|
Find CA real estate agents and Sacramento real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
14 Comments on Your Home is NOT an ATM or Bank
It amazes me on how some people think when it comes to their homes. Clients I warrned not to take out equity loans failed to listen and lost their homes. Others plan on staying for a long time and are paying down their debt. It all boils down to personel value, perception, and that evil thing that lurks around of impatience.
Whatever happened to common sense and the idea that if you can't pay for it outright- then you probably don't need it?! IMHO, cars and homes are the only things that should be financed. For everything else, you should save for it, then buy it when you have the actual cash to pay for it. But that's just me.....:-)
You are right on target. A lot of the home owners who did get foreclosed upon did treat their homes as piggy banks. Those are often the same ones now saying they were taken advantage of. The interest detectability is a good question.
Myrl,
I've done some due diligence for buyers by investigating distressed home mortgages, which are online here in Maryland. Some of them have had five or six cash out refi's in a couple of years. Banks are making money on this practice, and they just don't care.
Rich
I have never liked the cash out refi... I think they are a bad idea for the most part. And the old 120% of the value of your home 2nd mortgage was just plain dumb!
I hope those days are past where people pull cash out... but maybe the banks didn't learn a lesson.
Hi Myrl, I am glad that I am not deciding this, there have been so many that have benefited ( by not handing over more of their income which has ben sheltered through this exemption) from some of their creative mortgage activities. But the premise of the question has to based on whether our earnings are actually ours and then we contribute a share to tax revenue or if the earnings are actually not ours and we have to defend the portion that we keep. Once that is decided ( no one actually likes to answer that one). There is a line of thinking that is very broad. At either end, one being conservative and the other being liberal there are remarkably different answers. Neither extreme enjoys a majority however. In society we contribute to the whole for health and safety, infrastructure and protection. But there are thousands of other programs thought worthy that go beyond that. Therein lies the rub. This largest exemption ( home mortgage ) of the shared contribution seems most at risk the closer we get to the more liberal end of that line of thinking requiring more and more funds and the increase in government size to manage it. The four choices you gave have to be answered in the context of the original question. It is not as easy as one might guess.
This is an excellent post and I think it really deserves to be featured.
Most everyone I know is upside down... I remember a time though, especially on what we call the Eastside (Bellevue, Redmond, Kirkland). Many who got into homes in the 80's and 90's refinanced every couple of years to sustain a lifestyle that was above their income. The homes appreciated substantially for years so indeed, they were ATM machines. That's one of the reasons this recession has been so brutal... Many here in the Northwest thought that we'd be excluded from the down turn and homes would keep appreciating every year forever... Wrong!
Myrl, when Nissan came to Tennessee a few years ago from California it was the first time I had heard of people using their home's equity as an ATM machine. I was rattled about it then. now after the financial meltdown, there should be rules against it!
Douglas - I think when there appeared to be no end to the increased values of homes in a short amount of time, folks began to evolve their thinking differently. This crisis we are in, has shown many the error of our ways. . .Hopefully!
Brenda - There is a mantra I'm living by more, "SIMPLIFY." You are absolutely right about us not needing everything we think we do.
Rodney - I remember one particular homeowner, who had piggybanked their home and bought an RV, a boat, a small airplane, and flying lessons. It was insane. They loved their home, and managed to save it by paying off the second mortgage. How did they do it? By selling the plane the boat, the airplane, and a very reduced amount, because they were used, and it is an economy in decline.
Rich - Seriously, five or six cash out refi's??? That's absolutely crazy! You're right, banks DON'T CARE!
Shiela - I think hard lessons have been learned by many these past few years.
Tammy - The banks don't need to learn lessons, as long as taxpayers end up bailing them out for their insanity.
William - Sometimes I think the needs of the ultra right and the ultra left get addressed, while reality is ignored. I think because of this the middle class has been heavily decimated in the process.
Rene' - I understand there are areas of the country, which more than half of the homeowners are upside down. Most had nothing to do with creating the problem. They bought a home in good faith, and have managed to hang onto their jobs. Yet, they have watched their home values plummet to only half what they were 5 years ago.
Connie - I can imagine to those in Tennesse, seeing that occur was a shock.
Hi Myrl,
It is this exact mentality that got so many homeowners in trouble. We are such an instant gratification society. Too much conspicuous consumption.
Lisa
If people would have realized that a few years ago, we would not be having all of these short sale problems today! Great post!
Login or register to leave a comment