When the going gets tough, the houses get smaller. Or at least that’s what data from the U.S. Census Bureau are suggesting.
According to the data, the national average decrease was 51 square feet, to 2,422 square feet. In the Northeastern United States, the change was more dramatic: House size diminished by more than 200 square feet, to 2,529 square feet.
Is this a victory for the anti-McMansion forces that have spent much of the last decade railing against the waste, overconsumption and isolation that very big houses can promote? Not so much.
Philadelphia economist Kevin Gillen, vice president of Econsult Corp., said that buyers are having fewer children, so they need less space. They’re also looking for more centrally located and eco-conscious properties.
With some small year-to-year variations, houses have grown almost unceasingly since 1978, census data show. In the early 1980s, the decline in new-home size was temporary—30 years ago, the average size was 1,700 square feet. This time, the shrinking new house appears to be related to several, perhaps longer-term causes—conditions that Crowe said are likely to be around for awhile:
-A greater percentage of all homes are being purchased by first-time buyers, who don’t have to worry about selling old homes in a tough market. Nor do they tend to have a lot of money to buy houses.
-Consumers have a growing desire to cut energy costs.
-Buyers have smaller amounts of equity in their current homes to roll into their new ones.
-Credit standards are tighter, and there is less focus on home buying as an investment.
The largest share of buyers taking advantage of the recently expired tax credits were first-timers, figures from the National Association of Realtors show. In April 2010 alone, 49% of those buying previously owned homes were first-timers, up from 44% in March, the numbers show. Qualified first-time buyers were eligible for up to an $8,000 tax credit.
Because of that, “new construction, at least the relatively small amount that there is, has started to reflect smaller footprints,” said Michael Feder, president and CEO of Radar Logic of New York, which tracks real estate values. “This is probably a result of targeting a sale price and backing into what can be built,” Feder said—meaning that if you know what price range will sell, you build a house to fit it.
On average, home sales for less than $350,000 have increased 12% year-over-year during the months since January 2009, while sales of houses priced from $350,000 to $900,000 have decreased 8%.
Although energy efficiency—a component of “green” building—has been increasing in importance among new-home buyers, it isn’t yet a critical part of the decision-making process—especially with credit tighter and price a major concern, market research indicates.
In a members survey conducted last summer by the National Association of Home Builders, respondents said that “among buyers who are willing to pay more for green features, more than half—57%—are unlikely to pay more than an additional 2%” for them, said Joe Robson, the group’s former chair.
As record numbers of foreclosures mount across the country and the brakes are only now being put to four years of home-price declines, fewer Americans are buying houses as surefire investments.
A Fannie Mae survey in April of 3,400 Americans 18 and older showed reasons such as safety and quality of schools as the driving factors in owning a home.
Comments(1)