The response to my blog on Foreclosure the public perception had a lot of very good comments today. I am amazed at how many new ideas came out of that blog. One I would like to discuss is this; As a Realtor, how far should be be checking into a consumer's finances?
Years ago, the person asking that question would have been laughed right out of the real estate office. Back then it was a typical practice to interview and qualify the buyers, just before you hopped into the car. Things were much simpler than. We had 2 page contracts, cheaper houses (cheaper than today's new car!) and more trusting times. We didn't have 100% financing, unless the consumer was a Veteran.
We had basically four ways to buy a house
1) VA
2) FHA
3) Fannie Mae
4) Cash.
Each scenario had a different route to follow for the buyer, it was simple. We seldom, if every talked to a lender until we "found the house" and put it "under contract". Occasionally we would find the buyer had a skeleton or two in the closet and the deal would fall.
Oh darn! We would adjust, find the buyer a house he could afford or find a new buyer. Yes, it was silly and a waste of time. But that's how we did things...back then.
That was then, this is now...
Today, I seldom put a buyer in my car until they have talked to a lender. My buyers get pre-approval letters before we go out. It's a time saver for both of us and it puts the buyer in a better negotiating position. The sellers love it when the buyer is REAL.
Since the number of loan products has grown from 4 to 4,000 (at least) I know longer even try to pre-qualify a buyer. Straight to the lender they go. The lender gets the POWER to pre-approve them and tell me how high we can go...or not.
Here's my question...
Is this the right thing to do? Should I as an agent get more involved in learning about a buyer's financial situation? The reason for asking this question is this, is it important for me to learn the buyer's enough...so when they reach it or go above I can halt the process?
Is it MY responsibility to tell them NO!?
It occurs to me every now and then, we Realtors let the reigns go to lenders. We used to have control, but we gave it up. When did it happen? Were we wrong in doing so?
How does the Consumer Feel?
I've never asked a consumer how they feel about their Realtor knowing all about their finances. I know how I would feel, I would prefer NOT to share my financial history with anymore persons than absolutely necessary. So I would opt out of telling a Realtor.
Somehow I think most consumers would feel the same way as I do...
Go to sleep... lol
If I had to put myself in a clients shoes, yes, I wouldn't want anyone else to know about my finances and such. Just the people that need to know.
I think people just need to let go of the situation and put trust into the lender. Now...after being on here for 32 days now, I know many of you don't trust many lenders.....that you have your favorites. (hey, I am over here...try me....) lol
But seriously....overall, I do remember the days when a realtor would qualify a borrower. But there is just too much out there. Should I advise a client that they need to look at another house, just because I saw a picture of the front yard? Here is something that I wrote 3 weeks ago...about people being both a realtor and a loan officer> Part Time Realtor & Part Time Loan Officer : All in one. How is this possible?
It's not 100% of what you are talking about.... but it does give some insight.