Ar_home_b_search
 

I read on Bloomberg.com last night about Bank of America buying 2 billion dollars worth of preferred stock in Countrywide and while I think that this may be a good thing for the mortgage markets in general because it might inject a dose of much needed confidence into the market, it also made me wonder about what this might mean forthe Fed is looking out for the big guy, how about the little guy? the little guy?

What were the terms of the issuance of this stock?  Were there any assets that were provided as security specifically towards this class of stock?  If Countrywide does indeed go belly up, is BOA going to hold claim to real estate or some of Countrywide's various subsidiaries?  If this is the case, does it weaken the position of the common stockholders?

Another thought that ran through my mind when it first because public that Countrywide was having problems and folks started talking about the government bailing them out was, "What about the little guy?"  Why would Countrywide getting bailed out get so much chatter when there has been very little said about helping the poor slob who saw one of these adjustable, non-conforming mortgages as their only way to grab a piece of the American Pie?

I've written before where I stated that I didn't have a bunch of sympathy for people who took out these mortgages and I still pretty much feel that way.  At least when I hear them trying to blame everyone else for their problems by saying things like, "That evil mortgage broker never told me....." etc.  I wrote about this in my post, "Stop Blaming The Mortgage Broker"  That said, the problem has reached a point where even if the people who got suckered into these loans were stupid, that for the rest of our collective benefit, it's time for the government to step in and put a stop to it!

Uncle Sam is the only one big enough to fix this problemThe Federal Government is the only entity that has the authority to do something about the situation that these folks find themselves in.  The loan servicers don't have the authority to unilaterally change the terms of the mortgages that are in trouble.  Only the US government has the resources and authority to buy these mortgages and recast them under terms that would avoid foreclosure for the majority of these people. 

Yeah, the government is probably going to get burned on quite a few of them, but even on these properties, the government can hold them off of the market in a manner similar to the price supports on farm commodities.  By liquidating them in an organized, systematic fashion it would allow the market to absorb them in such a way as not to hurt the rest of us.

On top of this benefit, how about the social benefits of keeping families, who would otherwise lose their homes, in their homes.  I suspect that there are a lot of people out there in dire straights that wouldn't otherwise be if it weren't for the Draconian mortgage terms that they are now facing.  

I imagine that quite a few of you would view this sort of bail out of the little guy as some sort of government handout and it might indeed be just that.  However, how is that different than the Fed pumping money into the banking system by cutting the discount rate?  Other than indirectly (from the markets in theory stabilizing), are you going to benefit from this move?  Unless you own a bank and now have cheaper access to funds (that don't have to be used to buy mortgage backed securities, by the way) you're not going to benefit!  I can appreciate the psychology of it, but it's still basically the government cutting the big guys a break, while leaving the little guys to bake!

As always, I'm curious what you guys think!  Please let me know by commenting on this post.

 

Bob Mitchell

ValueList Real Estate Services, Inc. 

 

8 Comments on The Fed Is Helping The Big Guy, But Who's Going To Look Out For The Little Guy?

AUG
23
2007
again Bob, you make a great point. I agree, I just wrote a blog to post an update about the countrywide purchase but yes, what about he little guy? Do they not deserve any help? Should we just let them fall into foreclosure or should the government help restructure some of these loans? Is it fair that the guy who is in trouble and gets help, maybe they roll his into a 30 year fixed at his initial rate... Would that cause an uproar for the people who are in an ARM and making their payments? Will they have to reapply for a loan and go about the process or will the government roll theirs into a 30 year fixed? There are a lot of ifs that could happen but I still agree that the government needs to step in and help out a bit here.
1:37pm • #1
6 Featured Posts
Get behind your congressman/woman and your senators and push for FHA reform. If the reform would pass sooner rather than later and include provisions for 100% financing a lot of the sub-prime loans could be re-written into FHA fixed rate financing. That's how government could help the little guy.
2:28pm • #3
147,472 Points 6 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Rick:  Honestly, I don't think that it would have to be all that complicated.  The government would open the program up to anybody who would want to participate for a limited amount of time (we don't want to create a new bureaucracy here), say 36 months.  Those loans would be purchased from the note holder at a fair market price (high enough to warrant the note holder selling them, but not so high as to be a form of welfare for the rich).  Then, contingent upon the home owner meeting certain criteria for income and such, the loan would be recast at a reasonable rate (say 1/2% to 1% higher than the 30 day fannie mae mandatory net yield).

For the loans where the people made their payments, the government could then sell these mortgages after they had seasoned for 12 or 24 months.  For the loans where the borrower didn't make their payments, the government could secure the homes and sell them over a period of time (say, over the next 60 months).  

I'd love to brainstorm with others on here to see if we could come up with a workable program.

Rey:  Amen!

Ken:  Good idea, but I don't think that it would cover this situation completely.  It could be factored in though.

Thanks for the comments!

 

Bob Mitchell

ValueList Real Estate Services, inc. 

 

3:47pm • #4
937,507 Points 361 Featured Posts Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master
Bob, Interesting post. I'm going to have to digest this a little more. I'm never a fan of big gov sticking their nose in anywhere but your thoughts do have merit.
5:54pm • #5
179,456 Points 5 Featured Posts Called Shot Master

Bob -

Last summer, a casual friend came to me to buy a home. She and her husband had been online and were already "pre-approved." We found them a home. During the process, I tried to talk to them about finding a local lender. No, no - they had established a "relationship" with this online loan officer. I was just the real estate agent - what did I know?

Needless to say, you know where this story is going. The deal wasn't really a deal at all; the fees were some of the highest I've seen. Their name was in the paper and they have now moved into a rental single wide mobile home.

This cyber space loan officer made decent money off this couple and they never even met.

Not sure there are any easy fixes here! Great post!

9:44pm • #6
147,472 Points 6 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Bryant:  I'm pretty much a libertarian myself and think that the government should pretty much keep to it's basic mission, which is to provide for the common defense and to provide "public goods" (goods that the people need, but that the markets won't provide or at least won't provide in sufficient quantities).  That said, I believe that stabilizing the mortgage and real estate market falls under the second category.  Right now, the markets aren't providing adequate liquidity to the mortgage markets, therefore it's legitimate for the government to step in.  Homeownership is too important to our economy and to us as a people to let it get damaged by the government doing nothing or worse yet, only helping out the big guys!

Debbie:  I'm sure that there isn't any "easy fixes" but keeping families in homes is something that is worth the effort.

 

Bob Mitchell

ValueList Real Estate Services, Inc.

9:57pm • #7
MAR
19
2008
2 Featured Posts

One thing to remember is the little guy doesn't put $250K into election coffers like the big guy does.  And it doesn't matter what one's political affiliation is, those who are the funders of elections get a seat at the table.  Is it fair?  No.  Is it reality?  Yes.  Will it ever change?  Absolutely not.  So, what do you do about it?  You work hard to become a big guy so you too can have a seat at the table or you simply resign yourself to being a little guy and accept the consequences of the same.

As I mentioned in response to one of your other posts, our economy needed an enema as a way to correct itself.  It may not be comfortable, but it is necessary.  And while it may be advantageous in the short run to participate in a bailout, in the long-term all will suffer...more especially of those who did the right thing.  Our citizens have become far too dependent on government bailing-outs.  Airline, Chrysler, banking, etc., so what we're able to extract from this is the following:  I can make serious mistakes because the government is there to save me.  Therefore, why should I change my behavior.

I understand a lot of folks are hurting and that's unfortunate.  But I did not create the problem and should not be charged for correcting it.  Two months before all this mortgage mess hit, I sold the 3 houses I owned because I realized the lunacy of what I was seeing and knew it would come to an ugly end....I had no idea how ugly it really would be.  I then bought a small condo to fix up and sell when the storm passes. So, I did everything right, yet I'll ultimately be punished via taxes  (and lets not kid each other, there will be higher taxes because of this) and those who were foolish in their buying habits will have a credit hit and will get to buy again in two years.  Yes sir, somethings wrong with this picture.  

But then again, this is the very essence of politics.

10:50pm • #8

What does the graphic say?

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 

Bob Mitchell - Realtor St. Louis

Saint Louis, MO

More about me…

ValueList Real Estate Services, Inc.

Address: 4251 Martyridge, St. Louis, MO, 63129

Office Phone: (314) 231-5478

Email Me

A blog about St. Louis real estate and about real estate in general from a guy who has been selling real estate and doing mortgages since 1984. I'm also the owner of ValueList Real Estate Services, Inc. a discount real estate company serving St. Louis since 1995!


Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog