Special offer

The Fight Against Transfer Taxes ~ Via HouseLogic ~ Property Tax Fight...

By
Real Estate Broker/Owner with Waterway Realtors® • Notary Public & Apostille Florida RE Broker

The Fight Against Transfer Taxes

By: Sue Mellen

Published: October 27, 2010

Real estate transfer taxes may appeal to state lawmakers struggling with tight budgets, but residents in several states don't want their home sales taxed. Who's right?

 

What transfer tax opponents say

Recently, taxpayers in several states that don't have transfer taxes have launched campaigns, including proposed constitutional amendments, to prevent state lawmakers from imposing transfer taxes.

Those groups say there are good reasons for taxpayers to block transfer tax statutes, because they:

  • Raise the cost of home sales transactions, says NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® Chief Economist Lawrence Yun. "The increased cost may prevent some buyers from purchasing a home."

Example: A 1% transfer tax on a home valued at $400,000 would amount to $4,000. First-time home buyers can be hit especially hard, as they have no equity from the sale of a prior home to help pay transfer taxes.

  • Are hard on seniors who need to sell their home, since a home is often the largest and most important asset a person has. A real estate transfer tax burdens home owners who work hard to create equity in the home only to see it go to the government when they sell their home.
  • Can negatively influence current home values, says Al Angrisani, former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Labor and author of Win One for the Shareholders.  "A transfer tax works like a depressant on home value," he says.
  • Amount to double taxation. Home owners already pay property taxes to state and/or local governments every year, say critics. Making home buyers and home sellers pay more taxes when a house changes hands adds a second layer of fees.

In states that don't have transfer taxes, home owners often fight frequent legislative attempts to impose them. In Montana, lawmakers have proposed a transfer tax nine times in the past 10 years.

Proponents think transfer taxes are needed

Transfer taxes are a popular tool for generating revenue. In fact, 37 states now impose transfer taxes, which are paid at the real estate closing by the buyer, seller, or both as a percentage of the total sale price. Percentages range from .01% in Colorado to up to 2.2% in the District of Columbia.

In some places, more than one jurisdiction charges a transfer tax. For example, in Philadelphia, the state collects a 1% transfer tax and the city charges another 3% transfer tax.

Good reasons to use transfer taxes: 

  • Fund many state programs. In fiscal year 2004, real estate transfer taxes produced about $7 billion in state tax revenue, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, as reported by the Federation of Tax Administrators.
  • Pay for schools, roads, and other infrastructure that government has to build to accommodate growing populations.
  • Dedicate to specific purposes, such as the environment: Tennessee gives a portion of the transfer taxes it collects to wetlands preservation programs.

What others are doing

Not every state legislature believes in using transfer taxes. Fourteen states have remained free of real estate transfer taxes: Alabama, Arizona, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, Texas, Utah, and Wyoming. 

In three of those states-Missouri, Montana, and Oregon-groups such as state REALTOR® associations are working with local taxpayers and taxpayer groups to add constitutional amendments banning transfer taxes to the ballots as referendums during November elections.

In Missouri and Montana, taxpayer groups are working with state REALTOR® associations to promote a constitutional ban on transfer taxes. In Missouri, polling shows that 70% of registered voters agree with the ban, and the groups have collected more than enough signatures to secure the question's spot on the ballot.

Angrisani notes there's good reason for this groundswell of sentiment against transfer taxes. "States resort to taxes like these because politicians simply can't make the hard decisions to cut spending. Whether they like it or not, that's a decision state governments are going to have to make," he says.

What you can do

If this is an issue you want to get involved in:

  • Contact state and local legislators. Let your state representatives know you're in favor of legislation banning or regulating transfer taxes. There are particularly active movements in Missouri, Montana, and Oregon.
  • Volunteer with groups active in the issue. State REALTOR® associations are actively working with taxpayers and taxpayer groups to gain support for bans on or regulations of transfer taxes. Find a listing of state associations here.

Sue Mellen is a longtime writer and editor who splits her time between a townhome in Massachusetts, where the transfer tax is 0.456%, and a bungalow in Florida, where the transfer tax is 0.7%.

Posted by

FLORIDA LICENSE #BK-252335 REAL ESTATE BROKER

  Waterway Realty Logo

• Aventura • Bal Harbour • Bay Harbor Islands • Fisher Island • Golden Beach • Miami Beach •

 • South Beach • Sunny Isles Beach • Surfside • North Beach • The Waterways •

Cell/Text 786-229-7999       CALL US TODAY!

♥¸.· `'·.¸♥¸.·'´`'·.¸♥¸.· `'·.¸♥¸.·'´`'·.¸♥¸.·`'·.¸♥¸.·'´`'·.¸♥

Mott Marvin Kornicki, Realtor®

 

Mott's InstagramCompany Page on FacebookLinkedIN Company ProfileWe Like To Pin!Tweet Us! We Reply :)On YouTube!

Mott Marvin Kornicki  | Real Estate In Miami | Broker • Since 1978

Google Mott Marvin Kornicki

Aventura  | Miami | Miami Beach | Bal Harbour | South Beach | Sunny Isles Beach

Randy Ostrander
Lake and Lodge Realty LLC - Big Rapids, MI
Real Estate Broker, Serving Big Rapids and West Central MI

I am against anything that will take away the opportunity for people to become homeowners. If we worked on creating jobs there would be enough tax dollars without creating yet another way to punish the working people of America.

Nov 06, 2010 10:34 PM