|
Find TX real estate agents and Amarillo real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
12 Comments on MLS Seller Converts to FSBO (You may get a chuckle out of this)
Hi Suzi, some of this I think would require the SWAG method of comparables. :) We have the flood zone issue here...usually SWAG pricing.
Above ground pool issue, I don't think an appraiser would add much value for that. Another SWAG issue.
No idea about the shed.
The FSBO...a little loco I think. :)
If you don't know SWAG... Scientific Wild A$& Guess.
Suzi, in situations like that it is very hard to be precise...at least in my past experiences. Even if there are comps for a home in the flood plain, it does not mean that every buyer will pay that. Some may pay more, some may pay less. Same with above ground pools. All you can do is try to get in the ball park with the numbers that you have. In the situation you mentioned, I would think it would make about $20,000 difference atleast. But again, just a guess.
The SWAG method is fun. I have used that term on Listing Appointments before and they just think that I am being technical. LOL. :)
Suzi,
That is a real tough one and while you/we try not to use the SWAG method, you do have to remember that this is NOT an exact science! The property you are describing cannot even be considered a "Cookie Cutter". Making it even less scientific and leaning over closer to the SWAG method............lol that cracks me up too.
Now as far as selling one day and being listed the next, SURE that can happen, but did it really sell? Even if the property was listed TOO high at the start-$274900, it is amazing how many people will look at the property and think that it is worth what it did not sell for(The OLP)! GO figure that! Anyway, with that in mind, someone may have bought it for the $224k, thinking it is worth the OLP of $274900; now trying to do a quick flip and sell it for $258k. When you say "Closed" I am thinking now there is a new owner? As far as the advertising and trying to the math with and without the coop--the guy is probably smoking some of what he is growing down there..........
Bruce, I think I will call the L/A soon and see if it were an actual sell. Several things make me think it could have been an error--the parcel # did not change, the mls # did not change. I am thinking that it could possibly have been P for pending rather than C for close. Because it appeared to go straight from Active to Closed. I am not saying closed--it was indicatd at as such in the MLS. Note that after it re-listed 7/24 it was withdrawn 8/23. I will have to find out now for the sake of curiosity.
Good point about the above ground pool. Even an in ground pool ads value only if a buyer is looking for an inground pool. Somewhere by someone I got the impression that an aboveground pool can count against market perception (linked to value but not the same as market value). This particular above ground pool appears more permanent because it is surrouded by decking (is that a real word:-)?
By the way, in your area--how are ranch styles fairing in comparison to arcadian style homes? I am beginning to feel that ranch styles may be in serious trouble. But, it may be that other issues have been associated to ranches making it appear that ranches are "falling into buyer disdain".
Hi Suzi -
As an Appraiser, I look at the subect properties largest advantages or disadvantages and try to find similar sales to those first. In this case, it would be the flood zone. If there is a lack of similar sales in flood zones, I would try to group flood and non-flood zone similar properties against each other (but not necessarily like the subject) and try to determine a differential in price and days on market for a better idea of what to expect.
Also, if there is proof that the flood zone does not include the main structure, I would not consider the property in an absolute flood zone. It's common for the house to be built on the highest point of the property in flood zones and if it has a proven history of remaining dry through other floods, the flood zone it's in can be less of a negative.
Pools in the Northwest hold little value, so I am going to pass on that one...
Shops, sheds, barns and other exterior structures are generally given much less value than some buyers are willing to adjust their purchase price for in an Appraiser's world, so again... I'll pass on that one, too ... but again, finding somewhat similar properties with and without shops or other structures may give you an idea on value. Mind you, in my experience it's usually not nearly the amount that it cost to add the structure in the first place unless shops are a must-have in that area.
Of course all the above information may pertain to my market more than yours ... Hopefully a Mississippi Appraiser will see this and pipe in!
Hi Suzi , here a pool does not add value, it does however add days on the market.
I always search the tax records of the property and the neighbors for the flood plain info.
If the shed is in good shape it should add value to the property.
Never pay attention to FSBO ads, only 2% sell without listing anyway. :)
Wow, Damion what a surprise and pleasure to hear from you. Thank you for taking the time to give such a complete response. When I did not hear from you for awhile I figured you were busy and it would be a perfect time to sneak up on you. However, I am taking a break from blog posting this coming week and plan to improve myself by reading more of the great material already written.
This blog was worth it to run into the term "Swag". That's a Texan for ya. Thanks, Stephanie!
I pretty much have followed the same formula you layed out, but its nice to validate theories. I agree about the "anything over 3 acres most likely has wetlands" too.
You deserve 1st place. It won't take much to get there when you have time. I'll just have to work hard after next week not to lose 2nd.