|
Find CA real estate agents and Hemet real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
9 Comments on I am not a crook - Oh yes you are - A copyright crook!!!
Christopher:
Interesting read. Not sure I completely understand the underhanded methods.
Glad you dont !!
One broker pays an agent, not under his or her control, without the broker of records knowledge. Truly ciminal behavior in my opinion and, unless it's happened to you or have done it yourself, the thought would probably never cross your mind. : )
Hopefully someone engaging in that type of behavior realizes the error of their ways before it's too late.
Hi Christopher, I see you wrote this quite awhile ago but it still applies and really should have received more attention! I am going to check out what you say because I am seeing many copied articles.
I have suggested this and will reblog it...I know you wrote this a few months ago and I'm with Jane...it should have received more attention.
I also use copyright checking service and have never received a notice. I think I will copy and paste some text as you suggested. Thank you very much for sharing the information about Google's enforcement. I hope I won't have to use it.
One a month at the minimum! It seems funny that copyscape and others dont catch this sort of thing. Doint it yourself is certainly the way to go. Only takes a few minutes and costs nothing.
Seems like an awful lot of work to protect rather than promote. I have a different approach. When I find people who have copied my work, my first approach is to call and thank them. Then I require that they link back to me. In this manner I am not making it confrontational, but collaborative. The more people who use my content and link back to me the better. I have gained a great deal of google juice becuase of this approach. Many people don't understand copyright and do the copying becuase they can, not because they are trying to rip you off.
Larry, sorry to take so long to get back on this.
Your approach is very good indeed and have tried that.
The unfortunate part is that Google and other search engines seem to see it differently. What I have found is that it will still lessen the value of your content. Google is the only one that I truly track though. It seems that, even with a backlink to your original content, Google looks at it as being public property more tan original content. Not a good thing when it comes to exposure. Would be nice to find a way, if one exists, to keep the value of original content and still allow others to use it. If you have some additional information on this, Call me sometime. I would certainly appreciate it.