Special offer

Comparing Assessed Valuation to Sale Price

By
Real Estate Agent with Keller Williams

BUYER: Should I offer just a little more than the assessed valuation?

A lot of Buyers think there is some kind of magic ratio between the assessed value and the offer price that will be accepted. I usually try to explain that the assessed value leans heavily on the square footage of the home and the size of the lot. It has less relationship to condition and curb appeal.

Market value, or the price that will get an accepted offer, is more closely associated with buyer appeal. The condition, curb appeal, decorating, landscaping, and recent updates carry more weight than square footage and lot size.

Since not everyone in town accepts my reasoning, (always a few skeptics, y'know?) I decided to see if the sales stats would back me up. The two charts that follow show the sales in my hometown in 2010 and 2006. The sale price of the homes are across the "x" axis, or in other words they are arranged from left to right, with the higher priced homes to the right. The line follows the sale price as a percent of assessed valuation. In other words, if every house sold for exactly it's assessed valuation, we would have a straight line at 100%. It would certainly make pricing homes a lot easier.

 2010 Chart JPG

        As you can see, some of the foreclosed, REO properties sold for between 40% and 60% of their assessed valuation, with sale prices between $16,000 and a little over $40,000. From that point on, it gets harder to see a trend.

You certainly wouldn't want compare the home sales around $67,000, with one at 40% of the assessed value, and the next one at 120% of assessed value. Similarly, around $142,500 we have one selling at 120% of assessed valuation, with the next one selling at 80% of assessed valuation. Obviously, there is way too much variation in sale price to base your offer on the assessed valuation.

I had a similar set of numbers saved from the 2006 home sales for the same city, and was curious to see if the same patterns were there when things were booming, so I plotted the second chart:

 Assessed2006 JPG

A few differences showed up. With no distressed property sales, there were no sales below $54,000.  With a strong seller's market, almost all properties sold for more than their assessed valuation. A great majority sold for between 100% and 150% of their assessed valuation.

Notice that there still exists a huge variation between properties in the same price range. At several points on the chart, one property sold for 150% of its assessed valuation, while another sold for only 100% of its assessed valuation. While the "average" sale price looks better against the assessed valuation in 2006, there is too much variation to tell where a property should be priced based on its assessed valuation.

 

 

 

Posted by

     Signature

 

     

 

 

Wisconsin Real Estate Broker

                  (608) 921-1212

kw red

 

 

Brad Hornshaw
Brad Hornshaw Realtor Lynnwood, Bothell, Everett - Lynnwood, WA
Realtor, Listing Agent, Buyers Agent, Investments
Fred I agree there is more to it than assessed value. I like to look at it to get started, but than I do a complete C.M.A with at least a few Preview's......Brad
Jan 09, 2011 05:26 AM
Not a real person
San Diego, CA

Out here the assessed value of a property to be sold has virtually nothing at all to do with the sales price. It’s all because of Proposition 13 from 1978. One could easily have a million dollar home with an assessed value of about $192,223 if one bought a $100,000 home in 1978. Sell it for one million dollars, and the new owners will have a new assessed value of one million dollars.

Jan 31, 2011 09:04 PM
Not a real person
San Diego, CA

Just stopping by to invite you to the 2nd Annual ActiveRain Super Bowl Party. Hope you’ll come and bring some friends!

Feb 06, 2011 12:09 PM
Gary L. Waters Broker Associate, Bucci Realty
Bucci Realty, Inc. - Melbourne, FL
Eighteen Years Experience in Brevard County

I see assessed value as a tax term/tool and not with a direct correlation with sales price (or offer price in some cases).Thanks to Russel Ray for the re-blog or else I would have missed this one!

 

Aug 13, 2011 12:26 AM
Not a real person
San Diego, CA

I left a surprise for you in my blog this morning. Let me know when you find it. What? You thought I was going to tell you exactly where? Ha! This comment is a clue, though.

Happy Saturday!

Aug 13, 2011 12:44 AM
Jim Frimmer
HomeSmart Realty West - San Diego, CA
Realtor & CDPE, Mission Valley specialist

Out here the assessed valuation has absolutely nothing to do with pricing a home to sell. Proposition 13, passed in 1978, provides for assessed valuations when a property is sold, and property taxes are based on that assessed valuation for the first year. Every year after that, property taxes simply go up by a maximum of 2%, even though the market value of the home could be going up 30% annually, or more. Proposition 13 and the real estate bubbles, even when they collapse, have made homeowners into millionaires. Just get into that first home, make your payments, and hold on for 10-30 years and you'3r a millionnaire, probably a multimillionaire.

Aug 13, 2011 04:45 AM
Juli Vosmik
Dominion Fine Properties - Scottsdale, AZ
Scottsdale/Cave Creek, AZ real estate 480-710-0739

Fred, I stopped by because Russel featured you in his golden oldies blog feature.  He was right - this is great information and proof, once again, that market conditions have nothing to do with assessed values.  In 2006 when the market was peaking, homes sold well over assessed value. 

Aug 13, 2011 06:33 AM
EC, JF, Double R and Zoey the Cool Cat
Russel Ray Photos - San Diego, CA

I don’t think the assessed valuation of my condo has changed in the ten years I’ve owned it. Unfortunately, the property taxes keep going up though.

Aug 15, 2011 11:48 AM