Protecting the Seller When a Buyer takes Possession Prior to Close of Escrow

I usually discourage giving the buyer possession of a property prior to actually closing the sale, but with the current situation in the lending environment, it may become necessary to do this more regularly.

In California, we have a form called "Interim Occupancy Agreement" that spells out the terms of this arrangement. It is basically a short-term lease that references the purchase agreement, projected close of escrow date, and what to do if the escrow is terminated without closing. There are a lot of check boxes and blanks to fill in, but it has been designed and worded by California Association of Realtors' ("CAR") legal department, so it should meet the needs of most buyers and sellers.

Arm Wrestling a Contract

Since the seller is essentially doing the buyer a favor by allowing an early move-in, the seller should dictate the terms that would make him comfortable about taking this risk. How much risk is there? Looking at it from a "worst case" scenario : the buyer moves in, trashes the house, doesn't pay the agreed upon rent, fails to close escrow, and the seller must pay to legally evict him, then clean the place up, and continue to own the property making mortgage payments, taxes, insurance, etc, until it closes with a new buyer. Additionally, in our current soft market, delaying a sale for several months could easily cost the seller several thousands of dollars in lost sales revenue!

When offering early possession, you must hope for the best, but plan for the worst, in order to protect the seller. 

Prior to possession the buyer must:

  • Sign all escrow instructions and disclosures and have all contingencies removed in writing.
  • Conduct a final walk-through inspection and sign the "Final Verification of Property Condition."
  • Provide evidence of insurance.
  • Pay a substantial security deposit (3% of sale price) directly to the sellers in a cashiers check. An amendment to escrow signed by all parties will document this for the lender to calculate net proceeds that the buyer must bring to the closing. (This amount should come close to covering legal eviction expenses, replacement of carpet, new paint, and repairs to most damage.)
  • Pay a slightly higher-than-market daily rental amount due in advance each week until close of escrow. (This is to encourage them to close sooner, rather than let it drag out.)

While I think this is a very one-sided agreement, the seller is taking all the risk and the buyer is benefiting by early possession. If anyone has any additional suggestions or advice, I welcome your comments. 

 
This post has been included in California Information
Post is included in group: Carnival of Content - Real Estate Agents/Brokers

6 Comments on Protecting the Seller when giving Buyer Possession Prior to Closing

I always have the buyer sign an addendum not holding the sellers liable for any accident that might occur when moving in prior to closing. Also i note the appl, lawns,fixtures etc are in good working condition as of the date they move in, thus they can`t hold the seller responsible.

08/22/2007 07:45 PM by Scott Daniels Florida Real Estate 2.0. Agents Earn 100% Commission. (Florida List For Less Realty, Inc. Broker/Owner. )


This is one of those things I am adament about the seller not doing..  I have let buyers store their things in the garage or even put them in the home but I always retain possession of the key.. As far as I am concerned this is a major NO NO... Never..

08/22/2007 11:33 PM by Manhattan Beach CA/ e-PRO..... Kaye Thomas... (Real Estate West)


Vicki, great pointers... Interim Occupancy Agreement is essential.  Also, like the idea of the early earnest money deposit release to the seller. 

08/22/2007 11:52 PM by Pasadena CA Real Estate - Irina Netchaev (Keller Williams International Realty)


Scott - good points, thanks for your comment.

Kaye - I cringe on the rare occasions when I do it, but I have a situation right now where it really needs to be done.  I will hold my breath until closing!  Hope to see you at the AR get together in Irvine this Saturday nite?

Irina - In my latest case, we are requiring an additional 3% funds sent directly to the seller, leaving another 3% in escrow.  I figure the 3% left in escrow is "liquidated damages" in case it never closes, and the additional 3% would cover the bulk of repairs and legal costs to empty the house and clean it up, if necessary.  Will you be coming to our AR get together this Saturday?  Hope to see you then!

08/23/2007 12:14 AM by Vicki Lloyd ~ MBA, ACRE, e-PRO, Realtor Lake Forest, California (The Real Estate Professionals)


In circumstances where interim occupancy makes or breaks a sale, a seller might be very motivated to consider it.  I think one of the points that you mentioned is important and is often overlooked by sellers and their agents.  A listing agent should always incorporate verbiage requiring the buyer to provide evidence of insurance prior to occupancy.  Its a quick and relatively inexpensive means to keep all principles and agents out of court.

08/27/2007 12:58 AM by Kelly Kilpatrick, Broker-Associate (Gold Coast Realty)


Hi Vicki  ......I have to agree that this is going to become more of a standard practice between now and 2010. Homes are growing very old on the market, and the sellers are getting desperate. This is also a great way to keep a home from foreclosure by placing a nearly qualified buyer in the home with a substantial, non refundable down payment. Its all so easy to to say never do this, but when sellers are looking at losing homes to forclosure, I feel we owe it to them to get them someone in the home to make the payment. Case in point, I just got a listing because I run a little "rent to own" ad in the paper. A year ago, these nice people would not have considered doing this, but now , after 14 months of paying the mortgage and HOA dues, they are down to a few more months of savings and thats it. I like the way your post spelled out some issues, with your permission, I will print this and place it in my notebook.

Best wishes for all ......Mike Norvell Sr

10/05/2007 08:47 AM by Mike Norvell Sr., Developers Capital Realty (Developers Capital Realty, LLC)


Leave a response…

Name:
Notify me of new comments:
Comment:
What does the graphic say?
 
Real Estate Agent: Vicki Lloyd ~ MBA, ACRE, e-PRO, Realtor Lake Forest, California (The Real Estate Professionals)
Vicki Lloyd ~ MBA, ACRE, e-PRO, Realtor Lake Forest, California
Lake Forest, CA
More about me…
The Real Estate Professionals

Office Phone: (949) 457-0281
Email Me
Vicki Lloyd shares her views of all things real estate related in Orange County, California.

Visit my outside blog :

Live Lake Forest!

>
>


Prices for LAKE FOREST