Special offer

Proposition 13 : "The Information you want to know"

By
Real Estate Agent with Exit Valero Realty

Proposition 13 Defined: -

Passed by the voters in June, 1978, Proposition 13 substantially changed the taxation of real property in California. As a result of this Constitutional amendment:

  • The maximum amount of property tax cannot exceed 1% of the property's assessed value, plus any bonds or fees approved by the voters.
  • Real property can only be reappraised upon a change of ownership or new construction. Business personal property, including boats and airplanes, and certain restricted properties are subject to annual appraisal.
  • Except for those two instances, no increase in the assessed value of any real property can exceed 2% annually, regardless of the rate of inflation unless the Assessor has previously granted a temporary reduction due to the market value decline.

How Proposition 13 benefit homeowners:

Whether you bought your home last month or have owned your home for twenty years, if you live in California, Proposition 13 is protecting you.

The first benefit is that even the most recent home-buyer pay 1/3 of the property taxes that they would without Proposition 13. The initiative simply keeps the general level of property taxation lower and fairer. Without Proposition 13, many new buyers could not afford both their mortgage payments and their taxes.

Proposition 13 also gives new homeowners long-term security by providing predictability in taxes. Property taxes are levied once a year. The tax "rate" is applied to the value of your home to determine your tax bill. Proposition 13 help you by limiting the maximum tax rate to 1%. If a home has a value of $250,000, the owner will see a tax bill of $2,500.

But what happens when the value of your property goes up? In other states, if the value of your home doubles, so does your property tax bill. But because of Proposition 13, here in California the taxable value of your home can go up 2% per year. Thanks to Proposition 13, new buyers know exactly what their taxes will be next year, in five years, and in 30 years - reassuring information for those who plan to live in their homes when they retire.

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Contact your County Assessor's Office as well as your Tax Accountant before making any decisions or taking legal action.                                                                                                                       ( Courtesy of Fidelity National Title.)

Jyoti Sandhun   510 872 8942

Anonymous
lvtfan

Please show me some of those $250,000 homes in California!  I'd love to buy a home and have that $2500 property tax bill.  Oh!  I can't have one?  For me, it would be $600,000 or more, with a tax bill two or three times what the current owner is paying??   And I'd still have to pay the seller the $350,000 difference?

Saving 1/3 on one's property taxes seems like a long run for a short slide when one is faced with the unaffordable housing prices California has.

And no one seems to acknowledge that California's housing prices, which are mostly land prices, would have been a lot lower if the property tax had been left  alone. 

As it is now California folks who need to buy a house are left with the worst of both worlds: they pay hilariously high prices for their homes, and then they pay again through sales taxes, wage taxes and other perverse taxes, which damage the economy, reduce demand, send jobs elsewhere, for the infrastructure and services which give value to their property.

In a just society, all that could be paid for by a tax on the value of land.  Treat everyone equally, and there would be enough land to go around, and opportunity for all.

How sad that Californians can't or won't see it.   How sad that young Californians must subsidize well-off elderly homeowners and longtime corporate owners of property.  How sad that those who own sites that aren't so well located must subsidize those who have beachfront and ocean views. 

And even sadder, California's real estate brokers defend this idiocy.  Their business would be much healthier if the price of housing became affordable, and their customers were no longer locked into housing that no longer suited them.   You seem to think this favors an important constituency, but I can't see that it favors justice, fairness, housing affordability, homeownership, equality, or liberty.  It forces people into spending a huge portion of their budget for housing, paying off the previous owner and the mortgage lender, instead of on the things a family needs and wants, and then paying again through sales taxes, etc.   

If your mind is open to learning more, take a look at http://www.wealthandwant.com/themes/Prop13.html and http://www.wealthandwant.com/themes/Lowering_the_Price_of_Land.html, http://www.wealthandwant.com/themes/underpop/paying_the_wrong_party.htm, http://www.wealthandwant.com/themes/Paying_Twice.html, http://www.wealthandwant.com/themes/Capitalization.html and some of the links on those pages.   

Aug 30, 2007 03:04 PM
#1