|
Find NV real estate agents and Las Vegas real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
4 Comments on 100% financing is back AND 2nd Chance financing for people with recent foreclosures
Wow, isn't this the kind of thing that got banks in trouble in the first place? Lending money to people with a track record of NOT paying is just plain wrong.
The 2nd Chance program is more for people who have had to short-sale or foreclose for reasons such as their income dropped and they could no longer afford the payment on a mortgage that is much higher than what they could currently get based on much lower housing prices. Banks got into trouble by not only lending to people who didn't have good credit histories (this program requires good credit other than the foreclosure or short sale and it requires a year since the foreclosure to show a good rental history) but also by accepting stated income that wasn't commensuarate with their credit score or assets. Very little made sense on some of the loan programs back in the day; this makes a lot of sense for hard-hit homeowners who otherwise pay their bills.
I do like to see more financing options, I agree that 100% financing is too high of a risk for banks. We need Americans to save some money to purchase a home. Where banks need to change the guidelines is on stated loans for individuals that are self-employed. I believe most of the stated loans during the first decade of the 2000s were people actually on fixed incomes an "stating" somehting different. THe self-employed got hurt the most and likely were not the root of the problem (underwriters were resoponsible for this). Good info though on those programs!
I believe that the real estate market and the general economy would be better, and better served, if everyone – no exceptions – was required to put 10% down and were never allowed to take that 10% out unless they sell the house. It would create a more stable market because people wouldn't be trying to use their homes as cash machines. They'd also have a little better pride of ownership since they would always own at least 10% of their homes.