|
Find CO real estate agents and Colorado Springs real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
8 Comments on Split signing: when it absolutely must be done today
Rondel and Gary: Thanks for taking the time to view this. Yes, split signings can be a life saver.
Leon,
Why did you need to add separate certs since they both appeared before you on the same day and presumably signed the same doc? Just curious.
Rachel, that's a good question.
I notarize only the signature of the person who physically appears before me, at that time and moment. This is the actual notary acknowledgement that I used for the husband. I filled in only his name, because I only witnessed him signing the Deed of Trust:
I don't take anything for granted or assume anything. So I notarize only the signature of the person who appeared before me. Sometimes the acknowledgement will have the names pre-printed. If so, I cross out the name of the person who did not appear.
This is also reflected in the journal entry. The husband and wife appeared on the same day, but I have to note in my journal that they appeared at different times. The loose certificate is an indication that, although they appeared on the same day, they did not appear at the same time.
To me, each notarial act is a separate act, and that is why I do it that way.
I have been in almost the same situation, but in mine, they were in different counties, so I had to use two anyway. While it may be 'splitting-hairs' to use separate certificates it is also the proper way, as you said they are TWO different acts!
Login or register to leave a comment