Video Tour Providers Are Failing To Make Compelling Arguments To Win The Market Over

As most of you know, I'm a video tour tour provider. I'm also in support of just about anything that drives adoption of real estate video in the marketplace..whether from our company or not. But our industry needs a bit of some "tough love" around the product that we have because we definitely get it from a technology standpoint..but we are completely lost when it comes to making the case in the marketplace for the advantages of video tours over virtual tours.

For instance,  I've read a number of blog posts with interest recently around the differences of video vs. virtual tours. In most cases, the video tour providers argue points such as the following: (these are each actual examples)

- you can't see the dog's tail wagging or tree leaves blowing in the wind.

- You can't see the shooter and camera moving... and then turning back towards the entrance

I've never seen a virtual tour respond to *any* of these blog posts or even really to any of the arguments made; one or two probably have somewhere but more likely they simply don't need to respond.  Video tour providers simply have not made a compelling case to date.  I have visual images of certin unnamed virtual tour providers all enjoying belly laughs each time one of these posts is uploaded.  Like Beta vs. VHS, the best technology doesnt always win the marketplace.

Have We Lost Sight Of What Makes A Sale Because Of The Technology?

Proponents of video have said a million times that video is "better" than photos.  Usually, the argument is around the types of arguments above or how things are sold on TV. But the hard question for our industry is have we been effective in broadly making the case for video? For example, do we:

1) Correlate Advantages To Sales or Factors That Likely Contribute To Sales: For the life of me I cant see the correlation between leaves blowing on trees and the sale of a property. Either I have not yet made the connection because the example is not supported by enough documentation or there simply is not any correlation in the anecdotal sense or based on data.  If we cant make the the correlation ourselves, how can we expect customers to flesh out the advantages based on examples like the above?

2) Remember That Success Ultimately Drives Pricing: TV has hard and very specific metrics that drive pricing. Shows that don't have traffic don't last very long...shows that have lots of eyeballs charge a pricing premium. Virtual tour pricing continues to fall due to the relatively low barrier to entry for the technology and outsourcing while video tour pricing remains generally some multiple of VT pricing. Common sense tells us that people will generally make choices on pricing if faced with two similar choices that have no easily discernable difference in results. Until we as video providers can directly relate the increased cost of a video tour to some tangible advantage in terms of hard metrics relating to sales, cusomers will not broadly conclude that price difference is worth it.   Personally, I think that sellers would pay thousands of dollars for something close to a "sure thing" if a given video tour could reproduce sales results on a consistent basis. Note: the one-off sale after 5 years in business based on 6 video views does NOT count as a consistent value proposition.

3) Mistakenly Compare Our Technology To The Experience of Watching TV When We Dont Have A Comparable Level of Service: Last I checked, TV programs that I watch don't buffer, have long pauses, tiny video, or poor audio. 'Nuff said.

4) Step Away From The Keyboard And Get To Know Real People: If you approach your market as a technologist and all of the assumptions that come with technologists, then we'll continue to not be able to make broad connections in the marketplace. 99% of people don't give a rat's ass about technology - they want something that just works. You need to understand your marketplace and apply it to your technology.  This type of understanding of the mrket is why guys like Fred Light and Jeff Turner rule their respective roosts and have large followings.  It isnt about the player functionality or the codecs, its about making the technology simple and accessible. Sounds esy...but apparently it isn't.

5) Wrongly Expect Customers To Be Experts in Marketing Videos: We should have methods in place that consistently get a customer's video watched...over and over.  Again, people will immediately value in results not in a video product...as a video provider, you should be doing the lion's share of the work to get them those results.

By focusing on any or all of the above issues would go a long way to making a case for REALTORS to adopt a video strategy versus alternatives.

What Are We Doing At Vidlisting.com To Address The Above Issues?

We don't have all of the answers.  We likely fail just as much as others do.  But we have had some measure of success as well in the 9 months or so that we have been live online. Our videos are actually watched (60,000 to 75,000 videos watched each month and growing) and we have had a number of properties sold as a result of our videos.  We think that many elements of the same formula that has been so successful in our international investment and second home markets will also bring solid results as we expand into the US residential and commercial market. We offer:  

- Large Video That Doesn't Buffer: We have large videos that dont buffer....vistors click and the videos start and play all of the way through. While fine for rollercoasters and entermainment video, nothing kills the online buying decision making experience more than a 10-20 second delay in a property video.  We also dont know of any other real estate video provider currently providing 640 pixel wide video (most have 400...or less).

- Sustained Distribution Agreements With Established Portals:  Vidlisting.com is negotiating long term video distribution agreements with some of the largest real estate portals in the world. We dont all have A-List Real Estate bloggers willing to hawk our videos by cutting and pasting it into a given page to give it exposure. Our philosphy is "stupid simple":  quality distribution should be included for ALL customers. No uploading or cutting and pasting is required to take advantage of this distribution. 

- Affordable Video In Multiple Languages: Our standard package includes professional narration in English, Spanish, and Portuguese in order to meet the demands of the changes in demographics within the US and the needs of international investors with strong currencies. Our video pricing rivals pricing for higher end virtual tour services in most US markets.  Unlike many providers, we completely control our vertical from filming to editing to hosting, so we can take advantage of the best pricing at each stage of the production process.

- Eyeballs From Prospective Buyers: Our focus is on the critical first two weeks after a video is posted followed closely by the metrics for the first month. Those time periods are when you'll have the highest mix of prospective buyers. Getting hundreds or thousands of video views for a property in the first weeks of posting is routine for us now with only a few months in the business.  We expect to grow those numbers sharply as we sign more distribution deals.

- User Behavior: We are data "sponges" and use hard data about visitor behavior from our 60,000 to 75,000 monthly video views to drive much of our decision-making. We also look at user behavior on other video sites (whether real estate related or not). Each analysis is fed back into our production or infrastructure process.  This lets us focus on the right things that actually affect user behavior. 

- Ways To Manage Videos In Volume:  As a broker or agent with a large number of listings, are you really going to cut and paste large numbrs of video players into single page? How will you manage searching and browsing for a number of videos?  These questions are not easily answered with standard cut and paste video players or approaches. Here are some samples of how we can help manage video content in volume while mintining look nd feel of websites (http://activerain.com/blogsview/160733/Real-Estate-Video-Maintaining)

Currently, our US service areas for filming are South Florida, San Diego, Los Angeles, Atlanta, Virginia, NC, and NYC. Internationally, we are in Panama, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Mexico, Spain, UK, Italy, Bolivia, Argentina, and Brazil. We are constantly growing our production capability.

Please include your thoughts and let me know if you feel that we are on base or off-base with the point of this article.

Tony

Site: http://vidlisting.com    Daily blog: http://forsalebylocals.wordpress.com

 

 

 

 

 

13 Comments on Why The Video Tour Industry Just Doesn't Get It....

AUG
16
2007
123,309 Points 3 Featured Posts Outside Blog
Can you please provide me with your ATLANTA contact. I went to the link in youir blog, but could not find info on the local person. Thanks.
7:45am • #1
4 Featured Posts
You bring up some great points.  I feel video works in some cases such as when you have water or moving types of nature shots that can add to presentation that stills (or panoramic) can not.  But again, it goes back to what you said . . . is it generating the traffic?  The part I think we forget is that these types of technology are an enhancement to current advertising of a property . . . they are the only advertising.  And some of the technology is wonderful.  I especially like how Realtor.com nows allows video for enhanced listings to be attached, Sharper Agent has a feature called Marketing In Motion which allows tours and video to be embedded in email flyers, etc.  These are all great enhancements to marketing of a property in very efficient ways.  The part that is not recognizable just yet because it is so new . . . is it effective?  And time will tell.  And we constantly have to look for feedback from sellers and buyers regarding this.   
8:07am • #3
8 Featured Posts

kathy:  I love your thinking.  The addition that I would have is a small change from "is it effective?" to "is it sustainably effective?" 

Tony

10:01am • #4
1 Featured Post
I find that video tours are superior to using photos, and with most people starting their search online these days there is a lot of potential for this to become big.  Great points in the blog, keep up the good work.
11:31am • #5
8 Featured Posts

HouseFront:  Agreed. For instance, videos for los bosques uploaded yesterday morning already have over 72 views (http://www.vidlisting.com/player/videopage.asp?vid=jkhkhajdasd&t=v). Just one of N properties in a 30 hour period....so prospective buyers are definitely looking.  Take care...thanks for stopping by.

Tony

12:17pm • #6
AUG
17
2007
15 Featured Posts

Another aspect of the 'success' of video isn't necessarily related to the actual selling of the property.

Real estate is very competitive - there are tons of agents out there, and for the most part, their marketing strategies are identical, their websites are identical (sometimes literally in the case of template sites), their business cards are identical, their sales pitch is identical, and the product they have to sell is identical.

There is also the case for having a tool that sets you apart in the eyes of a customer.  And I find that customers understand the impact of video far more than realtors do. If you want to really study the impact of video on real estate, talk to actual customers, not realtors. 

Those people who are driving around town looking at record numbers of properties with gas at $3/gallon, sometimes hauling small kids around as well......  the idea of being able to preview homes from home, without pressure from an agent, is a genuine plus in the eyes of the customer.  It saves time and money, the main reason that many people use the internet.

So in evaluating the value of a good video tour, I think it's important to look at a lot of different angles in determining the value for a REALTOR.  Most of my clients do videos repeatedly because they know if they pop a video onto their laptop or their iPhone on a listing appointment, they just got the listing.  Period.

Sellers respond positively to video.  Just like buyers.  That's why it works.


9:14pm • #7
AUG
18
2007
8 Featured Posts

Fred: Great comments as usual. 

 "If you want to really study the impact of video on real estate, talk to actual customers, not realtors"

Totally agree, however, customers are not the decision-makers for implementation. The point of the blog post is that *we* know these things..but havent done a good job of communicating these points to the people making the decisions.  Excellent point on the listing conversation by te way.

"...in evaluating the value of a good video tour..."

I'm glad that you put the word, "good", in there. "Good" does not have to equal "perfect"....but four factors will determine good 1) audio 2) camera movement 3) Lighting and 4) scene transitions.

Tony

6:49am • #8
AUG
22
2007

Fred, Tony et al:

Here's a great story about the inherent value of video...

In addition to being the Founder and Driving Force behind www.RexNet.tv, I'm also a REALTOR.  Of course, I produce videos for all my listings.  I was hosting an open house one Sunday at a beautiful listing, when a young couple popped in.  They were cruising open houses and saw my signs.  They spent about ten minutes at the house.  Then...

Ultimately, they purchased the property.  And here's the great thing: They told me that when they went home after their open house whirlwind, they went to www.RexNet.tv and watched the property video over and over again.  My listing was the house they remembered, could tour repeatedly at their leisure, and sit and discuss decorating options while viewing the home online.  They readily told me that the video made the difference!

Does video work?  You betcha'!  In many ways, for buyers, sellers, agents, brokers, builders, advertisers, producers, promoters....

And, Tony, just as you're enjoying new distribution options, Rex is getting attention from some big market movers who recognize that high-quality, high-profile real estate videos are the wave - make that the tsunami - of the future.

Norvell Rose
www.RexNet.tv

11:22am • #9
AUG
31
2007

Thank you for a great post...video is the way of the future and I am hurrying to catch on! Best of luck to you!

9:20am • #10
8 Featured Posts

Christopher: Thanks for the kind words.  I love the tagline of your blog by the way  "askthebigguy"...

Best of luck to you too

Tony

11:10am • #11
DEC
04
2007

Good discussion and great points. I'm a professional videographer. And I have attempted tapping into the residential real estate market and found most realtors still reluctant to get involved with video. There is a common techo phobia with the realtors and the customers as well. The best and simplest advice for home shoppers is to spend $$250-500 on a digital camcorder before they start touring. Test the camera out, then document places they visit. Then they have their own record, albeit lesser quality without music etc and special lighting, but for the customers, that's their argument and it works. I know. I did it when I bought a sailboat. I had a video record of everything I saw. And I simply played the footage back over and over.  And instead of negotiating website and addresses, it plays back in chronological order on a simple TV or camcorder. That's all the customer wants, right? Is a visual record of what they saw. And now with the proliferation of cell phone video and it's poor (improving weekly) quality, and a tolerance for real room lighting,  and a jaded audience who demands "reality" vs. "quality", it's still a hard sell to justify  $500-$1000 (and more) in video production costs for a quality property video. And now, realtors ask to create video "on spec." and pay only when the property sells. Tough way to make a living.

Seems to me the market is commercial real estate. Why isn't commercial real estate big on video? Especially when larger monies are involved, and further distances from investors. Wouldn't that be useful to see a commercial property first, inside and out, maps, neighbourhoods, sewage, water, floors, for investors to get "a feel" for a commercial  property or investment. Working with an experienced videographer, the realtor is supposed to be selling the benefits of a property, helping to see the potential. The successful realtor should have:

a good on-camera presence (or learn to have one)

have a good videographer/editor as a partner and coach

an outline/script by the videographer

make the effort to help the investor relationship along with a pleasant and paced presentation style coached by a the videographer.

That's the $value$ a videographer brings to help your sale happen. But beware the BS. Viewers can smell it long before they see it. And a good videographer will tell you when you're stepping in it, and help you avoid it the future.

Thought I'd share and see where this goes. 

Videoboost! Communications. 

 

DonnieRae
2:40pm • #12
DEC
17
2007

Hey, DonnieRae!

Quick hint - target the brokers who get it, not the agents.  Target the consumers who get it, not the agents.  Target the advertisers who get it, not the agents.  Ultimately, the market is sellers, buyers, industry service professionals. 

As for commercial... I,too, thought this would be a great target market.  But, as I learned, commercial is driven not by an emotional experience (as in residential sales) but by bottom lines, P&L's, spreadshetts - numbers!  They could really care less about the story - it's all structure of the deal.

Now, as for some apartments...  Different story. 

Good luck!

Norvell Rose
Founder,CEO
www.RexNet.tv

 

8:37pm • #13

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Rainmaker_large

A. Grey | Vidlisting.com| Real Estate Video Mentor

Bremerton, WA

More about me…

Vidlisting.com

Office Phone: (360) 362-1032

Email Me

The blog and thinkpad of a real estate video professional. Topics include property tours, software development, advice about technology, consulting, and discussion of conceptual topics. All videos produced by vidlisting.com are produced with professional narration in English, Spanish, and Portuguese.


Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find WA real estate agents and Bremerton real estate on ActiveRain.