"FANNIE MAE IS OUT IN THE LAUNDRY SHED SCRUBBING THEIR UNDERWEAR." 

FANNIE MAE:  "Fannie Mae has a federal charter and operates in America's secondary mortgage market to ensure that mortgage bankers and other lenders have enough funds to lend to home buyers at low rates. Our job is to help those who house America."

Obviously, Fannie Mae is not on the job.

I believe that the inability of Fannie and Freddie to step in to buy more loans and increase the conforming limit to something that would help a lot of folks refinance their loans when their ARMs adjust is one of the saddest and most frustrating sub-chapters in this entire mortgage mess. 

Why doesn't Fannie Mae step up to the plate and help??  Perhaps a bit of the recent history of Fannie Mae will shed some light: 

              "Fannie Mae engaged in "extensive financial fraud" over six years by doctoring
              earnings so executives       could collect hundreds of millions of dollars in bonuses,
              federal officials said yesterday in a report that portrayed a company determined to
              play by its own rules."
  Washington Post, Wednesday, May 24, 2006

While Franklin Raines was cooking the books at Fannie to increase his and his crony's bonuses of multiple $millions, Fannie probably lost the ability to do anything that would help in this mortgage mess of monumental proportions.  Now, can someone please tell me why Franklin Raines is not going to jail?

A LITTLE HISTORY.  Following the attack on the United States on September 11, 2001, as the Federal Reserve slowly but relentlessly lowered interest rates and did everything else they could to spur the economy.  Lower and lower interest rates made buying a home very attractive.  Pretty soon, since our real estate market is interest rate driven, anyone who wanted to buy a home, did buy a home and we just about ran out of homes to sell.  As would occur in a market economy, prices of homes went up.  Fixed rates didn't increase that much, but ARM products and other designer loans increased. 

Hardly a month went by that I didn't get an e-mail announcement from respectable mortgage companies about the "Alt-A", special "No-Doc" and other special instruments.  The mortgage companies I refer to will usually rely on the buyer's credit score for loan approval.  No money?  No problem.  With a good credit score, you could get a mortgage loan.  History had shown that, if folks had a good credit score, they were a very good risk.  The higher the credit score, the lower the risk and the lower the intrest rate.  Fannie Mae streamlined the Desk Top approvals to a point where we could have a loan approval in about an hour.  Unfortunately, during this period, average prices of homes were increasing dramatically. 

What's in the future?  I'm not optimistic.

Unfortunately, the focus in my area has now changed from "prices need to come down so buyers will start buying again" to "no one is buying because the mortgage companies are in trouble."   I still believe that prices and the extraordinary increases in prices between 2002 and 2006 has been the cause of our financing problems.  One questions is, if prices had remained stable with normal 3-5% appreciation, would financing have evolved with the designer loans we now see in trouble??  I don't believe so.

2002    Montgomery County, MD           9,179 Homes SOLD        @ $300,294 Average price        
2003    Montgomery County, MD           9,309 Homes SOLD        @ $339,480      "
2004    Montgomery County, MD           9,942 Homes SOLD        @ $394,624      "
2005    Montgomery County, MD         10,131 Homes SOLD        @ $464,227      "
2006    Montgomery County, MD           8,204 Homes SOLD        @ $524,770      "
2007    Montgomery County, MD           6,795 Homes SOLD        @ $554,870      "

I'm not smart enough to fathom the solution.  I can only report what I see and hear.  I still believe that the price of homes is the problem. 

JUST LOOK AT THE NUMBERS.  NUMBERS DON'T LIE.  Prices in our area have increased almost 100%.  However, incomes in our area have increased by an average of about 18%.  There's a disconnect.  The high price of real estate could be handled as long as interest rates remained low.  But, they didn't.  Back in 2003-2004, our buyers could get an ARM with an interest rates of 4.5%.  Those loans haven't adjusted yet.  When they do, the home owners are going to be faced with a much higher rate.  Question is, will they be able to find a loan. 

Of course, not everyone who purchased a loan in the past 5 years is in trouble.  Many have 15-30 year fixed loans.  Many have sufficient income and credit scores to do what they need.  However, it appears that there are a significant number of home owners who do now or soon will need to refiance who will be in trouble.  We aren't concerned about the investor buyers.  They took the risk. 

I don't believe that the average home buyer, the residential home owner occupant, understood the risk.  They  took the opportunity to move up to the area they had dreamed about, where the public schools were ranked high, where commuting would be worth the time and gasoline costs because their family would have their dream home.

After all, the experts all said that prices would continue to go up and interest rates would stay low for the forseeable future. 

Didn't they??

 

 

31 Comments on HEY MOM, WHERE'S FANNIE MAE?

AUG
11
2007
167,495 Points 12 Featured Posts Outside Blog
Lenn, Once again you are what makes Active Rain great.  I really wish I could ad something to your post some words of wisdom but you covered it.  I know where I live in Florida the average home price was over 400,000 how was a first time home buyer, Police, Fire, teachers...etc going to buy?
8:12am • #1
293,347 Points 7 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Another great post, Lenn.

"Now, can someone please tell me why Franklin Raines is not going to jail?"

Judicious generosity with hundreds of millions of misbegotten funds?

 

8:14am • #2
434,595 Points 70 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Lenn,

I guess you don`t remember what happened inside of Fannie`s home 3 years ago!

They`re so behind the times it`s pathetic... I know you`re a sharp lady and you realize this as well...

BTW. How come our Presidential Hopefuls don`t mention this issue as well?

Where`s obama,edwards,biden or hillbilly on this topic? 

8:16am • #3
42 Featured Posts

Lenn

Outstanding post with incredible insight.  I agree with every talking point. 

8:19am • #4
141,700 Points 46 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Lenn: Outstanding post. "Pigs at the trough" is the vision that comes to mind when I think of Franklin Raines and cohorts. 

Home pricing is a huge issue in most markets.   

8:21am • #5
1 Featured Post Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router
During 2004 and 2005 I was thinking, "there is no way this can continue!" It has to stop somewhere.  Surely, like Floyd Wickman always said "the train is coming".  Well the train has arrived for me in 2007...  2006 wasn't so bad, but 2007 feels just like 1991 again.  The early to late 90's were some of my strongest years as a listing agent.  I feel like I know how to survive this, because I've done it before.  How long do you think this down cycle will last???  I'm thinking AT LEAST 3 more years before it shakes itself out. . . . 
8:24am • #6
1 Featured Post Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router
I also think buyers will now have to do more than just have breath in their body to get a loan, which is as it should be!  Raising FHA and VA loan amounts would help too,  Isn't it about time?
8:29am • #7
650,412 Points 264 Featured Posts Outside Blog
Excellent article Lenn. In my market right now values are already down 25% and the market is telling me it's not enough. Houses are just not selling regardless of the price. I have the best priced houses on the market and can't even get showings much less offers. Fannie Mae has screwed up big time and something needs to be done about it. Their financials have been cooked and are well pass being done already. They were given too much power and as always it was abused. THe reat of this year should be very very interesting.
8:48am • #8
7 Featured Posts
Lenn, I loved the post. It's always good to get a little education about how things got here. I wonder how much more the prices can continue to rise, if there's not a demand pushing them up. It's a basic business principle. I hear so much about how the bubble has burst for so many areas of our country and have to elieve that there will be a shrinking of prices as a result. But, I'm certainly no expert either, so we'll see. Thanks for the post.
8:54am • #9
613,578 Points 95 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router
Lenn, excellent post, clear understanding and the question is why doesn't Fannie Mae and Freddy react ? You made this so clear to understand. Thank you.
9:11am • #10
Great stuff and yes it is about inflated home values, our market in Williamson County TN has just seen outrageous jumps in values for no reason other thn people would sign the forms at closing.
9:20am • #11
If the government allows Fannie Mae to increase liquidity by lowering their lending standards, I think the real money to be made will be in shorting Fannie Mae stock.  It'll be a lot easier than selling houses.
9:59am • #12
125,210 Points 7 Featured Posts Outside Blog

 Lenn - your first line  says it all:  

 "FANNIE MAE IS OUT IN THE LAUNDRY SHED SCRUBBING THEIR UNDERWEAR."  But now what ?

 This should be featured as the facts are facts, no matter how you dress the pig, its still a pig. 

I agree with you 100% and feel that the road ahead may bring lower prices, but will loans be available ?  What a big mess.

10:02am • #13
894,504 Points 213 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Michael. Thanks for commenting.  From my own little world, this reflects my experience. 

Mike.  Judicious generousity?  Shucks.  He got a bonus when the left.  There was no limit to the perfidy that is Fannie Mae.

Scott.  Clinton did last Tuesday. 

Ed.  Thanks.  We're in interesting times.  I would rather NOT be in interesting times. 

Roberta.  "Pigs at the trough" is right on point.

Debbie.  This year is incredibly bad.  You're in a market that is usually active, even in bad times.  This year is different.

Bryant.  I've been following your posts about your market.  Ours isn't that bad, but it's particularly hard on the lower priced buyer.  How can a family with 2 children live in a 1 bedroom condo??  They're about $200K in my area and the condo fees are $350 a month.  There's nothing for anyone who makes less than $50,000 to buy around here.  If they are municipal employees, they often are required to live in the county in which they work.  Without 2 income, few would be buying homes.  Even then, they have a tough time.  Every uptick in morgtag. . . . .  This is getting too long.  I feel a post coming on.

Andrew.  I don't know how much education is involved.  Just my opinions.  But, I don't live in a cave.

Missy.  Thanks for stopping by.  Fannie and Freddie remind me of Nero watching Rome burning.

Paul.  Home prices are, IMO, 75% of our problems.  Of course, if we had 3% interest rates, home prices would be fine.

John.  You could be on to something.  But, if it doesn't happen, can you cover your shorts????? 

Michele.  Thanks.  I would hope it would be featured, but I suspect that folks are getting tired of reading about it.  Matt Heaton had a couple of good articles in the past 2 days. 

 

 

 

 

11:21am • #14
293,347 Points 7 Featured Posts Outside Blog

"Mike.  Judicious generousity?  Shucks.  He got a bonus when the left.  There was no limit to the perfidy that is Fannie Mae."

Lenn, I meant that he took care of the friends he needed to skate.  Judiciousness, i.e., good judgement, in graft and corruption and bribery.

No empathy here for criminal elitists!

1:25pm • #15
105,104 Points 2 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Lenn - You always provide great insight! You have hit the nail on the head, " Prices are the cause of the problem" We are not as subject to the high prices you experience, but I know full well the issues we have in Phoneix. I have a home to sell there and although I have my license there, am glad I am not working in a market such as those which experienced such a dramatic increase in property values.

To think the programs designed to house America have no way to assist in this crisis because of greed is unfathonable!

4:15pm • #16
894,504 Points 213 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Paula.

Thanks for commenting.  The problem here is the disparity betwen the increase in home prices and increase in income.

It just doesn't work.

 

4:28pm • #17
2 Featured Posts
Lenn..I agree with you the prices are the problem. My children can not afford to buy a home in the town they grew up in. I think that is so sad and so true of many communities. Incomes can not sustain the price of homes.
9:54pm • #18
AUG
12
2007
274,452 Points 41 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Lenn - This abnormal appreication has made things very difficult for homebuyers.

I've heard from many people that bought their homes in the 70's that they paid 18%, and they talk about it as if they had it tough.  Let's say that they had a mortgage of 1/10 of today's conforming loan, which was very realistic for home prices back then.  A mortgage of $41,700 in a 30-year fixed rate loan was $628.45 per month (at 18%).  If you take a loan at the maximum conforming rate (often times not even high enough in this market) of $417,000 in a 30-year fixed rate loan the monthly payment would be $2704.65 (at 6.75%).  Have salaries increased by nearly five times in the past 30 years or so?  The answer is a definite no.  If both of the above mortgages were 80% loans, the first person was putting down less than $12,000 whereas the next generation was putting down almost $120,000 to finance this loan.  Even with the lower salaries back then, it was a lot easier to save up $12,000 than it is to save up $120,000 now. 

This is the reason that people stretched to get into a home in the past few years, and why we are all paying for it now.  You're right about the homebuyer not understanding, or not caring, about the risk because everyone thought that the market would just continue straight up.  After putting the numbers together for this comment, I'm surprised that there are even first-time homebuyers at all anymore.

6:02am • #19
894,504 Points 213 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Monica.  The only folks fortunate to be a first time home buyer today are professionals with high incomes.

Adam.  Your are right on the money.  I sold homes in many down markets, but nothing is as hard as today and IMO, it is totally a price problem.  I could go on and on, but it isn't going to change things. 

$2000 a month will let you RENT a nice home for a family in my neighborhood. 

7:00am • #20
4 Featured Posts

Lenn,

Great post, and on something that we need to talk about right now...

Take care,

Tom Weiss

9:33am • #21
894,504 Points 213 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Tom.

Thanks for commenting. 

I agree.  We DO need to talk about this right now.  Our incomes depend on a stable real estate market.  Our country relies on the real estate industry for a considerable pecentage of the GDP. 

This is much more than a mortgage problem or financial market problem.

 

3:13pm • #22
110,335 Points 26 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Lenn, I was hooked at the top with the underwear scrubbing comment. Pretty much total agreement; especially love that you say this is not just a mortgage issue.

I have to say, there was a lot of 'oooh yes, foreclosures are affecting some areas of the country, glad it's not my area' at the beginning of this year. I would say that my County's foreclosure rate DOES affect the entire country and the front page news of banks putting money into stocks and credit gone wild like the girls, well, seems I'm right.

Real estate may be local but we are not living in a vacuum anymore. Call me old fashioned but, if your dream home means you with not have two nickels to rub together, is it a dream home or a fantasy home?

Just my two cents

3:54pm • #23
198,016 Points 56 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Lenn,

You are always right on.  It will be interesting to see what happens, I'm not optimistic on this one either.  There are so many things in the world today where the people that are supposed to be in charge or can make a difference have completely stepped away from the plate and it is quite disturbing.  We are losing sight in many cases of what is important..our future.  Too many people worried about what to do today and how to get rich quick. 

Another pet peeve.

4:22pm • #24
894,504 Points 213 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Carole.  Of course it's a national problem.  No one in this country lives in a cocoon.  We are all interdependent in one way or another.  Thanks for commenting.

Stephanie.  Thanks for stopping by.  You're right, of course.  The folks in charge haven't the foggiest idea what's going on.  They are all, each and every one of them in the pockets of one interest group or another.  The public is not an interest group.  I'm not optimistic either. 

6:39pm • #25
10 Featured Posts

I was listening to a recent news conference where Bush was saying his usual - the economy is strong.

Perhaps he should attend some open houses to listen to people who would like to buy a newer home but can't do anything because there's no one to buy their existing home.

Or sit at the kitchen table to tell sellers that if they want to get their divorce and move-on, they'll have to sell at $15-20K below what they paid for that new build 3 years ago. And then watch the tears flow when they realize that with that 100% mortgage they took out AND a lack of savings to cover the closing costs shortage, that they're trapped.

They need to get outside the beltway to get in touch with REAL people.

9:46pm • #26
AUG
13
2007
894,504 Points 213 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Elaine.  I suspect that the situation you describe could be around whether the housing market is in a mess or not.  Divorce does never make a good home sale scenario. 

That said, if housing costs had not escalated to absurb levels in 2004-2005, those folks wouldn't have paid as much and they would have realized a modest 3-4% appreciation per year.  If they had to sell, even for divorce, they wouldn't be trapped.

5:27am • #27
147,487 Points 6 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Lynn:  Excellent post.  The invisible hand is at work here and in my opinion this is just a pause in the action.  Housing formations are up and the population continues to grow.  I read somewhere that the US population will pass 400,000,000 million people by the middle of this century and that it is expected that over 80% of these people will live within 90 minutes of one of the coasts.  The laws of supply and demand state that if the supply of something is fixed (land within 90 minutes of the ocean in this example or say within an hour commute of a popular city such as DC) and the demand for that commodity goes up, then prices will go up.

We'll work through this glut that is on the market now and eventually the market will calm down.  When this happens, be ready to start riding another way up that way!

Bob Mitchell

ValueList Real Estate Services, Inc.

 

PS. If I'm right, now is a buying opportunity! 

 

1:56pm • #28
SEP
23
2008

Why isn't Franklin Raines in jail?

Jackie Whitworth
4:52pm • #29

Why isn't Franklin Raines in jail?

Jackie Whitworth
4:54pm • #30
894,504 Points 213 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router

Bob.  I think it's a buying opportunity in my market.  We're selling, albeit slowly.  But, we're seeing real value. 

5:01pm • #31

This blog does not allow anonymous comments

 


Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog