn't work.

Regards,

Jun 12, 2010 12:23 PM
Brian Madigan
RE/MAX West Realty Inc., Brokerage (Toronto) - Toronto, ON
LL.B., Broker

Larry,

Dual agency doesn't bother me as much as it used too. Theoretically, it quite bad, but, in many cases it can be good for both parties, since the deal gets done.

I think most large firms will agree to no dual agency, if you ask.

Brian

Jun 12, 2010 02:08 PM
John Grasty
for real estate results in the Tri-Cities. - Port Moody, BC
Your Tri-cities REALTOR, neighbour and volunteer.

Your commitment to single agency and undivided loyalty is second to none.

Congratulations Larry.

Jun 12, 2010 05:19 PM
Larry Estabrooks
Independent Real Estate Agent - Moncton, NB
100% representation means NEVER DUAL AGENCY !

Catherine - Yes Lindsay was very professional

Brian - I don't see how paying the price of full representation and getting limited representation can be a good deal. Of course it is the consumer's choice whether to have full representation, limited representation or no representation. In a fiduciary capacity as the estate trustee acting on behalf of the estate I made the logical choice - full representation. I was paying for full representation and I received full represent ion. 

John - Full representation is the smart choice. When I selected the lawyer to probate the estate I also made sure I would be getting full representation.

Jun 13, 2010 05:06 AM