Do brokers encourage buyers to make "no deposit contracts"? Why are they so pervasive? Are they legally binding?
A contract to be a mutually binding obligation on the buyer and the seller must have "consideration".
A contract is a promise or a set of promises for the breach of which the law gives a remedy, or the performance of which the law in some way recognizes as a duty.
A consideration is something (such as an act, a forbearance, or a return promise) bargained for and received by a promisor from a promisee; which motivates a person to do something.
So to put a real estate in its simplest form, Buyer and Seller enter into a contract and each are to undertake some tasks. Seller is to perform by delivering title (or in a short sale contract, first by delivering lender approval) and Buyer is to perform upon receipt of the title (or approved short sale acceptance by lender) by paying for the property according to the contract terms (first deposit and then purchase).
I can tell you up front, I don't like no deposit contracts. I don't like them because the typical buyer has inadequate funds to buy every property for which a contract is signed by him/her and often that buyer is looking to match up another buyer for a simultaneous or 30 day hence closing. The point is, the buyer has as much chance of walking away from the contract as closing on it, since there is literally no risk and no cost to the buyer. I have written about this before - see MULTIPLE SHORT SALE CONTRACTS AND HOW TO AVOID THEM.
Just to cover you next "ah ha" moment, yes - once the lender approval is obtained, if the buyer does not post the stated deposit then the buyer is in breach and can be sued for that deposit. Yippidee Yeah! No big deal there as few sellers are going to invest dollars to sue that buyer for the deposit.
Another reason I don't like "no deposit contracts" is that we find in Florida that one-half of those buyers decide not to buy the home and they never tell the seller or their broker of their decision. When it comes time for them to put down their deposit, or counter the seller's bank's demand, they cannot even be found. Thus these contracts too often are a waste of time for the brokers and the Title Company and lawyers.
Getting back to the no deposit contract - The obligation of the seller is to obtain something for the buyer (usually bank approval for the short sale). The obligation of the buyer is upon delivery of the bank approval, make the deposit and do certain inspections of the property, and then purchase the property by paying the balance of the funds. This is called "executory consideration". It is consideration based on the happening of an event. It is valid consideration.
Just because it is legal consideration and a valid contract does not mean a "no deposit contract" is something that broker should encourage. If you represent the buyer, you should be fully cognizant of the game plan your buyer has so you are not wasting your time. If you represent the seller, your confidence level that this buyer will perform on this contract should be extremely high if you are going to advise your client to accept the offer.
Most contracts contain so many other contingencies that the buyer can walk away on a whim - if done so timely. "No deposit contracts" have their place - just use them wisely.
Copyright 2010 Richard P. Zaretsky, Esq.
------------------------------------
Be sure to contact your own attorney for your state laws, and always consult your own attorney on any legal decision you need to make. This article is for information purposes and is not specific advice to any one reader.
Richard Zaretsky, Esq., RICHARD P. ZARETSKY P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW, 1655 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD, SUITE 900, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401, PHONE 561 689 6660 email: RPZ99@Florida-Counsel.com - FLORIDA BAR BOARD CERTIFIED IN REAL ESTATE LAW - We assist Brokers and Sellers with Short Sales and Modifications and Consult with Brokers and Sellers Nationwide! Shortsales@Florida-Counsel.com New Website www.Florida-Counsel.com.
See our easy to understand articles at:
TABLE OF CONTENTS - SHORT SALE AND LOAN MODIFICATION ARTICLES
Comments(13)