|
Find VA real estate agents and Leesburg real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
17 Comments on ALERT: Google and Facebook are NOT Locked in Epic Battle to the Death!
Hi Lenn. Facebook has its place but Google (and Active Rain) win hands down. To me anyway.... I've noticed a push for Facebook but I like more control. If they decide to charge for their service well I have my blogs. They may very well monetize their business that way. I do not want to find out so I focus on blogging more and the phone. It is a new toy though... for many people LOL Shiny and new. For now anyway.
I think Jason is right about Google. The company is pretty much involved with every thing we do on the internet. SCARY! Google will be finished when Google is ready to be finished...
I hope you're having a good week Lenn!
Paul
Lenn - You present a great argument to counter the recent assertions of Google's untimely demise, and I hope you're right. As a relative newcomer to blogging and SEO, I've yet to master any of it; it would be dreadful if I had to begin again :-)
Hi Lenn,
I think that a lot of people hope for a magic bullet. Facebook is in many ways easier than coming up with rich content for blog posts and the like. But the bottom line is that the blog is the centerpiece. You can perhaps lead people to your blog via facebook or twitter - but there is no substitution for posting content.
I appreciate the simple to understand differences you point out--for me the journey is just beginning and this easy to understand guide makes it better
Thanks
Lynn... Jason makes some good points.. one thing I have learned recently.. even though video blogging hasn't taken off, it has a stronger SEO search than does regular blogging and it has been proven. Just because less do it or it hasn't taken over, doesn't mean it's not as good. Overall though... my favorite one is... blogging is dead or will be dead soon.. lol In my opinion, it will never die as long as Google, Bing, Yahoo search, etc, etc are still around..as long as there is a place to search, blogging won't be dead. Some that stated this are the ones that liked facebook and or twitter because it required less writing.. and it was fun. Just my opinion.. but a good reblog here. thanks ps.. and facebook fan pages get searched with your key words... overall, content rules..
IMHO I think Facebook is for play in and Google is for working in. That's how I use them both.
Lenn - scary sign ... great content ... thanks for making sure I saw it!
Lana. Facebook has monetized the site with advertising, which is what Google did with AdWords and AdSense. They can't charge membership because it would be the end of their popularity. The public believes that the Internet should be FREE.
Paul. I agree. The reach of Google is little understood but awesome.
John. Since I was on the Internet before Google, I've watched it from the beginning. I've watched FB and Twitter too. They are not in the same league for business generation, IMO. FB and Twitter boast huge numbers, but that's rather like "hits" on a web site. Meaningless, if you are using a site for business generation.
Ruthmarie. Indeed. Fact is, it is Google that has made ActiveRain such a success.
Tim. We have just begun to scratch the surface of the potential of Google.
Jeff. Content rules is right. Google loves content, takes the content, indexes the content and let's you open your front doors to consumers who want what your content provides. As for video??? Hate it, hate it, hate it.
Evelyn. You are a marketing genius. Same here. I don't use toys in my work. I use serious advertising media and that's Google.
Jack. My pleasure.
I think Google rules also, and glad it does, being a stock holder since day one!
Jay. Good for you.
Hi Lenn,
Intuition says they aren't competing with each other. Both serve a purpose, but those purposes are very different.
Lisa
Scott Loper Team. I suspect you're intuition is right.
Hi Lenn. Lately I read about Goldman Sachs and how they've stopped taking orders for Facebook stock even limited the amount that some investors ordered. "Goldman Sachs will supposedly collect from new Facebook investors upfront fees of 4%, plus 5% of any gains as well as a private-placement fee for arranging the deal." This is big and am sure their ads will increase.
I also read in Business Week that they may charge for uploading pictures and charge a nominal fee for ad-free advertising. All speculation of course and there was a huge backlash when the rumor was going around that Facebook would be charging for their service. Once they do many users will probably flee. Content-wise I prefer content that is over the 420 character limit at Facebook.
Lana. Good information. Facebook isn't going to charge for their service any more than Google will be charging for listing or searching.
Goldman Sachs will make a mint on the underwriting.
Lenn - Thanks very much for taking the time to re-blog this post of mine. Glad you enjoyed it! I was inspired by all the doomsday claims I keep hearing about SEO, which are clearly very premature. :)
Thanks Jason. I am of the opinion that the folks who predict the demise of SEO never understood SEO and wish they didn't have to think about it.
Login or register to leave a comment